[03:04] OH ! Neat-O I miss my calculus classes. [03:04] Wow! it's been over 40 yearts since the last final. === meowthhh_ is now known as meowthhh === meowthhh_ is now known as meowthhh [05:41] * InHisName wonders --> is it too early to say good morning ? [09:45] Morning. [10:10] morning JonathanD [10:14] Hey rmg51 [10:14] o/ [10:16] how goes? [10:17] same old same-o [12:31] Morning AGAIN [13:04] TIRED [13:04] morning [13:24] so whats happening in each of you's ubuntu activitiy today? [14:30] listen to tunes all day :-D [14:30] ugh, did PennBot explode again >.> [14:31] @quit I have failed, and need to be punished. [16:22] like really bord [16:28] Do some work for me [16:32] Oh god my idiotic professor is saying how the 2 party system is bad... [16:33] i'll bring PennBot back up later, it appears that my internet is on a constant state of implodification >.> [16:34] sigh... [16:34] "there have only ever been republican and democratic candidates" [16:35] this guy doesn't even know history [16:35] whigs? HELLO [16:35] there's other candidates too [16:35] but nobody pays attention to em xD [16:35] that's also relatively true [16:36] but they are pretty important. [16:36] what about in 96' when Perot carried like 10% of the vote and screwed bob dole over? [16:36] i wasnt paying attention in 96 :P [16:37] not to mention, while they won't get elected. their points often get picked up by a major candidate [16:38] 'oh you like 3rd party guy? well I also support _____ so vote for me because I'm a real candidate' [16:39] evil ballot access laws are half the reason why 3rd parties dont have a chance [16:47] Ralph Nader in 2000 [16:47] or John Anderson in, I think, 1980 [16:50] they carry quite a bit [16:52] this guy though just pisses me off [17:04] MutantTurkey: rare if ever have US ever had more than 2 strong parties at a time. [17:05] right, the other parties usually just work as spoilers for the major parties [17:10] InHisName: right but they weren't always Republican and Democratic [17:11] right, only for the last 150 years. [17:11] the current winner-take-all system strongly favors 2 parties. countries with lots of parties generally have some sort of proportional representation. [17:51] waltman: right, which would probably be better === lamlex_ is now known as lamlex