[09:35] <ajmitch> stgraber: do you know what junk do I need to fill in on the myapps review screen when approving an app?
[09:37]  * ajmitch just wants to know if it actually uses the archive root/archive id there :)
[14:17] <stgraber> ajmitch: you need to enter something unique in the PPA field, AFAIK it's not used after that for ARB apps
[15:57] <wendar> the PPA has to be a real PPA (I generally just use staging)
[15:58] <wendar> but the "key" can be a random string
[15:58] <wendar> I generally just randomly type letters and numbers on the keyboard
[18:50] <ajmitch> wendar: it complained that there was already an application with that archive id, it seems to want the PPA string to be unique
[18:50] <wendar> I encountered that too, trying to remember how I got around it
[18:50] <ajmitch> as much as I'd like to use staging for all apps, it seems a bit broken to require a different PPA for every app
[18:50]  * ajmitch shall file bugs :)
[18:51] <wendar> because it also checks that the text is a valid PPA
[18:51]  * wendar looking at apps I recently launched
[18:52] <ajmitch> thanks
[18:53] <wendar> Archive root:
[18:53] <wendar>     http://extras.ubuntu.com/
[18:53] <wendar> Archive identifier:
[18:53] <wendar>     garbage/garbage
[18:53] <wendar> Archive signing key:
[18:53] <wendar>     garbage
[18:53] <wendar> Uploaded version:
[18:53] <wendar>     0.1-0extras11.10.1
[18:53] <wendar> That's from Framingham calculator
[18:53] <ajmitch> heh
[18:53] <ajmitch> and it didn't check that it was a valid ppa?
[18:54] <wendar> It's checking that it matches the general text patter of a valid PPA, but not checking that the PPA exists.
[18:54] <ajmitch> great
[18:54] <wendar> Because the way commercial apps work, it creates the PPA when they launch.
[18:56] <ajmitch> thanks for that, I'll approve & upload soon
[21:03] <ajmitch> wendar: how's the music lense going?
[21:04] <wendar> ajmitch: done except for a problem with apparmor profiles
[21:04] <ajmitch> anything serious?
[21:04] <wendar> ajmitch: the author didn't add access to the music databases to the profiles, so I need to add that
[21:05] <ajmitch> ok
[21:05] <wendar> I can probably get them up this afternoon
[21:05] <wendar> (up for vote, that is)
[21:05] <ajmitch> fwiw, I tried compiling conquests a couple of days ago on oneiric & precise, and it failed, so I need to give feedback to the author about that
[21:06] <ajmitch> apart from that, it's already in a PPA (for maverick) & uses a simple dh7-style rules file, so should be easy to fix up
[21:06] <wendar> ah, so just updated dependencies or something like that
[21:07] <ajmitch> or a stricter gcc
[21:07] <ajmitch> I just took a look because it looked cool :)
[21:07] <ajmitch> I'll still try& work down from the top of the list over the weekend
[21:15] <wendar> cool
[21:15] <wendar> I'll be away over the weekend, but back on Monday
[21:17] <ajmitch> we'll see how many more we can get pushed to extras.u.c this week, then we'll need to look at targetting them to precise soon
[21:17] <ajmitch> something to talk about at the meeting next week
[21:18] <cielak> ajmitch: I see harmonyseq is all done now, right? great, great thanks for your work!
[21:18] <ajmitch> cielak: thank you for your excellent submission :)
[21:18] <cielak> I guess it should appear in the USC within several hours?
[21:19] <ajmitch> I hope so
[21:20] <cielak> ajmitch: one more question: how do I get it now to precise, when the ARB will start working on submissions to precise?
[21:20] <cielak> shall I re-send it, will it be done automatically, or anyhow else?
[21:20] <ajmitch> cielak: 'soon' is all I can say, it won't be done automatically
[21:21] <ajmitch> we'll probably work that out next week
[21:22] <cielak> will I have to package it again for precise, or do you take care of these details?
[21:23] <ajmitch> it'll pretty much be exactly the same package, but with a different version in debian/changelog
[21:23] <ajmitch> I don't think you'll have much you need to do
[21:24] <cielak> likely, as far as I know there is no difference in dependencies
[21:24] <ajmitch> there aren't, it worked fine for me on precise
[21:24] <cielak> ah :)
[21:24] <cielak> well, thanks again!
[21:25] <ajmitch> if I've made any mistakes with the upload, I'll just re-push to the PPA :)
[21:26]  * ajmitch just has to wait for it to build in the PPA
[21:29] <cielak> the queue is now 4 hours for amd64 and 1 hour 50 mins for i386
[21:30] <cielak> so it shouldn't be too quick, I guess
[21:30] <cielak> :)
[22:26] <stgraber> ajmitch: let me fix that
[22:27] <ajmitch> stgraber: fix what?
[22:27] <stgraber> fixed
[22:27] <ajmitch> the build score?
[22:27] <stgraber> yeah
[22:27] <ajmitch> ok, thanks :)
[22:28] <stgraber> np, feel free to ping me when you have something that needs some bumping (as long as it's not openoffice, kernel, ... )
[22:29] <ajmitch> sure, I was just going to be patient since I'm at work right now
[22:59] <cielak> ajmitch: it seems to have successfully built
[23:00] <cielak> but it does not put it to extras, right?
[23:00] <ajmitch> iirc that should happen automatically, but not straight away
[23:06] <cielak> ah right :)
[23:07] <cielak> well, gotta go, it's quite late in my TZ, will check that out tomorrow
[23:07] <cielak> good night all!