vindex | hello | 02:36 |
---|---|---|
vindex | ive built a vanilla 3.2.10 kernel with perf enabled, since i wnated to use the performance counters for a personal project | 02:36 |
vindex | with make-kpkg i get the different deb packages, however the perf tool consistently fails the symbol test | 02:37 |
vindex | if i boot the same kernel with qemu and into a debian/ubuntu qemu image, the perf tool works fine | 02:37 |
vindex | can the linux-tools packages get built through make-kpkg as well? | 03:43 |
=== kengyu_ is now known as kengyu | ||
bullgard4_ | '~$ nmon' > r prints: " Linux: Linux version 2.6.32-38-generic (buildd@zirconium)." Is »buildd« the username of a computer named »zirconium«? What kind of user is that? | 06:27 |
* apw yawns ... another 80MB of updates | 08:15 | |
ppisati | moin | 08:16 |
apw | ppisati, morning | 08:17 |
smb | morning... lots of fun to look forward to | 08:18 |
apw | smb, a shiney new unity ... i wonder what fun that brings ... any guess where the keys are today | 08:22 |
* smb needs to install the shiny thing to know... | 08:22 | |
* apw watches it install ... excitemente | 08:24 | |
smb | apw, At least nothing gets removed... I think I saw in the upload mails that this will be famous 5.6 we have all been waiting for... | 08:24 |
apw | yeah what did 5.6 contains that we needed ? was that the alt not being annoying one ? | 08:25 |
* ppisati loves the smell of apw's positivty wrt to unity in the morning :) | 08:26 | |
smb | apw, yes I think so (or generally the "even without multitouch you can press two keys at once, now stop giving me the help screen on super+something" | 08:27 |
apw | new flash it seems in the bargain | 08:28 |
amitk | apw: hehe. Over on this side of the fence, work has ground to halt as everyone upgrades the galaxy s2 phones to Android 4.x and deals with the consequences :) | 08:28 |
apw | heheh ... that sounds fun | 08:28 |
* ppisati -> reboot | 08:29 | |
apw | - Dash - update Dash keyboard shortcuts so the 'CTRL + TAB' switches | 08:29 |
apw | between Lenses and 'TAB' by itself moves the focus between categories | 08:29 |
apw | new keybindings ... | 08:29 |
apw | - Alt+Tab default delay of 150ms is too long (LP: #888636) | 08:30 |
apw | - Numbers on Launcher icons sticking (LP: #942359) | 08:31 |
ppisati | so far, so good | 08:31 |
* apw reboots to get the new shiney | 08:31 | |
* smb wonders whether you need fps experience to have the reflexes required to operate it... | 08:32 | |
ppisati | unity2d: works here, still no overlay shortcut text and (thanks God) still no launcher on the second screen (with that bloody sticky edge) | 08:37 |
* smb ready to do the same (reboot) | 08:38 | |
apw | well i was able to reboot and login ... | 08:42 |
apw | glad to see they havent fixed the help | 08:43 |
smb | at least it does not come up when you press super+alt... | 08:44 |
ppisati | btw, did you see that the unity/UX/usability/$something_team is running a poll about multi screen setup + multi launcher setup? | 08:45 |
apw | ppisati, nope, where is that as i want to be chosing | 08:45 |
ppisati | you can even vote AGAINST sticky edge on the second screen and multi panel setup | 08:45 |
ppisati | hold on | 08:45 |
ppisati | nope | 08:46 |
apw | ppisati, though asking me to chose when i can only try one of them is a bit daft | 08:46 |
ppisati | actually the poll is "omg ubuntu" made for the unity team | 08:46 |
ppisati | big cockup... :P | 08:46 |
apw | oh so that won't have any input then | 08:47 |
ppisati | yep :( | 08:47 |
* ppisati curls in sadness in a corner, you can't stop the sticky screeny edge, they will assimilate us... | 08:48 | |
apw | heheh | 08:48 |
smb | Hm, still got the issue that clicking on an existing app in launcher moves the app and not the viewport... :/ | 08:48 |
smb | at least for some of them | 08:48 |
apw | smb, i still get launcher and help on pressing super-alt together if super is the first key that closes ... however short a time | 08:48 |
smb | apw, Yes, true. same here | 08:56 |
* apw also notes the resize space round a window has stopped working so you have to hit the 1px again | 08:57 | |
jk- | alt+right drag? | 08:58 |
smb | apw, hm there seems to be some space to left and bottom at least | 08:58 |
apw | jk-, oh i know how to get round it, but i doubt its expected to have gone | 08:58 |
apw | smb, not for me | 08:59 |
smb | to the right as well if only that stupid hidden scrollbar would not be | 08:59 |
smb | top is only 1px... | 09:00 |
apw | not any side for me, i have 1px and 1px only everywhere | 09:00 |
smb | apw, the special apw settings ...? | 09:00 |
apw | perhaps so .. sigh | 09:00 |
smb | apw, Or maybe... is that on a external screen? | 09:01 |
apw | nope all of 'em | 09:02 |
smb | Just was wondering whether the issue rises because there is more than one screen, which I do not have | 09:04 |
* apw doesn't really care ... i have it ... and so a bug i will file | 09:07 | |
smb | Given the speed of updates one feels like the white rabbit... I am too late for updates... I am too late for updates... | 09:08 |
ppisati | /msg smb ping | 09:47 |
ppisati | ops | 09:47 |
smb` | apw, For fun I did bug 953858 | 09:48 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 953858 in unity "Selecting running app in launcher moves app not viewport" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/953858 | 09:48 |
apw | oh thats oss as it does not do that smb` | 09:49 |
apw | (for me) | 09:49 |
=== Kiall_ is now known as Kiall | ||
apw | heh .. that looks odd indeed | 09:50 |
apw | mention the bug on #ubuntu-unity | 09:50 |
smb` | apw, Since you said you do not use multiple desktops that much, you would less likely. And it does not seem to happen with all applications | 09:50 |
apw | oh dear thats most odd, oh yeah and i would have to start using them to hit it | 09:51 |
apw | ppisati, in your precise/ti-omap4 rebase i see two commits i am not expecting ... right at the bottom of your delta ... | 10:24 |
apw | ppisati, UBUNTU: SAUCE: ata_piix: defer to the Hyper-V drivers by default | 10:24 |
apw | ppisati, UBUNTU: ubuntu: nx-emy - i387: NX emulation | 10:24 |
apw | ppisati, i am not expecting either of those to be in your delta | 10:25 |
apw | ppisati, if you concur i can just rebase them out of existance | 10:25 |
ppisati | apw: let me check | 10:38 |
apw | sudo aa-disable sbin.dhclient | 10:41 |
ppisati | apw: go ahead with those two commits, seems i rebased on master | 10:46 |
ppisati | apw: and these were there | 10:46 |
apw | ppisati, so drop them yes | 10:46 |
ppisati | flag | 10:53 |
* apw takes that as a yes | 11:18 | |
ppisati | apw: yes | 11:19 |
apw | ppisati, ok uploaded ... | 12:14 |
apw | ppisati, and i've prepared linux-meta ready for when its built | 12:16 |
ppisati | apw: cool | 12:25 |
* ppisati fails to understand poll() and decides it's time for lunch() | 12:25 | |
apw | cking, about ? your ecryptfs patches presumably are for arm too | 12:51 |
cking | apw, yep and yep | 12:52 |
apw | cking, applied and applied | 12:57 |
cking | ta | 12:57 |
* apw lunches | 13:55 | |
ogasawara | apw: just fyi, I've rebased master-next to v3.2.10 which happened to also include the fix for CVE-2012-1146 you pushed | 14:15 |
ubot2` | ogasawara: ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-1146) | 14:15 |
brendand | if i have a 2GB DIMM installed on a system and /proc/meminfo is only reporting 1653076 kB for MemTotal, what accounts for the lost megabytes? | 14:27 |
* ogasawara back in 20 | 14:43 | |
jsalisbury | ** | 14:59 |
jsalisbury | ** Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Today @ 17:00 UTC - #ubuntu-meeting | 14:59 |
jsalisbury | ** | 14:59 |
apw | jsalisbury, thats in 2 hours from your announcement right | 15:23 |
jsalisbury | apw, correct. | 15:24 |
jsalisbury | apw, it's an hour later in the US now due to the recent daylight time change. | 15:25 |
smb | weeks of confusion have begun :) | 15:25 |
apw | jsalisbury, thought so ... just checking you were on the same page as me | 15:25 |
smb | bjf, uploading :( | 15:33 |
bjf | smb, heh | 15:34 |
arges | jsalisbury, did I lose audio? | 15:38 |
jsalisbury | arges, I don't think so | 15:38 |
henrix | apw: still under analysis, but i would say bugs 922906 and 924400 are the same | 15:42 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 922906 in linux "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000009c" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922906 | 15:42 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 924400 in linux "kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000001f0" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/924400 | 15:42 |
henrix | apw: (can't speak on mumble!!!) | 15:42 |
henrix | apw: i've been looking at these bugs, and they seem to be a common issue w/ unmount and inotify | 15:43 |
apw | smb, whats your trick for fixing speaking on mumble | 15:44 |
smb | either restart | 15:44 |
smb | or change output from pulse to alsa and back | 15:44 |
henrix | heh i'll try that one. actually, it looks like my push-to-speak keys are not working... | 15:44 |
apw | umount and inotify ... hmm ... that rings a bell, i wonder if there was someting committed to linus recently | 15:44 |
apw | henrix, ahh did you add a keyboard since mumble started, that can break PPT keys | 15:45 |
smb | henrix, That sometimes seems to be because mumble tries to play something but cannot | 15:45 |
henrix | well, it's working now! | 15:47 |
henrix | thanks | 15:47 |
apw | its basically a frigile POS ... | 15:48 |
apw | bjf, i see a small formatting error in 'eCryptfs: Copy up lower inode attrs after setting lower xattr' | 16:09 |
apw | bjf, and i'd like to rebuild tip to fix it (buglink is missing prefix) | 16:09 |
bjf | apw, wfm | 16:10 |
bjf | apw, master or master-next ? | 16:10 |
apw | this is master-next | 16:10 |
bjf | apw, series? | 16:10 |
apw | master is 'tough its done' | 16:10 |
bjf | apw, you can do anything to master-next :-) | 16:10 |
apw | bjf, i need to check lucid natty and oneiric | 16:10 |
apw | just you are pushing too :) | 16:10 |
bjf | apw, we should be done now, i fixed a commit for colin this a.m. and am done | 16:12 |
apw | bjf, ahh i see now, its actually an upstream link so its as intended... | 16:13 |
=== cmagina_ is now known as cmagina | ||
apw | cking, ok your patches for bug #926292 didn | 16:16 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 926292 in linux "automake distdir.test fails because of an EPERM error" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/926292 | 16:16 |
apw | didn't have a proper buglink, most are already past the point of fixing, so you'll have to move them Fix Released manually ... | 16:16 |
cking | ack | 16:17 |
* apw gets blinded by the sun ... gah | 16:22 | |
* ogasawara throws a snowball at apw | 16:22 | |
* apw gets snow blinded as well | 16:23 | |
* smb doubts it would hit apw at all (being melted before ;-)) | 16:26 | |
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi | ||
* apw lobs an iceburg in smb's direction | 16:29 | |
* smb wonders how that castle looks like | 16:31 | |
smb | (burg being castle in de) | 16:31 |
apw | heavy and inbound | 16:32 |
apw | ogasawara, do they even build test upstream stable ... | 16:33 |
ogasawara | apw: apparently not | 16:33 |
smb | apw, sometimes it feels like "he" claims he does | 16:33 |
apw | so much for the claims of testing it | 16:33 |
* jussi hides from the snow fight... | 16:34 | |
* apw gets out big digger and uses it to heave a 25 tonne snow drift onto jussi | 16:34 | |
smb | apw, Question is what config is used (something like make alldontcareconfig) | 16:34 |
apw | allnoconfig perhaps | 16:34 |
ogasawara | heh | 16:35 |
apw | if it wasn't so hard to consume they could let us autobuild the -rcs for stable | 16:35 |
jussi | apw: be nice! :( | 16:35 |
apw | oh no, that might be seen as contributing and he cannot be seen letting us to do that | 16:35 |
smb | apw, The trigger may be hard. Though the queue is applicable when the review starts | 16:36 |
smb | git quiltimport --patches=<foo> | 16:37 |
apw | if it was a git repo like it is once it is released then the current autobuilder could be pointed at it | 16:38 |
smb | Right, that would be too simple | 16:38 |
apw | /home/apw/COD/linux/drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c:260: error: 'WM1811_JACKDET_MODE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) | 16:39 |
apw | that said the mainline builds built the tag and barfed instantly as above | 16:39 |
ohsix | broooooooonie | 16:39 |
apw | smb if they just pushed the -rc1 things he does, we could send him the reports ... sigh | 16:40 |
smb | apw, Problem seems to be that he seems to be unable to handle branches. Or he is just a je... One or the other | 16:41 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
henrix | cking: about bug #926292, i've tagged it verification-needed-oneiric. although the commit is queued for stable, i guess you'll want to test it, right? | 17:17 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 926292 in linux "automake distdir.test fails because of an EPERM error" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/926292 | 17:17 |
cking | henrix, yep, I'd like to hand verify it | 17:18 |
henrix | cking: ok, cool. just to confirm that | 17:18 |
cking | I'm just preparing a machine to test it as we speak, so good timing ;-) | 17:19 |
henrix | heh | 17:19 |
henrix | no hurry! :) | 17:19 |
=== jsalisbury changed the topic of #ubuntu-kernel to: Home: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/ || Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tues Mar 20th, 2012 - 17:00 UTC || If you have a question just ask, and do wait around for an answer! | ||
desrt | hi. does anyone know what the status of ext4+'discard' (ssd TRIM) support is? | 17:57 |
desrt | is this stable enough to be considered a best standard practice for use with SSDs at this point? | 17:58 |
cking | henrix, verification complete :-) | 18:00 |
henrix | cking: cool, thanks! | 18:01 |
apw | ogasawara, you will be pleased to know there is now a 3.2.11 which builds | 18:15 |
ogasawara | apw: nice | 18:15 |
ogasawara | apw: I'll get 'er rebased | 18:16 |
apw | ogasawara, the mainline builder just announced it, and it seems built ok on all arches | 18:16 |
johanbr | Hmm... it appears brcmsmac stopped detecting my wifi card some time after 3.2.0-12 | 18:37 |
johanbr | 3.2.0-12 works, 3.2.0-18 doesn't | 18:37 |
* jsalisbury is updating bios. Back in a bit. | 18:58 | |
bullgard4 | '~$ nmon' > r prints: " Linux: Linux version 2.6.32-38-generic (buildd@zirconium)." Is »buildd« the username of a computer named »zirconium«? What kind of user is that? | 18:59 |
apw | bullgard4, buildd is the user under which builds in ubuntu are | 19:02 |
apw | built on the buildds | 19:02 |
bullgard4 | apw: Thank you very much for your help. | 19:18 |
ah- | hi, i'm playing with kernel development on ubuntu and i'm wondering what's the best way to do incremental compiles | 19:53 |
ah- | at the moment i'm compiling my kernel according to http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2011/10/28/how-to-compile-a-new-ubuntu-11-10-oneiric-kernel/ and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel | 19:54 |
ah- | my problem with that is that after i change something "skipabi=true skipmodule=true fakeroot debian/rules binary-mbp" doesn't include my changes if i don't do "fakeroot debian/rules clean" | 19:55 |
ah- | before | 19:55 |
ah- | but cleaning and doing a full build on every change takes a lot of time | 19:55 |
pbuckley | distcc is your friend | 19:55 |
ah- | so it's not possible to do incremental builds? | 19:57 |
ah- | i fear even with distcc/ccache it'll take ages | 19:57 |
pbuckley | i prefer to do full builds.. i think of it as safer | 20:04 |
pbuckley | i think if you do the plain old make | 20:05 |
pbuckley | you can do incremetal builds | 20:05 |
ohsix | if you're working on a module you can use the regular linux build stuff to test it | 20:05 |
pbuckley | ^^ | 20:05 |
ah- | i'm doing that for a part of it but that doesn't work for everything | 20:06 |
* cking hammers ecryptfs with a kernel build and calls it a day, /me --> EOD | 20:40 | |
=== tsimpson_ is now known as tsimpson | ||
apw | ah-, you can remove the build stamp in debian stamps to get an incremental build | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!