[00:32] <ubottu> bastidrazor called the ops in #ubuntu (ab0rtion_shark)
[01:45] <marienz> bensois is that anti-circumcision type you might've seen around before
[06:50] <ubottu> urfr332gO called the ops in #ubuntu (markSander)
[06:52] <Corey> *sigh*
[20:28] <LjL> @mark #ubuntu shaneo Highlights a number of nicknames randomly, doesn't explain whether it was an accident or what
[20:28] <ubottu> The operation succeeded.
[20:30] <LjL> the zoo of #ubuntu :\
[20:30] <Silverlion> LjL: need help?
[20:31] <LjL> more like need to stop looking at it before i throw a fit
[21:36] <ubottu> In ubottu, guntbert said: !ppa =~ /!addppa/!addppa and !ppa-purge./
[21:39] <Myrtti> !ppa
[21:39] <ubottu> A Personal Package Archive (PPA) can provide alternate software not normally available in the offical Ubuntu repositories - Looking for a PPA? See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas - WARNING: PPAs are unsupported third-party packages, and you use them at your own risk. See also !addppa
[21:39] <Myrtti> !ppa ~= /!addppa/!addppa and !ppa-purge/
[21:39] <ubottu> I'll remember that Myrtti
[21:39] <Myrtti> !ppa > guntbert
[21:50] <popey> what do you define as "third party"?
[21:52] <Jordan_U> I would define it as anyone outside the maintainers of Ubuntu (in this case outside MOTU and others which handle the default repositories).
[21:54] <popey> so (for example) the Mozilla PPA run by the guy who works for Canonical on Mozilla. Is that 3rd party?
[21:59] <Pici> I thinkwe should ditch the unsupported part and just say that PPAs do not go through the same testing that repository packages do.
[22:02] <pangolin> how about: PPAs should be considered beta software and could cause more issues than they solve.
[22:03] <PerfM> Reporting for duty
[22:03] <pangolin> Hello PerfM
[22:03] <pangolin> How can I help you today?
[22:04] <PerfM> pangolin, same thing, different day.
[22:04] <pangolin> PerfM: In that case same answer as last time
[22:04] <PerfM> But you told me to come back a week later
[22:04] <pangolin> Please have "fun" elsewhere.
[22:04] <PerfM> that's so unfair
[22:05] <elky> No. What is unfair is you thinking you're owed entertainment on our behalf.
[22:05] <PerfM> Okay. If we're going to play this game, you can't just assume I'm thinking that.
[22:05] <elky> Oh look at that, you still have an active ban on this channel.
[22:06] <PerfM> elky, choke on my dick
[22:06] <pangolin> PerfM: not helpful
[22:08] <Corey> Overkill much?
[22:09] <elky> well, if he wasn't given the vanity troll cloak, he'd not have evaded the ban to get in here.
[22:09] <elky> so since i can't trust that the cloak isn't going to be changed again...
[22:09] <elky> no
[22:29] <dax> !opsnack > marienz
[22:29] <ubottu> marienz, please see my private message
[22:30] <marienz> dax: that's a false positive, not a false negative
[22:30] <dax> marienz: good point.