[02:15] <jono> hey folks
[02:15] <jono> are mailing list requests appoved by admins?
[02:15] <jono> I just wanted to see if someone could approve my new mailing list request for https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-accomplishments-contributors
[02:21] <wgrant> jono: No, it's automatic, but it can take a few minutes. That mailing list is set up now.
[02:31] <jono> thanks, wgrant
[07:19] <icedtea> can launchpad host a .tar.gz file with my source code and configure script?
[07:21] <icedtea> and also a ubuntu package, or rpm packages for other distros?
[10:08] <jokerdino> people, translation stat for eog is not updating for Tamil, would you please look into it?
[10:08] <jokerdino> https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+lang/ta the last one in the list
[10:08] <jokerdino> *the last one in the first page
[12:05] <therve> Hi!
[12:05] <therve> Is there a way using the API to know if a Ubuntu release is a LTS or not?
[12:06] <czajkowski> therve: just looking at the wiki - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
[12:07] <therve> czajkowski, right, I'd need a programmatic way to do it if possible
[12:07] <czajkowski> therve: why ?
[12:08] <therve> because I'd need to build an automatic list of Ubuntu releases
[12:08] <therve> and I'd like to have LTS in the name when applicable
[12:08] <geser> have to tried to use "distro-info"?
[12:09] <geser> although it uses it's own data source
[12:10] <therve> nope I haven't
[12:12] <therve> geser, it may do the trick, thanks
[12:14] <doko> hi
[12:14] <doko> https://code.launchpad.net/~doko/gcc/4.7
[12:16] <doko> is there any way to speed this up, e.g. doing a manual import? see as well bug 945503
[12:25] <therve> Ah
[12:25] <therve> FWIW, http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/ is what I needed
[13:31] <caribou_> I have a noob question regarding PPA : is this mandatory to create one entry for each target distro (i.e. lucid, maverick, natty, etc) or it is possible to upload only one package that could install on any target ?
[14:14] <geser> Caribou: depends on the software; compiled software often needs to get recompiled as the used libraries might have changed (-> different package dependencies)
[14:14] <Caribou> geser: no, it's an "all scripts" package, which would translate to a 'noarch' in RPMese
[14:15] <geser> Python sofware on the other hand might work if the lucid package gets copied to later releases
[14:15] <geser> if it's just script it should work if you upload the source package to lucid and copy it forward to later releases
[14:15] <Caribou> I don't mind creating one package per target, I just want to avoid useless duplication if necessary
[14:16] <Caribou> geser: ah, good idea, let me try that
[14:18] <Caribou> geser: thanks, looks like this might be what I'm looking for :)
[17:40] <mounirb> Does launchpad offer a bridge to bugzilla? If 2 organizations one uses Launchpad and the other use bugzilla, can they co-operate on resolving the bugs?
[19:23] <svwilliams> I apologize if this is the wrong channel, but does anyone know a project that has both a git repository for thier development and maintain a copy in launchpad
[19:24] <sinzui> mounirb, Lp does sync bugs status (and sometimes comment) for modern bugzilla. Lp wrote the plugin to sync bugzilla bugs and the plugin is provided by default by bugzilla no. All you need to do is register the bug tracker with Lp (it will detect the sync) for each bug in Lp you want to add a bug watch to the report bug tracker. Statuses are updated daily
[19:25] <sinzui> svwilliams, https://code.launchpad.net/nova does.
[19:26] <mounirb> sinzui - excellent and thank you for your reply - Does Launchpad has the same for Jira?
[19:26] <svwilliams> sinzui, fantastic thats exactly what I needed to see
[19:28] <sinzui> mounirb, No. There is an existing feature request to support jira
[19:28] <sinzui> mounirb, Bug #157488
[19:29] <mounirb> sinzui, great I will subscribe to that bug
[19:47] <davmor2> Hey guys the fact that unknown rated bugs are set above critical is that a bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/~<username>
[19:57] <lifeless> davmor2: whats the actual page you are looking at?
[19:58] <davmor2> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~davmor2
[19:59] <davmor2> lifeless: I see 5-6 unknown then all the criticals, highs, mediums
[20:00] <lifeless> so yes, I'm fairly sure that is deliberate - unknown is untriaged which means it could be critical
[20:01] <lifeless> (and triaging it will both move it on and make its status clear
[20:02] <davmor2> lifeless: that's okay I wasn't sure if it was deliberate or not