[00:19] TheMuso: Ping. Have you seen this issue with alsa 1.0.25? http://paste.ubuntu.com/853433/ Lines 2-4. [00:20] Not sure if it is a pulse issue or an alsa issue. [00:38] definitely new to alsa-lib 1.0.25. I just reverted to libasound2_1.0.24.1-4ubuntu1 and I don't get that error. [00:38] maybe it's old or corrupted? :D [00:39] Neko: New image. Probably just need to kick pulse to work with some change in upstream alsa. [00:43] Guess I'll need to see if I can reproduce this on x86, since it is pulse-alsa.conf. [00:47] Yea, I can reproduce it on an x86 VM instance with "sudo alsactl restore". [02:28] Well, I have a solution to the pandaes audio issue. Not perfect, but works within the current confines of alsaucm. [02:28] Will upload tomorrow, when my eyes are no longer crossed. [05:07] GrueMaster: I just fixed some of those alsa-lib errors you showed me the other day, seems 1.0.25 changed some syntax for its conf files. [07:45] aramadxp images now building momentary === LetoTheII is now known as LetoThe2nd [08:51] ogra_: why is it called the FINAL arm meeting? do you plan to commit mass suicide after it (e.g. Lemmings)? :) [09:09] ppisati, the ARM team within Canonical is being dissolved and its memebers assigned to other teams in the company [09:17] NCommander: around? Daviey asked me about http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/precise_probs.html - are you aware of the "linux-armadaxp-tools-3.0.0-1500 has no installation candidate" in there, or is that resolved now? [09:18] !@#$#!@! [09:18] we shouldn't be building linux-tools [09:18] ^- cooloney [09:19] linux-tools built failed under armhf [09:20] so i disable it in out linux-armadaxp package due to urgent upload request [09:20] it can be built under armel, i think [09:23] cooloney: I don't think we even need it [09:24] NCommander: perf is very useful tool even for arm, we use it a lot for ti-omap4 [09:24] NCommander: and I saw some new tools was added from Marvell LSP [09:24] cooloney: what would it take to fix it ? [09:25] NCommander: i guess it's related to compiler, but don't have much time to take a look [10:18] cooloney: Oh, can you merge my latest armadaxp upload into git? [10:18] (I really should request zinc access) [10:20] cooloney: Oh, I see in another channel that you're already on top of it. Nevermind. :) === Jack87|Away is now known as Jack87 === juan is now known as Guest54640 === Guest54640 is now known as jsol [15:50] ogra_: Did you get my email on the pandaES audio situation? [15:50] GrueMaster, yes, looks ok, lets upload it after someone (i.e. infinity) also eyeballed it quickly [15:51] that udev rule is our hack anyway, adding another few lines for PandaES wont do any harm [15:55] ogra_: I'm sure you and Tobin are enough of a review. And I'm happy to not take the blame on Panda audio this cycle. ;) [15:55] haha, ok, then i'll just upload after the call === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-nom [16:37] WHEEE! [16:37] so chromium 17 seems to work just fine on armel [16:37] looks shiny, but takes twice as long as FF to start === Ursinha-nom is now known as Ursinha [16:45] ogra_: Yeah, no big shock there. It's just as bloated, just differently. :P [16:46] yep, but its great to have it after we had to live with 14 for ages [16:48] Not seeing chromium for armhf (at least not on my mirror yet). [16:52] GrueMaster, thats what we taljked about in the meeting :) [16:52] only armel yet [16:53] but it builds there for the first time in years [16:54] ah, ok. [17:07] NCommander: armadaxp netinstall uImage resets, bug 939645 [17:07] (which doesn't exist yet) [17:07] mahmoh: the image fails to boot? [17:07] greaaaaaaaaaaaat [17:07] right [17:08] GrueMaster: ^, can you take a look? [17:08] ubot2`: ? [17:08] NCommander: Can I nuke the armada here or do you have data that you want to keep? [17:08] for me at least, I'm using the 1500.3 uImage and the net installer uInitrd now [17:08] GrueMaster: nuke and path. [17:08] *pave [17:09] ok [17:09] I'm in a meeting now, but will be soon. [17:09] mahmoh: so it doesn't boot at all? You got the bootargs right? [17:10] NCommander: it loads and tries to boot but resets immediately [17:10] mahmoh: ugh, might be an issue with the mkimage commands [17:10] mahmoh: Gets into userspace, or dies in kernel init? [17:10] disclaimer: I did tftpboot it though but the checksum was fine so ... [17:11] infinity: dies before kernel init, right after load - you should be able to get to the bug [17:11] Oh, shiny. [17:11] (And no, I can't get the bug, I don't have the hardware) [17:12] infinity: I meant see the bug (maybe) to see the details of where it fails exactly [17:13] Starting kernel ... interrupt request pc : [<0000803c>] lr : [<006505cc>] sp : 005ffde0 ip : fffeffff fp : 006d6ce8 r10: 005fff98 r9 : 00000bdc r8 : 005fffcc r7 : 00000018 r6 : 005ffdec r5 : 00000000 r4 : 005ffef7 r3 : 00008010 r2 : 000000f8 r1 : 00000bdc r0 : 0040ff14 Flags: Nzcv IRQs off FIQs off Mode SVC_32 Resetting CPU ... [17:13] NCommander: the good news is the uInitrd looks like it's fine so far ... [17:30] mahmoh: god thats special [17:31] mahmoh: try it with a differentuImage [17:42] Yea, I see the same thing. Will look at the kernel a little. [17:48] Did the linux-armadaxp meta get bumped? It seems to be pulling linux-image-3.0.0-1500-armadaxp 3.0.0-1500.2 instead of 3.0.0-1500.3 [17:50] apt-get dist-upgrade is pulling the kernel in, but usually I should be able to just do apt-get update && apt-get install linux-armadaxp to update the kernel. [17:53] grrr. resolvconf install error. [17:56] GrueMaster: That trick only works in the case of ABI bumps. [17:56] ok. [17:56] GrueMaster: No ABI bump means no new linux-meta, means you need to upgrade the kernel image itself, not count on linux-meta to do it. [17:56] (But, as you note, apt-get upgrade gets it right) [18:01] Guess I'm just used to more that a minor change with new kernels. [18:03] Ok, the kernel in ubuntu-ports/dists/precise/main/installer-armhf/20101020ubuntu113/images/armadaxp/ is busted. Not even sure of it's origins. [18:08] infinity: sorry, I started to look at it, but lost my session (forgot to run in screen) [18:08] infinity: for chromium on armhf, if someone else has time to look, feel free [18:08] micahg: Oops. [18:09] I'm pretty craptacularly busy today, but remind me tomorrow to kick off a build, so I can look at it Monday. :P [18:09] GrueMaster: Yeah, I think the SRU 2-week cadence with an ABI bump almost every time has conditioned people to assume that new kernel == new ABI. [18:12] infinity: that's about the same timeframe I have :) [18:18] ppisati: The mmap patch seems to have fallen out of the 2.6.35 omap4 kernel. [18:21] GrueMaster: uh? it was there [18:21] GrueMaster: wait [18:23] GrueMaster: gitweb on kernel.u.com is sloooooooowwww... [18:24] use bzr ! [18:24] :P [18:25] ogra_: i'll send a pull req to convert from git to bzr :) [18:25] GrueMaster: patches are still there [18:25] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick.git;a=commit;h=2956dd26b949343aca5581356bff6c1cf18a22c2 [18:25] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick.git;a=commit;h=ddc72fa76d3965ca3576cfbc7a1de6e1e4b4a681 [18:25] M/omap4 [18:26] Maybe in the tree, but the tests are failing. [18:26] sudo ./mmap-test [18:26] Couldn't allocate the heap: 1902Mb [18:26] doh! [18:26] SRU kernel? [18:26] These are the tests included from the earlier bug (can't remember the bug number. [18:26] Yes, latest SRU kernel. [18:26] ok, i'll check it out [18:27] 2.6.35-903-omap4 #31-Ubuntu [18:27] remind me where the test are located [18:27] *these tests [18:27] I'm trying to find the original bug. It was fix released a while ago. === calculu5 is now known as calculus [18:28] (and of course the bug isn't in the test source. [18:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861296 [18:32] Launchpad bug 861296 in linux-ti-omap4 "mmap fails to allocate 2030Mb heap on ARM" [Undecided,Fix committed] [18:32] GrueMaster: the original bug was that eclipse failed to compile on arm [18:33] since the eclipse build passed some herejava please use insane amounts of memory plx [18:33] and this made x86 builds pass while arm where failing due to this bug [18:33] xranby_ac100: I think it was renamed or a new bug with specific info was created (see above). [18:35] im not sure there exist an original bug.. try ask doko [18:35] since it was clear mmap did not behave identical on x86 and arm i filed the above bug [18:35] xranby_ac100: I already posted the link (see backscroll). [18:35] * xranby_ac100 scrolls back [18:36] GrueMaster: before i rejoined? [18:36] bug 861296 is what I was referring to. [18:36] Launchpad bug 861296 in linux-ti-omap4 "mmap fails to allocate 2030Mb heap on ARM" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/861296 [18:36] It has the mmap-test source. [18:38] xranby_ac100: haskell-src-exts and qtwebkit-source are still FTBFS with OOMing issues. [18:38] (07:26:30 PM) GrueMaster: Couldn't allocate the heap: 1902Mb <---- how much swap are in use on your test system? [18:39] I'm not convinced that it's this particular issue, though. I can get the mmap test to pass on some kernels where the builds will still fail. :/ [18:39] SwapTotal: 33554428 kB === Jack87 is now known as Jack87|Away [18:39] ok [18:40] I think I probably need to spend some solid time revisiting that next week and hunt down the root cause before we get too close to release. [18:40] xranby_ac100: I run the same SRU test suite on all platforms and kernels. This passed on the previous kernel for this platform. Every image is installed from netboot & preseed. [18:41] GrueMaster: i am convinced [18:41] btw, thank you for running those tests [18:41] I added them to my SRU regression testing specifically for this reason. [18:46] micahg: Kicking off a chromium testbuild locally now, but yeah, my timeframe for looking at it is probably still Monday. ;) [18:48] micahg: Kicking off a chromium testbuild locally now, but yeah, my timeframe for looking at it is probably still Monday. ;) [18:53] * ppisati -> EOD [18:54] ppisati: Also, still missing headers from the dove headers package. [18:55] linux-headers-2.6.32-423 is virtually empty. [18:55] (changelog & copyright info only). [18:55] GrueMaster: Yeah, didn't we agree that we just didn't deeply care anyway? :) [18:56] infinity: really should be a kernel team call on that, but in general yes. [18:56] (and I had thought he was going to look at it). [18:56] GrueMaster: well, yes. If they care, they can fix it. But I'm betting they don't if we don't. [18:56] And I'd be shocked if we had any dove users. [18:57] we do ! [18:57] GrueMaster ! [18:57] ogra_: I said users, not QA testers. :P [18:57] heh [18:58] I think there are commercial users, but maybe not for this specific kernel. [18:58] ogra_: If GrueMaster's desk is representative of our average user, we're doing a pretty poor job of targetting, well, normal people. [18:58] surely not on dove devboards [18:58] I know HP has a little desktop system (I've seen one at a friends house). [18:59] did they ever sell that armada ebox they showed in brussels ? [18:59] Ubuntu: Linux for Crazy People? [18:59] isnt it that ? [18:59] And it has our kernel patches at least. [18:59] from crazy people for crazy people [18:59] I'm pretty sure I have a t-shirt that says something about Human Beings. [18:59] * GrueMaster is having issues with LP. [18:59] QA people don't qualify. [19:00] That's why my blog is titled "Terminal Insanity". [19:00] ;) [19:00] GrueMaster, about time you gain membership [19:00] so it shows up on planet [19:01] Yea, I looked into that a while ago. Lot of hassle. [19:01] heh [19:01] not really [19:01] And I just haven't had the spare cycles to jump through the hoops. [19:01] one wikipage that lists your contributions [19:02] and one evening to attend the rmb meeting [19:02] NCommander: GrueMaster: otherwise, the net-installer works fine as far as I can tell, need to preseed it now to enable nightly install verification testing [19:02] mahmoh: I'll takea hammer to it [19:02] you surely got enough bugs under your belt to qualify easily [19:02] mahmoh: I'll pass you my preseed. [19:02] thx [19:04] Guhhh. What is going on with our web servers? paste.ubuntu.com is slow, lp is almost non-existant. [19:05] and email is also having issues. [19:06] GrueMaster: No issues here, perhaps you're suffering routing issues to the DC? [19:06] Must be. [19:07] ping seems fine. [19:57] mahmoh: http://paste.ubuntu.com/854454/ [19:57] That's the preseed I am currently working with. [19:58] GrueMaster: thx! [23:05] janimo`: for this apr upload in the freeze queue, what's the definition of "recent enough" for the kernels? [23:07] slangasek, hey, thanks for the welcome mail ! :) [23:07] :-)