=== apachelogger_ is now known as apachelogger === Guest8646 is now known as jrgifford === jtv1 is now known as jtv [06:12] Hi, what should I do to avoid this error when requesting a recipe build? "Rejected: File ltsp_5.3.4+bzr2129~oneiric1.tar.gz already exists in PPA for Alkis Georgopoulos, but uploaded version has different contents. " [06:12] I think that the recipe re-creates the orig.tar.gz from launchpad, and it uses a different timestamp, hence the problem, but I don't know how to avoid that. [06:12] You can not reuse versions [06:13] Any hints how? [06:14] Here's my recipe: https://code.launchpad.net/~alkisg/+recipe/alkisg [06:14] alkisg: It's not using an orig.tar.gz at all [06:15] alkisg: You've only got one revno in the version template, but you've got two branches. [06:15] So a change in the packaging branch will not change the version string, so it won't be possible to upload it. [06:15] Ah, so I need to specify a version for the other branch too, got it [06:15] Thank you very much [06:19] hey folks [06:19] does anyone know who maintains Twisted in Ubuntu? [06:19] if anyone [06:19] it looks like I might have found a bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685 [06:19] Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [06:21] jono, is the problem that pygtk/reactor apps don't close on exit? I had to call reactor.crash() to force my app to close on precise, while it works fine on previous ubuntu versions.... [06:22] alkisg, it might be related, but this issue is that some processes just don't run [06:22] alkisg, on the bug you can see the test script I wrote [06:25] My problem does not exist on debian testing with the same python-twisted-core version as precise... So I think it's caused by debian/patches/00_gi_gtk3reactor.patch [06:25] Maybe yours is caused by the same patch too [06:28] alkisg, could you test the script in the bug to see if you get the same issue? [06:28] alkisg, and maybe leave a comment on the bug about this? [06:29] jono, I'll try it later on today, both on precise and on wheezy [06:29] alkisg, that would be wonderful if you could, many thanks! [06:43] jono: you didn't include the test scripts though... [06:56] Can anyone tell me the reason for this recipe build failure: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/xbmc-linaro-daily [06:57] the recipe build was successful locally using bzr dailydeb [06:59] alkisg, it is attached to the bug [07:00] alkisg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685/+attachment/2832795/+files/scriptchecker-twisted.py [07:00] Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [07:00] jono: accoms = [ { "script" : os.path.join(scriptslocation, "test1.py") }, [07:00] No test1.py here, it's still in your desktop [07:00] alkisg, oh, just create those, they can be anything [07:00] scriptslocation = "/home/jono/Desktop" [07:00] OK [07:00] I will clarify this in the bug [07:00] Or just use location = . and attach a .zip [07:02] alkisg, I can attach a zip [07:02] will do [07:03] jono: or, if they can even not be python files, execute something like /bin/true [07:04] But btw, I can't exit from the main loop with Ctrl+C, like in my app [07:04] I have to use Ctrl+\ ==> core dumped etc [07:05] alkisg, updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/949685 [07:05] Ubuntu bug 949685 in twisted (Ubuntu) "When running processes a process regularly gets stuck and does not complete" [Undecided,New] [07:05] alkisg, right, I have noticed that too [07:08] jono: the scripts seem to run properly here, I see all exit codes [07:08] alkisg, run it a few times [07:08] does it always run ok? [07:09] Yes, at 10 times at least [07:09] The only problem I see is that it doesn't terminate [07:11] http://paste.ubuntu.com/874146/ [07:12] alkisg, strange [07:12] what system are you running it on? [07:12] 12.04? [07:14] Yes, and dist-upgraded yesterday [07:14] what is your python-twisted version? [07:14] 11.1.0-1ubuntu1 [07:15] how strange [07:15] maybe a dist-upgrade from yesterday fixed it [07:15] dist-upgrading now [07:17] jono: I tried 6 more times, the 6th time I got the problem [07:17] alkisg, ahhh [07:17] run scripts [07:17] Running: /tmp/test1.py [07:17] [07:17] you were just lucky it seemed :-) [07:17] Indeed, maybe running the same script in a loop would help [07:18] alkisg, very possibly [07:18] could I ask you to add your feedback to the bug report? [07:19] Sure, let me try the loop first... [07:20] thanks alkisg [07:20] good idea [07:20] brb [07:29] jono: I uploaded a loop version of the script which makes the bug always reproducable for me [07:37] thanks alkisg [07:59] How did my karma suddenly expire?? [08:01] It was there yesterday [08:02] https://launchpad.net/~vibhavp/+karma === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [10:15] I have downloaded a diff file from the launchpad , how can I apply patch from that file in my local? [10:17] patch -p0 < filename [10:21] bigjools:I use bazaar! [10:22] and the diff file has three file changes === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga-afk [10:38] Can anyone tell me the reason for this recipe build failure: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/xbmc-linaro-daily [10:38] the recipe build was successfully locally using bzr dailydeb [10:41] hi aviksil [10:41] looking.. [10:41] jelmer: ok, thanks [10:41] vivekimsit1: you said you had a diff file, that doesn't sound like bazaar to me [10:43] aviksil: that seems to be bug 760735 [10:43] Launchpad bug 760735 in Launchpad Auto Build System "Daily recipe: failure because of Permission denied accessing build/patch directories" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760735 [10:44] jelmer: oh ok [10:49] jelmer: where can I put the workaround --tar-ignore=.pc? [10:52] aviksil: that's a dpkg-source option I think [10:52] aviksil: you don't have any control over the arguments to dpkg-source on Launchpad [10:53] jelmer: oh ok. then what could be the solution? [10:53] aviksil: one of the ways to workaround the issue is to not ship patches in your package but rather to have a 3.0 (native) package with all patches applied to the source tree [10:53] aviksil: that's what bzr-builder is doing anyway [10:54] jelmer: ok, will try native package then === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell === zyga-afk is now known as zyga === zyga-xchat is now known as zyga [13:17] Hi all, somebody can take a look at question #190062 [13:17] ? === yofel is now known as yofel_ === yofel_ is now known as yofel === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [14:26] Please could someone bump the 2 builds here as I'm trying to debug build failures and multi-hour turn around makes it a slow op: https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesodhunt/+recipe/upstart-daily-build-test [14:36] jodh: you can test locally [14:37] dobey: not that easy as the problem only seems to occur when building on lp, hence these test builds with extra debug. [14:38] jodh: i mean, you can build a recipe locally, and then build the resulting .dsc in pbuilder, and get the same results [14:38] though i don't remember the name of the "build the recipe" command at the moment [14:45] dobey: thanks - I didn't know that. I'm trying that now... [15:06] whee, just packaged & recipe-built my first ppa package! where's the cake? [15:08] * jelmer hands rebel some cake [15:09] yummie :D just for a moment there I thought the cake thing was a not really happening [15:23] dobey: I've built the recipe successfully with pbuilder locally. So, something about the lp environment is different. Please could you bump those builds so I can compare the local output with lp buildlogs? [15:23] dobey: It may be the fact that lp is using a lucid kernel. I've been bitten by that a few times already. [15:25] jodh: i don't know there is any way to bump the builds [15:25] or at least, i don't think i have enough permissions to do it [15:46] hello [16:00] hi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audacity/+bug/355846/comments/47 is spam [16:00] Ubuntu bug 355846 in audacity (Ubuntu) "audacity stops recording after about a second when using software play-through" [Undecided,Confirmed] === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [16:02] bdrung: taken care of [16:02] thanks === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch [16:31] hi [16:32] launchpad having any issues this morning? [16:32] cannot seem to propose a merge, it's hanging [17:28] czajkowski: howdy! cmars232 is reporting that launchpad propose merge is hanging for a long time for him.... [17:29] kirkland: I know saw the question [17:29] just on a call atm [17:29] czajkowski: ah, k, sorry! I pointed cmars232 here :-) [17:29] cmars232: did you just file a question on lp [17:30] i did [17:30] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/190084 [17:30] cmars232: nods I poked jcsackett about it [17:31] tried with bzr lp-submit, i get File exists: /srv/bazaar.launchpad.net/mirrors/00/08/94/7c [17:32] i mean bzr lp-propose-merge [17:32] not lp-submit === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging [18:04] cmars232: if you're getting file exists, can you confirm that you do not see a proposal for it in your list of active reviews? (code.launchpad.net/~$YOURUSERNAME/+activereviews, if you're unsure what i mean). [18:43] Hi all. LP Bug search URLs have milestones as numeric ids ("field.milestone%3Alist=47818"). Is there a way for me to programatically work out what those should be (preferably via launchpadlib)? I want to construct search URLs, e.g. search by milestone plus tag. [18:51] hello folks...quick question. Is it normal to be able to 'bzr branch something...' without doing launchpad-login launchpad-id first? [18:52] amorphous: for public things, yes i think so [18:52] ok..so the login is required only for writing stuff to launchpad or accessing additional data... [18:53] jamesf: hmm, thats odd an unexpected [18:53] jamesf: probably can nab it from the milestone object in lplib [18:53] jamesf: you could file a bug, we should probably make that consistent with the API search params [18:54] and yeah, what lifeless said [18:54] amorphous: i think so, yes [18:56] lifeless: looks like this is relevant https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/436706 [18:56] Ubuntu bug 436706 in Launchpad itself "Milestone vocabulary leaks object id" [Low,Triaged] [18:56] lifeless: I didn't find anything looking at the milestone object in lplib [18:58] (I'm manually creating myself a lookup table for now, until/unless I work out way to derive the table) [18:59] but re: launchpadlib, I may just not know where to look. Still, there's nothing in the json returned for the milestone object. [19:03] jamesf: maybe it's not anywhere in there then. i would look at self_link; if it's using the name instead of the id though, i guess that won't work [19:05] dobey: yeah, no joy from self_link either. nvm, just thought I'd ask. Thanks === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [22:39] wgrant: How long is it reasonable to expect to wait for an automatic retry after depwait? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtruby/4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1/+build/3270370 finished over an hour ago, but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/korundum/4:4.8.1-0ubuntu1/+build/3270351 is still depwait. [22:39] I'd have thought with two publisher runs per hour, it'd be good by now? [22:40] ScottK: retry-depwait only runs once an hour. [22:40] wgrant: OK. Thanks. When does it run? [22:40] It takes about 50 minutes to run, so "all of the time" [22:41] OK. [22:42] So it's build, publisher run start -> finish, retry-depwait start -> finish. [22:42] Basically, yeah. [22:42] I'm guessing two hours wouldn't be surprising then. [22:42] Got it. Thanks.