[00:19] <stefanct> TheMuso: thx (flashrom sync)
[00:20] <stefanct> there will probably be another one (bugfix-only this time) in the next days
[00:20] <Laney> jtaylor: looks like you forgot to specify that gnome-video-arcade was sponsored
[00:21] <jtaylor> Laney: I used syncpackage
[00:22] <Laney> yes
[00:22] <Laney> you need to give it -s
[00:22] <jtaylor> oh
[00:23] <jtaylor> shouldn't that be implicit if the "uploader" has no upload rights?
[00:23] <jtaylor> or a warning
[00:24] <Laney> what's the uploader?
[00:24] <jtaylor> the person in the changelog
[00:24] <Laney> some random debian person?
[00:25] <Laney> you want the person that requested the sync
[00:25] <jtaylor> yes, but you could still add a warning?
[00:26] <Laney> how could it know to warn?
[00:26] <Laney> -b is just dumb bug closing
[00:26] <Laney> sponsor-patch is supposed to be the more advanced logic afaik
[00:28] <jtaylor> can'T it check the person in the changelog and if its different from the syncer warn?
[00:29] <jtaylor> hm no
[00:29] <jtaylor> unsponsored syncs exist too
[00:29] <Laney> the person in the changelog is the person who did the upload to debian which is irrelevant for syncs
[00:36] <jtaylor> I'll add that flag in future, must get to bed now, bye
[00:37] <Laney> np, just wanted to let you know
[00:37] <Laney> nn
[02:48] <highvoltage> join #ltsp
[02:48] <highvoltage> (oops)
[04:17] <orbisvicis> is there any possibility to build packages against karmic? with pbuilder..
[04:18] <orbisvicis> ie would there be a backup repository somewhere ?
[04:19] <nigelb> yes
[04:19] <orbisvicis> nigelb: official? where?
[04:19] <micahg> orbisvicis: http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/
[04:20] <nigelb> yeah, that ^
[04:20] <orbisvicis> amazing absolutely
[04:21] <micahg> orbisvicis: keep in mind karmic isn't receiving any security updates, so it's not recommended to run it if connected to the internet in any way
[04:23] <orbisvicis> micahg: I patch/upgrade the packages (to their newest version) myself and build them with pbuilder, I just need compatible environment
[04:23] <orbisvicis> micahg: I've long abandoned the ide of ugrading from karmic, I haven't had luck with the upgrade procedure
[04:23] <orbisvicis> *idea
[04:24] <micahg> orbisvicis: doing that for each package we update is quite time consuming (http://www.ubuntu.com/usn)
[04:25] <orbisvicis> well I guess I don't upgrade packages with an eye to security, just when I want newer server features. For example now I need to rebuild the php suite
[04:26] <orbisvicis> It's only a personal server with limited connection to the internet
[04:26] <orbisvicis> I think it original used to be either gutsy or hardy - can't quite recall - and I upgraded up till karmic till I gave up
[04:28] <micahg> orbisvicis: if you have the resources, I'd suggest cloning and filing bugs and maybe we can fix the upgrade (lucid is supported as the upgrade path from karmic and hardy)
[04:30] <orbisvicis> eh it's such a melange of packages that I'd really rather not touch the thing even with a ten-foot pole, at least not until I have to
[04:31] <orbisvicis> I mean, a lot of the upgrade bugs are probably self-inflicted from stupid packages and repositories I've tinkered with to render filing bugs untenable
[04:31] <orbisvicis> anway /end rant
[04:32] <orbisvicis> and thanks for the help
[04:33] <orbisvicis> err now looking, how would I use this site with pbuilder? there are just isos as far as I can tell
[04:34] <micahg> orbisvicis: I gave you a link that you can use in sources
[04:35] <orbisvicis> ah ok didn't realize
[04:35] <orbisvicis> oh oops
[04:35] <orbisvicis> yeah you're link works
[04:35] <orbisvicis> *your
[07:14] <TheMuso> stefanct: np
[08:10] <dholbach> good morning
[14:43] <tkennedy> Hello MOTU members. How long should it take for packages to show up in my PPA on launchpad?
[14:44] <tumbleweed> tkennedy: half an hour after they've built
[14:44] <tkennedy> hmm so then there is a problem with them I suspect as after using dput it said it uploaded them successfully but they are not there
[14:45] <Laney> you should be able to see it on the website a few minutes after uploading
[14:45] <tumbleweed> you signed them with a key registered in LP?
[14:45] <Laney> and you should get an email when it is processed
[14:45] <tumbleweed> you should get an e-mail to more than  5 mins after upload
[14:45] <Laney> if not, check you signed it correctly, yeah
[14:45] <tkennedy> ok maybe that's the problem then...I think my LP key is different than the one I created...I will re import my new one and try again
[14:46] <tkennedy> I would have expected some kind of feedback somewhere during the upload
[14:46] <tkennedy> I used dput....
[14:46] <tumbleweed> tkennedy: dput just uploads the files by ftp
[14:46] <tkennedy> gotcha
[14:59] <orbisvicis> question about: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2012/CVE-2012-0830.html
[14:59] <orbisvicis> does "released" mean a patch has been released for the affected package, ie PHP 5.3.6 on oneiric
[15:02] <orbisvicis> (or that the released package suffers the cve)
[15:09] <geser> "released" means a fixed package is available through the -security reposity
[15:49] <orbisvicis> geser: thanks
[16:30] <hrw> can someone take a look at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/93138015/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.gcc-4.6-armel-cross_1.59_BUILDING.txt.gz and tell me why gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi-base is not published?
[16:32] <hrw> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6-armel-cross/1.58/+build/3104740 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6-armel-cross/1.59/+build/3219251 differ a lot ;(
[17:05] <ashams> on https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xev there's no branches after hardy, now xev has a new version, where should I push it?
[17:05] <ashams> I'm new to this :)
[17:05] <hrw> ashams: checked debian/control?
[17:05] <ashams> no, will do
[17:06] <ashams> one sec
[17:08] <Ampelbein> ashams: Wasn't the xev package superseded by the x11-utils package? It contains xev now.
[17:10] <ashams> Ampelbein, got it
[17:10] <ashams> thnx
[17:21] <EvilResistance> launchpad's PPA builders use sbuild right?
[17:21] <EvilResistance> not pbuilder?
[17:22] <tumbleweed> an old sbuild fork
[18:24] <jtaylor> come on now armel qemu chroots are broken too?
[18:24] <jtaylor> how is one supposed to support those plattforms ._.
[18:27] <directhex> by working for canonical?
[18:27] <tumbleweed> there were apparently once ARM boards given to community members, with the intention that they should run porterboxes
[18:32] <directhex> yes, genesi handed out efikamx machines with freescale imx53 boards inside
[18:34] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: become a DD and get access to debian porterboxes :)
[18:36] <directhex> this is a compelling argument
[21:14] <micahg> directhex: canonical is not supporting armel anymore from 12.04 on
[21:15] <ajmitch> only armhf from now on?
[21:17] <tumbleweed> yup
[21:18] <tumbleweed> I don't remember anyone saying when they expected the armel port to go away, though
[21:27] <directhex> lulz armhf
[22:03] <ScottK> tumbleweed: I'm sure Canonical would never abandon something like armel and leave users without an upgrade path ...
[22:04] <tumbleweed> :)
[22:04] <broder> isn't the upgrade path enable armhf and let multiarch save the day? :)
[22:04] <broder> oh, i guess i left out the "magic" step
[22:23] <orbisvicis> I want to use the pbuilder --othermirror to add some custom local files, is this how I would go about it:
[22:23] <orbisvicis> mkdir -p ./ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/...
[22:24] <orbisvicis> cp *.deb ./ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/
[22:24] <orbisvicis> --othermirror deb file:/ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/...
[22:25] <jtaylor> does it have a Packages index?
[22:25] <jtaylor> the othermirror
[22:27] <orbisvicis> no, there is no other mirror, just some debs I want to add
[22:27] <orbisvicis> any guide on creating a mirror
[22:28] <jtaylor> dpkg-scanpackages /some/folder/with/debs /dev/null | gzip -9 -c >Packages.gz
[22:28] <orbisvicis> is the index the ls-lR ?
[22:28] <jtaylor> the folder containing the Packages.gz should be in the deb line
[22:29] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: thanks that seems rather straightforward
[22:45] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: can't seem to get it to work, do I need anything outside of othermirror and bindmounts ?
[22:47] <jtaylor> it only has effet during --create
[22:47] <orbisvicis> ah
[22:49] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: so I run pbuilder --create with --othermirror and --bindmounts. Then I just run pdebuild to build any software dependent on packages in othermirror (and the packages in othermirror will be installed automatically)
[22:49] <orbisvicis> thats about it ?
[22:50] <jtaylor> I think bindmounts needs to be in the .pbuilderrc
[22:52] <orbisvicis> hm already started --create, if it doesn't work ill pass that option as pdebuild -- --bindmounts ...
[22:53] <tumbleweed> easy answer: just run a web server :)
[22:55] <jtaylor> or login with --save-after-login and do it by hand
[22:58] <micahg> \o/ rebuild universe failures under 500
[23:00] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: didn't know that existed.. thanks :)
[23:00] <jtaylor> you can also just unpack the tarball and edit the file and repack it
[23:00] <jtaylor> or use cowbuilder that does not pack it at all
[23:02] <orbisvicis> never thought of that either
[23:02] <orbisvicis> that could help debugging some packages that failed to build
[23:02] <orbisvicis> *just failed
[23:02] <jtaylor> there is a hook that will drop you in a shell after failure
[23:02] <jtaylor>  /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/C10shell
[23:04] <orbisvicis> yeah --bindmounts needs to be constantly passed or saved in pbuilderrc
[23:39] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: any idea why the path would be duplicated, ie "file not found: /storage/pbuilder/repo//storage/pbuilder/repo//...*.deb"
[23:40] <jtaylor> whats your deb file:... line?
[23:40] <jtaylor> and whats the path in the Packages.gz for the packages?
[23:41] <orbisvicis> oh the Packages.gz path has to be relative :)
[23:41] <jtaylor> I have dpkg-scanpackage . /dev/null executed in a flat folder full of debs  ... and deb file:///path/to/repo ./ which works
[23:45] <orbisvicis> jtaylor: i have "file:/path/..." but otherwise the same
[23:46] <jtaylor> I think it must be file:///path
[23:51] <orbisvicis> oh, its probably an apt-cache problem, I first ran pkg-scanpackage with the full path, probably have to clear or update it to the new Package.gz
[23:53] <jtaylor> < offline
[23:53] <orbisvicis> cool thanks
[23:57] <orbisvicis> yep that was it