| rmk | Publishing seems to take longer than builds in most cases for me. | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottK | Interesting. | 00:42 |
| ScottK | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-numpy/1:1.6.1-6ubuntu1/+build/3301333 is building on meissa (arm panda), but that doesn't show up on https://launchpad.net/builders | 00:43 |
| ScottK | LP does know about it though ... https://launchpad.net/builders/meissa | 00:43 |
| ScottK | wgrant: ^^^ expected? | 00:43 |
| wgrant | ScottK: The enabled and listed flags are separate. Normally all enabled builders are also listed, but apparently someone misclicked here. | 01:03 |
| wgrant | I've fixed it. | 01:03 |
| ScottK | OK. Great. Thanks. | 01:03 |
| ScottK | First time I remember seeing that. | 01:04 |
| wgrant | ScottK: Yeah, I've only seen it happen once before. | 01:12 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === czajkowski changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: czajkowski | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide: https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | For packaging help: join #ubuntu-packaging | ||
| === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
| === amithkk is now known as ubuntu | ||
| === ubuntu is now known as marcoceppi_ | ||
| === danilo is now known as danilos | ||
| pipedream | Can someone available please answer a query for more space for a PPA? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/189847 | 10:25 |
| === jml` is now known as jml | ||
| czajkowski | pipedream: I've asked someone to look into it for you | 10:45 |
| mrevell | Looking at that now pipedream | 10:45 |
| pipedream | great | 10:46 |
| pipedream | currently each time I update I remove the all packages, wait a few minutes for launcpad to realise, and re-upload | 10:46 |
| mrevell | pipedream, How much space do you need? | 10:47 |
| pipedream | I'm not sure yet. How exactly is the space used? If I upload many versions, are old ones kept? For a period of time or for a few versions? | 10:47 |
| mrevell | pipedream, 4GB enough? | 10:47 |
| mrevell | pipedream, If you upload a version that supersedes something that's already there, the old version gets deleted. | 10:48 |
| pipedream | 4G would be nice, and if I have problems I can ask again | 10:48 |
| mrevell | pipedream, Cool. That PPA now has 4GB space. Let us know how you get on. | 10:49 |
| pipedream | I hope to leave the sagemath-upstream-binary behind soon, and work on a from-source, which I can do in a separate PPA, I guess. But I still have a few bugs left | 10:49 |
| pipedream | Thanks! | 10:49 |
| mrevell | No prob :) | 10:49 |
| czajkowski | mrevell: thanks | 10:49 |
| Laney | I am getting an OOPS (e.g. OOPS-e4975d66c50bf7dacc7ce1bf5b388eaa) when trying to retry a build. Known fault? | 10:51 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=e4975d66c50bf7dacc7ce1bf5b388eaa | 10:51 |
| czajkowski | Laney: is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-libzip/0.10-1/+build/3293804 the page you are trying to retry ? | 10:56 |
| Laney | yes | 10:57 |
| Laney | I was just being too impatient to wait for the depwait to be broken automatically | 10:57 |
| czajkowski | Laney: is it back working now as I only see a private page and cant access it | 10:58 |
| Laney | czajkowski: It's in Needs building now, don't know if someone else retried or if it got done automatically :-) | 10:59 |
| czajkowski | I cant try it so I guess automatically | 10:59 |
| Laney | cool beans | 10:59 |
| Laney | I just gave back armhf OK, so either it was specific to giving back from depwait or the problem is solved | 11:01 |
| czajkowski | Laney: if it happens again can you log a bug and will get it looked at | 11:01 |
| czajkowski | thanks | 11:01 |
| === mpt_ is now known as mpt | ||
| wgrant | Laney: Consistent retry timeouts normally indicate that the cronjob is part-way through retrying it. | 11:17 |
| Laney | wgrant: Ah, makes sense. | 11:17 |
| wgrant | retry-depwait is horrible and keeps transactions open for ages :( | 11:18 |
| Laney | it's probably sufficiently unusual to worry about too much | 11:19 |
| === geser_ is now known as geser | ||
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| === marcoceppi_ is now known as amithkk | ||
| === amithkk is now known as ubuntu | ||
| === ubuntu is now known as amithkk | ||
| === jwhite_ is now known as jwhite | ||
| Pikkachu | hi, the indicated package diff is wrong here: https://launchpad.net/~renatosilva/+archive/ppa/+packages | 14:50 |
| Pikkachu | "diff from 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120311 to 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315" | 14:51 |
| Pikkachu | 20120311 was deleted, which will be definitive within 7 days, so I assume the diff link will disappear? | 14:51 |
| Pikkachu | or it will be "from 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2 to 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315"? | 14:52 |
| === Pikkachu is now known as PikkachuAway | ||
| === PikkachuAway is now known as Pikkachu | ||
| === bulldog98_ is now known as bulldog98 | ||
| dobey | Pikkachu: it would be from the previous version in the ppa, to the current version in the ppa | 15:21 |
| Pikkachu | dobey: I realize that, but the question is whether that link will change as it should, or not | 15:34 |
| Pikkachu | the previous versions were deleted, they're all the same and it was just a matter of version adjustment | 15:35 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| dobey | the diff won't get regenerated afaik. also, your versioning will break things | 15:37 |
| dobey | you want ~P20120315 i guess, and not -P.. | 15:37 |
| * EvilResistance agrees with dobey on this | 15:37 | |
| * EvilResistance is a packager xD | 15:37 | |
| dobey | but hard to fix that now | 15:37 |
| EvilResistance | mhm | 15:37 |
| dobey | not sure what you're trying to do exactly with it in your ppa though | 15:38 |
| Pikkachu | it what? | 15:38 |
| Pikkachu | why ~ not -? | 15:38 |
| dobey | because - separates the "debian version" from the "upstream version" | 15:39 |
| Pikkachu | the diff should be changed, though | 15:39 |
| Pikkachu | and ~? | 15:39 |
| dobey | so your "upstream version" is now "1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2" | 15:39 |
| Pikkachu | correct | 15:39 |
| Pikkachu | I patched the ubuntu package, I'm not willing to create an alternative version | 15:40 |
| dobey | you just did that | 15:42 |
| dobey | https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage#versioning | 15:42 |
| dobey | although i have to totally disagree with that launchpad help page as well | 15:43 |
| Pikkachu | "future Ubuntu versions will supersede your package. " -- does not apply | 15:44 |
| Pikkachu | in that case, future versions would destroy the patch | 15:45 |
| Pikkachu | well, seems reasonable though... it enforces me to keep up-to-date with latest version | 15:45 |
| dobey | if you want to patch it, you should either keep up to date, and maintain your alternate version, or work to get the patch upstream | 15:46 |
| Pikkachu | I'm confused with that page now | 15:48 |
| Pikkachu | I'm confused at all | 15:48 |
| Pikkachu | 2.10.0-0ubuntu3 will already supersede my version | 15:49 |
| Pikkachu | so I see no practical difference between "ppa" and "-" | 15:49 |
| Pikkachu | as for the tilde, I have no idea whether the package needs recompilation | 15:49 |
| Pikkachu | besides, it's available only for oneiric already | 15:50 |
| Pikkachu | as for getting the patch applied upstream, you'd be surprised how difficult it is to communicate with pidgin devs | 15:51 |
| dobey | it won't supersede your version | 15:51 |
| dobey | that's the point :) | 15:51 |
| Pikkachu | why not? | 15:51 |
| dobey | [dobey@lunatari:~]: dpkg --compare-versions 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu3 gt 1:2.10.0-0ubuntu2-P20120315 | 15:51 |
| dobey | [dobey@lunatari:~]: echo $? | 15:51 |
| dobey | 1 | 15:51 |
| Pikkachu | false? | 15:51 |
| dobey | yes | 15:52 |
| Pikkachu | how so, I can't understand why | 15:52 |
| dobey | because using the - where you did changed the semantics of the versioning | 15:52 |
| Pikkachu | it's like a fork? | 15:52 |
| dobey | well you made a fork regarldess of the version | 15:52 |
| Pikkachu | ok I just want to understand it | 15:53 |
| Pikkachu | the dash adds a semantic of a fork (just like if you changed package name), that's what I mean | 15:54 |
| dobey | no. it changes the semantics of how the version comparison in dpkg works, because the "upstream version" is different in the two versions | 15:55 |
| dobey | the upstream version is not "2.10.0" in both cases | 15:55 |
| dobey | so "2.10.0-0ubuntu2" is greater than "2.10.0" | 15:55 |
| dobey | i really need to go get lunch right now though. later | 15:57 |
| Pikkachu | ok thanks anyway | 15:57 |
| Pikkachu | anyway, it seems reasonable to not be superseded as well, because I don't really want to update the package | 15:58 |
| Pikkachu | hmm but I need to get noticed of 0ubuntu3... | 15:59 |
| * Pikkachu confused | 15:59 | |
| === danilo is now known as danilos | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | ||
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | ||
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | ||
| === wedtm is now known as wedtm|away | ||
| === wedtm|away is now known as wedtm | ||
| kirkland | weird things are happening in LP right now | 20:45 |
| kirkland | had a bug that just "disappeared" for a while | 20:45 |
| kirkland | been working on it all day | 20:45 |
| kirkland | went about 2 minutes with Launchpad giving it equivalent of a 404 not found | 20:45 |
| kirkland | just came back | 20:45 |
| kirkland | now, trying to change the assignee, that's failing | 20:45 |
| kirkland | Sorry, something went wrong with your search. (Error ID: OOPS-3611440967e645c2a3d8c68345be9b24) | 20:45 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=3611440967e645c2a3d8c68345be9b24 | 20:45 |
| kirkland | trying to change the milestone says: | 20:46 |
| kirkland | The following errors were encountered: | 20:46 |
| kirkland | Object: , name: u'959650' | 20:46 |
| jonrafkind | I want to set up an automated job to send nightly builds to launchpad but gnupg is asking for my password, is there a way to use debuild without gnupg prompting for a password? | 21:01 |
| dobey | jonrafkind: why not use daily build recipes on launchpad itself | 21:51 |
| jonrafkind | because i have no idea what that is | 21:51 |
| dobey | https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes | 21:52 |
| EvilResistance | that's dependent, of course, on you having all the code and stuff on a Bazaar branch on LP | 21:52 |
| dobey | we use launchpad recipes extensively for nightlies builds in ubuntuone | 21:52 |
| jonrafkind | ah thats most likely why i dont use it and never will | 21:52 |
| dobey | eh, you can create an import of a different upstream on launchpad, just for building recipes | 21:53 |
| jonrafkind | sounds like a blast | 21:53 |
| dobey | if the thing is already pacakged in ubuntu, there probably is an import of upstream already set up even | 21:53 |
| dobey | you'd just need a branch that contians the debian/ directory | 21:54 |
| dobey | which you nest with the recipe | 21:54 |
| jonrafkind | anyway i just made a new gpg key without a password, supposedly that iwll work | 21:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!