[01:15] ScottK: looking at bug 852603 for lucid. hedgewars includes a haskell server, which our packages include, but i can't get the current server to build on lucid's haskell stack. sru seems out, given that [01:15] what about a backport? [01:15] Launchpad bug 852603 in hedgewars (Ubuntu Lucid) "hedgewars << 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852603 [01:15] backport with no server, that is [01:47] broder: Would that require backporting haskell stuff? === jalcine is now known as jalcine_ === jalcine_ is now known as jalcine === jalcine is now known as jalcine_ === jalcine_ is now known as jalcine [03:43] someone should merge gnash. [03:44] what goodies will it bring? [03:44] no new upstream release, so just to fix a CVE? [03:46] if noone else gets to it in the next hour or so I'll merge & upload then [03:46] Yes. Fixing a CVE [04:00] I started on it [04:00] gnash that is [04:00] ajmitch: I got it [04:03] micahg: ok [04:03] you TIL so you know it best :) [04:04] yeah, only reason I didn't upload was I ran into a little trouble building the source package === jalcine is now known as jalcine_ [04:09] * micahg thought he filed a bug for that [04:09] * ScottK went through RC bugs and did some syncs for grave bugs. [04:09] Didn't look. [04:09] nope, guess not [04:09] ScottK: thanks, I'm going to try & hit up that rc bugs list over the weekend as well [04:09] did you leave comments on the page? [04:10] Yes [04:10] great [04:11] it looks like we won't run out of things to do before release day [04:11] oh no, plenty to do :) [04:11] and there's always the 100k open bugs :) [04:12] and I thought you'd be able to have a nice, relaxing final week before release :) [05:12] ScottK: i was thinking of disabling the haskell stuff in the backport, which would also mean the release pocket package would have the (old) server, and the backport package wouldn't === jalcine_ is now known as jalcine [05:33] Hi, I'm using python-distutils-extra. I'm not sure if that's to blame, but in Lucid the auto-generated POTFILES.in is missing the files of certain directories, while in Precise it works fine. [05:33] Here's my setup.py: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~epoptes/epoptes/trunk/view/head:/setup.py [05:33] The files from epoptes-client/ are missing, so I had to create a potfiles-workaround/ dir and symlink them there! :( Any ideas? [06:30] ajmitch: test building openclipart overnight [06:34] micahg: oh right, I hadn't checked up to see if that was uploaded :) [06:35] * ajmitch had thought that sweetshark had taken the diff & was going to upload === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [07:46] good morning [07:50] hi dholbach [07:50] hi ajmitch [08:17] can somebody help with #960914 ? i'm unable to update my system now. [08:20] toabctl, you might want to ping mvo in #ubuntu-devel [08:31] dholbach, ok. thanks === jalcine_ is now known as Guest61506 === Guest61506 is now known as JackyAlcine === JackyAlcine is now known as jalcine === jalcine is now known as Guest81870 === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [11:00] broder: As long as it's a separate binary for the server stuff, that sounds fine. === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan [13:18] ScottK: https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental/+files/kile_2.1.0-1ubuntu2~ppa1.dsc << New kile package that recommends texlive-latex-extra [13:18] Sure. Let me have a look. [13:20] shadeslayer: Did you talk to fabo about it? [13:20] nop [13:20] nope [13:21] fabo: a user emailed the ubuntu-devel-disucss that kile should recommend texlive-latex-extra, because kile doesn't work properly without it [13:21] sec [13:21] shadeslayer: btw, kdevelop 4.3 is in the queue. I noticed that you're the last one to have touched it. [13:21] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/attachments/20120316/a2457c52/attachment.html [13:22] also : http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/43779/kile-will-not-work-on-ubuntu-utf8x-def/48272#48272 [13:22] shadeslayer: Also the changelog entry is a bit 'terse'. Explain why the change is being made. [13:22] fabo: uh yeah, Riddell is doing KDevelop that right now [13:22] ScottK: oh sure .. [13:22] -that [13:24] Please fix that and then work out with fabo if it makes more sense to do this here or in Debian. [13:25] shadeslayer: have you checked the issue? we've clean up dependencies on 2.1.0 [13:25] sec, phone call [13:44] fabo: back, yes, i've tested it and I got the same error without texlive-latex-extra [13:44] ( the same error as on stackexchange ) [13:44] and doesn't happen after installing texlive-latex-extra [13:44] Here's a test document if you want to test : http://paste.kde.org/444584/ [13:45] that's just one of the templates that kile provides [13:45] otoh if I remove line 2, it works .... [13:45] so I'd say since kile ships the template which requires utf8 support, we should pull in the extra package === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:51] Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor who could upload my sflphone package. It's regarding bug report 913018. [13:51] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sflphone/+bug/913018 [13:51] Launchpad bug 913018 in sflphone (Ubuntu) "sflphoned crashed with SIGSEGV in std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook()" [Medium,Confirmed] [13:52] I have added 2 patches to the sflphone package from Debian unstable so that it builds on precise. It would be a upgrade from sflphone 1.0.1 to 1.0.2. [13:53] shadeslayer: or promote to Suggests to avoid to pull 28M (for referenc bug 577595) [13:53] Launchpad bug 577595 in kile (Ubuntu) "huge list of dependencies for Kile" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/577595 [13:55] heh, I like the reasoning, installing a latex editor shouldn't pull in shit loads of deps ... otoh I would also scream at upstream for having templates that pull in large deps [13:56] ok, lets demote it to suggests [13:56] I'll poke upstream as to what can be done about the templates [14:56] shadeslayer: probaly it's enough to replace "utf8x" with "utf8" in the template [14:56] oh, whats the difference? [14:57] "utf8" is included in texlive-latex-base (dependency of texlive recommends of kile) [14:57] no I meant, what's the difference in the packages? [14:58] "The supported encoding by the LaTeX team is utf8 and covers a fairly specific/limited range of unicode input characters. It only defines those symbols that are known to be available with the current font encoding. utf8x is not officially supported, but covers a much broader range of input symbols." (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/Internationalization) [14:58] was about to answer your question :) the first part was an explanation why it might be enough for the fix (dependency-wise) [14:59] right [14:59] I've emailed upstream, will pass this new info along as well [14:59] what the difference exactly is between utf8 and utf8x, I don't know [15:00] well, looks like support for more chars in utf8x [15:00] but perhaps "utf8" is enough for most people, and only those with special needs have to switch to "utf8x" [15:00] yeah [15:02] some more input: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/13067/utf8x-vs-utf8-inputenc [15:02] oh yay [15:02] no need to add more deps === vibhav is now known as Guest43747 [15:52] tumbleweed: pin [15:52] err ping [16:14] mfisch: hi [16:15] tumbleweed: since upstream for python-djvulibre used a different fix, I think I can drop my FFe [16:15] tumbleweed: then is there a different process for just pulling a new rev from Debian? [16:17] mfisch, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess [16:17] dholbach: thx, thats what I needed [16:17] mfisch: you might notice that the version uploaded to unstable doesn't build on precise :) === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away === jalcine_ is now known as Guest10125 === Guest10125 is now known as JackyAlcine === JackyAlcine is now known as Guest91681 [17:34] n #engineering [17:34] bah [17:44] ScottK: it's not a separate binary - they're in the same package currently [17:44] broder: Considering we don't have not automatic on lucid, that's a bit concerning. [17:45] It sounds like there's no particularly good answer. [17:45] ScottK: i'm not particularly opposed to saying that there's just nothing we can do, but wanted to make sure that was the case first [17:45] If the game's not playable due to online game changes, something > nothing. [17:46] broder: I'm not sure I understand the situation completely enough to make a decision. If the package in lucid is effectively useless, then I'd say go ahead. [17:46] it's not useless. you can still do local lan play and possibly local AI play [19:44] Hi all! [19:50] ScottK: I'm fearing the scipy maintainers are mia, is it really impossible without maintainer ack? [20:46] jtaylor: Not impossible, just preferred. If they aren't responsive, get barry to review it. If he gives it a +1, I'll approve. [20:59] Hi, could someone look at bug 913018 and maybe sponsor the sflphone package? [20:59] Launchpad bug 913018 in sflphone (Ubuntu) "sflphoned crashed with SIGSEGV in std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/913018 === tumbleweed changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Precise: Beta Freeze | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://bit.ly/fz6AyQ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ | Fix-It Friday: http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/KljH7rwo1X [21:13] usual rules, unseeded stuff gets waved through when the buildds aren't too full? [21:13] yup, probably immediately === ScottK changed the topic of #ubuntu-motu to: Precise: Beta Freeze - open season for unseeded package bug fixing | Want to get involved with the MOTU? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing | Sponsor queue: http://bit.ly/fz6AyQ | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS | http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ | Fix-It Friday: http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/KljH7rwo1X