wendar | I'd like to get that first lens pushed through | 18:27 |
---|---|---|
wendar | any meta thoughts on the repo layout? | 18:27 |
wendar | should I send it to vote? | 18:27 |
wendar | sounds like mhall119 has a stack to push through once we settle on the layout for the merged repos | 18:28 |
wendar | mhall119: once we get through the list of Oneiric lenses, we can start on the Precise ones, have those lined up and ready to go before the Precise launch | 18:29 |
mhall119 | wendar: already have a list :) | 18:33 |
mhall119 | wendar: in fact, if you PM me your G+ email, I'll share the doc with you | 18:34 |
wendar | cool, will do | 18:34 |
wendar | mhall119: I'm assuming the music scopes are compatible with the default Music Lens | 18:44 |
mhall119 | wendar: I'm assuming so, yes | 18:45 |
wendar | we can't do those with our merged repository strategy, will need to talk to the Music Lens developers on how they want to handle it | 18:45 |
wendar | if they're okay with it, I'd say we do one merged source package for the collection of music-related scopes | 18:46 |
wendar | the lens is a main package, which extras can depend on | 18:46 |
ajmitch | wendar: right, I think that's a good idea & the layout you proposed looks good | 19:07 |
stgraber | wendar: I'll "try" to have a look this afternoon, was planning on doing that over the weekend but ended up not being around much | 19:17 |
ajmitch | stgraber: you're not the only one :) | 19:30 |
* ajmitch is feeling a bit guilty about wendar doing all the work this month | 19:31 | |
wendar | ajmitch: aw, it'll be someone else's turn next month :) | 20:14 |
ajmitch | wendar: unity-lens-graphicdesign is a native package? (version is 0.1) | 22:04 |
stgraber | yep, I think that makes sense considering it's a mix of multiple sources | 22:11 |
stgraber | and 0.1 should ensure it's going to be lower to whatever might end up in the archive at some point | 22:11 |
ajmitch | I'd have thought you'd want extras in the version at least | 22:13 |
ajmitch | something to match how versioning is done for the other packages | 22:13 |
ajmitch | if you really want, I believe you can have different versions for the binary package than the source package :) | 22:14 |
stgraber | yeah you can can but it's black magic at this point ;) | 22:18 |
ajmitch | true | 22:18 |
ajmitch | it warped my mind when I saw it being done | 22:18 |
stgraber | I guess 0.1~extra1~11.10 or similar could work (if dpkg doesn't explode telling us a nativ package shouldn't have such weird version number) | 22:18 |
ajmitch | I don't think it should complain | 22:18 |
ajmitch | I think dpkg even treats 0~0 as valid | 22:18 |
ajmitch | so for this lens & scope set, they're all by the same author at the moment? | 22:22 |
wendar | ajmitch: it's 0.1-0extras11.10.1~ppa1 in the PPA | 22:33 |
wendar | ajmitch: maybe I didn't push that change to the remote repo | 22:33 |
wendar | ajmitch: bzr builddeb refuses to accept extras version numbering | 22:34 |
wendar | ajmitch: so I've been doing development with native version numbers, and changing it at the end before I push to the ppa | 22:34 |
ajmitch | wendar: right, I should have checked the PPA as well, sorry :) | 22:34 |
wendar | so the final version will be 0.1-0extras11.10.1 | 22:34 |
ajmitch | it probably refuses to accept the - in the version | 22:34 |
wendar | actually, what it complains about is combining "3.0 (native)" format with a non-native version | 22:35 |
ajmitch | it may be worth changing it from 0.1-0extras11.10.1 to 0.1~extras~11.10.1 as stgraber suggested, for native packages | 22:35 |
wendar | yeah, could be (worth the change to ~), but if we were going to change I'd rather change all over, so we don't have to explain two version number schemes to developers | 23:26 |
wendar | they can't get our current scheme right, so I hesitate to introduce any more complexity | 23:26 |
wendar | (or, to put it another way, since I'm the one setting the ARB versions anyway, it's not really a big deal to remember to use debuild for the final build with proper version numbers) | 23:28 |
wendar | or, maybe we can talk to the bzr-builddeb folks about an exception for version numbers that match "extras" | 23:28 |
wendar | ajmitch: oh, and yes, this lens and scopes are all by the same author, just originally developed as multiple separate packages | 23:30 |
wendar | ajmitch: so, in the future, we can just tell the author to develop their lenses that way to begin with (and get quickly to create lens/scopes that way too) | 23:32 |
ajmitch | wendar: ok | 23:35 |
wendar | oh, and on guallet, I changed the format from "3.0 (native)" to "3.0 (quilt)", but it seemed to cause the developer more grief than it was worth. | 23:37 |
wendar | "3.0 (native)" seems to be more approachable, more like the "my software is just a bundle" idea. | 23:38 |
ajmitch | so any patches are applied inline? | 23:40 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!