[13:43] <bmoez_> hi, i think ubuntu-installer is very good but before beginning the instalation it looks very slow (i mean when i clic "next" at the first time, it takes a long time to go to next step)
[14:11] <tsimpson> that's more to do with the fact that the compressed filesystem (off the CD) has to be uncompressed and loaded into RAM
[14:13] <bmoez_> ok, but is it possible to make it more faster, because many new users didn't like this?
[14:17] <tsimpson> it's not an easy problem to solve, it's not intentionally slow or anything, it just depends on how powerful the system is
[14:30] <bmoez_> other question, is it possible to add burg like an option (with good resolution) because many love it
[14:52] <cjwatson> absolutely not
[14:52] <cjwatson> http://askubuntu.com/questions/11863/why-doesnt-burg-replace-grub
[14:52] <bmoez_> and add  option to don't download any paquet altougth if the PC is connected to the net (for low connection like 1 to 4 Mo/minute)?
[14:55] <cjwatson> burg has had no upstream activity whatsoever since October 2010; it is a dead project
[14:58] <bmoez_> and about downloading paquets in low connection?
[15:09] <cjwatson> I'd rather it just do something sensible rather than adding Yet Another Option; e.g. abort pending downloads if it gets to the end of installation before they finish
[15:09] <cjwatson> we do have bugs about that kind of thing, it's just fairly fiddly to hook up
[15:10] <cjwatson> there's a difference between the downloads that are essential for it to do what you asked for (e.g. language support) and those that are optional