| bmoez_ | hi, i think ubuntu-installer is very good but before beginning the instalation it looks very slow (i mean when i clic "next" at the first time, it takes a long time to go to next step) | 13:43 |
|---|---|---|
| tsimpson | that's more to do with the fact that the compressed filesystem (off the CD) has to be uncompressed and loaded into RAM | 14:11 |
| bmoez_ | ok, but is it possible to make it more faster, because many new users didn't like this? | 14:13 |
| tsimpson | it's not an easy problem to solve, it's not intentionally slow or anything, it just depends on how powerful the system is | 14:17 |
| bmoez_ | other question, is it possible to add burg like an option (with good resolution) because many love it | 14:30 |
| cjwatson | absolutely not | 14:52 |
| cjwatson | http://askubuntu.com/questions/11863/why-doesnt-burg-replace-grub | 14:52 |
| bmoez_ | and add option to don't download any paquet altougth if the PC is connected to the net (for low connection like 1 to 4 Mo/minute)? | 14:52 |
| cjwatson | burg has had no upstream activity whatsoever since October 2010; it is a dead project | 14:55 |
| bmoez_ | and about downloading paquets in low connection? | 14:58 |
| cjwatson | I'd rather it just do something sensible rather than adding Yet Another Option; e.g. abort pending downloads if it gets to the end of installation before they finish | 15:09 |
| cjwatson | we do have bugs about that kind of thing, it's just fairly fiddly to hook up | 15:09 |
| cjwatson | there's a difference between the downloads that are essential for it to do what you asked for (e.g. language support) and those that are optional | 15:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!