StevenK | $ grep BugsInformationTypeMigrator garbo-hourly.log-20120320 | grep -c Blocked | 00:04 |
---|---|---|
StevenK | 117 | 00:04 |
StevenK | wgrant: ^ | 00:04 |
wgrant | StevenK: Well, the problem here is clear. | 00:16 |
wgrant | The PRF has gone insane. Get it killed. | 00:17 |
=== cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
wgrant | wallyworld: So, using StormRangeFactory will generate a query something like https://pastebin.canonical.com/62588/ | 01:23 |
wgrant | wallyworld: Note the slight oddness in that you have to include the sort key in the SELECT list, due to the DISTINCT. | 01:24 |
wallyworld | wgrant: ok, seems simple enough. how do i tell the batching infrastructure to use it? | 01:25 |
wgrant | wallyworld: There's only a couple of places that use it so far, but see eg. ArchiveSubscribersView | 01:26 |
wgrant | self.batchnav = BatchNavigator( | 01:26 |
wgrant | self.subscriptions, self.request, | 01:26 |
wgrant | range_factory=StormRangeFactory(self.subscriptions)) | 01:26 |
wallyworld | ok, thanks | 01:26 |
wgrant | That is up to 30% faster than the original query. | 01:29 |
wgrant | Then you just need https://pastebin.canonical.com/62590/, which takes <1ms for 100 people. | 01:30 |
wgrant | Intriguing. | 02:15 |
wgrant | Chromium is of the opinion that my launchpad.dev wildcard cert has been revoked. | 02:15 |
wgrant | Despite it not having a CRL or OCSP endpoint specified. | 02:15 |
wgrant | Anyone feel like reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/involvement-config-validity/+merge/98328? | 03:44 |
StevenK | wgrant: r=me | 03:47 |
StevenK | wgrant: In my branch to change IBug.{private,security_related} to make use of information_type most of the TestBugMirrorAccessTriggers fail with AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'concrete_artifact' | 03:48 |
wgrant | StevenK: You'll need to change the triggers to use information_type instead of private and security_related | 03:49 |
wgrant | StevenK: There's a card in Next for that. | 03:49 |
wgrant | I was going to do it once production's column was populated. | 03:49 |
StevenK | Right. | 03:49 |
StevenK | But is sort of seperate to this work to move IBug definition | 03:50 |
wgrant | It means that setting .private and .security_related still has to set the DB flags. | 03:51 |
StevenK | wgrant: I'm tempted to re-write the garbo jobs __call__ to be faster and not call bug._setInformationType() in a loop | 03:51 |
wgrant | See how it goes overnight. | 03:52 |
wgrant | Killing PRF before you sleep if necessary. | 03:52 |
StevenK | wgrant: What about the VACUUMs that keep turning up? | 03:53 |
wgrant | They shouldn't be too terrible most of the time. | 03:54 |
lifeless | StevenK: what about it ? | 03:58 |
StevenK | lifeless: They seem to keep blocking garbo jobs | 04:01 |
StevenK | Just look at the trail of fail in garbo-hourly.log | 04:01 |
lifeless | autovacuum is more a symptom not a cause | 04:02 |
lifeless | it canm be blocked by other writes | 04:02 |
lifeless | even if it shows up, its almost certainly not the reason for lag | 04:02 |
wgrant | Lag is not relevant here. | 04:03 |
wgrant | Long transactions. | 04:04 |
lifeless | samesame | 04:04 |
lifeless | vacuum is only long when its blocked on another xaction | 04:04 |
wgrant | StevenK: /win 6 | 04:54 |
wgrant | Bah | 04:54 |
StevenK | Haha | 04:54 |
wgrant | StevenK: How are you structuring your branches? | 04:55 |
StevenK | wgrant: I'm only working on one at the moment, and it's only 200 lines. | 04:56 |
wgrant | StevenK: Hm | 04:56 |
StevenK | wgrant: What are you thinking? | 04:56 |
wgrant | StevenK: But you appear to have a branch which stops writing to Bug.private and Bug.security_related | 04:56 |
wgrant | Which can't be in the same branch. | 04:56 |
StevenK | Not any more. | 04:56 |
wgrant | Ah | 04:56 |
wgrant | Good good. | 04:57 |
StevenK | IBug.private is now IBug._private and stuff is looking good. | 04:57 |
StevenK | Just running test -vvm bugs to see if there is anything heinous before I put up an MP. | 04:59 |
wgrant | This branch still keeps the flags and information_type in sync, just from the opposite direction? | 04:59 |
StevenK | Roughly | 05:00 |
StevenK | setPrivacyAndSecurityRelated is utterly horrid | 05:00 |
StevenK | So the less I touch it, the better. | 05:00 |
StevenK | I'm thinking we want to replace it with IBug.transitionInformationType() like the methods on IBugTask. | 05:01 |
wgrant | Yes. | 05:02 |
wgrant | 1) Get things keeping information_type in sync with private and security_related (done) | 05:03 |
wgrant | 2) Populate information_type (nearly done) | 05:03 |
wgrant | 3) Treat information_type as canonical, mirroring to private and security_related | 05:03 |
wgrant | 4) Get that deployed everywhere (including ftpmaster) | 05:03 |
wgrant | 5) Replace the triggers (I'm just testing that now) | 05:03 |
wgrant | 6) Stop touching private and security_related in any way | 05:04 |
wgrant | 7) Drop private and security_related | 05:04 |
StevenK | 8) Kill IBug.set{Private,SecurityRelated,PrivacyAndSecurityRelated}, replacing it with IBug.transistionToInformationType() | 05:05 |
wgrant | That's part of 6 | 05:05 |
StevenK | Ah | 05:05 |
StevenK | I did wonder | 05:05 |
StevenK | Right, I do like that plan. | 05:05 |
StevenK | We have cards for part 6 and 7? | 05:06 |
wgrant | Not yet. | 05:07 |
StevenK | Shall I create two in Backlog, sans bugs for now? | 05:07 |
wgrant | Sure. | 05:07 |
wgrant | Also, I missed a step | 05:08 |
wgrant | 2.5) ALTER TABLE Bug ALTER COLUMN information_type SET NOT NULL; | 05:08 |
* StevenK stabs Kanban | 05:08 | |
StevenK | Ah yes | 05:08 |
StevenK | Let me create a card for that and stuff into next | 05:08 |
StevenK | We'll need to fix the model/interface code seperately, but that's a trivial patch. | 05:09 |
wgrant | Are you fixing test_bug_mirror_access_triggers to not set private/security_related directly? | 05:09 |
StevenK | Already done | 05:09 |
wgrant | s/need/potentially and non-critically want/ | 05:09 |
wgrant | StevenK: Can you push? My trigger branch needs that. | 05:09 |
StevenK | wgrant: What I mean is sprinkle things like notNull=True to information_type in the model | 05:09 |
wgrant | StevenK: I'm aware. We probably want to do that at some point, but it's not in the critical path. | 05:10 |
wgrant | Nor important at all. | 05:10 |
StevenK | I'd prefer to do it just after the DB patch is deployed, but meh | 05:10 |
StevenK | The following 1 account(s) were found. Select the account you wish to access. | 05:11 |
StevenK | <list of two things> | 05:11 |
* StevenK stabs Kanban harder | 05:11 | |
wgrant | I only had one. | 05:11 |
StevenK | wgrant: Sorry, got distracted by Kanban. lp:~stevenk/launchpad/bugs-use-information_type | 05:16 |
wgrant | Thankyou sir. | 05:18 |
wgrant | StevenK: We should complete (and test as a whole) parts 3-7 before we land any of them. | 05:25 |
wgrant | In case we've missed something | 05:25 |
wgrant | 5 is done, asounds like you're close to 3 and 6, and 7 is pretty trivial :) | 05:25 |
StevenK | 3 yes, 6 no. | 05:26 |
wgrant | StevenK: Isn't 6 mostly a matter of deleting code? | 05:32 |
wgrant | Or does 3 not change the queries that use it? | 05:32 |
StevenK | 3 does not. I'm trying to keep it simple. | 05:33 |
wgrant | Ah, sure. | 05:33 |
StevenK | 3 falls back to _private and _security_related if information_type is not set, so it's not dependant on the garbo job being complete. | 05:33 |
StevenK | Hmmmm. That could not be helping. | 05:35 |
StevenK | wgrant: What should I set information_type to if IProduct.private_bugs -- I want to say PROPRIETARY. | 06:02 |
wgrant | StevenK: USERDATA | 06:03 |
wgrant | PROPRIETARY doesn't exist yet. | 06:03 |
wgrant | It's defined, but it doesn't exist. | 06:03 |
StevenK | wgrant: Are you still reviewing since you're OCR and everything. | 06:56 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
stub | LINE 3: ... WHERE bt.bug=bug.id ORDER BY bt.name LI... | 07:51 |
stub | Could have sworn we fixed that one already (BugTask.name does not exist...) | 07:51 |
stub | Scoping rules seem subtly different in 9.1 if you use the same tag to alias more than one table in a nested query | 07:56 |
adeuring | good morning | 08:54 |
czajkowski | aloha | 09:03 |
jelmer_ | moin adeuring, czajkowski | 09:09 |
=== jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
dpm | hi jtv, are you around? | 09:44 |
jtv | Hi dpm! Trying to have a conference call atm, but can get back to you in half an hour or so if that's okay. | 09:45 |
dpm | jtv, sure! if you've got 5 minutes for me later on, that'd be perfect | 09:46 |
=== gmb changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: gmb | Firefighting: - | Critical bugtasks: 4*10 | ||
=== jml` is now known as jml | ||
=== mpt_ is now known as mpt | ||
rick_h | morning | 11:15 |
deryck | Morning, everyone. | 11:44 |
rick_h | morning | 11:48 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
deryck | abentley, adeuring, rick_h -- I'm coming. joining hangouts is slooooowww here for some reason. | 13:32 |
rick_h | deryck: all the beach air interfering with your bandwidth :P | 13:33 |
adeuring | abentley: can't hear you | 13:51 |
abentley | adeuring: My mic shows levels. Let's both rejoin. | 13:51 |
adeuring | ok | 13:51 |
adeuring | abentley: let's use muble. Google claims that have to install an new plugin... | 13:53 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
abentley | adeuring: I think job.fail needs transaction.abort before it. Here's how it fails without it: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/892304/ | 15:16 |
adeuring | abentley: ouc, of course, yes | 15:16 |
abentley | adeuring: Maybe we should go back to having commit/abort methods on the runner? I know it's not pretty. | 15:17 |
adeuring | abentley: I think we should first try to fix the bugs we have currnently. I really don't like to have DB commit into lazr.jobrunner... | 15:19 |
abentley | adeuring: Or maybe the runner could accept a transaction manager. | 15:19 |
abentley | as a parameter. | 15:19 |
adeuring | abentley: well, that's bascially teh same ;) | 15:19 |
abentley | adeuring: This is a bug that we have currently. | 15:20 |
abentley | adeuring: I was getting this, so I had to disable oops handling to get the real error. | 15:20 |
adeuring | abentley: does this mean that the OOPS handling is also broken? | 15:21 |
abentley | adeuring: The oops handling was broken because job.fail was not aborting the transaction, so when it tried to invoke methods on job, it got InternalError: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block | 15:22 |
adeuring | abentley: ah, ok. | 15:23 |
abentley | adeuring: I've worked around all of this by doing "import transaction; transaction.abort()" immediately before job.fail, but this is not a long-term solution. | 15:24 |
adeuring | abentley: the branch I'm working on should fix the problem: it changes the methods fail(), queue(), suspend() etc | 15:25 |
abentley | adeuring: Great. | 15:26 |
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
deryck | abentley, rick_h -- Just FYI for the YUI history curious, our phantom history events is a bug fixed in YUI 3.4.1. | 15:58 |
rick_h | deryck: awesome | 15:59 |
abentley | deryck: Ah, great. | 15:59 |
deryck | abentley, rick_h -- http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/892344/ shows the issue. simple initialState bug. | 15:59 |
deryck | abentley, rick_h -- I vote for waiting on upgrade to fix it. :) | 15:59 |
rick_h | deryck: yea, guess so | 16:00 |
deryck | only other option is to fork our 3.3.0 and patch the history module. | 16:01 |
rick_h | right, messy | 16:01 |
deryck | then we have a diff against 3.3.0, have to maintain our own build, etc. when the issue is annoying but relatively minor. | 16:01 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
sinzui | deryck, rick_h what is stopping us from using 3.4.1? | 16:57 |
deryck | sinzui, upgrade time && too many js irons in the fire. | 16:57 |
rick_h | sinzui: hopefully the combo loader will make it much easier to swap out versions, run all our tests, and find out what issues pop up | 16:58 |
sinzui | :( this is why we stopped updating zope for 3 years | 16:58 |
sinzui | rick_h, well if the calendar dies, we have incentive to use 3.4.1 with a hack to make the popup work in firefox | 16:59 |
rick_h | sinzui: that and 3.5 is due next month so the hope is more to jump to 3.5 | 16:59 |
sinzui | That would make me happy | 16:59 |
deryck | I don't think it's far off actually. Just not NOW()! :) | 16:59 |
rick_h | sinzui: yea, so the plan isn't to not upgrade, but try tomake one big jump with combo loader + 3.5 in sucession | 17:00 |
deryck | that's the chief driver of the combo loader, to make upgrades much easier. | 17:00 |
rick_h | yea, it's all kind of tied together with combo loader, 3.5, handlbars/pybars. Lots of parts moving that hopefully we can snap together | 17:01 |
deryck | exactly. | 17:02 |
deryck | and that's also what gives me hope that an upgrade is not just vapor, but something that will happen. | 17:02 |
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
rick_h | tumbleweed: ping | 17:34 |
sinzui | jcsackett, do you have a few minutes to talk about the auditor editing case in the the mockups | 18:42 |
jcsackett | sinzui: sure. | 18:59 |
jcsackett | sinzui: can you start the hangout? i do not have a functioning webcam, so will have to use my phone. | 18:59 |
sinzui | jcsackett, starting now | 19:01 |
sinzui | jcsackett, does you phone see a hangout with me in the messenger? | 19:03 |
tumbleweed | rick_h: pong | 19:13 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: wanted to see if you could help me out with the test data so I can get the test working for that MP | 19:14 |
rick_h | I posted back on the MP what I got going, and need to see if the test data in wadllib is out of date | 19:14 |
tumbleweed | rick_h: I can't see pastebin.canonical.com | 19:16 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: k, sec | 19:16 |
rick_h | http://paste.mitechie.com/show/569/ | 19:17 |
rick_h | basically checking the date formats given the test json data in wadllib works out, so curious if the json out of that bug is different and needs updating | 19:17 |
tumbleweed | thanks for actually doing a test. I was just testing it from launchpadlib, against lp | 19:19 |
lifeless | flacoste: hey | 19:20 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: ok, I wasn't sure what the test is hitting and wondered if you could shoot me a json file to check against | 19:20 |
flacoste | hi lifeless! | 19:20 |
flacoste | yes, it would be a good time to talk! | 19:20 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: end of the day, the change seems good, but I'd like to get a good test to make sure we don't break things again | 19:20 |
tumbleweed | rick_h: IIRC the problem was that namespace_url (line 483 of application.py) was None | 19:20 |
lifeless | cool, @ 30 past? Would like to nab a snack first | 19:21 |
* lifeless is astonished that pg 8.4 handles bugtag.name without blowing up | 19:22 | |
rick_h | tumbleweed: ugh, ok, so deeper issue than it seemed | 19:22 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: ok, the source for that test stuff is open right? if so I guess I'll just pull that down and trace through to be able to duplicate something | 19:23 |
tumbleweed | rick_h: you should be able to test it by checking isinstance(lp.distributions['ubuntu'].date_created, datetime.datetime) | 19:24 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: right, but I need to get that into a unit tests with a json api response and an existing known wadl file. but yea, I'll pull that down and try to get it going | 19:26 |
rick_h | tumbleweed: thank | 19:26 |
tumbleweed | of course :) | 19:26 |
rick_h | it helps to know that's what the bug was hiting, couldn't tell that input the test file in the pastebin from the bug was using as input | 19:26 |
lifeless | flacoste: okies | 19:32 |
* flacoste starts hang out | 19:33 | |
lifeless | gary_poster: do you have a little time today, once I'm finished with flacoste, to talk paralleltest ? | 19:35 |
gary_poster | lifeless, I have my call with Francis in 24 min, and am trying to get a machine ready for analysis right now. I know it would be good to talk. We also have our scheduled call tomorrow though | 19:36 |
gary_poster | IOW, not easily, now | 19:42 |
gary_poster | no | 19:42 |
lifeless | gary_poster: no worries; perhaps we can talk a little tomorrow 1:1 | 20:06 |
gary_poster | ok cool | 20:06 |
gary_poster | lifeless I'll ping if I have time before EoD today in case you are around/available | 20:06 |
lifeless | cool, thanks | 20:10 |
gary_poster | lifeless, if we can make it fast we could talk now | 20:55 |
gary_poster | lifeless, https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/extras/canonical.com/goldenhordeoneonone ? | 20:55 |
kirkland | getting some weird LP oopses ... anyone around to take a look? | 20:57 |
lifeless | kirkland: gotta link the OOPS man :P | 20:58 |
lifeless | gary_poster: sure, trying to get in | 20:58 |
lifeless | this multi account stuff really is a nuisannce | 20:58 |
kirkland | lifeless: copying over from #launchpad (where I did) ... | 20:58 |
kirkland | Sorry, something went wrong with your search. (Error ID: OOPS-3611440967e645c2a3d8c68345be9b24) | 20:58 |
gary_poster | lifeless, I tried inviting your @gmail.com | 20:59 |
lifeless | yeah | 20:59 |
kirkland | I'm also getting a "not found" on a bug that I've been looking at/working on all day | 20:59 |
lifeless | that used to work | 20:59 |
lifeless | seems to not now | 20:59 |
lifeless | gary_poster: sending you an invite instead | 20:59 |
gary_poster | :-) cool | 21:00 |
lifeless | kirkland: thats a 404; it is oopsing because you have a local referrer | 21:00 |
kirkland | lifeless: what does that mean, sorry for being dense? | 21:14 |
kirkland | lifeless: I've been working on this private bug all day long https://bugs.launchpad.net/ztrustee/+bug/959650 | 21:14 |
kirkland | lifeless: and it's now disappeared for all I can tell | 21:14 |
mwhudson | i guess you no longer have permission to see it | 21:18 |
mwhudson | for whatever reason | 21:18 |
lifeless | kirkland: you may have been unsubscribed from it | 21:28 |
lifeless | kirkland: hmm | 21:29 |
lifeless | ztrustee may have been renamed :) | 21:29 |
lifeless | https://launchpad.net/ztrustree | 21:29 |
kirkland | lifeless: interesting; I'm on the team that owns the project | 21:30 |
lifeless | kirkland: can you see the project? | 21:30 |
kirkland | lifeless: I can see ztrustee (which is right); ztrustree is 404 | 21:30 |
lifeless | hah, yes ok | 21:31 |
lifeless | so there are two possibilities | 21:31 |
kirkland | Include the error ID OOPS-e72a16ca0af50bf4338dddc14d2ba243 in your message. | 21:31 |
lifeless | we've nerfed something in private projects | 21:31 |
kirkland | lifeless: any info there? | 21:31 |
lifeless | or you / your team have been unsubscribed from that bug, leading to no access | 21:31 |
kirkland | lifeless: how odd, okay, thanks | 21:32 |
kirkland | lifeless: we can recreate the bug, that's no problem | 21:32 |
lifeless | its failing in File "/srv/launchpad.net/production/launchpad-rev-14969/lib/lp/bugs/security.py", line 127, in checkAuthenticated | 21:32 |
lifeless | return self.obj.userCanView(user.person) | 21:32 |
lifeless | which is a cannot-access situation | 21:32 |
kirkland | lifeless: this is the first time something like this has happened, though, so I thought I'd mention it in case it's systemic | 21:33 |
lifeless | kirkland: I'm 99% certain someone in your team unsubscribed the team from the bug | 21:33 |
kirkland | lifeless: okay, we'll go with that | 21:33 |
kirkland | lifeless: I'll re-raise if it happens unexpectedly again | 21:33 |
lifeless | what they need to do if they don't want notifications is to use the *mute* feature | 21:33 |
lifeless | until the disclosure project is rolled out | 21:33 |
lifeless | the disclosure project is decoupling access controll and notification | 21:33 |
kirkland | lifeless: k | 21:33 |
lifeless | which will avoid this rather spectacular foot gun | 21:33 |
kirkland | lifeless: btw, can you tell me who to thank for the recent "Affiliations" feature, when searching for a person or team? | 21:34 |
kirkland | lifeless: cool | 21:34 |
lifeless | purple panthers | 21:34 |
lifeless | the same folk working on disclosure | 21:34 |
lifeless | e.g. sinzui & co | 21:34 |
kirkland | lifeless: lovely | 21:37 |
kirkland | sinzui: thanks!!! | 21:38 |
sinzui | kirkland, I will pass that on to the squad. they did the testing and work to make it appear in real time | 21:42 |
kirkland | sinzui: it's *awesome* | 21:42 |
kirkland | sinzui: and exactly what I was looking for in Bug #930364, which was marked wont-fix | 21:43 |
_mup_ | Bug #930364: show badges when searching/selecting a launchpad user <disclosure> <person-picker> <Launchpad itself:Won't Fix> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/930364 > | 21:43 |
kirkland | sinzui: I think you noted that in Comment 7, which is good enough for me! | 21:44 |
sinzui | fab | 21:44 |
sinzui | kirkland, we have started the UI for showing who has access to private data: https://qastaging.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+sharing is a draft of a what we will announce in a few weeks | 21:47 |
* sinzui cannot see that page so cannot answer question about who has access and how, but the views to do that will be in place next week | 21:47 | |
sinzui | StevenK, http://blog.launchpad.net/general/reimagining-the-nature-of-privacy-in-launchpad-part-1 | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!