[04:15] * micahg figures there haven't been enough chromium uploads this week and goes for one more :) [04:20] :D === jalcine is now known as webjadmin_ [07:19] Can I bring unity fixes to precise? [07:19] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/934061 [07:54] good morning [08:24] dholbach: hi [08:24] hi vibhav [08:25] dholbach: Did you recieve my email? [08:25] yes I did [08:25] but I received a lot of emails this weekend, so it'll take a while until I get to yours [08:26] dholbach: Could you write the testamonial until Wednesday? [08:26] I'll do my best [08:27] Thanks dholbach [08:32] Whenever I aaply a patch, the .diff becomes empty and there is no patch applied , anybody experiencing this problem? [08:34] how are you applying the patch? [08:35] patch < p.diff [08:35] the file is empty [08:35] Never mind though I have applied the patch manualy [08:35] if it's empty it's not going to do anything, I'd suspect you accidentally did > p.diff instead [08:37] right [08:37] I did that [08:37] thanks ajmitch === bludude is now known as soaringsky [09:40] Is aptitude broke in oneiric? [09:42] I've been using a combo of aptitude and apt-get under 11.10 and I've got a number of packages I can't install as its saying it can't install them due to the deps being a bit new that whats supposedly required it seems [09:42] a bit newer, sorry [09:42] yes, if you have multiarch (amd64 will have i386 added as a foreign arch) [09:43] tumbleweed, What if I'm not even running x86 and haven't knowingly installed anything from another arch? I'm running the omap4 (armel) build [09:44] I won't have installed anything from another arch unless someone has mistaken packaged somnething that way in the 11.10 armel repos [09:45] then aptitude should probably work === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [10:15] A number of packages are broken like libqt4-dev for example - it won't install as it says its deps are a bit too new basically :/ [10:15] danboid: can you pastebin the exact error? [10:20] That happens with apt-get and aptitude - apt-get -f install has been no help but yes will pastebin the error [10:30] * Laney cuddles pexpect [10:31] automating haskell syncs since 2012 [10:32] http://paste.debian.net/159427/ uh oh [10:39] In [10]: c[0].comment_date [10:39] Out[10]: u'2011-12-12T13:49:17.718509+00:00' [10:42] Laney: sounds like we should get around to writing that syncpackage module... [10:42] Oakland 2012 :-) [10:43] heh [11:25] Dear MOTUs, please look at this FFe : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/806291/comments/30 . Need ack of a 2nd MOTU , and/or upload to Debian then sync. [11:25] Launchpad bug 806291 in Ubuntu "[FFe][needs-packaging] Boot-Repair" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [11:27] yann__: ScottK and I both commented on that as release team members [11:27] ScottK offered you archive-admin review, if it was a sync from debian, and I offered you an FFe if it was a sync. So what's blocking uploading it to Debian? === dan__ is now known as Guest52270 [11:50] Here's an example of the sort of errors I get trying to install certain (mainly -dev it seems) packages under 11.10 armel: [11:50] http://pastebin.com/sLKQ8jBZ === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [11:51] I can still install some packages [11:51] apt isn't totally fubar - yet - I think! :) [11:52] Hopefully I won't have to re-install! [11:52] did you disable the updates repository by chance? [11:52] geser, Don't think so but let me check.. [11:55] geser, Ah! Seems I only had 'Important security updates' selected but not the other three so lets see.. [11:55] 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8 is in oneiric while 4:4.7.4-0ubuntu8.1 is in oneiric-updates [11:55] geser, Dunno how it got unchecked [12:48] tumbleweed: Lack of sponsoring. [12:52] ScottK: yeah, and a package like that probably deserves some fairly thorough review (I wouldn't jump and sponsor it) [13:06] * ScottK neither. [13:26] Is it possible to get the source qt-gstreamer backported to Maverick? [13:26] Or has there been no interest in doing so? (I'm willing). [13:45] jalcine: You know Maverick goes out of support in a month, right? [13:46] eh, I know people who use Gutsy still. :p [13:46] !backports [13:46] If new updated Ubuntu packages are built for an application, then they may go into Ubuntu Backports. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports - See also !packaging [13:46] jalcine: ^^^ [13:47] Thank you *clicks* [13:50] some one plz http://pastebin.com/Qd2pzRXW [13:51] genupulas: nothing to worry about there, you just didn't have a gpg key for the e-mail address you are using [13:52] but i have uploaded an GPG key in my LP with that email [13:53] http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=raja.genupula%40yahoo.com&op=vindex looks like there are *lots* of keys with that ID [13:53] so it didn't know which one to use [13:53] https://launchpad.net/~genupulas [13:53] export the ID in DEBSIGN_KEYID === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [13:58] tumbleweed: like this export DEBSIGN_KEYID=92661626 [13:58] ? [13:59] export DEBSIGN_KEYID=0x92661626 [14:01] tumbleweed: i did as you said , am i have to do total process again ? [14:01] no [14:01] are you wanting to upload it to a PPA? or just build a deb locally? [14:01] debuild -S [14:02] yes [14:02] i did but same error [14:03] gpg --list-secret-keys 0x92661626 outputs anything? [14:03] http://pastebin.com/rvRjH8kR [14:04] genupulas: the error seemed reasonably clear: no secret key available [14:04] yes gpg --list-secret-keys 0x92661626 gave me output [14:04] it have sec,uid,ssb [14:05] Coming back to Boot-Repair's upload to Debian: thanks Tumbleweed and SkottK for your answers (i was disconnected so i may have missed someone-else answer). As SkottK said, it is now lacking sponsor for upload into Debian. [14:05] genupulas: throw in a -k0x92661626 ? (to debuild) [14:06] yann__: right. But we can't grant you an FFe in Ubuntu unless you can get an archive-admin who volunteers to review it [14:06] didnt get you , sorry [14:06] and that's far more likely if it comes from debian [14:07] genupulas: debuild -S -k0x92661626 [14:07] tumbleweed: thats awesome , thanks man [14:08] tumbleweed: thank you very much [14:09] genupulas: I don't know why it wasn't finding your key. Maybe someone else has an idea? [14:09] tumbleweed: am i able to upload this in my Lp just for trail [14:10] yes [14:10] to a PPA [14:10] yes [14:20] tumbleweed, genupulas: my guess is that the key uid (including any comments) as used in the changelog entry doesn't match a uid on that key [14:21] but as I can't find a keyserver which can lookup that key (timeouts), I can't check it [14:22] export GPGKEY=k0x92661626 duane told me to do that in .bashrc , i did that and i am trying again [14:22] i will let you know if i got any [14:23] thank you tumbleweed geser === JanC_ is now known as JanC [14:28] (sorry i have connectivity issues) [14:30] here is why i think it would be a good thing to put Boot-Repair in Ubuntu ISO : Boot-Repair is used by ~500 Ubunteros/day, and most of them currently have to download another ISO (Boot-Repair-Disk, or Ubuntu-Secured-Remix) to repair their boot/GRUB. [14:35] it's ok to wait for a mentor to upload in Debian, but this would probably mean no inclusion in Precise ISO. If by chance a MOTU was interested to review it now, i can take time to answer any question. [14:42] yann__: It's very, very unlikely it would be added to the ISO now as we're well past feature freeze. [14:44] ok, no problem, then. I'll wait for Alessio to finish his exams ;) [14:45] getting onto ISOs is hard, there's a big fight for space === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 [15:32] dh_installinit -a --no-start --name=cryptdisks-udev --upstart-only -> this installs the script for ALL run levels? === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [16:40] if i uploaded a package to my ppa:lpusername and i cannot it is not there, where else could it have been uploaded? [16:40] or how can i find it? [16:40] if it was accepted, you'd have got an e-mail (within 5 mins or so) [16:40] you sure the gpg key you signed it with was linked to your lp account? [16:41] i think so, cause it said "Succesfully signed dsc and changes files" [16:41] plustwo: that's unrelated [16:42] tumbleweed: i'll need to recheck then [16:43] by unrelated, I mean, that means you signed it, not that LP knew who signed it [16:43] what signal can be used in upstart to start a task after umount ? [16:43] ok [16:44] tumbleweed: so i'll need to upload my key to LP? [16:44] plustwo: yes [16:45] ok, i'll recheck how to do that on the packaging-guide then. tnx [16:45] tumbleweed: just thinking, will that mean i lost the ppackage? [16:46] yes [16:46] *ppackage/package [16:46] ok. will try again then, tnx again [16:48] any idea's ? :) [16:51] hi all [17:05] dholbach: Could I PM you? [17:06] vibhav, sure, if it's quick - I need to rush out in a bit :) [17:06] thanks === JanC_ is now known as JanC [17:08] No upstart freaks around no ? ;) [17:12] tumbleweed: the key is in LP, i just uloaded my first package to my ppa as well. [17:12] it was successful. [17:16] good [17:17] now how do i ask for somebody to check if there's any mistakes to be relooked? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [18:23] hello, how can I put a directory with spaces in the install file? [18:23] you can't [18:23] :/ [18:24] if its required you ahve to install it in rules [18:24] (or with an executable install file, not recommended) [18:35] or use wildcards [18:36] wildcards? [18:36] like ? [18:37] file* [18:37] standard shell globbing [18:37] this*contains*spaces :) [18:37] this?space should work too? [18:37] presumably [18:53] ok, thank you, jtaylor and tumbleweed [19:03] does this also work in links files? [19:03] no [19:05] :/ [19:09] there is dh_linktree in precise for mass linking === barry` is now known as barry === tubadaz__ is now known as tubadaz === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti [20:23] hi there, I'm trying to test if an app is completly translated, I do have a chroot environment (pbuilder) with the latest ubuntu version, know how can I installed the 'pt' version for example? [20:28] I know that the klavaro package is not complety translated, since I've it in ubuntu oneiric, I'd like to translate what's left [21:21] Question about the ubuntu sponsorship process for MOTU, it says to ask for some 'recommendations' to be added to your wiki page. Should I actively be asking people to add them or do I just sit back and wait? [21:22] when you apply for upload rights, it's usually a good idea to reach out to people who've sponsored several things for you in the past [21:23] * pabelanger nods [21:23] I feel kind cheesy asking for them, but I guess I have to start [21:25] i don't think it's cheesy, especially since it's just part of the process [21:25] broder: I feel cheesy, not the process. [21:26] Never was one to get signature for a year book :) [21:26] people are supposed to watch devel-permissions, and endorse/comment on applications that they see coming past [21:26] tumbleweed: err, wat? [21:26] news to me [21:26] but that doesn't happen so much(as far as I know) most endorsements are solicited [21:26] broder: I thought that was the purpose of devel-permissions? [21:27] is it? i don't ever remember hearing that i was supposed to be watching it [21:27] "supposed" is a strong word :) [21:27] i don't think so. it's just a public record of applications, but you can use it like that if you want [21:28] i expect people don't announce there until after they've secured some endorsements though [21:28] pabelanger: you might find http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi helpful [21:28] broder: ack'd === yofel_ is now known as yofel === jbicha is now known as Guest1267