[01:41] <skaet> hmm... just spotted the crontab needed turning on.   Missed the start of the day UTC so some may need to be manually generated.
[01:42]  * skaet turns on the crontab
[01:42] <skaet> for daily images
[01:46] <skaet> ~cdimage/.isotracker.conf now updated to "Precise Daily"
[01:54] <skaet> infinity, slangasek,  if either of you are around, could you take care of: Revert changes to debian-cd/CONF.sh
[02:26] <skaet> infinity,  just noticed that the mx5 image didn't get posted.   can you see if you can figure it out?
[05:38] <pitti> Good morning
[05:39] <pitti> Riddell: publish-image-set.py also outputs the rm -rf www.prev and cp -al commands,  so just follow those
[05:40] <pitti> Riddell, skaet: congrats to beta-1, nicely done!
[05:59] <slangasek> skaet: debian-cd/CONF.sh fixed; mx5 published
[07:57] <Riddell> slangasek: you edited the .htaccess in cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/precise/beta-1/ to remove the slashdot redirect?
[07:57] <Riddell> why's that?
[07:57] <Riddell> they are still linking to the wrong location
[08:12]  * Riddell adds it back
[10:11] <micahg> doko: are we not doing a second archive rebuild or has it just been deferred?
[10:25] <doko> micahg, deferred
[10:25] <micahg> doko: do we know until when?
[10:25] <doko> micahg, likely beta2, maybe before
[10:25] <micahg> ok, thanks
[13:30] <mdeslaur> Hello. Could someone please grant me a FFe for a new version of my pasaffe package?  LP: #944789
[13:44] <ScottK> Looking
[13:45] <ScottK> mdeslaur: Done.
[13:48] <nessita> hello all! can anyone confirm if this bug requires a UIFe? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-control-panel/+bug/944120
[13:48] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 944120 in ubuntuone-control-panel "Order of the buttons is wrong on the settings tab in the qt control panel for Ubuntu" [Undecided,New]
[13:48] <mdeslaur> thanks ScottK :)
[13:49] <ScottK> nessita: It does, but just get an ack from the docs team and it's no problem.
[13:49] <nessita> ScottK: thanks, I will
[14:27] <skaet> pitti,  good morning.  :)  thanks for taking care of the mx image.
[14:28] <skaet> Riddell,  good afternoon - around?
[14:32] <Riddell> hi skaet
[14:38] <stgraber> just filed bug 944849 (so far, just want to have the proposal reviewed before I start spending time on it)
[14:38] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 944849 in isc-dhcp "[FFe] converting isc-dhcp from sysvinit to upstart" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/944849
[14:39] <skaet> hi Riddell,  :)   just noticed one of the images ok'd for release didn't get published,  specifically Ubuntu desktop powerpc had enough testing this time around it looks like the image is basically usable with some workarounds.
[14:39] <stgraber> (use case is to make dual-stack dhcp servers and relays work)
[14:39] <skaet> It belongs on: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/precise/beta-1/ page.
[14:39] <Riddell> skaet: I think I did run ARCHES='powerpc' for-project ubuntu publish-release daily-live 20120228.1 desktop named beta-1
[14:40] <Riddell> and it didn't do anything
[14:40] <Riddell> so I assumed it was incorrect
[14:40] <Riddell> skaet: shall I try again?
[14:40] <skaet> interesting...  yes please try again.
[14:41] <Riddell> skaet: hmm 20120228.1 is gone
[14:41] <Riddell> maybe it never existed and that's why the command didn't work?
[14:42] <skaet> yeah that would explain it...  but there was an image there and folks were testing...
[14:43] <Riddell> skaet: it probably got moved to 20120301 with the respin
[14:43] <skaet> Riddell, nope,  I explicitly didn't respin it.
[14:43] <Riddell> skaet: yes the one in 20120301 has a date stamp of 20120229
[14:43] <Riddell> skaet: so whatever the respin was for didn't affect powerpc?
[14:44] <skaet> ahh... yeah that would explain it.
[14:44] <skaet> it shouldn't have - since it was an arch specific rebuild.... ie.  took 9 minutes as opposed to 40.  :P
[14:44] <Riddell> ok I'll publish 20120301
[14:44] <skaet> echo ubuntu desktop && date && ARCHES="i386 amd64 amd64+mac" buildlive ubuntu daily-live && (ARCHES="i386 amd64 amd64+mac" for-project ubuntu cron.daily-live &)
[14:45] <skaet> was what was run...
[14:46] <Riddell> skaet: powerpc syncing
[14:46] <skaet> Thanks.   :)
[14:47] <skaet> see any syntax/glitches in the invocation?
[14:47] <Riddell> skaet: in which invocation?
[14:48] <skaet> Riddell,  ^ build invocation to do the others except powerpc.  ;)
[14:48] <Riddell> skaet: the command is fine if that's what you want to achieve
[14:49] <skaet> Riddell,  yeah that is what I was trying for.
[14:50]  * skaet wishes she'd spotted this yesterday before turning on those dailies,  could be no more than 1 old version of the dailies cleanup kicking in too...
[14:56] <Riddell> yes it will be the no more than 1 old version of the dailies cleanup
[15:34] <dobey> pitti, skaet: hrmm, there isn't much discussion on -devel for my ui freeze mail :-/
[15:37] <pitti> dobey: give it some time :)
[16:34] <GrueMaster> pitti: I have a merge request in for flash-kernel to fix Bug 626749.
[16:34] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 626749 in flash-kernel "flash-kernel tries to use MTD devices on OMAP4 when no flash-kernel.conf exists" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/626749
[16:34] <GrueMaster> Just waiting for someone with more privileges than I.
[16:34] <skaet> Riddell,   what should the support period be for the armhf+omap4 image and the DVD - I had "?" because I wasn't sure if you wanted to be testing them for the point releases... some cases we didn't.
[16:35] <Riddell> skaet: I assume we don't want to do updates for those
[16:35] <Riddell> ScottK: agree?
[16:35] <ScottK> I do.
[16:35] <skaet> RIddell, ScottK,  then just put down the 18 month. :)
[16:36] <ScottK> If there's some solid reason to respin them for a point release, we can (we've done it before).
[17:09] <slangasek> Riddell: I didn't edit any .htaccess files directly; if one changed it was a publish-release accident
[17:33] <slangasek> hey, seb128 has mentioned to me that there was a problem with the freeze queue getting flushed after the beta release
[17:33] <seb128> not getting flushed rather :p
[17:33] <slangasek> apparently the queue was only partially flushed, leading to packages staying in the queue overnight that were supposed to get flushed
[17:34] <slangasek> I see the wiki page doesn't actually mention the need to flush the queue, so I'm fixing that
[17:34] <ScottK> I started emptying it, but then was offline all evening.
[17:34] <slangasek> aha
[17:34] <slangasek> ScottK: so the partialness of it was a limitation of the UI?
[17:34] <ScottK> Yes.
[17:35] <ScottK> Right now it's 3 -5 packages at a time or you get a timeout.
[17:35] <slangasek> right
[17:35] <ScottK> Also I was trying to dribble them in a bit just in case there was an OMFG right after the release.
[17:35] <ScottK> But that was probably me being more careful than I needed to be.
[17:36] <slangasek> well, I think it's better to just get them all flushed out... and a few of us still have shell access to do that in one go without timeouts :P
[17:36] <skaet> slangasek, thanks for adding it to the WIKI.
[17:36] <slangasek> ScottK: so rather than feeling the need to painfully iterate the web UI, do you want to poke one of us to do the flushing?
[17:37]  * skaet was under the impression that opening the archive would drain it automatically, but should have checked. :/
[17:37] <seb128> just for the record the reason it's annoying is that there is a bug in the new lightdm and rather than figuring it out on friday morning we figured it out on friday end of european day
[17:37] <slangasek> (though now it's on the checklist so hopefully won't require poking in the future)
[17:37] <seb128> (landing a flush on friday is a bad timing to deal with potential issues)
[17:37] <ScottK> Yes.  That's why I started pushing it out Thursday night.
[17:38] <ScottK> slangasek: Repeatedly clicking on slow/unreliable LP pages at least lets me feel useful.
[17:38] <slangasek> heh
[17:38] <ScottK> Is that exposed through the LP API yet?
[17:39]  * ScottK wonders
[17:42] <slangasek> which part?
[17:42] <ScottK> The accepting a package part
[17:42] <ScottK> (i.e. can we make it so that I don't have to use the LP U/I anymore)
[17:43] <slangasek> ah, no idea
[20:22] <skaet> Riddell,  flavour vs. flavor - text had flavor in it, and http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/derivatives has "Recognized flavors" as the title,  so am going to unify the spelling of the title of the page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavours to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors so its all consistent.
[20:22] <skaet> added redirects as well, so no matter what you type,  path to content should work.
[22:06] <Riddell> thanks skaet
[22:16] <skaet> Riddell,  thanks for making the change.  :)
[22:21] <Riddell> of course there's a whole "derivatives team" that needs changed
[22:23] <skaet> yeah I noticed that earlier...  more than a 5 minute tweak for that one.  :P
[22:25] <stgraber> ouch, I stopped counting the number of places where we aren't consistent a long time ago ;)
[22:27] <stgraber> the flavour vs flavor part is one issue, the derivative vs flavor is another big one that people still do wrong over and over again...
[22:28] <Riddell> that's mostly because mdz insisted on using derivative for many years
[22:29] <Riddell> I quite like the fedora term of "spin" but we can't go copying them :)
[22:29] <micahg> Riddell: you just have to spin it the right way ;)
[22:30] <Riddell> ho ho ho
[23:23] <stgraber> would appreciate if someone could have a quick look at bug 945236 (I currently have upstream sitting next to me ;))
[23:23] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 945236 in babeltrace "[FFe] new upstream version (1.0.0~pre3) renaming some binary packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/945236
[23:43] <skaet> stgraber,  approved, as long as lands prior to March 15th.
[23:44]  * skaet has inserted comment into bug.
[23:44] <stgraber> skaet: I'll upload in the next 30s ;)
[23:44] <skaet> :)