| jokerdino | i am trying hard to make pornview build from source but i keep failing :( | 06:44 |
|---|---|---|
| vibhav | jokerdino: Maybe I could help you | 07:06 |
| vibhav | Suppose I want a package that is of an old version in Ubuntu be updated from upstream,what doo I do? | 07:09 |
| jokerdino | i dropped pornview and i am now messing with uisp | 07:14 |
| crimsun | hmm? still at it? :-) | 07:15 |
| jokerdino | lol :/ | 07:15 |
| * crimsun is waiting for digikam to finish test-building on armhf | 07:15 | |
| nigelb | heh, pornview. | 07:15 |
| * nigelb gets reminded of a particularly long discussion on a m/l related to it. | 07:15 | |
| jokerdino | when i dropped the patch, i get this http://paste.ubuntu.com/865632/ | 07:16 |
| jokerdino | for pornview | 07:16 |
| jokerdino | nigelb: why on earth is it named pornview? misleading name. | 07:16 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: that shouldn't cause the build to fail, though | 07:16 |
| vibhav | jokerdino: pornview caused a huge flame war at the unity-design mailing list | 07:17 |
| jokerdino | i know. ;) | 07:17 |
| crimsun | flamewar? why is that not surprising? | 07:17 |
| nigelb | and there was a total of 1 email about the name. | 07:18 |
| nigelb | jokerdino: It's like the old libp0rn. | 07:19 |
| jokerdino | o.O | 07:19 |
| jokerdino | weird FOSS people | 07:19 |
| jokerdino | i was expecting a backlash for that X lens. | 07:20 |
| crimsun | heh, the merged pornview FTBFS with a missing -lpng anyway | 07:22 |
| nigelb | also, hi crimsun! I just realized why the nick sounded familiar :) | 07:23 |
| crimsun | nigelb: hiya! | 07:24 |
| jokerdino | crimsun: what is that supposed to mean? :S | 07:24 |
| crimsun | ah, pornview is a multiarch casualty | 07:24 |
| vibhav | nigelb: Can I PM you ? | 07:24 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: it's looking for libpng in the wrong place | 07:24 |
| jokerdino | wah. | 07:24 |
| crimsun | it'll take another 4 hours to compile digikam anyway ;-) | 07:25 |
| jokerdino | dropping the ubuntu patch makes it build | 07:25 |
| nigelb | vibhav: sure | 07:25 |
| jokerdino | crimsun: i can build pornview after dropping the ubuntu patch. should i upload the modified dsc to my PPA for verification? | 07:27 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: sure, or use sbuild or pbuilder | 07:27 |
| jokerdino | pbuilder gives positive results. | 07:27 |
| jokerdino | dpkg-deb: building package `pornview' in `../pornview_0.2pre1-11ubuntu2_amd64.deb'. | 07:28 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: that isn't the merged one ;-) | 07:28 |
| crimsun | Source-Version: 0.2pre1-11.1ubuntu1 | 07:28 |
| crimsun | Space: 12428 | 07:28 |
| crimsun | Status: attempted | 07:28 |
| jokerdino | i thought mom did the merging? | 07:28 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: it attempts to | 07:29 |
| * jokerdino is confused. | 07:29 | |
| crimsun | jokerdino: note that your version string is 11ubuntu2, which is "older" (less) than 11.1ubuntu1 | 07:29 |
| jokerdino | wah, i used the wrong dsc | 07:30 |
| jokerdino | i will get back to you | 07:30 |
| jokerdino | well, it failed. | 07:34 |
| jokerdino | no more p0rn for 12.04 then | 07:34 |
| nigelb | lol | 07:35 |
| jokerdino | regarding uisp, i can't find this patch | 07:40 |
| jokerdino | Build with -Wno-error as some warn_unused_result warnings are | 07:40 |
| jokerdino | + generated. Fixes FTBFS. | 07:40 |
| jokerdino | may be it was a bad idea to try uisp | 07:49 |
| vibhav | jokerdino: heh | 07:49 |
| jokerdino | i will pick the relatively easier looking radare | 07:50 |
| jokerdino | no success with radare either | 08:13 |
| crimsun | uploaded pornview | 08:14 |
| jokerdino | oh wow | 08:14 |
| vibhav | crimsun: Congrats | 08:14 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: don't worry, that one was kinda hairy. It was easier to keep the Ubuntu delta. | 08:14 |
| jokerdino | http://paste.ubuntu.com/866336/ what about radare :? | 08:15 |
| crimsun | jokerdino: hmm, what are you attempting? | 08:18 |
| jokerdino | trying to build the debian src without modifications | 08:18 |
| jokerdino | (crimsun https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pornview/+bug/935370) | 08:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 935370 in pornview (Ubuntu Precise) "pornview version 0.2pre1-11ubuntu2 FTBFS on i386 in precise" [High,New] | 08:19 |
| crimsun | hmm, I fail. | 08:20 |
| crimsun | I utterly forgot to update the changed-by :/ | 08:20 |
| crimsun | oh well, guess Ubuntu Merge-o-Matic gets more karma ;-) | 08:21 |
| jokerdino | LOL :p | 08:22 |
| jokerdino | i am going to do something other than rc bugs | 08:24 |
| crimsun | good luck :) | 08:27 |
| jokerdino | is this bug still open? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-user-docs/+bug/804855 | 08:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 804855 in gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) "Typo string 913" [Low,Fix committed] | 08:40 |
| vibhav | How Do I update packages in Ubuntu? | 08:56 |
| jokerdino | which package? | 08:56 |
| jokerdino | you mean locally or in the repo? | 08:56 |
| vibhav | repo | 08:56 |
| jokerdino | you need to sync it from debian. | 08:57 |
| jokerdino | but i am not very sure about the process. i will withdraw from your question | 08:57 |
| vibhav | thanks | 08:57 |
| vibhav | I dont know any programming launguage, can I w\still contribute to MOTU?? | 09:07 |
| vibhav | Never Mind, I have started working on "Needs Packaging Bugs" | 09:10 |
| valdur55 | Cups default filters doesn't include Samsung-ML1670 fiters... | 09:13 |
| valdur55 | filters. How can i fix it? | 09:13 |
| vibhav | IS there any way I can know the dependencies of a specific program using the 'configure' script? | 09:17 |
| jokerdino | you can use apt-cache show rdepends packagename | 09:18 |
| arand | vibhav: I think you'll need to do some detective work there, normally. | 09:18 |
| arand | I'm assuming that this is a new package | 09:19 |
| vibhav | arand: The package is not in the repos | 09:19 |
| arand | vibhav: And if it is a new package, aim to package it for Debian first. | 09:19 |
| vibhav | arand: I was working on a "Needs PAckaging" bug | 09:19 |
| valdur55 | vibhav, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AptGet/Howto#auto-apt | 09:19 |
| jokerdino | vibhav: there is no readme file? | 09:20 |
| vibhav | jokerdino: There is, but it doesnt list the dependencies | 09:20 |
| arand | valdur55: Oh, that's a convenient one :) | 09:20 |
| vibhav | ( https://launchpad.net/unity-lens-bliss ) | 09:20 |
| arand | Oh, though packaging Unity bits for Debian might be tricky... :) | 09:21 |
| vibhav | I was going to say that | 09:21 |
| vibhav | Cant I directly package it for Ubuntu and upload to my PPA | 09:22 |
| arand | Of course. | 09:23 |
| vibhav | But I dont know the dependencies :( | 09:23 |
| jokerdino | take a wild guess haha | 09:24 |
| vibhav | No way | 09:24 |
| jokerdino | i am guessing it has the same depen as the unity-lens-app | 09:24 |
| vibhav | What are the dependencies of ^ | 09:25 |
| vibhav | found out | 09:26 |
| vibhav | syntax error in unity-lens-bliss-0.1.3/debian/control at line 16: line with unknown format (not field-colon-value) | 09:46 |
| vibhav | Can anybody tell me the reason of the problem? | 09:46 |
| arand | Could you pastebin the control file? | 09:49 |
| jtaylor | hurray pytables built :) | 12:15 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| vibhav | My builds are failing giving the message "Missing build dependencies: libunity-dev (>= 5.2)" | 14:03 |
| jokerdino | add it to the control | 14:03 |
| jokerdino | the debian/control file | 14:03 |
| jtaylor | tumbleweed: your build status history is not updating anymore :( | 14:44 |
| dross | hey guys :3 Can sexually explicit packages be in MOTU? i.e. XXX slash screens of the GIMP mascot | 14:58 |
| ScottK | dross: Go read the code of conduct and then think about it. | 14:59 |
| dross | ScottK: I don't see anything against it in there | 15:01 |
| ScottK | Not a specific 'rule', but think about the intent of it. | 15:01 |
| dross | to cater those who use gimp for rather xxx nature of commissions :-) | 15:02 |
| dross | ScottK: I dont' think it's inconsiderate since people won't use it unless they are looking for it | 15:03 |
| dross | i.e. Bible tools, not everyone believes in "God" or are religious at all | 15:03 |
| jtaylor | well, but its very optional, why offend the easily offended | 15:03 |
| jtaylor | more people will complain that its there than that its not | 15:03 |
| ScottK | dross: Where's the line? If there was a package that contained images of people being tortured to death, would that be OK? | 15:03 |
| dross | you all are offending athiests and those who don't believe in God by including bible tools | 15:03 |
| dross | how is that any different | 15:04 |
| ScottK | dross: It's not a black and white thing. | 15:04 |
| dross | ScottK: so are you saying the ubuntu project is controlled by christian morals? | 15:05 |
| dross | that's what I'm getting from this conversation | 15:05 |
| ScottK | dross: No. | 15:05 |
| ScottK | I'm saying it takes some balancing. | 15:06 |
| dross | it would be optional and even the package name would be very apparent | 15:06 |
| ScottK | FWIW, I think offending Muslim morals is more of a concern. There is a very popular derivative oriented towards them, so from my POV Christian morals aren't even the worst case. | 15:07 |
| PaoloRotolo | Hi all! | 15:07 |
| ScottK | dross: I don't actually know the answer to your question and I'd have to see exactly what we're talking about to have a firm opinion. My answer to your question is "maybe". | 15:07 |
| dross | ScottK: let me get you a thread. i was just messing around and even told the gimp developers. Now it's turning in to an interest. | 15:08 |
| dross | http://lulz.net/furi/res/1993335.html | 15:08 |
| ScottK | dross: I'm just about to have to leave, so I really can't look into it further right now. | 15:08 |
| dross | splash mockup http://img.lulz.net/src/Untitled.png (NSFW) | 15:10 |
| === oojah is now known as ral | ||
| vibhav | My builds are failing giving the message "Missing build dependencies: libunity-dev (>= 5.2)" | 16:28 |
| Ampelbein | vibhav: For what release are you trying to build? | 16:29 |
| vibhav | Ampelbein: oneiric | 16:31 |
| vibhav | Ampelbein: https://launchpad.net/~vibhavp/+archive/needspackaging/+build/3256388 | 16:32 |
| vibhav | Its stuck on "Dependency wait" | 16:32 |
| Ampelbein | vibhav: See the rmadison output at http://paste.ubuntu.com/866899/, oneiric doesn't have that version of libunity-dev | 16:32 |
| jtaylor | oneiric only has 4.0 | 16:32 |
| vibhav | Ampelbein: How Do I build it for oneiric then ? | 16:33 |
| Ampelbein | vibhav: You could try to backport the precise version to oneiric | 16:34 |
| Ampelbein | (of libunity-dev) | 16:34 |
| vibhav | Ill package it for precise then | 16:34 |
| vibhav | will backport it later | 16:34 |
| vibhav | thanks Ampelbein | 16:35 |
| Ampelbein | yw | 16:35 |
| vibhav | Also, Is fixing "Need Packaging" Bugs also called contributing to MOTU ? | 16:39 |
| Ampelbein | Of course. | 16:39 |
| vibhav | Ampelbein: I uploaded a package for a certain "Needs Packaging" Bug , what do I do next ? | 16:40 |
| vibhav | in my PPA * | 16:40 |
| Ampelbein | vibhav: The preferred way to get new applications in Ubuntu is via Debian first, but there's also REVU so that people can review | 16:42 |
| Ampelbein | !revu | vibhav | 16:42 |
| ubottu | vibhav: REVU is a web-based tool to give people who have worked on Ubuntu-specific packages a chance to "put their packages out there" for other people to look at and comment on in a structured manner. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU Please consider maintaining new packages in Debian rather than Ubuntu, they can be easily synced across. | 16:42 |
| vibhav | Ampelbein: The Application is for unity, so I upload it to Ubuntu. | 16:43 |
| Ampelbein | vibhav: Then REVU is the way to go. | 16:43 |
| vibhav | "REVU is no longer the primary path for submitting new packages for Ubuntu" | 16:45 |
| vibhav | But I can still use it, right? | 16:45 |
| ScottK | Yes, but you'll have to look for reviewers. | 16:49 |
| ScottK | Also we're past feature freeze, so you'd have to have release team approval to get any new packages in. | 16:49 |
| vibhav | Where will I get reviewers from ? | 16:54 |
| ScottK | Here is probably the best place. | 16:55 |
| vibhav | I just uploaded a new package, Its telling me that I have 0 uploads | 16:59 |
| vibhav | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/u/vibhavp | 17:00 |
| m4n1sh | vibhav: how did you upload to REVU? | 17:00 |
| vibhav | m4n1sh: dput | 17:03 |
| m4n1sh | vibhav: full command? maybe you used the wrong URI or something | 17:03 |
| vibhav | dput revu unity-lens-bliss_0.1.3-1_source.change | 17:03 |
| m4n1sh | vibhav: " Processing of uploads is done every 5 min" from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU | 17:04 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === nixmaniack is now known as n1x | ||
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: I moved it to ubuntuwire http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/lp-ftbfs-report/historical/primary-precise.html | 17:53 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === PabloRubianes_ is now known as PabloRubianes | ||
| Rcart | Hello, while working on a bitsize bug, created a patch and commited the changes, quilt creates a .pc dir | 20:54 |
| Rcart | I wanna know if is recommends to delete that dir before commiting the changes, or let it in there | 20:54 |
| jtaylor | opinions diverge here, I prefere branches without quilt stuff | 20:55 |
| Rcart | does it matters? | 20:55 |
| jtaylor | not really, it just keeps the diff smaller | 20:56 |
| Rcart | Ok, I'll remove it. Thanks jtaylor (: | 20:57 |
| broder | a udd branch should always have the patches applied, including the .pc dir | 21:22 |
| broder | there are things that are unfortunate about it, but that's the udd format for 3.0 (quilt) patches. trying to not submit branches like that causes problems during review | 21:22 |
| Rcart | broder: what kind of problems? | 21:30 |
| broder | Rcart: it increases the probability that a sponsor will run into problems merging | 21:31 |
| broder | i don't think i've ever been able to merge a branch with patches unapplied directly - i always have to go and apply the patches and then merge it | 21:31 |
| Rcart | Understood | 21:37 |
| Rcart | broder: do you have some time to review this fix-typo branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~rcart/ubuntu/precise/hyperestraier/fix-914180 | 21:42 |
| broder | Rcart: sure, i'll take a look | 21:42 |
| broder | Rcart: did you commit with the patches unapplied? there's a lot of diff for just a debian/control typo fix | 21:43 |
| Rcart | I'm using edit-patch, and I guess that it unapplies the patches | 21:43 |
| Rcart | yes, the diff is scary | 21:44 |
| broder | ah, you used edit-patch to change the debian/control file? | 21:44 |
| Rcart | yep | 21:44 |
| broder | we don't use patch systems like quilt to modify stuff in the debian/ directory | 21:44 |
| broder | just stuff outside of it | 21:44 |
| broder | for stuff in the debian directory, you can just modify it directly | 21:44 |
| broder | in this particular case, this is a package that ubuntu is getting from debian, right? | 21:44 |
| Rcart | without any patch? just the changelog entry? | 21:44 |
| Rcart | yes | 21:45 |
| broder | Rcart: yes, just the changelog entry. no edit-patch needed | 21:46 |
| Rcart | awesome, I'll fix it right away | 21:46 |
| broder | Rcart: it might be easiest to just start over so we can get rid of the rest of that diff | 21:46 |
| broder | once you've made the change, you can push --force lp:~rcart/ubuntu/precise/blah/blah/blah | 21:47 |
| broder | to overwrite the branch that's already there | 21:47 |
| Rcart | in fact I do --overwrite for the push | 21:47 |
| broder | err, right that one | 21:47 |
| broder | sorry, i'm mostly a git person | 21:47 |
| Rcart | should I report this to upstream? | 21:48 |
| broder | Rcart: not upstream, but you should report it to debian | 21:48 |
| broder | we actually have a script that makes that really easy - submittodebian | 21:48 |
| broder | you can run it once you've made your change | 21:49 |
| Rcart | yeah, I mean debian | 21:49 |
| broder | for any package that we're importing from debian, we almost always prefer getting the change from debian to maintaining it ourselves, at least in the long term | 21:50 |
| broder | so i would have asked you to submit it to debian anyway :) | 21:50 |
| Rcart | updated (: | 21:56 |
| broder | Rcart: much better :). i'll go ahead and sponsor it now | 21:57 |
| Rcart | thank you broder, I'm gonna submit it to debian (: | 21:58 |
| broder | awesome. do you know how to associate the debian bug with the ubuntu one on lp? | 21:59 |
| Rcart | yep, adding a bug watcher, no? | 21:59 |
| broder | right | 21:59 |
| broder | that's important because it means that down the line people can easily confirm that you sent the bug to debian | 22:00 |
| Rcart | Ok | 22:00 |
| Rcart | btw, I'll work on this bug too #902485 | 22:01 |
| Rcart | bug 902485 | 22:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 902485 in mpd (Ubuntu) "mpd unable to create database" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/902485 | 22:01 |
| Rcart | It's a typo, and this time I need to work on a patch, right? | 22:02 |
| Rcart | sorry, needs to update a string* | 22:03 |
| broder | Rcart: is the only change that the "start-create-db" needs to be removed from the usage string of the initscript? | 22:03 |
| Rcart | yes | 22:04 |
| broder | it's not trying to create the database from the package's postinst script or something? | 22:04 |
| Rcart | the database creation is now inside mpd, not needed to be called directly | 22:05 |
| broder | ok | 22:05 |
| broder | the initscript usually lives at debian/packagename.init or debian/init | 22:05 |
| broder | since it's inside the debian/ directory, you just modify it directly | 22:05 |
| Rcart | Ok, and then report it to debian as well? | 22:06 |
| broder | sure. have you checked that debian hasn't fixed this already? | 22:07 |
| Rcart | yes, I did. There's no bug report about it. | 22:08 |
| broder | cool. then yeah, fix it and report it to debian | 22:08 |
| Rcart | awesome | 22:09 |
| broder | Rcart: still working on a test build of hyperestraier, btw - my network connection's a bit slow today | 22:21 |
| Rcart | broder: No worries (: | 22:26 |
| broder | damnit, i need to do more ppa uploads. "dput ubuntu" comes out without thinking if i'm not careful | 23:23 |
| jtaylor | ^^ | 23:24 |
| Rcart | https://code.launchpad.net/~rcart/ubuntu/precise/mpd/fix-902485/+merge/95761 | 23:27 |
| Rcart | broder: would you review it please? | 23:28 |
| broder | Rcart: sure, looking now | 23:34 |
| broder | Rcart: the patch looks good, but it seems like there are a bunch of bugs open against mpd about install-time failures | 23:37 |
| broder | e.g. bug #778571 | 23:37 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 778571 in mpd (Ubuntu) "package mpd 0.16.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/778571 | 23:37 |
| broder | if that still happens, it would be nice to fix those now | 23:37 |
| broder | if you don't want to, though, i can just upload the patch and we can move on | 23:37 |
| broder | hmm, actually, it's not clear that all of the postinst faliure bugs are the same | 23:39 |
| Rcart | broder: I've never try to fix FTBFS bugs S: | 23:40 |
| broder | Rcart: these aren't FTBFS; they're failure to install | 23:40 |
| broder | but they alos seem to be a pretty mixed bag - this may not matter as much as i had thought | 23:41 |
| Rcart | I would like to try to fix them, but no have experience on that kind of bugs S: | 23:42 |
| Rcart | Do you have any link on debian/ubuntu about it? I'd really like to work on that kind of bugs | 23:46 |
| Rcart | (kind of bored of typos) | 23:46 |
| broder | i do'nt know of any references, but i can try to help you understand what's going on | 23:47 |
| Rcart | awesome, let's do it then =P | 23:48 |
| broder | anyway, i don't see anything obvious with any of the install failures, so i'll just upload your typo fix | 23:48 |
| Rcart | broder: take a look: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489353 | 23:59 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 489353 in mpd "failure to start causes failure to install/upgrade" [Normal,Open] | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
