[00:00] * jalcine_ is away: Gone away for now === jalcine_ is now known as jalcine === jalcine is now known as JackyAlcine === JackyAlcine is now known as jalcine [03:33] hi guys !!! [04:58] hi all. you maybe aware of this, or not; and it may be Kubuntu specific, or not (not sure) - But posting here for the sake of diligence http://osdir.com/ml/kubuntu-users/2012-03/msg00110.html === ronnoc_ is now known as ronnoc [05:59] http://youtu.be/WRMy20z6luo [05:59] what's with this? [05:59] ugly animations in the latest version of kubuntu [06:33] http://youtu.be/WRMy20z6luo :: what's with these ugly animations? [07:17] Riddell: your latest changes on Qt aren't commited in the repo. Do you mind if I push them? [07:23] fabo: was there a reason we didn't push libzip 0.10 for precise? [07:25] micahg: it's binary incompatible. it took some time to transition in Debian. The transition finished recently. We can sync request now. [07:26] fabo: it'll need an FFe + commitment for the transition [07:26] oh, not too big [07:26] only 11 packages, it'll fix a depwait as well [07:27] fabo: were you planning on filing the paperwork? [07:27] the transition was pretty safe [07:27] micahg: I can do [07:27] fabo: thanks [07:36] Riddell: pushed. I assumed you don't mind :) === Mamarok- is now known as Mamarok [08:19] fabo: thanks [08:20] Riddell: I commited the changes to fix bug 911733 [08:20] Launchpad bug 911733 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) "Patch Qt to fix annoying KDE bug 275469 (ghost taskbar entries)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/911733 [08:20] yep, thanks === Mamarok- is now known as Mamarok [09:31] shadeslayer: are u here ? [09:43] fabo: thanks for fixing bug 911733 :) [09:43] Launchpad bug 911733 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) "Patch Qt to fix annoying KDE bug 275469 (ghost taskbar entries)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/911733 [09:44] schnelle: yw :) [09:48] fabo: this is precise only, right? this won't be backported to qt 4.8 from oneiric backports? === fenris is now known as Guest97336 [09:53] schnelle: looking in the backport atm. it will be another bug for backporting. [09:54] schnelle: in oneiric, it's 4.7.4 [09:56] can anyone tell how i can upgrade to 12.04 beta , since kubuntu-devel-release-upgrade says No new release found [09:56] fabo: yes it's 4.7.4 in official repository. but if one (like me) is using backports to get kde 4.8, he also gets qt 4.8 from backports [09:58] fabo: hmm i think i missunderstood you. you said basicly the same thing as i did. sorry :) [10:17] DoctorPepper: sudo do-release-upgrade -d [10:19] schnelle: No new release found [10:21] DoctorPepper: hmm it works for me in oneiric === rdieter is now known as rdieter_away [12:01] Hey all [12:21] firefox will not integrated anymore on kubuntu ? [12:21] or this is a fake new ? [12:22] the ubuntu packager is removing the important patch [12:22] debfx: I think I have someone who would like to have a PPA with a patched firefox in it, would you be willing to help? [12:22] help set it up [12:23] how stupid is the guy that has done this ? [12:23] how much* [12:24] who is ? [12:24] not stupid. canonical I expect [12:25] i think that who has done this is stupid [12:27] what does the dropped patch do? [12:28] tsdgeos: i guess open the open dialog kde [12:28] Riddell: I don't think it's feasible to maintain a patched firefox in a ppa [12:28] tsdgeos: talk to mozilla kde helper which does things like open kde dialogues [12:28] debfx: because firefox changes so much? [12:29] so we get rekonq that crash all the time and firefox that sucks on style [12:30] and chromium which has a working kde integration [12:30] well it's the only pseudo decent browser [12:31] Riddell: yes [12:37] hey does any one knows where i can find dolphin documentations [12:38] Sifrazooy: I don't understand your question [12:39] Riddell: i want to add and use some functionalities in dolphin [12:40] Sifrazooy: like ? [12:40] Riddell: for more details i want to be able to retreive the right click list on dolphin file manager and reuse them again [12:40] Sifrazooy: if you want to know how to make plugins for debian the right people to ask are kde developers who have an irc channel of #kde-devel [12:40] s/debian/dolphin/ [12:40] Riddell meant: "Sifrazooy: if you want to know how to make plugins for dolphin the right people to ask are kde developers who have an irc channel of #kde-devel" [12:41] Riddell: thnx for help :D [12:41] debfx, not a really good kde integration with chromium and kde the tabfonts etc are trill too small to read on a large monitor and they can't be resized [12:41] still too small [12:42] BluesKaj: I didn't say it's perfect but at least it exists [12:45] BluesKaj: have you filed a bug about that? [12:45] debfx, yeah, takes up less real estate than FF [12:45] 'yes about 18mos ago [12:47] don't think it was ever assigned ..not many ppl use a 42" monitor, so the font appears fine on most desktops and laptops === greyback is now known as greyback|lunch [13:28] fabo: do you have some time to review a few changes for the qt package? [13:36] debfx: soon to be busy for the next 2h30. I could put in queue after that. [13:38] fabo: that would be great :), the patches are in http://people.ubuntu.com/~debfx/qt4/ [13:38] np [13:39] they are based on the debian experimental branch [13:39] but I also want to push 0002 and 3 to precise === greyback|lunch is now known as greyback === dantti|2 is now known as dantti [14:20] Riddell: so that firefox-kde helper was removed because: a) did not compile b) has no maintainer c) it is policy not to ship distro patches d) anything else [14:29] tsdgeos: it was removed because it's difficult and time consuming to maintain such a large patch with firefox's rapid release schedule [14:32] debfx: because api changes? [14:34] And no one to do the work. [14:42] hello! any workaround for bug #941989? [14:42] Launchpad bug 941989 in gtk2-engines-oxygen (Ubuntu) "wrong textcolor in tooltip of gtk apps" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/941989 [14:44] andreaxxx: user support in #kubuntu [14:46] Riddell: for 12.04 too? [14:50] andreaxxx: yes or try #kubuntu+1 or #ubuntu+1 [14:50] ty ;) [15:37] muon uses zeitgeist now? [15:43] fabo: I approved your libzip FFe, but please get it done quickly. [15:47] ScottK: thanks [15:47] fabo: If there's anything that needs a sync that you don't have upload rights for, let me know. [15:48] micahg: paperwork done, now we need to push the stuff ^^^ [15:49] fabo: ok, are we sure the reverse dependencies will build with a no change rebuild? [15:49] ScottK: libzip should be merged, trigger rebuild on the 7 known good packages [15:49] micahg: See the bug. All but two. [15:49] yes [15:50] then push the 2 changes for the remaining packages [15:50] fabo: merge or sync? We don't have a current diff for libzip [15:50] fabo should have sync rights for libzip as a kubuntu-dev [15:50] ScottK: sync [15:51] ah cool :) [15:51] fabo: just close the bug please when syncing (-b XXXXXX) [15:51] Oh. Give it a try then. [15:51] ok [15:51] fabo: have you tried syncpackage yet? [15:51] micahg: Shouldn't it stay open until the transition is done? [15:51] micahg: no, it will be my 1st try [15:51] ScottK: well, if we want to be technical about it, we should just add bug tasks for the packages and have each one closed on upload/sync :) [15:52] Yes. Easier just to close it by hand when done. [15:52] with tasks though, LP will record as you go, so you're never wondering where you are :) [15:53] fabo: I can go through the rest in a few hours, I have to finish something else up [15:53] or have ScottK do them [15:54] * ScottK can do the syncs after libzip is built and published. [15:54] I'll syncpackage for libzip and let you do the remaining packages? [15:58] * fabo back in 5min, call in progress... [15:59] Are they syncs or no change rebuilds? [16:00] You should be able to do ebook-tools too. [16:33] ScottK: syncpackage done. the 7 other packages are no change rebuilds. [16:33] OK. [16:34] fabo: Is this your first Ubuntu "upload"? [16:34] ScottK: no, I've done Qt (this morning) [16:34] Ah. Cool. Congratulations on that one then. [16:34] thanks :) [16:35] ScottK: is there's a way to find which packages I'm allowed to upload? [16:36] I think there is a magic command that I can never remember [16:36] cjwatson will know [16:36] Yes. There is. [16:36] micahg should know too. [16:36] k [16:36] edit_acl.py -P kubuntu -S precise query [16:37] from https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk [16:37] thanks [16:38] fabo: if you're wondering about a specific packages, there's also ubuntu-upload-permission in ubuntu-dev-tools [16:38] ok === koolhead17|away is now known as koolhead17 [16:45] micahg: bug 959103 [16:45] Launchpad bug 959103 in Oneiric Backports "Please backport krename 4.0.9-1 (universe) from precise" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/959103 [16:46] fabo: yes? [16:46] just replied to your comment [16:48] fabo: that should go on the other bug, you can mark the backport request as a duplicate and target the other bug to oneiric [16:48] k [16:49] fabo: FYI, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure [16:50] fabo: let me know if you need sponsorship for it, as I'm piloting in ~10 hours [16:52] micahg: I've nominated the bug for oneiric, subscribed ubuntu-sru and going to prepare the release-proposed package [16:53] fabo: sounds good, task approved === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 === yofel_ is now known as yofel