| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| jcastro | negronjl: mira, the moin charm got some updates a while back but we never finished it off, it looks pretty close if you want to finish off a review | 15:49 |
|---|---|---|
| negronjl | jcastro: I'll look into it in a minute....id you happen to have a bug number, that will speed things up | 16:41 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: I updated distcc ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/944989 ). When you get a chance, can you review it again ? | 16:41 |
| _mup_ | Bug #944989: charm needed: distcc <Juju Charms Collection:In Progress by negronjl> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/944989 > | 16:41 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: looking righ tnow | 16:47 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: thx. | 16:47 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: *really* nice work | 16:52 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: thx ... ok to promulgate now ? | 16:53 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: do you want to promulgate that? (don't forget to make it owned by ~charmers first) | 16:53 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: Yes and yes ... | 16:53 |
| SpamapS | I'll +1 in the bug just for doc purposes | 16:53 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: thx | 16:53 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: btw ... I thought that promulgate would change the ownership of the branch to ~charmers on it's own ... | 16:54 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: it doesn't | 16:54 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: ok .. .I'll do it | 16:54 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: I believe pushing to lp:charms/foo does .. | 16:55 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: We'll find out very soon :) | 16:55 |
| SpamapS | if that doesn't do it, then I've taken to just pushing to lp:~charmers/charms/oneiric/foo/trunk with --rememeber .. then promulgating | 16:55 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: distcc ... promulgated | 17:09 |
| negronjl | glusterfs charm .... here I come !!!!!!!! | 17:09 |
| SpamapS | oooohhhhhh snap | 17:12 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: hey, can you please change ownership of lp:charms/tomcat6 to ~charmers? | 17:13 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: will do | 17:13 |
| m_3 | negronjl: can you do the same for lp:charms/hadoop-mapreduce? that's still showing as a personal branch | 17:14 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: lp:charms/tomcat6 shows as yours :P | 17:16 |
| negronjl | m_3: will do | 17:16 |
| negronjl | m_3: done | 17:17 |
| m_3 | negronjl: cool thanks! | 17:17 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: doh | 17:17 |
| negronjl | m_3: no worries ... | 17:17 |
| jamespage | m_3: zookeeper charm appears to work OK on oneiric | 17:18 |
| m_3 | jamespage: whoohoo! | 17:18 |
| jamespage | m_3: should I remove the config options that are specific to precise? | 17:18 |
| jamespage | its a bit misleading ATM | 17:18 |
| m_3 | jamespage: I think they'll be two separate charms maintained in parallel... any better ideas? | 17:19 |
| jamespage | m_3: kinda what I mean; I'll update the branch to remove the PPA options for oneiric | 17:19 |
| jamespage | they can stay for the precise version | 17:19 |
| m_3 | jamespage: right | 17:19 |
| jamespage | m_3: or I could backport the packages in the PPA to oneiric - that would be easier actually | 17:20 |
| jamespage | then people can kill themselves with 3.4.3! | 17:20 |
| m_3 | jamespage: easier? really? :) | 17:20 |
| jamespage | m_3: the packaging is simple so yes | 17:21 |
| m_3 | jamespage: it makes sense to keep separate branches lp:~charmers/charms/oneiric/zookeeper/trunk (lp:charms/zookeeper) and lp:~cha...precise... | 17:21 |
| jamespage | m_3: yep | 17:22 |
| m_3 | jamespage: it's just a little backwards from the usual "direction" of the branch :) | 17:22 |
| jamespage | m_3: charm backport - I like it! | 17:22 |
| * m_3 groan | 17:22 | |
| jamespage | m_3: OK if I promulgate that now! | 17:23 |
| jamespage | ? | 17:23 |
| m_3 | jamespage: just still scared of backports in packages :) | 17:23 |
| m_3 | jamespage: please go ahead and shrink wrap it | 17:23 |
| jamespage | m_3: https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/oneiric/zookeeper/trunk | 17:24 |
| jamespage | deone | 17:24 |
| jamespage | done even | 17:24 |
| m_3 | jamespage: awesome! | 17:25 |
| m_3 | charms are almost tended... jcastro will even be happy... we're net positive count after the changes :) | 17:25 |
| jcastro | \o/ | 17:26 |
| andrewsmedina | What I do when a bootstrap instance state is not-started? | 18:40 |
| avoine | check the log on the server in /var/log/juju/ | 18:41 |
| andrewsmedina | avoine: -bash: cd: /var/log/juju: No such file or directory | 18:43 |
| andrewsmedina | =/ | 18:43 |
| avoine | if there is none and you are on aws also check /var/log/cloudinit/ | 18:43 |
| SpamapS | andrewsmedina: what provider are you using ? | 18:44 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: ec2 (openstack) | 18:44 |
| andrewsmedina | using default juju version works fine, but with the last ppa version, bootstrap returns "not-started" status | 18:45 |
| SpamapS | bootstrap usually doesn't return anything.. can you explain? | 18:45 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: after bootstrap, when I execute juju status, returns the bootstrap instance status | 18:46 |
| avoine | andrewsmedina: check in /var/log/cloudinit/ if something have failed there | 18:49 |
| SpamapS | andrewsmedina: right, ok. So you need to use the EC2 API tools to figure out why the instance hasn't started yet. | 18:50 |
| SpamapS | andrewsmedina: euca-get-console-output on the instance ID should help | 18:50 |
| hazmat | its probably the same problem of the metadata server not being configured to return values for 1.0 api version | 18:51 |
| hazmat | its a configuration (.ini) fix for nova | 18:51 |
| hazmat | ie. bug 942868 | 18:52 |
| _mup_ | Bug #942868: metadata service reports to support 1.0 but serves incorrect data <canonistack> <juju:Confirmed> <OpenStack Compute (nova):New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/942868 > | 18:52 |
| SpamapS | Right! | 18:53 |
| hazmat | it feels like a packaging bug, we could update juju to just use latest or another common version that's enabled by default | 18:53 |
| SpamapS | major DOH there ;) | 18:53 |
| hazmat | ie. work around it | 18:53 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: is everything ok in the instance | 18:53 |
| * SpamapS is getting giddy.. in 2 hours his upstream will go from 1Mbit to 5Mbit .. woot. | 18:53 | |
| SpamapS | hazmat: I think we should update juju to use the *latest* common version that we know we can support. | 18:54 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, technically the metadata we're after is common to all of the extant versions | 18:54 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: but I think that juju does not found zookeeper agent in this instance | 18:55 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: isn't there a "best effort" url? | 18:55 |
| hazmat | it looks like 2009-04-04 is the latest version available | 18:55 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: cloud-init boot finished at Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:53:55 +0000. Up 300.53 seconds | 18:55 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, 'latest' is latest, but some risk of deviation.. | 18:55 |
| hazmat | pretty minor though | 18:55 |
| hazmat | internally these all dispatch to the same implementation for ostack | 18:55 |
| SpamapS | andrewsmedina: right, so from there, you need to look at the juju agent logs,which will be in /var/log/juju .. or perhaps if they had catastrophic errors, in /var/log/upstart | 18:56 |
| hazmat | the error should be in the console output | 18:56 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: try:;latest;except:;try:known_old_version | 18:56 |
| jcastro | hazmat: ok so now /charms says 60 official | 18:56 |
| hazmat | jcastro, woot! | 18:57 |
| hazmat | m_3, nice | 18:57 |
| jcastro | hazmat: heh ok, so we're sure this is right right? | 18:57 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: but with an old juju version works fine | 18:57 |
| jcastro | I still see some are counted twice | 18:57 |
| hazmat | jcastro, /charms is cross series, add a series to it if you want a particular series | 18:58 |
| hazmat | jcastro, ala http://charms.kapilt.com/charms/oneiric | 18:58 |
| jcastro | oh cool! | 18:58 |
| jcastro | got it! | 18:58 |
| jcastro | ok, so 54! | 18:58 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: with the agents being started in upstart jobs.. are you sure the error would be in the console? | 18:58 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, yes, the metadata server error happens pre-agent during juju-admin initialize | 18:59 |
| hazmat | which is just a cli command for cloud-init | 18:59 |
| hazmat | andrewsmedina, can you pastebin the console output? | 19:00 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: well at least we have a fail early then. ;) | 19:00 |
| andrewsmedina | SpamapS: http://dpaste.org/u7oDI/ | 19:06 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: ^^ | 19:08 |
| hazmat | andrewsmedina, that's status output.. i meant the equivalent of ec2-console-output.. or the cloud init log | 19:09 |
| hazmat | but that's the output i would expect for this bug from status | 19:11 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: http://dpaste.org/1qhg4/ | 19:11 |
| hazmat | huh.. | 19:11 |
| andrewsmedina | everything seems ok | 19:12 |
| hazmat | andrewsmedina, if your logged on the machine.. what's the output of.. curl http://169.254.169.254/1.0/meta-data/instance-id | 19:12 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: humm | 19:14 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: http://dpaste.org/oRDnk/ | 19:14 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: juju-sample groups isn't created | 19:17 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: im wrong | 19:19 |
| andrewsmedina | juju-sample groups is here | 19:19 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: the problem is my http_proxy =/ | 19:25 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| SpamapS | Ugh always the proxy | 19:39 |
| hazmat | errand time, bbiab | 19:47 |
| andrewsmedina | I removed the proxy but nothing has changed =/ | 20:00 |
| jcastro | negronjl: nice work on the review! | 20:21 |
| jcastro | so we can promulgate that badboy? | 20:21 |
| negronjl | jcastro: sure | 20:21 |
| negronjl | jcastro: checking to see if he has access to do it. If he doesn't, I'll merge it. | 20:22 |
| jcastro | I don't think he does | 20:22 |
| jcastro | he looks like a new contributor | 20:23 |
| jcastro | time for a tshirt and a mug! | 20:23 |
| negronjl | jcastro: python-moinmoin merged and pushed and promulgated | 20:26 |
| * jcastro rings the bell | 20:26 | |
| negronjl | clear | 20:26 |
| jcastro | third one in 2 days fellas! | 20:26 |
| negronjl | jcastro: do we need to upgrade this guy ? | 20:26 |
| jcastro | what do you mean? | 20:27 |
| negronjl | jcastro: how many charms does patrick have ? | 20:27 |
| jcastro | this is his first | 20:27 |
| negronjl | jcastro: nm then ... ignore me | 20:27 |
| jcastro | your mixing him up with Nathan I think | 20:28 |
| jcastro | which has like 4 or 5 now or something | 20:28 |
| jcastro | but only interested in writing, not reviewing | 20:28 |
| jcastro | SpamapS: got time for a quick G+? | 20:44 |
| jcastro | I need like 45 seconds for you to explain something to me | 20:44 |
| jcastro | m_3: https://launchpad.net/~chris-lea/+archive/node.js | 20:53 |
| jcastro | FYI I didn't know there was a node PPA | 20:53 |
| _mup_ | Bug #947483 was filed: Support for container relations <juju:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/947483 > | 20:59 |
| hazmat | bcsaller, lbox needs the bug flag to show up in the kanban | 21:00 |
| bcsaller | hazmat: and I think rerunning it isn't adding the bug for me now, but I think it used to | 21:01 |
| hazmat | bcsaller, i just did it by hand.. | 21:02 |
| _mup_ | juju/force-upgrade r458 committed by kapil.thangavelu@canonical.com | 21:08 |
| _mup_ | some environment destruction tests where missing inlinecallbacks decorator | 21:08 |
| hazmat | niemeyer, the charm test spec looks like it could use another review.. https://codereview.appspot.com/5624044/ | 21:19 |
| hazmat | m_3, what's the url for your charm testing jenkins instance? | 21:21 |
| * hazmat keeps forgetting | 21:22 | |
| SpamapS | jcastro: back from lunch, we can G+ any time. | 21:33 |
| m_3 | hazmat: it's moving ec2 accts atm... gimme a few | 21:42 |
| jimbaker | hazmat, can you respond to julian edwards and gavin panella re the maas provider branch? | 21:54 |
| * SpamapS still wishes providers had been made fully pluggable so they would be useful without being fully integrated into juju.environment.config :-P | 21:56 | |
| hazmat | jimbaker, sure | 21:57 |
| jimbaker | hazmat, thanks! | 21:57 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: my problem is that juju version in bootstrap in different from my machine | 22:00 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: in my machine I use ppa version | 22:01 |
| hazmat | andrewsmedina, juju should detect that and use the ppa version when bootstrapping, unless a different juju-origin has been set in environments.yaml | 22:01 |
| jimbaker | SpamapS, good point. a role for ju-jujitsu? or is that just crazy talk? | 22:03 |
| andrewsmedina | hazmat: I defined juju-origin: ppa, but the version installed is the distro version | 22:04 |
| SpamapS | jimbaker: totally crazy. juju has to adapt to make them pluggable | 22:04 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, after the cli plugins got nixed i gave up on out of tree plugins | 22:05 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, its moot at this point... and in the future juju will be a binary cmd | 22:05 |
| hazmat | big fat juicy binary | 22:05 |
| jimbaker | hazmat, :) | 22:06 |
| SpamapS | can still do plugins | 22:06 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, for providers.. maybe.. but they'd be out of process.. i wouldn't hold your breath | 22:06 |
| SpamapS | hazmat: go has no dlopen? | 22:11 |
| hazmat | SpamapS, yeah.. it has LoadLibrary.. | 22:14 |
| jseutter | hey, I'd like to test out my charm using lxc containers I saw mentioned a while back. Does this work, and is there some documentation on how to do it? | 23:24 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: where's the latest charm testing spec branch? | 23:36 |
| m_3 | that moved into juju itself right? or is it still in charm-tools? | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!