[02:19] hi guys [02:20] 2 weeks ago I changed my pictures from internal Atrix storage to my new sdcard. I moved all the files and configured the camera app to save there, so far so good. But U1 is not uploading my pictures anymore... I checked in the Settings and I have no place to tell it that it should now monitor my sdcard. How can I fix it? [02:21] afeijo, hrm, I don't know, our android devs are sleeping atm, could you open up a question in askubuntu? [02:21] tag it as ubuntuone? [02:21] askubuntu.com? [02:22] yes [02:22] ok [02:22] afeijo: wait :) [02:22] ah [02:22] * afeijo halt [02:22] I forget karni never ever ever sleeps [02:22] yeah, he does not [02:22] karni, shall I reinstall? [02:23] afeijo: This will be fixed in one, at most two updates from now. We're aware of the issue, we'll allow any location to be source for uploads. [02:23] afeijo: No, I'm sorry, it is not supported just yet. If you want to upload to U1 automatically [02:23] cool :) [02:23] so I just need to wait for a few more days, then an update will get my last pics and sync? [02:23] afeijo: You'd need to use the /mnt/sdcard/ mount point (whatever that is for you). There are vendors out there with /mnt/sdcard-ext or /mnt/ext-sd or what not [02:24] in atrix, the internal is /mnt/sdcard, the external is /mnt/sdcard-ext [02:24] afeijo: Yes, although 'few days' is rather tricky - I'm leaving for few days to rest. But rest assured, when I'm back, it won't be far to the update. [02:24] afeijo: Right. [02:24] afeijo: Well.. ;> /me chuckles [02:25] np, I'll just plug the cable now and drag the files, not many tho, under 20 I guess [02:25] afeijo: Do you have a minute? [02:26] karni, to you I have 10 minutes :) [02:26] afeijo: Perfect. Then let me see what I can do about that ;) [02:26] karni, oh, the folder in my PC is named Pictures - MB860, is it possible to rename it to Pictures - Atrix? [02:27] afeijo: yes. are you using ubuntu? [02:27] not right now [02:29] afeijo: Anyway - what you need to do is create a folder called however you like on your PC, and sync it with Ubuntu One (make it a cloud folder) [02:29] afeijo: Then, you can point Ubuntu One Files to upload to that location [02:29] ah, got it, thanks [02:31] karni, what can I do to help about the sdcard-ext ? [02:31] afeijo: you already did. give me a moment :) [02:32] let's make that experiment and see how trivial it'd be to make it work for you [02:32] k [02:32] omg.. looks like GreenDroid has broken stuff again [02:33] afeijo: I'll try, anyway. [02:33] GreenDroid should buy you a couple drinks :) [02:33] I'm good ;) [02:34] yesss [02:34] step 1, check [02:37] k, patching [02:38] afeijo: do you keep your pictures in 'DCIM' folder on your /mnt/sdcard-ext ? [02:38] yes [02:38] afeijo: perfect [02:41] afeijo: Try this, http://goo.gl/UDfxJ in your browser, or http://goo.gl/UDfxJ.qr with your QR code scanner [02:42] afeijo: When you do, launch the app once. Make sure auto-upload is enabled (you can also change the upload folder from there). What interest me more is - will it detect the new picture if you take a new one with your camera. [02:43] afeijo: I'll grab a sandwitch, back in few minutes. [02:43] k [02:44] installed & it is uploading 1 of 6 files [02:44] make it 19 [02:44] perfect so far [02:46] afeijo: did you snap a picture or have you installed fresh and pressed "all and new photos" ? [02:46] I snap a pic [02:46] afeijo: sweet ;) you are welcome! ^_^ [02:46] afeijo: Thanks, now I know this will work for sdcard-ext people [02:47] afeijo: So, like I said - if you want to upload to a different cloud folder, just create it from your computer, and direct U1F to it from auto-upload settings. [02:47] karni, you're the best, unbelievable fast to solve stuff :) [02:47] afeijo: Also - I'm still working on it, so whenever you think somethings broken - don't hesitate to contact me [02:47] but if I open a new folder and move the files, it will upload it all over again? [02:47] afeijo: Thank you, it was easy ^_^ Just little time to make it a nice "Setting" [02:48] afeijo: Well. I tell you what! [02:48] afeijo: Current version would upload only new pictures (if you finish uploading these). If you move them into the new folder, it should never reupload them. [02:48] funny that my folder for my xoom I remember labeling it Pictures - Xoom, the app asked me for the name when I first installed. But in my atrix it didnt [02:49] afeijo: There's more! The new version that is coming would not even upload a file, that you sent to U1 from your computer. Magic! ^_^ [02:49] heh [02:49] afeijo: Hrm. FWIW, the Android app never asks. It defaults to ~/Pictures - [02:50] But you can always change that. We'll also allow to create cloud folders from the android app, too, it's a matter of time. [02:50] maybe I named my xoom but didnt find where to do it in the atrix? android 2.3 let me name it? [02:50] afeijo: Negative, all default to ~/Pictures - , unless you (later) change the upload directory. [02:50] karni: you never sleep do you? :-) [02:50] ralsina: hehehe [02:51] ralsina: I'm in positive mood. I like to fix stuff ad-hoc, when there's people testing around ^_^ [02:51] karni: cool, as long as you are having fun ;-) [02:51] ralsina: YES ^_^ ! [02:51] ralsina: I totally agree with you :) [02:52] * ralsina goes to sleep. Since it's late 6 FREAKING TIMEZONES TO YOUR LEFT ;-) [02:52] did you guys saw that box.com giving 50gb for those that install their android app? sound like unfair competition heh [02:52] hahahaha [02:52] ralsina: I'll be leaving really soon, too. Night!! :) [02:52] gmt -0300 here, not so late yet [02:52] afeijo: 4AM here [02:52] wow [02:53] I wake up 7 am, cant do that [02:53] btw, some times I need to open U1 app in Windows for it to download the new pictures... it should be automatic right? [02:53] afeijo: Well. It's called competition. I think I've tried the box.com Android app. And, as all, it has it's up sides, but I didn't like it. [02:54] karni, the current box version has a pretty good interface, blue and white [02:54] afeijo: It should be. You can drop by at any work day and poke nessita or mande'l (without the aphostrpohe) [02:54] no ssh support, but it has webdav [02:54] afeijo: the u1 in windows should start on login, yes [02:54] afeijo: Also - I'm not saying our's better. No it's not. I'm saying they're's not good enough for me. Also, they appear in 'Share' dialogs when they shouldn't, so it's wrongly configured intent filters. [02:55] indeed [02:55] ralsina: I didn't mention you, as I didn't want to bother you with these kind of things ^_^ You're the guru here! [02:55] karni: nah, I am just a sleepy manager :-) [02:55] * karni chuckles [02:56] All righty, I'm either going to get some sleep or work done, gotta say goodbyes! [02:56] same here. Bye! [02:56] Bye o/ [02:56] g'night!! [02:56] take care afeijo === smb` is now known as smb [09:03] morning all! [09:07] Morning mandel! [09:07] How are you? [09:07] jalcine, great, getting ready to get some work done :) [09:09] same here :) [09:09] just finishing boiling some more water for tea. [09:14] jalcine, tea or coffee is always needed :P [09:31] Good morning, all! :D [10:21] davidcalle: ARTE+7 broke :( [10:21] Chipaca, :'( [10:21] davidcalle: (it was scraping, and they changed their site) (and i haven't had time to fix it yet) [10:22] Chipaca, ok [10:22] not the first time it happens, and to be expected. Tempted to move to ARTE rss feeds. [10:22] but there's a lot less content hanging off of http://videos.arte.tv/fr/videos/meta/index-3188674-3223978.html than there is via search [10:22] Chipaca, I thought you were already using the feeds. [10:22] no, because i'm greedy [10:23] but rethinking that [10:23] Chipaca, greedy screen scraping, the best kind of scraping :) [10:23] TED also scrapes; I could change it to talk to the google spreadsheet instead, but that's a pain [10:24] we'll see [10:24] Chipaca, let's make a video scrapers workshop at UDS :) [10:25] davidcalle: some companies already do this, and they have huge teams only dedicated to keeping the scrapers running [10:26] granted, they are more ambitious than us; they want to snarf the actual video, as opposed to sending users to sites [10:27] davidcalle: I like the idea of croudsourcing scrapers, but then the idea of source curation becomes complicated and politicsish [10:27] Chipaca, right. [10:28] Chipaca, I could push some scopes devs in this direction and have scopes/sources. [10:43] Chipaca, any experience with libsoup dealing with wrong ssl certiicates? I'm getting a connection error problem while on Qt I get a nice PyQt4.QtCore.QString(u'SSL handshake failed'), PyQt4.QtCore.QByteArray() [10:43] Chipaca, I have been stuck with that for a while now.. :( [10:46] mandel: none, i'm afraid [10:46] mandel: if you want, you can cry on my shoulder/we can take a look at it in about 1.5 hours [10:46] mandel: not that I have experience, but sometimes a new set of eyes help [10:47] mandel: and good morning ;) [10:47] ralsina, lol at least the qt version works.. so I don't understand why libsoup is freaking out.. [10:47] mandel: because it's not qt ;-) [10:47] Chipaca, don't worry, I guess that if I find out wtf is going on Iit will be a nice blog post [10:47] mandel: different libraries different painful spots and all that [10:48] mandel: just curious, is there a libsoup mailing list? May be worth asking there [10:48] ralsina, there should be, I'll see if there is an irc channel too [10:48] but I'll finish with the qt implementation first [10:54] mandel: yes please [11:11] good morning! [11:33] Morning gatox :) [11:34] jalcine, hi! o/ [11:34] How are you? [11:34] jalcine, fine, you? [11:35] Well, I've got like two source packages (with about 10, 11 packages they provide in all) now to work and build before the 27th. [11:35] :P [11:36] Shouldn't be too much, just need to get started, lol. [11:37] jalcine, jeje always the hard part [11:40] * mandel hates ssl certs.. jesus! this is plainly stupidly hard! [11:49] i need to leave for a while... brb! === gatox is now known as gatox_brb [12:13] good morning! [12:20] ralsina: aloha [12:20] hi there czajkowski [12:27] back! === gatox_brb is now known as gatox [12:30] ralsina, mandel my mac mini is here! :D [12:30] gatox: cool! [12:30] * ralsina still has to order his [12:30] ralsina, i'm going to see how to share it via web [12:30] wait, everyone is getting one but me.. dammed I should not have had one already! [12:30] mandel, i bought my own [12:31] mandel: noone is stopping you. Noone is paying you for it either ;-) [12:31] gatox: something like logmein may work [12:31] gatox: but it's PAINFUL [12:31] dobey, now nautilus plugin (in precise) does not listen to PublicFilesList, PublicFileAccessChanged [12:32] ralsina, had to try :P [12:32] gatox, careful, you might like it [12:32] mandel, naaaaaaa.... but it's necessary [12:38] elopio, do we have any tests for nautilus plugin? [12:38] rye: too early for dobey yet [12:39] rye: and probably for elopio too [12:40] ralsina, I have a question about design.. not UI design but the design of the api of the web client [12:41] ralsina, all string should not have the app name (Ubuntu One) because sso is not app specific, the problem is that the webclient does not have the app as the input in its constructor.. is it a valid things to do? [12:41] mandel: shoot! [12:41] mandel: ENOPARSE [12:42] ralsina, ok, so the ssl dialog as it is in trunk has a string like the following: If you are not sure about this server, do not use it to connect to %(app_nmae)s [12:42] mandel: right [12:43] ralsina, and it is the webclient the one that call the ssl dialog via the spawn process passing as an arg --appname 'my app' [12:43] ralsina, but atm welclient does not know the appname, this means it has to be passed somehow.. [12:43] right [12:44] * ralsina is starting to need a diagram to follow where this is going [12:44] I'm thinking about the __init__ since appname is not something that changes that often but I think it is a very crappy api for a webclient lib [12:44] ralsina, ^ [12:44] mandel: ok, this is a webclient for our own usage. If we need to make it a bit less general to present a better UX, that's ok [12:45] mandel: so, I feel the appname belongs in the dialog, yes [12:45] mandel: and that means the webclient needs to know about it, so, where else could you pass it? [12:45] ralsina, so, wc = WebClient('Ubuntu One') for example, right? [12:45] mandel: right.That means "This is a WebClient we are using to connect to Ubuntu One" [12:46] mandel: unless the wc needs to connect to more than one "app" so to speak. [12:46] ralsina, in theory not, but it could, is more of a This is a WebClient used by Ubuntu One [12:46] ralsina, same as you can have with " This is a WebClient used by Software center" [12:47] mandel: ok, then that [12:47] ralsina, so, its ok, right? [12:47] even though I find it a little ugly :P [12:48] mandel: not all that ugly IMHO === jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine_ [13:29] o/ [13:30] duanedesign, morning! [13:31] * duanedesign woke up late. Stayed up to late playing with his arduino [13:31] alecu, nessita, ralsina: I'm off to have lunch, but here is some food for though, I'm thinking of storing the pinned certs by the user in in ~/.cache/ubuntu-sso/ rather than ~/.cache/ubuntuone/ what do you think? [13:32] gatox, briancurtin and urbanape you too ^ [13:32] mandel: hmmmm both feel wrong :-/ [13:33] ralsina, then we have a problem 'cause we have to store it somewhere, I don't mind the keyring.. but there is not api for that yet [13:33] mandel: right [13:33] mandel: let's talk about it after your lunch [13:33] ralsina, ok, them I'm off to have it :) [13:36] rye: eh? if it doesn't listen now, then it never has. that code hasn't changed this cycle. [13:37] dobey, it used to show when the files are published, using an emblem, now it does not, and it requires to re-publish the file to get the link on every nautilus restart [13:38] rye: then something else must have broken it, if it worked before, because that code has definitely not changed. [13:39] in fact, i think the only thing that's changed in the nautilus extension, is removing the locationbar widget "ribbon" [13:40] dobey, okay, i will take a look and will run in circles, scream and shout in case i find the reason [13:41] rye: testing with the same account, on natty and oneiric VMs also, would probably be helpful. it should be working, but as you know published files have been giving us grief for a long time :-/ [13:41] hello! [13:42] alecu, hi! [13:43] * mandel lunch [13:43] hello alecu1 [13:43] buenos días! [13:44] are we near u1sdtool unhanging? [13:44] nessita, buenas [13:44] muy buenas! [13:44] dobey: would fixing bug #947711 require a UIFe? [13:44] hola rye, gatox :-) [13:44] hello nessita [13:44] hola ralsina [13:45] nessita: removed the version from the manpage if you want to merge it [13:45] ralsina: already looking [13:45] nessita: also, I have a brach to fix bug #947711 (we are showing the wrong filechooser), but am not sure if it needs a UIFe [13:46] ralsina: looking at the bug report [13:46] dobey: hola! were you able to check if tarmac for u1client was stucked? I have this branch approved for 22 hours now :-) https://code.launchpad.net/~nataliabidart/ubuntuone-client/15-minutes/+merge/95900 [13:47] ralsina: i don't think so [13:47] dobey, nessita: if it doesn't, I would like to have that merged in the release (it's a very simple fix) [13:48] ralsina: what I don't like is having 2 different file choosers depending on the platform... is there any way to research this a little bit further to see if we can use the same in both? [13:48] nessita: i guess when openstack went boom yesterday, it had a lock held. should get picked up now [13:48] nessita: the logical thing is to use the native chooser on each platform [13:49] ralsina: also, I personally don't see this bug as a release blocker... would you agree to have it merge for the next release? (is still before beta-2_ [13:49] ) [13:49] nessita: we are not using the native one on windows because of a Qt bug, but that's temporary [13:49] nessita: sure, no problem [13:49] ralsina: so, if we swicth to use natuve file choosers... we still need to workaround the bug in windows, no? [13:49] * dobey has a bunch of branches that need reviews [13:50] nessita: we don't switch on windows until the bug is fixed on Qt. That way we have a windows-only bug [13:50] nessita: instead of a bug in both platforms :-) [13:50] dobey: I did one! [13:51] ralsina: regarding the manpage branch... perhaps you did not push the changes? I don't see the new revno on LP nor when local branching [13:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/libubuntuone/fix-crits/+merge/96008 [13:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/ubuntuone-installer/string-change/+merge/96037 [13:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/libubuntuone/u1ms-load-fixes/+merge/96046 [13:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/rhythmbox-ubuntuone/url-handler/+merge/96045 [13:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/rhythmbox-ubuntuone/fix-preview/+merge/95982 === JackyAlcine_ is now known as jalcine [13:52] dobey: I think you missed one change in the installer branch... we also need to change 'Discover your personal cloud" [13:53] dobey: ie, remove "the freedom of" === jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine_ === JackyAlcine_ is now known as jalcine_ [13:54] eh? [13:54] nessita: let me check the man branch [13:54] nessita: indeed not pushed sigh [13:54] nessita: there it is [13:54] oh [13:55] that is just silly [13:55] :-/ [13:57] dobey: why? [13:57] ralsina: ack [13:58] nessita: because it changes the messaging in a slightly pointless way, and seemingly for no reason other than for the sake of changing something. but whatever, i don't feel like bothering about it any more. i already changed/pushed it [14:00] dobey: thanks [14:01] rye: just manual tests [14:01] elopio, could you please point me towards them? [14:03] rye: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Applications/UbuntuOne/11.10#Sharing_and_publishing [14:03] elopio, thank you [14:03] rye: np. [14:05] nessita, dobey: are we not doing the change in installer to show the cloud image? Ad if so why? [14:07] ralsina: because this is the result of the discussion yesterday of the strings being too specific about plan and feature availability. [14:07] dobey: that is about strings, but what about the image itself? [14:07] ralsina: see the last comment from rtgrant on the bug. [14:08] dobey: bug number handy? [14:08] dobey: approved [14:08] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-installer/+bug/944982 [14:08] Ubuntu bug 944982 in ubuntuone-installer trunk "[UIFe] Changes to the ubuntuone-installer Splash Screen" [High,Triaged] [14:08] dobey: thanks, looking [14:14] ralsina: I'm looking at https://code.launchpad.net/~ralsina/ubuntuone-control-panel/go-native/+merge/96123, is there any constant for the 0 in the linux side? [14:14] nessita: 0 is the default [14:14] ralsina: that was no my question :-P [14:15] nessita: ok, no, there isn't one :-) [14:16] dobey, nessita: we are going to go with a mix of both mockups: the cloud with the simpler texts [14:16] dobey, nessita: expect a third mockup soon [14:18] what? no. stop changing things :( [14:18] dobey: deep breaths [14:18] ralsina: *another* change? why? we talked about this directly with rtgrant yesterday [14:19] nessita: because rtgrant understood that we couldn't do the cloud thing [14:19] ralsina: we never ever said that [14:19] nessita: which is why he went with the other design [14:19] nessita: miscommunications happen [14:19] ralsina: we were very clear that the text does not scale, we never mentioned the image... [14:19] it doesn't mean they always have to be corrected! [14:20] the kind of miscommunication that turns a potentially very large branch, into a trivial one, isn't bad :) [14:21] dobey: he [14:21] dobey: but you know. People keep on talking ;-) [14:23] let them talk. [14:23] meanwhile, i'll get things done :) [14:24] dobey: cool, let's do that ;-) [14:26] i did it already. but now you've gone and changed things, so it's no longer done. :( [14:34] ralsina: my ideas for the windows root problem suddenly fell apart. i'm on XP as admin, running an admin command prompt, and sd runs fine. i commented on an issue to get more user info because i can only reproduce this if i really go out of my way, which people probably are not doing [14:34] briancurtin: yes, that's what happened with my "solution" :-/ [14:35] briancurtin: I could never make it fail, but a bunch of users can [14:35] the only way i got it was to shut down the sd that gets started up for you, then run your own in an explicit admin cmd, but i cant imagine why anyone would be doing that (most dont even know how) [14:36] (on win7) [14:36] briancurtin: yes, in that case, it's ok to fail :-( [14:36] briancurtin: maybe it's something about the user profiles [14:37] ralsina: could be, hopefully i can get more info back [14:37] briancurtin: maybe you can contact some of the users who had the issue [14:38] nessita, ralsina when you have a moment please: https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-sso-client/ugly-reset/+merge/96130 [14:38] ralsina: the bug i'm assigned to (#930398) was created by joshuahoover based on what users are seeing. i'll dig around and try to find more reports [14:39] briancurtin: we were getting these reports mostly from xp users and win7 users who appeared to be running as the administrator user [14:42] * mandel back [14:42] ralsina, alecu, nessita do you fancy to have a chat about where to store the fingeprints of pinned ssl certificates? [14:43] mandel: on mgmt call for 1 hour at least [14:43] ack [14:43] mandel: do we need to store those? [14:43] I mean, what happens if we don't store that? [14:43] mandel, oh, right. [14:44] nessita, well designed added a checkbox that says remember my decision in the ssl dialog.. so we have a problem there [14:44] nessita, the ssl dialog would show up on every reboot. [14:44] nessita, reboot, or SD restart, or... you get the idea. [14:44] alecu, exactly, which would be a PITA [14:44] mandel, where does firefox store them? [14:44] alecu, FYI, qt implementation does work well with the ssl certs, libsoup on the other hand.. I need to look closer to that one [14:45] alecu, its own storage [14:45] alecu, /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/ [14:45] mandel, right. But is it encrypted? [14:46] gatox: the branch you linked requires a UIFe for the bug. Would you plaase add some details to the bug such as a screenshot before, and one after? [14:46] mandel, that surely is not the pinned list. User process don't have access there! [14:46] nessita, [14:46] ok [14:46] mandel, unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "pinned" [14:46] gatox: thanks\ [14:46] alecu, that is one of the places, I'm looking at the API from mozilla [14:46] mandel, "dont' have *write* access there" [14:47] alecu, you are right, those are the global ca ones.. [14:47] dobey: I will start with the releases, I will also do protocol since you have a lot in your plate right now [14:48] mandel, probably is inside one of the sqlite dbs in .mozilla/profiles/etc.... [14:48] alecu, this is it: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Using_nsILoginManager [14:48] ok [14:48] alecu, yes.. so, the deal is, there is nothing we an re-use AFAIK [14:49] mandel, probably not. But I don't want to store that list in plain text without knowing the security implications of that. [14:49] mandel, hmmm [14:50] alecu, we surely don't want that.. it is a hard problem to solve, of course, I can propose the qt implementation (which might need a UIFe duw to a string change) and then move to libsoup and that [14:50] mandel, I think the list of accepted certificates should be of similar value to the fingerprints of servers in ~/.ssh/known_hosts [14:51] mandel, so, my guess is that having a plaintext list of accepted certificates would be fine [14:51] alecu, yes, I was thinking of using a similar things under a diff location, we just need the fingerprints, nothing else [14:51] mandel, so, if we make sure that folder where we store it has permissions 600, I think it would be fine. [14:52] alecu, I was thinking of ~/.cache/ubuntu-sso-client [14:52] alecu, mandel: what about asking to the security team? [14:52] nessita, very good point [14:52] alecu: you can ask the same guy about the ssl certs "thing" [14:53] alecu, what channel is that? [14:53] joshuahoover: i'm on XP trying as actual admin (like root), as admin-granted regular user (like someone in sudoers), and a regular user -- not seeing this problem at all on XP :/ [14:53] mandel, nessita: firefox uses a plaintext file with permissions 600, called "cert_override.txt" [14:54] briancurtin: very strange...we got so many complaints, it seemed rather wide spread [14:54] briancurtin: the problem appears once you install U1 from the installer, as far as I know [14:54] nessita: right, briancurtin, if you're not installing from the installer then it may not reproduce [14:55] i just ran the installer in a clean XP VM and it's working great [14:55] joshuahoover, briancurtin: and I also think this was caused by an older version of the installer, were the perms were raised for the installation and then they were never downgraded [14:55] nessita, mandel: https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Cert_override.txt [14:55] briancurtin: which version of the installer? [14:55] whatever i get from the website just by default, i'll find a version # [14:55] joshuahoover, briancurtin: so, our installer will promote itself to admin, and then it will not demote itself before running syncdaemon [14:55] briancurtin: we rolled back the broken version [14:56] briancurtin: it needs to be 2.99.3 [14:56] mandel, I think we should use a text file similar to that [14:56] alecu, I think that using the same format seems logical but I don't want to add that code to the current implementation, the branch will get too big [14:56] alecu, you type faster :P [14:56] briancurtin: this is the one causing problems: http://one.ubuntu.com/windows/ubuntuone-2.99.3-windows-installer.exe [14:57] mandel, absolutely true, it can come in a subsequent branch. [14:57] joshuahoover: thanks, i'll try that or get another env setup on this XP box [14:57] briancurtin: cool [14:57] alecu, so, I'll do the following, qt implementation no pinned certs, libsoup implementation not pinned, pinned certs for both [14:57] mandel, you may cross out "libsoup" from that list. [14:58] alecu, why? [14:58] briancurtin: one thing to note is that we added the 'root' check late in the code, so I would advice checking in which revno we implemented the "is_root" method in the os_helper modules [14:58] alecu, we are going to ignore it? [14:58] nessita: i'll check, thanks [15:01] me [15:01] briancurtin, nessita: honestly, the check added more problems than it fixed [15:01] me [15:01] me [15:01] ralsina: running the tests with "def is_root(): return False" on windows seemed to work just fine, FWIW [15:01] briancurtin: that was our previous implementation ;-) [15:01] (although i cant see that being very acceptable) [15:02] me [15:02] me [15:02] meh [15:02] alecu, urbanape, me? [15:02] me [15:02] me [15:02] mandel: go [15:02] DONE: Got the Qt implementation working with ssl certs and the ssl dialog. [15:02] TODO: Talk with josh and nessita, there is a new string, should it be translated. Maybe not. Look at pinned certs. [15:02] BLOCKED: kinda with libsoup and certs but I'm ignoring the issue atm. [15:02] next: gatox [15:02] DONE: [15:02] Propose a couple of branches yesterday (most of them landed, one pending for review), propose a branch for: Bug #945065 [15:02] TODO: [15:02] Keep fixing things in SSO. [15:02] BLOCKED: [15:02] No [15:02] Launchpad bug 945065 in Ubuntu Single Sign On Client "ResetPassword page has some widgets really close to the right margin [UIFe]" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/945065 [15:02] nessita, go [15:02] DONE: reviews and final landings for today's releases, teach lead call [15:02] TODO: releases [15:02] BLOCKED: nopes [15:02] NEXT: ralsina [15:02]