[00:40] <stiltzkin> Hi folks, hoping someone can help me with installing fglrx on precise or at least give me an idea as to why I'm getting compile-time errors with ATI's packages.
[00:41] <stiltzkin> I am following the guide here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BinaryDriverHowto/ATI but changed "oneiric" to "precise" at the build step. The installer retrieved all dependencies for my system but fails to build.
[03:06] <botfather> The problem cannot be reported:
[03:06] <botfather> The problem happened with the program /usr/lib/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon which changed since the crash occurred.
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
[03:30] <botfather> he wanted to say i just upgraded .. got a 180 meg download .. rebooted and the box is bloody fast like hell !
[03:30] <botfather> thing realy flies
[06:02] <botfather> anyone ubuntu around here ?
[06:02] <botfather> i think we might have some memory footprint problems
[06:03] <botfather> VSZ is way larger then i am used to
[06:04] <botfather> i think the GAE team went against the same python2.7 bug though i think they found a fix for it .. not sure how that went
[06:05] <botfather> > ;ps
[06:05] <botfather> cpu=10.0 mem=0.2 vsz=453548 rss=20944 stat=Sl+ started=07:04 time=0:00 threads=6
[06:05] <botfather> ratio is more than 20
=== Claudinux_ is now known as Claudinux
[10:11] <brendand> hey mvo
[10:15] <mvo> hey brendand
[10:16] <brendand> mvo - i was going to ask you that old question about whether you have up-to-date coverage reports for swc somewhere :)
[10:17] <mvo> we still don't have it it cron :/
[10:17] <mvo> I can geneate one for you
[10:17] <brendand> mvo - i'm running the tests now. it's ok
[10:21] <brendand> mvo, i see from the blueprint you're aiming to get the coverage up to 85% soon, right?
[10:22] <mvo> brendand: yes, but we are not nowhere close yet :/
[10:22] <mvo> at like 75 or so
[10:23] <brendand> mvo - yeah, you need to write a lot of test code to make a dent :)
[10:23] <brendand> :(
[10:23] <brendand> mvo - that's because there's so much damn code in software-center ;)
[10:23] <mvo> we should delete it all!
[10:24] <mvo> less bugs too this way
[10:24] <brendand> mvo!
[10:24] <brendand> you're a genius
[10:24] <mvo> haha
[10:25]  * mvo hugs brendand
[10:25] <brendand> yeah, 74%
[10:25] <mvo> I think for some of the exception handling its ok to add "# pragma: no-cover" as that is difficult to test
[10:26] <mvo> and debug code as well
[10:44] <brendand> mvo - qml ui is 'experimental' right now, correct?
[10:44] <mvo> yyes
[10:47] <brendand> mvo, so it can be covered with #pragma's?
[10:48] <brendand> mvo, does #pragma: no-cover have to be applied to a whole file or can it be function by function?
[10:57] <mvo> brendand: block by block
[10:57] <mvo> brendand: for function by function its pretty flexible
=== greyback is now known as greyback|lunch
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== greyback|lunch is now known as greyback
[16:33] <Guest38129> &
=== albrigha is now known as Guest32450
=== Guest32450 is now known as albrigha
=== zyga-xchat is now known as zyga
=== zyga is now known as zyga-afk
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== salem_ is now known as _salem