| GrueMaster | Can someone verify the beta 1 arm images for me? I'm still getting failed checksums. This is after zsyncing locally. Twice. http://paste.ubuntu.com/875432/ | 01:12 |
|---|---|---|
| infinity | GrueMaster: ubuntu-12.04-beta1-preinstalled-desktop-armhf+ac100.tar.gz: OK | 01:46 |
| infinity | GrueMaster: Though I do have the server failures. | 01:46 |
| infinity | GrueMaster: Mirrors should be correct now. Someone should poke me violently tomorrow about finding the root cause of this issue, though. | 01:53 |
| infinity | Oh, and I note that there's a bug, and it's been assigned to me. Lovely. | 01:56 |
| GrueMaster | Your welcome. | 02:15 |
| ScottK | pitti: The stack of KDE related demotions that component mismatches wants to do look bogus to me. For example, kcolorchooser is on list. kdegraphics (which is in Main) depends on it: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/i386/kdegraphics/5:71~pre15ubuntu11 so why does component mismatches want to demote it (most if not all of the others are similar). | 04:21 |
| pitti | ScottK: ok; it's possible it was because of the kde-mdeta/kubuntu-desktop uninstallability? they are gone from c-m as well now, anyway | 05:48 |
| * pitti rebuilds ubuntu desktops and alternates, uninstallability is fixed now | 10:01 | |
| Daviey | pitti: did you promote maas-enlist? | 10:56 |
| pitti | Daviey: no? I think I might have demoted it as part of cleaning up component-mismatches | 10:56 |
| pitti | but I'm not sure any more which package that was | 10:56 |
| pitti | (well, it was several) | 10:56 |
| Daviey | pitti: you ACK'd it after jdstrands review, 4 hours ago. | 10:57 |
| pitti | right, the FFE | 10:57 |
| pitti | but it needs a reason to stay in main | 10:57 |
| pitti | otherwise it'll keep falling out again | 10:57 |
| Daviey | pitti: it's seeded | 10:57 |
| Daviey | it's on c-m | 10:57 |
| pitti | it was this morning | 10:58 |
| pitti | but for main -> universe | 10:58 |
| pitti | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt | 10:58 |
| * pitti re-runs it | 10:58 | |
| pitti | c-m doesn't currently auto-update | 10:58 |
| pitti | haven't had time yet to find out why | 10:58 |
| Daviey | pitti: it was added to the seed a few days ago :/ | 10:58 |
| pitti | well, all I can say is that this morning it wanted to go back | 10:58 |
| pitti | but perhaps it was another package | 10:58 |
| pitti | Daviey: oh, right, that was there before | 10:59 |
| pitti | Daviey: now I remember | 10:59 |
| pitti | Daviey: I demoted cobbler-enlist | 10:59 |
| Daviey | cool | 10:59 |
| * pitti promotes maas-enlist | 10:59 | |
| Daviey | that was correct | 10:59 |
| Daviey | thanks | 11:00 |
| === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch | ||
| Laney | could someone score ghc/ppc up please? Looks like we might have a full arch set this time and I would like to avoid any possibility of skew. | 12:05 |
| Laney | Took 1h49 last time, so it's not too chunky. | 12:05 |
| cjwatson | done | 12:06 |
| Laney | cheers | 12:06 |
| Laney | cjwatson: also, could I ping about deploying ben? | 12:07 |
| Laney | mehdi grabbed me about it the other day | 12:07 |
| cjwatson | gcc-4.4 is nearly finished so it should start after that | 12:07 |
| cjwatson | oh yeah, ok - I should write up my release meeting stuff first, then I'll have a look | 12:07 |
| Laney | cool | 12:07 |
| Laney | note that i haven't merged the new config branch with what we currently have for some time | 12:08 |
| Laney | we should be able to simplify the configs using the new global.conf stuff | 12:08 |
| Laney | urg, there is a new dep if we want to merge upstream again | 12:13 |
| Laney | libtyxml-ocaml-dev | 12:13 |
| ScottK | pitti: Thanks. | 12:36 |
| === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback | ||
| Riddell | does the release-team meeting have a new format this week? | 13:45 |
| pitti | I believe so | 13:51 |
| Riddell | pitti: so do I send in a report or do something else? | 13:51 |
| pitti | Riddell: the report format hasn't changed | 13:51 |
| pitti | just that the meeting won't be a standup round any more, but free form questions AFAIR | 13:52 |
| Riddell | pitti: and we read all the e-mails before then ask questions in channel | 13:52 |
| pitti | right | 13:52 |
| Riddell | I wonder if skeat is planning to do a "poke read e-mails now" before the meeting | 13:52 |
| ScottK | We should decide in advance who we're going to pick on and everyone have a question to fire at that one person. More fun that way! | 13:53 |
| ScottK | ;-) | 13:53 |
| pitti | fortunately IRC has a natural way of serialization :) | 14:01 |
| Riddell | how do I log into a live CD if it puts me at a login manager? | 14:21 |
| Riddell | oh the user changed, got it | 14:22 |
| doko | skaet, cjwatson, apw, ogasawara: sorry, forgot to send email about yesterday's gcc-4.6 upload. changes affect ARM only. will send email later today | 15:34 |
| ogasawara | doko: ack thanks, I'll hold our upload till gcc's finished building | 15:35 |
| skaet | doko, prewarning of a day before the upload would be appreciated at this stage in the release cycle. | 15:35 |
| skaet | doko, any more bug fixes on the horizon for gcc/eglibc/binutils between now and beta freeze? | 15:36 |
| doko | skaet, just a gcc-defaults upload to make gccgo (universe) point to 4.7 once it's built | 15:37 |
| skaet | doko, thanks. :) | 15:38 |
| doko | afk now, getting breakfast | 15:39 |
| doko | skaet, wait, there are still two eglibc issues left. jodh looks at 508083, and I have to look at 929219. not sure if before beta2 | 15:42 |
| skaet | doko, gotcha, thanks. keep me posted please. :) | 15:44 |
| Daviey | Okay if i do a server (i386|amd64*) respin? | 16:04 |
| Daviey | inprogress | 16:06 |
| stgraber | infinity: your metalink fix didn't seem to work for some reason... http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/dvd/20120309/ | 16:08 |
| cjwatson | Daviey: sure | 16:09 |
| infinity | stgraber: Curious. I'll look at that later today when I'm also looking at hash sum weirdness. | 16:14 |
| stgraber | infinity: thanks | 16:14 |
| ogra_ | infinity, yeah, its intresting that ac100 has a proper one ... iirc cjwatson fixed that on my request in the last alpha, i looked but coundt find a commit related to it though | 16:20 |
| ogra_ | *couldnt | 16:21 |
| infinity | I'm sure it was fixed by hand, like I just fixed the beta by hand. | 16:21 |
| infinity | But I'm going to look into the root issue later today. | 16:21 |
| cjwatson | I wittered about it on IRC at the time | 16:21 |
| ogra_ | i thought that was about the bashism in our -boot script | 16:22 |
| cjwatson | 2012-02-01 | 16:22 |
| Daviey | pitti: where did you get the '8 mins' per cd build from? | 16:22 |
| cjwatson | not just that no | 16:22 |
| cjwatson | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/02/01/%23ubuntu-release.html#t11:54 | 16:23 |
| cjwatson | note that I went down a blind alley there for a while so read the whole thing rather than believing my initial comments :) | 16:23 |
| cjwatson | I thought that the checksum-directory change I made had fixed this | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | and I think also the publish-daily change; but evidently not | 16:24 |
| infinity | cjwatson: It's not ac100-specific, I think it's more to do with carrying over old builds into new directories. | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | right, that was what the checksum-directory change was supposed to be about, though | 16:25 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Which is only rarely done in the case of arch-only respins, but now ARM does it on every run. | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | anyway, just a place to start | 16:25 |
| infinity | cjwatson: But yeah, I'll look later today, it's on my TODO. Purge it from your mind. ;) | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | I might've screwed up the -nt test or something | 16:25 |
| pitti | Daviey: if you start the buildlive program on cdimage, you can see the start and end time from the buildds | 16:30 |
| Daviey | pitti: right, but seems to take *much* longer for non-live :) | 16:45 |
| Daviey | oh, not *much* longer, that was an exaggeration | 16:45 |
| pitti | Daviey: alternates should take less than 10 (didn't measure) | 16:46 |
| pitti | Daviey: cron.daily-live also take a bit, but it runs in parallel with the next buildlive | 16:46 |
| ogra_ | Daviey, about time to produce live server images then :P | 16:48 |
| Daviey | ogra_: please drive a blueprint at UDS for that :) | 16:55 |
| Daviey | (i'm not kidding.) | 16:55 |
| ogra_ | heh, only if NM goes onto the server-live image :P | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | (are you actually thinking about live builds ?) | 16:56 |
| cjwatson | Riddell,Daviey,ogra_,pitti,etc.: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/CDImageSetup | 16:58 |
| Daviey | ogra_: Considering a squashfs into d-i. | 16:59 |
| ogra_ | whee | 16:59 |
| Riddell | cjwatson: lovely, thanks, can you link to it from the description of this team? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage | 16:59 |
| Riddell | I expect that's where I'll look when I've forgotten | 16:59 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, pretty clear, thx | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | Riddell: sure, done | 17:00 |
| ogra_ | hmm, i have never sudoed to cdimage before deploying ... good that you wrote that up :) | 17:01 |
| cjwatson | that would be why there are lots of files owned by ogra then? ;) | 17:03 |
| ogra_ | heh, sorry | 17:03 |
| infinity | Tsk. | 17:04 |
| cjwatson | can actually cause problems sometimes - best to always sudo to cdimage before doing anyway | 17:04 |
| cjwatson | anything | 17:04 |
| ogra_ | yeah, i think the distinction of production/development helps there | 17:04 |
| ogra_ | that way i will always sudo right after login | 17:04 |
| micahg | pitti: gilir: skaet: lightdm-gtk-greeter just needs to be consolidated, I have two source packages at the moment that need to be merged and I"ll endeavor to do that over the weekend | 18:07 |
| gilir | thanks micahg :) Let me know if you want help for this | 18:09 |
| micahg | gilir: I'll need a review of the combined package before upload | 18:10 |
| skaet | thanks micahg. :) | 18:13 |
| sbeattie | pitti: FYI, the eglibc package in maverick-proposed to fix bug 605042 has been superceded; also, for some reason that bug was not showing up on the SRU tracking page that I can see. | 19:56 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 605042 in eglibc "[armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605042 | 19:56 |
| === cody-somerville_ is now known as cody-somerville | ||
| Laney | is anyone available to process bug #951206? | 23:09 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 951206 in haskell-deepseq "RM: Provided by GHC" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/951206 | 23:09 |
| slangasek | Laney: what does 'provided' mean? Is this a source-only removal because the binary should come from somewhere else, or does ghc now ship it in the main binary package? | 23:12 |
| slangasek | n/m, see it in the ghc binary package | 23:14 |
| slangasek | removing | 23:14 |
| Laney | it means that ghc now exposes that library | 23:14 |
| Laney | and Provides it in the packaging sense too | 23:15 |
| Laney | cheers | 23:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!