[08:14] <suihkulokki> Since I got approval to elfutils update, LP#934433, where do I find someone to do the upload?
[08:14] <pitti> suihkulokki: did you check whether we can sync?
[08:15] <pitti> an overview about the changes in the new upstream release would be nice (upstream changelog etc.)
[08:15] <micahg> suihkulokki: elfutils was just uploaded
[08:16] <suihkulokki> pitti: there is quite a bit of changes, not just bugfixes, so I thought it is better to a minimal update
[08:16] <pitti> suihkulokki: ah, thanks for checking
[08:16] <suihkulokki> micahg: thanks
[09:56] <micahg> can someone please tell me if syncevolution needs an FFe: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/syncevolution.git;a=blob;f=NEWS;h=1907b2f4cf08eab9f5649212c93be8fec71ef26e;hb=HEAD
[09:56] <micahg> we're at 1.2.1 right now
[10:01] <tumbleweed> micahg: I wouldn't think so
[10:01] <micahg> tumbleweed: thanks
[10:01] <Laney> looks ok to me
[10:10]  * cjwatson retries the Xubuntu alternate build, which failed for transient reasons
[11:32] <cjwatson> that's better, worked that time
[21:54] <dobey> does bug #949424 make any sense to people?
[21:54] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 949424 in rhythmbox "[UIFe] String and feature changes in new Rhythmbox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/949424
[22:00] <ScottK> dobey: It needs more detail on the packaging changes you're proposing.
[22:00] <ScottK> (can't approve "maybe we should re-enable Magnatune", need what the plan is)
[22:04] <dobey> ScottK: right. i said "maybe" because i am not sure if we should or not. technically not having it is a regression, but i'm not sure it's big enough of one to bother with this late.
[22:06] <ScottK> Avoiding a regression is good.
[22:07] <dobey> if we do re-enable it, it's one of the things i'd like to split to a new binary
[22:07] <ScottK> If it's a seperate binary and  you can find an archive admin with time to review it, not regressing is good and I'd imagine low risk.
[22:08] <dobey> it didn't used to be. but since i'm also proposing some binary reorg, i think i can fit it in there :)
[22:14] <dobey> ScottK: updated the description
[22:14] <ScottK> OK.
[22:14] <ScottK> I'd see if you can find an archive admin with time (not me)
[22:15] <dobey> slangasek: wink wink :) ^^ care to look?
[22:40] <slangasek> dobey: I have time to binary new these for you, yes, and if the only reason you're on the fence about -magnatune is because of the freeze, Just Do It
[22:40] <slangasek> it's a regression, it's straightforward to fix
[22:41] <dobey> slangasek: i'm on the fence because it changes strings. but if you think we should do it, i will. :)
[22:41] <slangasek> ah, what are the string changes for magnatune?
[22:43] <dobey> there are a couple of s/purchase/download/. and i think 3-4 more strings which seem to be entirely new. i'll have to look at the diff (it's huge) and find them again
[22:43] <slangasek> but even if built, this wouldn't be installed by default, right?
[22:43] <slangasek> so isn't really covered by https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserInterfaceFreeze
[22:45] <dobey> well, i'd guess we'd want to have -plugins recommends it, to avoid it disappearing on upgrade?
[22:48] <slangasek> that's not necessarily true
[22:49] <slangasek> I think it's more important that it continues to be available, than that it continues to be installed by default
[22:52] <dobey> ok
[22:55] <dobey> i need to run now, but i'll check back later. there are some important bug fixes we need for the u1 plug-in, so trying to get it cleaned up a bit as well. thanks
[23:55] <stgraber> is there any cdimage admin around? I just noticed Edubuntu doesn't have .metalink files generated on cdimage, breaking wubi...
[23:55] <infinity> I might be.
[23:56] <stgraber> infinity: hey there. I did a quick grep in my usual branches and couldn't find any reference to metalink, so my guess is that it's a private or very obscure branch :)
[23:56] <infinity> Really, this code's private-only?
[23:56] <stgraber> anyway, I see that ubuntu, xubuntu, ... dailies all have it, so it's likely some kind of check that needs tweaking
[23:57] <slangasek> infinity: yup, new code
[23:57] <slangasek> so it's private only
[23:57]  * infinity grumbles.
[23:57] <stgraber> well, either private or not easy to find in the branches I have around (debian-cd, livecd-rootfs and live-build)
[23:58] <infinity> That list is conspicuously missing cdimage.
[23:58] <stgraber> oh, good, so it's not me looking at the wrong place, there indeed wasn't anywhere to look then :)
[23:59] <stgraber> apparently all the daily-live ones have it but Edubuntu is "dvd" and I can't find another dvd product with it, so that might be the current check