[00:19] TheMuso: thx (flashrom sync) [00:20] there will probably be another one (bugfix-only this time) in the next days [00:20] jtaylor: looks like you forgot to specify that gnome-video-arcade was sponsored [00:21] Laney: I used syncpackage [00:22] yes [00:22] you need to give it -s [00:22] oh [00:23] shouldn't that be implicit if the "uploader" has no upload rights? [00:23] or a warning [00:24] what's the uploader? [00:24] the person in the changelog [00:24] some random debian person? [00:25] you want the person that requested the sync [00:25] yes, but you could still add a warning? [00:26] how could it know to warn? [00:26] -b is just dumb bug closing [00:26] sponsor-patch is supposed to be the more advanced logic afaik [00:28] can'T it check the person in the changelog and if its different from the syncer warn? [00:29] hm no [00:29] unsponsored syncs exist too [00:29] the person in the changelog is the person who did the upload to debian which is irrelevant for syncs [00:36] I'll add that flag in future, must get to bed now, bye [00:37] np, just wanted to let you know [00:37] nn === kloeri_ is now known as kloeri [02:48] join #ltsp [02:48] (oops) [04:17] is there any possibility to build packages against karmic? with pbuilder.. [04:18] ie would there be a backup repository somewhere ? [04:19] yes [04:19] nigelb: official? where? [04:19] orbisvicis: http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ [04:20] yeah, that ^ [04:20] amazing absolutely [04:21] orbisvicis: keep in mind karmic isn't receiving any security updates, so it's not recommended to run it if connected to the internet in any way [04:23] micahg: I patch/upgrade the packages (to their newest version) myself and build them with pbuilder, I just need compatible environment [04:23] micahg: I've long abandoned the ide of ugrading from karmic, I haven't had luck with the upgrade procedure [04:23] *idea [04:24] orbisvicis: doing that for each package we update is quite time consuming (http://www.ubuntu.com/usn) [04:25] well I guess I don't upgrade packages with an eye to security, just when I want newer server features. For example now I need to rebuild the php suite [04:26] It's only a personal server with limited connection to the internet [04:26] I think it original used to be either gutsy or hardy - can't quite recall - and I upgraded up till karmic till I gave up [04:28] orbisvicis: if you have the resources, I'd suggest cloning and filing bugs and maybe we can fix the upgrade (lucid is supported as the upgrade path from karmic and hardy) [04:30] eh it's such a melange of packages that I'd really rather not touch the thing even with a ten-foot pole, at least not until I have to [04:31] I mean, a lot of the upgrade bugs are probably self-inflicted from stupid packages and repositories I've tinkered with to render filing bugs untenable [04:31] anway /end rant [04:32] and thanks for the help [04:33] err now looking, how would I use this site with pbuilder? there are just isos as far as I can tell [04:34] orbisvicis: I gave you a link that you can use in sources [04:35] ah ok didn't realize [04:35] oh oops [04:35] yeah you're link works [04:35] *your === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone [07:14] stefanct: np [08:10] good morning === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson === jincreator1 is now known as jincreator === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:43] Hello MOTU members. How long should it take for packages to show up in my PPA on launchpad? [14:44] tkennedy: half an hour after they've built [14:44] hmm so then there is a problem with them I suspect as after using dput it said it uploaded them successfully but they are not there [14:45] you should be able to see it on the website a few minutes after uploading [14:45] you signed them with a key registered in LP? [14:45] and you should get an email when it is processed [14:45] you should get an e-mail to more than 5 mins after upload [14:45] if not, check you signed it correctly, yeah [14:45] ok maybe that's the problem then...I think my LP key is different than the one I created...I will re import my new one and try again [14:46] I would have expected some kind of feedback somewhere during the upload [14:46] I used dput.... [14:46] tkennedy: dput just uploads the files by ftp [14:46] gotcha [14:59] question about: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2012/CVE-2012-0830.html [14:59] The php_register_variable_ex function in php_variables.c in PHP 5.3.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a request containing a large number of variables, related to improper handling of array variables. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-4885. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0830) [14:59] does "released" mean a patch has been released for the affected package, ie PHP 5.3.6 on oneiric [15:02] (or that the released package suffers the cve) === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan [15:09] "released" means a fixed package is available through the -security reposity === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [15:49] geser: thanks [16:30] can someone take a look at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/93138015/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.gcc-4.6-armel-cross_1.59_BUILDING.txt.gz and tell me why gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi-base is not published? [16:32] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6-armel-cross/1.58/+build/3104740 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6-armel-cross/1.59/+build/3219251 differ a lot ;( === Guest51693 is now known as Zic [17:05] on https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xev there's no branches after hardy, now xev has a new version, where should I push it? [17:05] I'm new to this :) [17:05] ashams: checked debian/control? [17:05] no, will do [17:06] one sec [17:08] ashams: Wasn't the xev package superseded by the x11-utils package? It contains xev now. [17:10] Ampelbein, got it [17:10] thnx [17:21] launchpad's PPA builders use sbuild right? [17:21] not pbuilder? [17:22] an old sbuild fork === JanC_ is now known as JanC [18:24] come on now armel qemu chroots are broken too? [18:24] how is one supposed to support those plattforms ._. [18:27] by working for canonical? [18:27] there were apparently once ARM boards given to community members, with the intention that they should run porterboxes [18:32] yes, genesi handed out efikamx machines with freescale imx53 boards inside [18:34] jtaylor: become a DD and get access to debian porterboxes :) [18:36] this is a compelling argument [21:14] directhex: canonical is not supporting armel anymore from 12.04 on [21:15] only armhf from now on? [21:17] yup [21:18] I don't remember anyone saying when they expected the armel port to go away, though [21:27] lulz armhf === jdong_ is now known as jdong [22:03] tumbleweed: I'm sure Canonical would never abandon something like armel and leave users without an upgrade path ... [22:04] :) [22:04] isn't the upgrade path enable armhf and let multiarch save the day? :) [22:04] oh, i guess i left out the "magic" step [22:23] I want to use the pbuilder --othermirror to add some custom local files, is this how I would go about it: [22:23] mkdir -p ./ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/... [22:24] cp *.deb ./ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/ [22:24] --othermirror deb file:/ubuntu/pool/main/p/php5/... [22:25] does it have a Packages index? [22:25] the othermirror [22:27] no, there is no other mirror, just some debs I want to add [22:27] any guide on creating a mirror [22:28] dpkg-scanpackages /some/folder/with/debs /dev/null | gzip -9 -c >Packages.gz [22:28] is the index the ls-lR ? [22:28] the folder containing the Packages.gz should be in the deb line [22:29] jtaylor: thanks that seems rather straightforward === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [22:45] jtaylor: can't seem to get it to work, do I need anything outside of othermirror and bindmounts ? [22:47] it only has effet during --create [22:47] ah [22:49] jtaylor: so I run pbuilder --create with --othermirror and --bindmounts. Then I just run pdebuild to build any software dependent on packages in othermirror (and the packages in othermirror will be installed automatically) [22:49] thats about it ? [22:50] I think bindmounts needs to be in the .pbuilderrc [22:52] hm already started --create, if it doesn't work ill pass that option as pdebuild -- --bindmounts ... [22:53] easy answer: just run a web server :) [22:55] or login with --save-after-login and do it by hand [22:58] \o/ rebuild universe failures under 500 [23:00] jtaylor: didn't know that existed.. thanks :) [23:00] you can also just unpack the tarball and edit the file and repack it [23:00] or use cowbuilder that does not pack it at all [23:02] never thought of that either [23:02] that could help debugging some packages that failed to build [23:02] *just failed [23:02] there is a hook that will drop you in a shell after failure [23:02] /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/C10shell === echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna [23:04] yeah --bindmounts needs to be constantly passed or saved in pbuilderrc [23:39] jtaylor: any idea why the path would be duplicated, ie "file not found: /storage/pbuilder/repo//storage/pbuilder/repo//...*.deb" [23:40] whats your deb file:... line? [23:40] and whats the path in the Packages.gz for the packages? [23:41] oh the Packages.gz path has to be relative :) [23:41] I have dpkg-scanpackage . /dev/null executed in a flat folder full of debs ... and deb file:///path/to/repo ./ which works [23:45] jtaylor: i have "file:/path/..." but otherwise the same [23:46] I think it must be file:///path [23:51] oh, its probably an apt-cache problem, I first ran pkg-scanpackage with the full path, probably have to clear or update it to the new Package.gz [23:53] < offline [23:53] cool thanks === broder_ is now known as broder === bkerensa_ is now known as bkerensa [23:57] yep that was it