quidnunc | How do I verify which DIST pdebuild is using? | 01:14 |
---|---|---|
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
quidnunc | god damn you pbuilder | 01:39 |
dholbach | good morning | 07:34 |
_nullthree | morning | 07:39 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
tumbleweed | jtaylor: from #debian-ubuntu: | 10:50 |
tumbleweed | 12:46 < sgnb> unison has been synchronized in precise, but not unison2.32.52 | 10:50 |
tumbleweed | 12:47 < sgnb> unison2.32.52 should be imported to precise as well, to keep compatibility with previous ubuntu releases | 10:50 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
jtaylor | wtf is that for a source package name oO | 17:26 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
tumbleweed | compatibility package :) | 17:36 |
jtaylor | do you know what exactly its needed for? | 17:37 |
jtaylor | because I'm guessing it will fail to build + needs patching for the log | 17:37 |
tumbleweed | the reason in the debian upload was "to maintain compatibility with squeeze" | 17:38 |
tumbleweed | I'm assuming the network protocol has changed | 17:38 |
tumbleweed | but I left finding that out to you :P | 17:38 |
jtaylor | I already inquired in #debubu | 17:39 |
* tumbleweed saw | 17:39 | |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
geser | jtaylor: why to you expect it to FTBFS? | 18:26 |
jtaylor | rsvg has disappeared in ubuntu | 18:27 |
geser | ah | 18:27 |
=== tobin is now known as joshuaBRB | ||
geser | jtaylor: see also bug #941836 and bug #937596 requesting that version too | 18:32 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 941836 in unison (Ubuntu) "Please add unison2.32.52 packages to precise" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/941836 | 18:32 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 937596 in unison (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu should deliver compat package: unison 2.32" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/937596 | 18:32 |
jtaylor | meh forgot to subscribe to the package | 18:33 |
jtaylor | is there a tool for that btw? | 18:33 |
jtaylor | only know of pts-subscribe | 18:33 |
geser | I don't know of any for LP | 18:34 |
lifeless | CLI tool? you could add one to lp-dev-tools | 18:34 |
lifeless | but the only events LP knows about for a per-package-subscription today are bug mail | 18:34 |
geser | you might also want to ask sgnb if we really need 3 version of unison in the archive (there is also unison2.27.57) | 18:34 |
jtaylor | hm and it does not look patched for the log dir change | 18:35 |
jtaylor | why was that done without debian in a package that forks so often :( | 18:36 |
=== joshuaBRB is now known as tobin | ||
jtaylor | tumbleweed: I'll merge the unison package, do I need an ffe for that? | 18:52 |
jtaylor | 2.32 | 18:53 |
geser | as it's a new source package you'll need a FFe | 18:54 |
jtaylor | its not really new ;) | 18:55 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
ScottK | It takes an archive admin to review it, so you need an FFe. | 19:56 |
jtaylor | k I'll reuse the existing unison ffe | 19:57 |
ScottK | Please don't | 20:00 |
jtaylor | k new one then | 20:04 |
jtaylor | bug 937596 | 20:25 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 937596 in unison (Ubuntu) "feature freeze exception: Ubuntu should deliver compat package: unison 2.32" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/937596 | 20:25 |
jtaylor | whats the SRU version number when the same XYbuildZ version is in a later release and is not affected? | 21:25 |
ScottK | How about XY0.1 | 21:30 |
jtaylor | buildX.11.04.1? | 21:30 |
ScottK | Oh, wait. | 21:30 |
ScottK | Same version in a later release is not affected? | 21:31 |
micahg | jtaylor: you're in trouble, you have to rebuild the later release in any event, for versioning: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging | 21:31 |
ScottK | How does that work out? | 21:31 |
micahg | and the same question as ScottK ^^ :) | 21:31 |
jtaylor | the cause is actually a library, but the broken packages declares its dependencies in a broken way, fixing that fixes the issue | 21:31 |
jtaylor | the broken package is a leaf package, the library not | 21:31 |
jtaylor | so its safer to just fix the leaf package | 21:32 |
jtaylor | the library is not actually broken, it just behaves in a way not expected by the broken leaf package | 21:32 |
jtaylor | it does in a later release so no fix necessary | 21:32 |
jtaylor | but I could fix the leaf package in the later release too, it does not even declare a dependency on libc | 21:32 |
ScottK | That would solve the versioning problem. | 21:33 |
jtaylor | can armel and armhf do unaligned memory access? if no how is that handled in qemu armel? | 21:53 |
jtaylor | hm no to the first according to http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiFixes but my qemu question still stands | 21:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!