=== m_conley|dinner is now known as m_conley_away [05:31] guess i'm back. arch was fun [05:36] chrisccoulson, is there a proposal for using the new silent update behavior expected in fx13? i'm curious as to how that would jive with the firefox sru policy. [05:36] or is that precise+1? [05:38] LLStarks: no [05:42] i could draw one up after i brush up on the finer details of sru policy and firefox's special rules [05:43] LLStarks: no, it doesn't work with our packaging system [05:43] oh [05:43] so, mozilla is just doing this for the tarball user? [05:43] we've kicked that idea around in general for silent updates at various UDSs already [05:43] yes [05:44] well, tarball or other upstream installs [05:45] why doesn't it work? couldn't /opt be feasible with a privilege escalation? [05:48] main archive packages don't install in /opt [05:50] and the last thing we want to do is give Firefox escalated privs :) [05:50] micahg, mozilla could offer a google chrome-like repo [05:51] that is parallel to the archive version [05:51] LLStarks: we've been streamlining our processes to get updates out faster [05:51] it has been pretty fast [05:52] and as seamless as infrastructure seems to allow [05:52] heck, we're even getting chromium out faster now thanks to jdstrand's help recently with QA [06:02] it's all good, except for the part where apt sucks [06:05] no, it's not that apt sucks, it's that it's not standard practice to push silent updates so we don't have the functionality (except for unattended-upgrades when set by as sysadmin) [06:06] why would maintainers have to push, couldn't the user opt-in the unsupported mozilla behavior? [06:06] no, we disable the mozilla updater in our builds [13:13] hi, what file contain my marked pages? [17:05] I am attempting to work on adding in quicklist items to firefox for unity and am having a bit of trouble with figuring out what file these options need to appear in. I have the nightly download. Any suggestions?