| aviksil | Spads: ping | 08:42 |
|---|---|---|
| Spads | er, hello | 08:47 |
| aviksil | Spads: Is this build error due to QEMU ARM test builder: https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/overlay/+build/3285688 | 09:24 |
| Spads | qemu: Unsupported syscall: 336 | 09:26 |
| Spads | ^-- This would suggest it was. | 09:26 |
| Spads | Do you have a link to the actual build page, rather than just the log? | 09:26 |
| Spads | oh n'mind, I'm the one who followed the log link :) | 09:26 |
| aviksil | ok. so what should be the workaround? or is there any way to schedule build on real armel builder? | 09:28 |
| aviksil | Spads: ^^^ | 09:30 |
| Spads | you'd have to ask IS about access to physical builders, but I'm filing a bug against qemu-linaro now | 09:31 |
| aviksil | Spads: ok | 09:31 |
| aviksil | Spads: and also, on a similar note, are these armel build failures due to QEMU builder too: https://code.launchpad.net/~aviksil/+recipe/lttng-ust-daily? | 09:33 |
| Spads | possibly. I recommend you file bugs against qemu-linaro about them. | 09:35 |
| aviksil | Spads: ok, thanks, will do | 09:35 |
| DNX | hi guys! Do I have any chance to change my username with another already existing but unused? | 09:49 |
| DNX | here is the account: https://launchpad.net/~dnx | 09:50 |
| DNX | RoMiONeT is not an active member of any Launchpad teams. | 09:51 |
| DNX | Karma: 0 | 09:51 |
| DNX | since 2009-09-28 | 09:51 |
| czajkowski | DNX: you could mail them just because they don't have karma doesnt really mean they don't use LP | 09:51 |
| DNX | of course czajkowski, thank you! | 09:52 |
| czajkowski | np | 09:52 |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | ||
| * benonsoftware only got benny as the username because he emailed the old benny :P | 09:52 | |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
| === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | ||
| === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | ||
| czajkowski | what would you like hear more about from launchpad? https://www.facebook.com/questions/326779177369296/ | 15:20 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan is now known as trolllogger | ||
| === trolllogger is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| cjohnston | so I see that the work items part of BPs is now live.. are they going to be migrated? | 17:02 |
| czajkowski | cjohnston: yes after the release of 12.04 | 17:06 |
| cjohnston | hrm.. so an email should probably go out to Ubuntu MLs telling them status.u.c won't pick up items that are in the new field | 17:08 |
| czajkowski | mrevell: can you comment ? | 17:09 |
| czajkowski | salgado isn't around | 17:10 |
| mrevell | cjohnston, status.u.c does pick up work items that are in the new field. It picks up the work items whether they're in the whiteboard or the new work items box. | 17:10 |
| cjohnston | I just found that mrevell.. wasn't aware that it had been updated. must have missed that MP.. thanks | 17:11 |
| mrevell | np :) | 17:11 |
| czajkowski | cjohnston: sorted :) | 17:11 |
| czajkowski | mrevell: thanks | 17:11 |
| cjohnston | ty czajkowski | 17:12 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| * mgedmin got more launchpad email about bug 190848, all without the bug title in the subject | 17:35 | |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 190848 in Fontconfig "font in terminal does not resemble font in preview" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/190848 | 17:35 |
| czajkowski | mgedmin: thats the same bug as before right ? | 17:38 |
| mgedmin | yes | 17:39 |
| czajkowski | mgedmin: and did you change your bug mail settings, | 17:40 |
| mgedmin | no | 17:40 |
| czajkowski | :) | 17:40 |
| dobey | mgedmin: i'm pretty certain that's a bug in launchpad's upstream bug watcher code. you should file a bug against launchpad itself | 17:53 |
| mgedmin | oh, it looks like somebody already did: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/138775 | 17:55 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 138775 in Launchpad itself "Notification subject included bug number but no summary" [Low,Triaged] | 17:55 |
| dobey | ah, ok | 17:55 |
| dobey | that is pretty old | 17:55 |
| bdmurray | czajkowski: I'm trying to file a bug with apport and I'm consistently getting an oops report and I'd like to find out if it is something with apport or Launchpad. | 18:10 |
| czajkowski | hmm | 18:10 |
| czajkowski | haev you got a oops number? | 18:11 |
| bdmurray | Error ID: OOPS-784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | 18:11 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | 18:11 |
| czajkowski | bdmurray: wondering is it to do with apport as lp is fine | 18:13 |
| czajkowski | but I'm unsure | 18:13 |
| czajkowski | rick_h: are you about ? | 18:14 |
| jokerdino | hello people.. | 18:15 |
| jokerdino | the translation for this template https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/sound-theme-freedesktop/+pots/sound-theme-freedesktop/ta/+translate?show=untranslated does not update for Tamil | 18:15 |
| jokerdino | it keeps saying one string hasn't been translated when it has already been done with. | 18:16 |
| rick_h | czajkowski: what's up? | 18:16 |
| czajkowski | rick_h: could you help bdmurray please as unsure | 18:17 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| rick_h | looking at the oops | 18:17 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| czajkowski | thanks you | 18:19 |
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | ||
| rick_h | bdmurray: so it looks like LP is rejecting it because the description on the bug report is > 50000 characters long | 18:20 |
| jokerdino | happy weekend then czajkowski | 18:20 |
| rick_h | I'm guessing apport submitted the description or did you write it out? | 18:20 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: if it's apport, then probably need to file a bug that they need to keep the descriptoin under that limit | 18:20 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: if you wrote it, any chance of shortening it up? | 18:21 |
| bdmurray | rick_h: do you mean field.comment in the oops report? | 18:21 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: no, that's under 50k characters | 18:22 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: must be in an attachment or something I guess from apport | 18:23 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: I can't see it from the oops | 18:23 |
| bdmurray | rick_h: so if one of the attachments is > 50000 characters this would cause an oops? | 18:25 |
| rick_h | bdmurray: looking, I don't think so. It's only on the description field. I'm not 100% sure how apport fills in the value | 18:26 |
| rick_h | deryck: ping, know how apport gets lp the descriptoin field in a bug report? | 18:26 |
| rick_h | deryck: in this oops I don't see any description value, but guess it submits an attachment perhaps? https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=784b24ada04f53ab155d80242075ed70 | 18:27 |
| deryck | rick_h, no, actually I don't know. I would have thought bdmurray did. ;) hi bdmurray :) | 18:27 |
| rick_h | hah! | 18:27 |
| bdmurray | hey deryck | 18:27 |
| deryck | let me look at the OOPS and see what's up. The issue is bdmurray can't update a bug report? | 18:28 |
| deryck | oh, oops on filebug. | 18:28 |
| bdmurray | deryck: I keep getting an oops trying to submit one via apport | 18:28 |
| rick_h | it's filing a bug from apport right bdmurray ? | 18:28 |
| bdmurray | rick_h: right | 18:28 |
| rick_h | right, triggering an sql condition where the description is too long, but I don't see the description set in the oops | 18:28 |
| * deryck is looking into it.... | 18:29 | |
| deryck | so sane_description is meant to block an empty string and a too long description. | 18:33 |
| rick_h | ah, it could be empty/missing not long...doh | 18:34 |
| bdmurray | and the description we are referring to here is a combination of comment in the oops report and my attachments right? | 18:34 |
| deryck | I think it's just the comment. | 18:35 |
| deryck | I don't see anything to indicate what's going wrong here. Looks like you filled out the form and hit submit and boom. | 18:36 |
| deryck | bdmurray, this happens consistently? Even now, you get the same error? | 18:36 |
| bdmurray | if you look at an apport bug, bug 956524, you'll see information that is included by apport and doesn't appear in my comment | 18:36 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 956524 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "The release notes link on the first screen of the installer do not open the release notes" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/956524 | 18:36 |
| bdmurray | notice the lines ProblemType ... UpgradeStatus | 18:37 |
| deryck | ah hmmm | 18:38 |
| deryck | bdmurray, did you fill out anything in the form when you went to submit it? | 18:38 |
| deryck | and yeah, trying the link, it doesn't fill out the title as apport filed bugs normally do. | 18:38 |
| bdmurray | deryck: the information in field.comment and field.title I put in | 18:39 |
| bdmurray | deryck: apport only prefills the title for crashes or package install failures | 18:39 |
| deryck | ah ok | 18:39 |
| deryck | I'm honestly not sure what's wrong. If I'm reading the constraint correctly, it's just a simple "is it an empty string or too long" check. And what bdmurray has filed in meets that check.... | 18:41 |
| deryck | though clearly createBug is hitting that error. | 18:41 |
| deryck | I don't see how what apport does or doesn't do would affect this constraint | 18:41 |
| bdmurray | I wouldn't be surprised if the information apport was putting in was more than 50k | 18:42 |
| bdmurray | what happens to the data that apport sends? | 18:42 |
| deryck | ah | 18:43 |
| deryck | right, that's it probably. and it's not reflected in the OOPS. | 18:43 |
| deryck | bdmurray, so I think we need a bug against apport and lp that apport shouldn't try to append more characters to the description than the description + apport < 50k chars. | 18:44 |
| deryck | bdmurray, and I think the data goes to the librarian, and is unpacked via the token in the url. | 18:45 |
| bdmurray | deryck: is this constraint new or changed? and do you have an idea of how many times this has happened? | 18:46 |
| deryck | bdmurray, I don't know how often we hit this, and I don't think it's new or changed. | 18:46 |
| bdmurray | deryck: okay, thanks | 18:48 |
| deryck | bdmurray, that OOPs says past week count was 13. | 18:49 |
| bdmurray | deryck: oh, I see that now - thats kind of neat | 18:50 |
| deryck | I forgot about it a lot myself :) | 18:51 |
| bdmurray | deryck: could you look at bug 957326 and add to it? | 18:59 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 957326 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport should ensure description is less than 50k characters" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/957326 | 18:59 |
| deryck | bdmurray, sure. looking now... | 19:00 |
| deryck | bdmurray, I don't think I need to add anything. that seems perfect. | 19:01 |
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | ||
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | ||
| m4n1sh | jelmer: ping | 20:59 |
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | ||
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | ||
| jelmer | m4n1sh: pong | 21:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!