[04:06] <ATP> Hello all it's me the guy with the touchscreen problem :/ Ok i fixed the short circuit from the cable twist. I also soldered the jumpers and now the LCD display works but I only have output. Input does not work at all, should I install some driver? I have kernel 2.6.35 in my ubuntu 10.04 beagle. How do I see if touchscreen drivers are installed? Also should the input show up somewhere in the /dev/input , if not should I make
[04:06] <ATP>  one myself with mknod command?
[04:06] <ATP> thanks in advance
[05:50] <lopi> anyone else trying to snag a raspberry pi in ten minutes? :P
[05:51] <GrueMaster> Erm, no?  YOu do know that ubuntu will not run on it, right?
[05:54] <lopi> eh doesn't mean it won't be fun to play with
[05:55] <steev_> based on the fact that their website sucks and is down already, i doubt anyone will be buying any
[05:57] <lopi> I seriously doubt that
[06:01] <gildean> i could see lots of applications for the pi
[06:02] <gildean> not desktop, but embedded
[06:04] <steev_> meh, farnell.com is down, and that other one is like register to show your interest
[06:04] <steev_> i hate sites like that, just stfu and take my money
[06:19] <lopi> steev_: agreed, they just said on twitter it should be fixed at some point, keep refrsehing
[06:20] <steev_> lopi: i have better things to do
[06:20] <steev_> they had their chance
[06:20] <steev_> like the XO i will not buy one now
[07:12] <lilstevie> steev_, hah, I plan on getting one after the rush dies down, It is not an apple device, screw joining the queues for it
[07:13] <steev_> lilstevie: your distributors are a reflection of self, if you choose (admittedly huge) suppliers who can't handle the load, you're not worth my time.  i wasn't particularly interested overall, but i figured i'd load up and see if i could, since neither site would even load, meh
[07:16] <lilstevie> heh, well to be honest I am shocked about RS
[07:16] <lilstevie> huge multinational
[07:16] <lilstevie> can't take a bit of load
[13:28] <pnphi> joined
[13:28] <pnphi> excuse me ! ! !
[13:28] <pnphi> please help me ! ! !
[13:31] <pnphi> i have a image ubuntu arm Minimal
[13:32] <pnphi> I want this image up to ubuntu desktop ! ! !
[13:32] <pnphi> what do i do ?
[13:32] <pnphi> install 1046 packages ? ?
[13:32] <pnphi> or what else ?
[13:34] <infinity> pnphi: What sort of system?
[13:34] <pnphi> i don't understand ...
[13:34] <infinity> pnphi: What computer is this on?
[13:35] <pnphi> Qemu !
[13:35] <infinity> pnphi: We generate desktop images for several target platforms (beagleboard, pandaboard, etc)
[13:35] <infinity> Oh.
[13:35] <pnphi> this image minimal run on qemu...! !
[13:35] <infinity> If it's qemu, yeah, just "apt-get install ubuntu-desktop^" on your current minimal system. :P
[13:35] <pnphi> what else ?
[13:36] <infinity> What do you mean what else?
[13:36] <infinity> That will do it.
[13:36] <pnphi> other way ?
[13:37] <infinity> There's no way to install ubuntu-desktop without installing ubuntu-desktop, no.
[13:37] <pnphi> "install ubuntu-desktop" will install 1046 Packages..so long time
[13:38] <infinity> Yes, and?
[13:38] <infinity> If you want the full ubuntu desktop, you need all those packages.
[13:38] <pnphi> yes
[13:39] <pnphi> 1046 packages,how multiple packages to a package?
[13:39] <pnphi> more packed into one package?
[13:40] <infinity> Packages have dependencies.
[13:40] <infinity> ubuntu-desktop depends on everything required for a "proper" Ubuntu Desktop environment.
[13:40] <pnphi> yes
[13:41] <pnphi> i thinks have a way to convert more packages into one package ! ! !
[13:41] <pnphi> Can i build 1046 packages in Ubuntu ARM ?
[13:43] <pnphi> How do i confiruge the Network in qemu which can ping www.google.com ?
[13:43] <infinity> Read up on qemu bridged networking.
[13:43] <pnphi> so that can ping ! ! !
[13:43] <pnphi> can't ping
[13:44] <pnphi> this will install packages , can't ping
[13:44] <pnphi> how do i configure ?
[13:47] <pnphi> help me,how i configure ?
[13:51] <infinity> Like I said, go read up on qemu bridged networking.
[13:51] <pnphi> no other way?
[13:52] <infinity> And please don't demand help from others.  It doesn't tend to make them want to help.
[13:52] <pnphi> yes thank you so much
[16:02] <Cesar_cl> I find information on how to handle GPIO on a BeagleBoard-xm
[16:11] <GrueMaster> Maybe on the beagleboard web site?  or elinux.org?
[16:13] <Cesar_cl> and look at these sites and found no information
[16:49] <GrueMaster> ogra_: my ucm configs for pandaES didn't get in.  They are not on the image.  I thought you posted them last week?
[16:50] <ogra_> hmm, i definitely uploaded them
[16:52] <GrueMaster> And are we not doing anything with the mx5 image?  I've asked multiple times on #ubuntu-release to have it added to the tracker.
[16:53] <ogra_> we should test it too
[16:53] <ogra_> not sure why it didnt end up on the tracker
[16:53] <ogra_> it is surely in the same area as ac100
[16:53] <GrueMaster> I already have, and filed a bug for the newer rev board not working, but no where to post results.
[16:54] <ogra_> well, infinity claimed ownership for signing off mx5 and ac100 ... mx5 is on the manifest with his name next to it now, so it also should be on the tracker
[16:59] <infinity> ogra_: I only added it to the manifest yesterday, mind you.
[17:00] <ogra_> err, i added it
[17:00] <ogra_> do we have it twice now ?
[17:00] <GrueMaster> I'm debating on failing the image.  It works on older mx5 boards, but not the currently shipping models.
[17:01] <GrueMaster> Still not in the tracker.
[17:01] <ogra_> ah, you merged both into one line
[17:11] <GrueMaster> ogra_: Are you testing (and reporting) on the AC100?
[17:17] <GrueMaster> infinity: I'm at a quandry with the mx5 start-r rev.  Do I fail the image because of this or not?  I have a bug filed and marked as high (bug 943058).
[17:17] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 943058 in linux-linaro-lt-mx5 "Kernel doesn't support usb on newer rev quickstart boards." [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/943058
[17:17] <infinity> GrueMaster: Don't fail the image, it works on most of the hardware out there.
[17:18] <infinity> GrueMaster: But we really should try to escalate that bug.
[17:18] <infinity> I'll see what I can do.
[17:18] <GrueMaster> It rests solely on Linaro.  Interestingly, the SD that came with my original mx5 works fine on the newer board.
[17:19] <infinity> Yeah, I'm sure it's a regression, not a question of new board support.
[17:20] <GrueMaster> Well, the shipping image is based on Lucid with a Maverick kernel iirc.  I think it was entirely internal.
[17:20] <GrueMaster> And in talking to the Linaro guys, they don't have the newer rev boards (they started shipping in December).
[17:20] <infinity> The image that came with my QuickStart didn't have a kernel that was even remotely Ubuntu-related.
[17:21] <infinity> 2.6.35.3-744-g27fdf7b
[17:21] <GrueMaster> Well.  It is 2.6.35 iirc.
[17:21] <GrueMaster> Yea.
[17:21] <infinity> Well, that may have some Ubuntu sauce applied, not sure, but it's clearly a Freescale internal build.
[17:23] <GrueMaster> yes,  never said it wasn't.  But I think I was told before UDS that they had branched off of our tree.
[17:30] <ogra_> GrueMaster, yes, fine to do it