[09:35] stgraber: do you know what junk do I need to fill in on the myapps review screen when approving an app? [09:37] * ajmitch just wants to know if it actually uses the archive root/archive id there :) [14:17] ajmitch: you need to enter something unique in the PPA field, AFAIK it's not used after that for ARB apps [15:57] the PPA has to be a real PPA (I generally just use staging) [15:58] but the "key" can be a random string [15:58] I generally just randomly type letters and numbers on the keyboard [18:50] wendar: it complained that there was already an application with that archive id, it seems to want the PPA string to be unique [18:50] I encountered that too, trying to remember how I got around it [18:50] as much as I'd like to use staging for all apps, it seems a bit broken to require a different PPA for every app [18:50] * ajmitch shall file bugs :) [18:51] because it also checks that the text is a valid PPA [18:51] * wendar looking at apps I recently launched [18:52] thanks [18:53] Archive root: [18:53] http://extras.ubuntu.com/ [18:53] Archive identifier: [18:53] garbage/garbage [18:53] Archive signing key: [18:53] garbage [18:53] Uploaded version: [18:53] 0.1-0extras11.10.1 [18:53] That's from Framingham calculator [18:53] heh [18:53] and it didn't check that it was a valid ppa? [18:54] It's checking that it matches the general text patter of a valid PPA, but not checking that the PPA exists. [18:54] great [18:54] Because the way commercial apps work, it creates the PPA when they launch. [18:56] thanks for that, I'll approve & upload soon [21:03] wendar: how's the music lense going? [21:04] ajmitch: done except for a problem with apparmor profiles [21:04] anything serious? [21:04] ajmitch: the author didn't add access to the music databases to the profiles, so I need to add that [21:05] ok [21:05] I can probably get them up this afternoon [21:05] (up for vote, that is) [21:05] fwiw, I tried compiling conquests a couple of days ago on oneiric & precise, and it failed, so I need to give feedback to the author about that [21:06] apart from that, it's already in a PPA (for maverick) & uses a simple dh7-style rules file, so should be easy to fix up [21:06] ah, so just updated dependencies or something like that [21:07] or a stricter gcc [21:07] I just took a look because it looked cool :) [21:07] I'll still try& work down from the top of the list over the weekend [21:15] cool [21:15] I'll be away over the weekend, but back on Monday [21:17] we'll see how many more we can get pushed to extras.u.c this week, then we'll need to look at targetting them to precise soon [21:17] something to talk about at the meeting next week [21:18] ajmitch: I see harmonyseq is all done now, right? great, great thanks for your work! [21:18] cielak: thank you for your excellent submission :) [21:18] I guess it should appear in the USC within several hours? [21:19] I hope so [21:20] ajmitch: one more question: how do I get it now to precise, when the ARB will start working on submissions to precise? [21:20] shall I re-send it, will it be done automatically, or anyhow else? [21:20] cielak: 'soon' is all I can say, it won't be done automatically [21:21] we'll probably work that out next week [21:22] will I have to package it again for precise, or do you take care of these details? [21:23] it'll pretty much be exactly the same package, but with a different version in debian/changelog [21:23] I don't think you'll have much you need to do [21:24] likely, as far as I know there is no difference in dependencies [21:24] there aren't, it worked fine for me on precise [21:24] ah :) [21:24] well, thanks again! [21:25] if I've made any mistakes with the upload, I'll just re-push to the PPA :) [21:26] * ajmitch just has to wait for it to build in the PPA [21:29] the queue is now 4 hours for amd64 and 1 hour 50 mins for i386 [21:30] so it shouldn't be too quick, I guess [21:30] :) [22:26] ajmitch: let me fix that [22:27] stgraber: fix what? [22:27] fixed [22:27] the build score? [22:27] yeah [22:27] ok, thanks :) [22:28] np, feel free to ping me when you have something that needs some bumping (as long as it's not openoffice, kernel, ... ) [22:29] sure, I was just going to be patient since I'm at work right now [22:59] ajmitch: it seems to have successfully built [23:00] but it does not put it to extras, right? [23:00] iirc that should happen automatically, but not straight away [23:06] ah right :) [23:07] well, gotta go, it's quite late in my TZ, will check that out tomorrow [23:07] good night all!