[01:09] <benonsoftware> Hello
[01:10] <benonsoftware> With bug 945109 and 945108 they are the same, should I make 948109 a duplicate of 948109 and just redo the comment I made?
[01:10] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 945109 in partman-auto "install failed at choose partitions to format" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/945109
[01:10] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 945108 in partman-auto "install failed at choose partitions to format" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/945108
[01:33] <dlentz> benonsoftware, it looks like you figured it out?
[01:34] <benonsoftware> Ah, yes
[01:51] <benonsoftware> Should bug #904336 be invalid with a stock response comment?
[01:51] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 904336 in ubiquity "we're sorry; the installer crashed. please file a new bug report at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug (do not attach your details to any existing bug) and a developer will attend to the problem as soon as possible.To help the developers understand what went wrong,include the following detail in your bug report,and attach the files/var/log/syslog and/var/log/partman:" [Undecided,New] http
[10:53] <berdario> Hello, it seems that bug #938645 is a dupe of 926859
[10:53] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 938645 in xorg "Unity interface is garbled when running in VirtualBox (dup-of: 926859)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/938645
[10:53] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 926859 in unity "llvmpipe software rendering needs blacklisting in unity-support-test" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/926859
[10:53] <berdario> but this seems wrong
[10:53] <berdario> I'll change it now
[11:55] <wagafo> Somebody found a workaround to bug 811171  and bug 839281 that suggests adding a parameter at boot for the kernel. Could these bugs be in the kernel instead of gnome-power-manager and friends (the bug has been around for 2 years...).
[11:55] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 811171 in compiz "compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x093bbb18 *** (dup-of: 691070)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/811171
[11:55] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 691070 in compiz "compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: corrupted double-linked list: 0x000000000195ae60 ***" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/691070
[11:55] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 839281 in gnome-power-manager "Double brightness events after logging in." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/839281
[11:55] <wagafo> Sorry, bug 811171 is unrelated to this.
[11:58] <wagafo> Let me try it again, 691070 is not related either: Somebody found a workaround to bug 527157  and bug 839281 that suggests adding a parameter at boot for the kernel. Could these bugs be in the kernel instead of gnome-power-manager and friends (the bug has been around for 2 years...).
[11:58] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 527157 in gnome-power-manager "Brightness controls skips Levels." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/527157
[11:58] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 839281 in gnome-power-manager "Double brightness events after logging in." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/839281
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:32] <JohnNapster> hello
[20:32] <JohnNapster> anyone here?
[20:33] <blkperl> JohnNapster: hi
[20:33] <JohnNapster> i've got a question
[20:34] <blkperl> JohnNapster: yes?
[20:35] <JohnNapster> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/942590
[20:35] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 942590 in update-manager "UI freeze exception" [Low,Fix committed]
[20:36] <JohnNapster> i wanna know why the does the .pot file differ from all the .po files
[20:37] <JohnNapster> blkperl: got an idea?
[20:39] <JohnNapster> if you would branch update-mnager and go into the "po" directory, you would notice that the .pot file is not exactly the same as the .po files
[20:40] <JohnNapster> bzr branch lp:update-manager
[20:40] <JohnNapster> then in home dir  cd update-manager
[20:40] <JohnNapster> no, wit
[20:40] <JohnNapster> ćoeztucewhzuiočwfvupnifopbbbwrt
[20:40] <JohnNapster> fuck
[20:41] <JohnNapster> again...
[20:41] <JohnNapster> bzr branch lp:update-manager
[20:42] <JohnNapster> then open nautilus and navigate to the dir that has the update-manager folder (possibly ~) and then go into the  po  dir
[20:43] <JohnNapster> open the file tht has the extension  .pot
[20:43] <JohnNapster> then open one file  (doesn't matter which one) that has the extension .po
[20:44] <JohnNapster> see that the string from .pot and all the .po files differ
[20:44] <JohnNapster> they differ for a dot ut still
[20:45] <JohnNapster> the string is "There are no updates to install"
[20:46] <JohnNapster> in .pot file it is "There are no updates to install."  but in all the .po files it is "There are no updates to install"  (notice the dot in .pot file)
[20:46] <JohnNapster> i wanna know why is that so
[20:47] <JohnNapster> and how exactly are the .po files generated?
[20:47] <JohnNapster> are they generated from the .pot file?
[20:48] <JohnNapster> if yes, why the difference between "There are no updates to install." (with dot) and "There are no updates to install" (without dot)
[20:48] <JohnNapster> ???????????????????
[22:22] <akrogames> Hi all !
[22:23] <akrogames> This  bug #945699 is a duplicate of bug #945699
[22:23] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 945699 in icedtea-web "package icedtea-7-plugin 1.2~pre3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/945699
[22:23] <akrogames> Yes ubot
[22:23] <akrogames> I am Thibaud ECAROT
[22:23] <akrogames> on x64 and i386
[22:25] <akrogames> There was someone?
[22:27] <dlentz> akrogames, you gave only one bug number
[22:27] <jtaylor> 945699==945699
[22:27] <akrogames> ^^
[22:27] <akrogames> sorry
[22:28] <akrogames> #945892 = 945699
[22:28] <akrogames> :)
[22:28] <jtaylor> it was already duplicated by the bug
[22:28] <jtaylor> bot
[22:29] <akrogames> oui
[22:30] <akrogames> I can help you on something?