[08:51] <ochosi> morning everyone
[08:52] <baizon> hi hi
[09:18] <micahg> ochosi: are those 2 bugs it for backports for gmb?
[09:19] <ochosi> micahg: yes
[09:19] <ochosi> micahg: sorry, haven't gotten round to adding the third test-case for the sound-menu
[09:19] <micahg> ok, I guess you're leaving me to do the debdiffs?
[09:19] <ochosi> no, i thought i'd do that after adding the third bug
[09:19] <micahg> oh, so, there is a 3rd bug
[09:19] <ochosi> but if you wanna do the debdiffs, i'm not holding you back :)
[09:20] <ochosi> thing is that i have to get a hold of the developer again
[09:20] <ochosi> i'm not 100% sure what each commit does and what all the problems with mpris2 were
[09:20] <micahg> ochosi: about the overlay scrollbars bug, will this break on non-overlay scrollbar enabled systems?  I was going to upload to natty and oneiric since they have the same upstream version
[09:20] <ochosi> i'm using the version from my ppa mostly (which is pretty much git)
[09:21] <ochosi> no, it won't break that. i'm not using overlay scrollbars and the patches didn't break my system/gmusicbrowser
[09:21] <micahg> s/upstream/Ubuntu/
[09:21] <ochosi> yeah, natty and oneiric would be cool
[09:22] <micahg> okay, both patches look sane, I'll open tasks for you
[09:23] <ochosi> micahg: would you wanna wait for the third bugreport for the backport or do these two first?
[09:23] <ochosi> hi j1mc 
[09:23] <micahg> doesn't matter to me, it's just a week in -proposed in between uploads
[09:24] <ochosi> ok
[09:24] <ochosi> in that case i'd say let's go forward with these two first
[09:24] <ochosi> because i'll be on holidays from thursday on for a week
[09:24] <ochosi> and really off irc
[09:24] <micahg> I'll be piloting for the next half hour or so if you want to create the debdiffs
[09:24] <ochosi> ok, i'll first have to read up on how to really do that :p
[09:33] <ochosi> micahg: quick question, i'm generally following this guide now https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff, do i have to add stuff to the changelog as well for the debdiff?
[09:33] <micahg> yes
[09:34] <micahg> you'll need a new entry versioned properly (see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging)
[09:34] <ochosi> ok, who do i put as maintainer/committer? you? upstream?
[09:34] <micahg> you go on the maintainer line in debian/changelog as it's your upload
[09:34] <ochosi> ok
[09:35] <micahg> BTW, that's set with the DEBEMAIL and DEBFULLNAME env vars
[09:35] <ochosi> thanks, i'm not really into the packaging stuff yet :)
[09:38] <ochosi> micahg: hm, put me just in debian/changelog or change the maintainer stuff in debian/control also?
[09:39] <micahg> ochosi: run update-maintainer for debian/control
[09:40] <ochosi> k
[09:40] <j1mc> hey ochosi 
[09:41] <j1mc> i got your email. lunch tomorrow sounds good.
[09:41] <astraljava> Who's buying? I'm in. :D
[09:41] <j1mc> :)
[09:42] <ochosi> hehe
[09:42] <ochosi> ok, good
[09:43] <ochosi> micahg: thanks. one more question. so the correct version number to use would be 1.1.7-2ubuntu1, since it's a backported fix? or would it rather be 1.1.7-3 ?
[09:44] <micahg> nope
[09:44] <micahg> did you see the security wiki page?
[09:44] <ochosi> yes, read, maybe not 100% understood
[09:44] <micahg> natty and oneiric have the same version :)
[09:46] <ochosi> errm, so which version number is it then? :)
[09:46] <micahg> 2.0-2 in two releases         2.0-2ubuntu0.5.04.1 and 2.0-2ubuntu0.5.10.1 is the hint line
[09:48] <ochosi> so it'd have to be 2.0-2ubuntu0.11.04.1 and 2.0-2ubuntu0.11.10.1 ?
[09:49] <micahg> well, if you've got the right idea, you just need to use the gmb Debian version instead of the example :)
[09:49] <micahg> s/if//
[09:49] <ochosi> but in debian/changelog i can only put one number
[09:50] <ochosi> yup, 1.1.7-2ubuntu0.11.04.1
[09:50] <micahg> yep, looks good
[09:50] <ochosi> currently there's "unstable" (i guess from debian), do we keep that?
[09:50] <micahg> you'll do one for natty, then change the debdiff to reflect oneiric s/11.04/11.10/ s/natty/oneiric/
[09:51] <ochosi> oh ok, so two debdiffs
[09:51] <micahg> you targer natty-proposed
[09:51] <micahg> and oneiric-proposed
[09:51] <ochosi> ok, i think i get it now
[09:53] <ochosi> meh: update-maintainer: Error: Unsupported additional parameters specified: debian/control
[09:54] <ochosi> micahg: ^
[09:54] <micahg> weird
[09:55] <micahg> wfm
[09:55] <micahg> did you add a new changelog entry yet?
[09:55] <ochosi> yes
[09:55] <micahg> did you modify anything in debian/control?
[09:55] <ochosi> i'm pretty sure i didn't
[09:56] <ochosi> but i can quickly get a clean version of it
[09:56] <ochosi> no, still the same error
[09:56] <micahg> can you pastebin the file?
[09:57] <micahg> are you on precise?
[09:57] <ochosi> no, oneiric
[09:57] <micahg> hmm, still should work :)
[09:57] <ochosi> but i started with the changelog/debdiff for natty
[09:58] <ochosi> so do you want changelog or control?
[09:58] <micahg> control
[09:59] <ochosi> micahg: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/851139/
[09:59] <micahg> nothing unusual
[10:00] <ochosi> it's the clean file from the package anyway
[10:00] <ochosi> i'd be surprised if that were borked
[10:00] <ochosi> wanna see the changelog?
[10:00] <ochosi> maybe there's a problem there
[10:00] <micahg> sure, just | head should be fine
[10:00] <micahg> as long as it includes the maintainer line
[10:01] <ochosi> micahg: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/851142/
[10:02] <mr_pouit> simply move manually Maintainer: to XSBC-Original-Maintainer:, and set the new maintainer as Xubuntu Developers <xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com> :P
[10:02] <mr_pouit> hello
[10:02] <ochosi> hey lionel
[10:03] <micahg> wfm
[10:04] <micahg> wfm in an oneiric chroot :)
[10:04] <ochosi> :)
[11:19] <ochosi> micahg: lost in chroot? :)
[19:05] <micahg> ochosi: no, just various issues