[00:01] <ScottK> Is that common enough it's worth it to comment on every accept?
[00:01] <ScottK> Could we just ping on the problem cases and people reply?
[00:02] <infinity> We've been doing that, but it's a bit problematic when the accept was out of your timezone.
[00:02]  * infinity shrugs.
[00:02] <infinity> I'm not wildly picky, but it can be irritating to hunt down rationale, or even a person to ask about rationale.
[00:07]  * ScottK finds adding overhead to commonly performed operations to solve rare problems annoying.
[00:13]  * Riddell snoozes
[00:13] <ScottK> JFTR, New has been done.  I've done it for packages that were related to FFE's I approved.
[00:13] <skaet> Thanks ScottK
[00:14] <skaet> Riddell,  if still around,  are things set for the next set of dailies to show up as beta 1 - or still some things pending to do there?
[00:15] <Riddell> skaet: iso tracker should be done
[00:15] <nessita> hello everyone! I was wondering if someone can help me defining if a given bug requires a FFe or not
[00:15] <Riddell> skaet: just ticking the boxes and pressing the button when the isos appear I think
[00:15] <skaet> Riddell,  coolio.  nusakan switched?
[00:16] <nessita> the bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/930716 (please note that there is a branch attached to the bug report that shows all the changes that would be needed to solve it)
[00:16] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 930716 in ubuntuone-client/trunk "ubuntuone.credentials is not preferring the SSO Qt UI for auth" [High,In progress]
[00:16] <Riddell> skaet: hmm let me see
[00:18] <Riddell> skaet: hmm how do I do that again?
[00:20] <Riddell> nessita: so it's ubuntuone.credentials making use of a new API to show a given frontend?
[00:20] <ScottK> Is either one shipped on the CD?
[00:21] <nessita> Riddell: yes, the new API and new frontend are already in Ubuntu, the branch onle makes ubuntuone.credentials "prefer" that
[00:22]  * ScottK votes bug fix (no FFe), but only barely.
[00:22] <nessita> ScottK: ubuntuone.credentials is shipped on the CD, sso as well (but not the Qt bits). SSO will fallback to the GTK+ UI if the requested UI is not available
[00:22] <ScottK> OK.
[00:23] <ScottK> Unless Riddell disagrees, I think you can call it a bug fix.
[00:23] <Riddell> fine with me
[00:23] <nessita> thanks! :-)
[00:28] <Riddell> skaet: sorry I need to sleep, you'll need to do whatever nusakan needs yourself
[00:29] <ScottK> I bet we could do a release team meeting really fast and well with trello
[00:29] <skaet> Riddell,  ack.  ok,  will handle.
[00:29] <skaet> or at least will try.  ;)
[00:44] <skaet> default_milestone=Precise Beta 1 has been set in .isotracker.conf
[00:46]  * skaet notes that edubuntu-dvd appear to be be building,  will see if it now shows up under Beta 1.
[01:44] <skaet> Edubuntu DVD has now appeared under Precise Beta 1... *\o/*
[01:46] <skaet> Framework for gathering release note information for Beta 1 is now up at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/TechnicalOverview
[01:47] <skaet> gnomescan is a FTBFS fix, have approved
[01:48] <skaet> the unapproved queue is now empty, and so on that note,  time to go for dinner.
[01:52] <infinity> skaet: gnomescan was being replaced with gnome-scan anyway.  I need to review and upload that this weekend.
[01:52] <infinity> skaet: But oh well. :)
[01:53] <skaet> infinity, :)  beer-o-clock!
[01:54] <infinity> If crimsun swings by asking why his gnomescan builds are failing to upload, that's why.  And I'm on it (later).
[01:57] <infinity> Oh, or Ampelbein may have already uploaded gnome-scan, even better.
[01:58]  * infinity will clean up gnomescan later.
[17:45] <ScottK> Wow.  Powerpc caught up.
[21:49] <skaet> Riddell, NCommander, pitti, slangasek - since we've got a first set of images up under Beta 1 on the iso tracker,  I went ahead and disabled the crontab for now, so they have a chance to gather some test results.
[21:49] <NCommander> skaet: great, I'll keep an eye on it over the weekend
[21:50] <skaet> Thanks NCommander  :)
[21:52] <tumbleweed> incoming tesseract spam
[21:53] <skaet> NCommander,  could you and see if you can figure out why the ubuntu-server images for i386/amd64 didn't get built/posted?   also xubuntu-alternate appear missing.
[21:54] <NCommander> skaet: will smack it
[21:54] <skaet> :)  Thanks!
[22:19] <tumbleweed> ScottK: thanks! you made quick work of that
[22:25] <ScottK> ;-)
[22:25] <ScottK> skaet: I accepted a kde4libs update today for a milestoned bug, so the Kubuntu images need rebuilding.
[22:27] <skaet> ScottK,  which bug?
[22:28]  * ScottK looks
[22:29] <ScottK> skaet: Bug #935521
[22:29] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 935521 in kde4libs "missing file in kdoctools.install script" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/935521
[22:32] <skaet> ScottK,  thanks.   have added needed to the pad.  Edubuntu affected as well?
[22:32] <ScottK> I don't know. If they ship any kde apps, they are, so I'd assume so.
[22:35] <skaet> NCommander, ^^ please add Edubuntu and Kubuntu rebuilds to the list after you finish looking at server/xubuntu-alterate
[22:36] <skaet> ScottK,  just checked the manifest,  and yes - they're included.
[22:36] <skaet> in Edubuntu
[22:36] <skaet> stgraber, highvoltage ^^ fyi.
[22:36] <NCommander> skaet: will do
[22:37] <skaet> Thanks!  :)
[22:37] <highvoltage> thanks skaet
[22:50] <ScottK> tesseract storm is over.
[22:51] <stgraber> skaet: indeed, we ship kdeedu so we'll probably need a rebuild then
[23:14] <Riddell> thanks ScottK