[00:00] <phillw> i'm on  10TB/month allowance, so cannot go too crazy with stuff :)
[00:00] <stgraber> yeah, I have the same quota on my servers too and I'm on gigabit so it's kind of risky to share very popular stuff :)
[00:08] <phillw> stgraber: we don't get Gb any more, I think it was dropped because of mis-use :(
[00:10] <phillw> But, on the plus side.. i am allowed IRC stuff which is a big No No one some providers.
[00:10] <phillw> s/one/on/
[00:25] <stgraber> oh, I never had a provider block IRC or any port for me
[08:49] <jibel> mvo, good morning
[08:49] <jibel> mvo, lucid upgrade is stalled, are you testing something ?
[08:52] <mvo> jibel: I was testing but I can stop, I can finally reproduce it on my home box
[08:54] <jibel> mvo, np, it seems to be running with extra debugging code. anything to revert or should it keep running this way ?
[08:57] <mvo> jibel: just revert the entire bunch
[08:57] <jibel> mvo, ack
[08:58] <mvo> ta
[09:32] <jamespage> jibel: I merged the reboot testing stuff that SpamapS did into ubuntu-server-iso-testing yesterday
[09:32] <jamespage> I'd like to get it and the one test we have at the moment deployed into the lab
[09:32] <jamespage> when would be a good time to upgrade the ubuntu-iso-testing packages?
[09:33] <jibel> jamespage, now is a good time.
[09:33] <jamespage> jibel: guessed it might be :-)
[09:39] <jamespage> jibel: OK upgrading now
[09:49] <jibel> mvo, in apt.log there are lines like "packageX Recommends PackageY [...] can't be satisfied!"
[09:49] <jibel> mvo, should all of them be reported as bugs ?
[10:09] <jamespage> jibel: bah - missing the media info description setter from the jenkins configuration templates.
[13:43] <brendand> jibel - i can swear i'm 'losing' windows in the Spread workspaces view
[13:43] <brendand> ah, that's it. it doesn't show minimised windows
[13:43] <brendand> not sure if that's correct
[13:44] <brendand> seems like a regression
[13:44] <brendand> i seem to be using a ppa version of compiz
[13:56] <jibel> brendand, #ubuntu-unity should be able to help with this.
[14:00] <tehowe> Dloaded the alternate beta and attemptee an LVM install which failed - however the beta 1 is released and that test case was passed! Do I file a contradictory bug there or where? New to this.
[14:01] <jibel> tehowe, report a bug against the package debian-install and attach the file /var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman
[14:02] <jibel> the package name is debian-installer sorry
[14:10] <tehowe> Hi Jibel... do you mean in Launchpad? I'll be doing it from my Debian/Maemo smartphone
[14:10] <tehowe> Also the tasksel bug is carried over from Oneiric
[14:11] <tehowe> Hi Jibel... do you mean in Launchpad? I'll be doing it from my Debian/Maemo smartphone
[14:11] <tehowe> Also the tasksel bug is carried over from Oneiric
[14:25] <jibel> tehowe, right, in launchpad.
[16:30] <roadmr> balloons: hey, I heard you had problems with checkbox-gtk :(
[16:38] <balloons> i did?
[16:38] <balloons> what issues? i believe its in the ppa and working great
[16:38] <balloons> if it's not thats news to me ;-)
[16:39] <balloons> which i'm happy to help fix
[16:39] <brendand> balloons, it's not in the ppa
[16:40] <brendand> balloons, just checkbox-app-testing
[16:42] <brendand> balloons, checkbox-gtk is in universe. this means it can't be found if checkbox-app-testing is run from a live session
[16:42] <brendand> unless the user enables universe
[16:43] <balloons> ohh
[16:43] <balloons> ouch
[16:43] <balloons> gotcha
[16:43] <balloons> can you help me fix?
[16:43] <brendand> balloons, short term, you need to ask people to enable universe if they are running live
[16:43] <balloons> yes because checkbox-qt is in by default now right
[16:44] <balloons> that would be easiest?
[16:44] <brendand> balloons, longer term, get checkbox-gtk built in your ppa
[16:44] <brendand> roadmr probably knows better how to do that than me
[16:44] <brendand> balloons, longest term. switch to checkbox-qt
[16:44] <brendand> but we're not there yet
[16:45] <balloons> yes, beta2 i hope to be using checkboxqt
[16:45] <balloons> but we'll see where it is and where i am
[16:46] <balloons> how did you hear about the issue?
[16:46] <balloons> i'll update the docs now
[16:46] <brendand> sorry about this, a decision was taken without being thought all the way through
[16:51] <tehowe> Jibel, I've filed 944945 against debian installer for the alternate install ISO. Can't get logs off the machine but can report on their content via Launchpad :)
[16:55] <jibel> tehowe, without the error it is impossible to know which package failed to install.
[16:55] <jibel> tehowe, when it fails you can switch to a console with ctrl+arrow
[16:57] <jibel> the take a picture if you cannot get the logs off the machine, or try to mount an external drive or usb stick and copy /var/log/syslog on it
[16:57] <jibel> s/the/then
[16:59] <balloons> brendand, no worries. i knew about the decision.. just a ton going on this week, it slipped thru. i didn't want to hold u shipping checkbox-qt
[16:59] <tehowe> Okay I will try to see if a stick shows up in /dev and try to mount it then jibel
[17:00] <tehowe> Log is very long so not sure how to find what's relevant if I have to take a photo?
[17:01] <tehowe> Just pls don't close bug yet as it's been around for a while
[17:01] <jibel> tehowe, if you don't do anything after the crash the error should be near the end of the log
[17:02] <jibel> tehowe, I don't have the intention to close it :)
[17:02] <tehowe> Okay :)
[17:04] <jibel> you can also try to find something in the log that looks like an error. you can use nano to edit it in the installer environment
[17:08] <roadmr> brendand, balloons: well if the plan is to use checkbox-qt eventually, I think the best short-term fix is to ask people to enable universe
[17:34] <roadmr> balloons: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/944980
[17:34] <roadmr> balloons: checkbox should be back in main once this bug gets looked at (hopefully!)
[17:35] <roadmr> balloons: er, make that checkbox-gtk
[17:42] <Sweetshark> hi there!
[17:44] <Sweetshark> balloons seems to be afk right now. Can anyone help Sophie out getting started with checkbox here: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Ubuntu-Canonical-doing-more-manual-testing-for-LibreOffice-tp3772178p3793462.html ?
[17:45] <Sweetshark> I have no experience with it at all and am a bit overcommited to learn the details and communicate them coherently.
[17:46] <Sweetshark> this would be very important to get the existing upstream litmus tests into checkbox so that we have good coverage there.
[19:00] <botfather> so how to i start a new instance of chromium ? i need a second browser
[19:01] <botfather> and is there a way to have my session saved ? ubuntu used to keep track of what dir my xterms were working in as well
[19:01] <botfather> hmm
[19:03] <botfather> haha right click the icon was a good plan ;]
[19:23] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all!
[19:30] <balloons> hey.. back now
[19:30] <balloons> sorry, i'm going to be afk a bit on irc today
[19:30] <balloons> sweetshark, what all do you need?
[21:35] <anon1905> hi
[21:36] <anon1905> I need help with pulling a branch for checkbox testing
[21:36] <anon1905> When I ran "bzr branch lp:~nskaggs/checkbox/checkbox-app-testing" in terminal, it gave the error message "bzr branch lp:~nskaggs/checkbox/checkbox-app-testing Permission denied (publickey). ConnectionReset reading response for 'BzrDir.open_2.1', retrying Permission denied (publickey). bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist."
[21:37] <balloons> hi anon1905
[21:37] <anon1905> hi balloons
[21:37] <balloons> is your lp enviroment setup?
[21:38] <anon1905> BTW I am new to launchpad environment
[21:38] <anon1905> so I am not aware of its details
[21:39] <anon1905> I simply have an account with launchpad and I logged in from my terminal using the command "bzr launchpad-login <username>
[21:39] <anon1905> do I have to do something else before pulling the branch?
[21:40] <balloons> ohh, no worries
[21:40] <balloons> let me find the link for you
[21:40] <balloons> and we can walk thru it
[21:40] <anon1905> ok
[21:43] <balloons> check this page out. doc.bazaar.canonical.com/latest/en/mini-tutorial
[21:43] <anon1905> sure
[21:43] <anon1905> Thanks
[21:44] <balloons> see the creating a copy of another branch on that page
[21:44] <balloons> try that out and see if it works
[21:44] <anon1905> ok
[21:51] <balloons> any luck anon1905
[21:52] <anon1905> trying
[21:52] <anon1905> will ping u back in 5 mins
[21:56] <kenjo> upgraded to beta and have a huge problem booting. end up with just a black screen. if I boot with text I eventually get a login prompt. but the login hangs for several minutes. then I get in . I use nis and automount for home directory. nis wporks but I need to restart autofs then I can start lightdm and login. but It takes about 10 minutes to do tis procedure. and suspend obviously do not work ..
[21:58] <anon1905> Hi balloons, it is not working
[21:58] <anon1905> it still pops up the same error message
[22:04] <balloons> hey kenjo.. sorry to hear about your troubles
[22:12] <kenjo> it must have something to do with network initialization.  in the log the first kernel message has timestamp 22:40:52 but the network do not start to work until 22:43:45 duo NetworkManager[1097]: <info> (eth0): DHCPv4 state changed preinit -> bound.... thts 3 minutes to get an ip number. something is wrong.
[22:20] <skaet> kenjo,  they are reverting the latest patch of lightdm that went in earlier today,  should be a new version available to update to shortly.
[22:20] <skaet> this match what you're seeing: https://launchpad.net/bugs/944865
[22:20] <skaet> ??
[22:21] <anon1905> Hi Balloons, found the issue
[22:21] <anon1905> the problem was with my rsa public key
[22:53] <kenjo> can't create links in nautilus it's just crash