| === [ESphynx] is now known as ESphynx | ||
| ajmitch | micahg: nice to see that openclipart is still building, 16 hours later... :) | 02:27 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | ajmitch: yeah, it got one of the slower builders | 02:54 |
| * ajmitch just hopes it won't need to be uploaded again | 02:59 | |
| micahg | ajmitch: nah, should be fine :) | 02:59 |
| micahg | ajmitch: Finished 5 minutes ago (took 17 hours, 20 minutes, 54.0 seconds) | 03:00 |
| ajmitch | as long as I don't get the blame ;) | 03:00 |
| ajmitch | those aren't small packages that it produces | 03:02 |
| micahg | nope | 03:05 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:05 |
| Whoopie | Good morning! Could someone of the devs help me fixing this build failure? -> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/98423805/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-armel.sflphone_1.0.2-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 07:55 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson sponsored the sflphone package, but it fails on armel and armhf. | 07:55 |
| Whoopie | I can't find the cause because the build looks the same for i386 and amd64. | 07:56 |
| Zhenech | o/ Whoopie | 08:01 |
| Zhenech | Whoopie, my eyes tell me, that it tries to link to stupid things, just don't ask me why :) | 08:01 |
| Zhenech | does it happen on debian too? | 08:01 |
| Zhenech | yes it does | 08:02 |
| Whoopie | Zhenech: hey. It seems as the linking looks the same on all archs. | 08:04 |
| tumbleweed | Zhenech: the problem appears to be that it's creating libpjsip-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnu.a but trying to link to libpjsip-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi.a | 08:05 |
| Whoopie | tumbleweed: your eyes are really better then mine. ;-) | 08:10 |
| tumbleweed | took me a minute to see it | 08:11 |
| tumbleweed | the correct tuple is the eabi one. So you need to figure out where the other one is coming from | 08:12 |
| tumbleweed | err correct gnu triplet | 08:12 |
| Whoopie | tumbleweed: could it be that the gnueabi is derived from the "checking build system type" | 08:16 |
| Whoopie | ? | 08:16 |
| tumbleweed | I suggest debugging it under qemu / a qemu-user-static chroot | 08:17 |
| Whoopie | ok | 08:18 |
| tumbleweed | pbuilder-dist knows how to create arm chroots | 08:18 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| Whoopie | tumbleweed: I used this -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RootfsFromScratch | 08:53 |
| Whoopie | is it also ok? | 08:53 |
| vibhavp | Do i need to suscribe the review team when submiting debdiffs for precise? | 09:00 |
| dholbach | vibhavp, 'ubuntu-sponsors'? yes :) | 09:02 |
| tumbleweed | Whoopie: I remember running into bugs in that but yes, it should work | 09:04 |
| vibhavp | dholbach: I mean the Ubuntu Review Team | 09:06 |
| vibhavp | Since we have passed FF | 09:08 |
| tumbleweed | vibhavp: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | 09:09 |
| vibhavp | tumbleweed: I sorry I used the word review instead of release | 09:12 |
| vibhavp | This means, should I suscribe the Ubuntu Release team when submiting a debdiff for precise? | 09:12 |
| Laney | if you need a freeze exception, yes | 09:13 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| vibhavp | dholbach: Thanks for uploading my debdiff! | 09:22 |
| dholbach | vibhavp, I hope you didn't mind I made a few modifications | 09:22 |
| vibhavp | dholbach: Could you send me the modified debdiff, Ill use it as an example to improve my skills | 09:23 |
| dholbach | vibhavp, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/98511604/kupfer_0%2Bv206%2Bdfsg-1_0%2Bv206%2Bdfsg-1ubuntu1.diff.gz | 09:25 |
| Whoopie | tumbleweed: any idea where to start debugging? It seems to be an autotools issue (according to a quick google search). | 09:34 |
| tumbleweed | Whoopie: I'm no autotools expert, I can't say without looking at it | 09:43 |
| savvas | hello, does this mir request look ok to you? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgxps/+bug/965467 - I think I included everything the requirements wiki page suggested | 10:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 965467 in libgxps (Ubuntu) "[MIR] Please transfer libgxps 0.2.2-1 (universe) to main" [Undecided,New] | 10:23 |
| Laney | looks complete, yes. You should speak to the desktop team about whether they want to push it | 10:27 |
| savvas | hi Laney :) thanks again for sponsoring the package! | 10:37 |
| Laney | you're quite welcome | 10:37 |
| Rhonda | hmmm, missed 4 new mixtapes from dholbach, wtf :) | 11:45 |
| * Rhonda hugs Laney for accepting wesnoth-1.10 :) | 11:45 | |
| dholbach | Rhonda, a shame you weren't there on Saturday in Berlin - it was a great night :) | 11:45 |
| Laney | \o/ | 11:46 |
| Laney | still in the NEW queue unfortunately | 11:46 |
| Laney | there are quite a number of steps | 11:46 |
| Rhonda | dholbach: Well, there was sorta birthday party for my son at Saturday in our house, so … :) | 11:46 |
| dholbach | haha, great :) | 11:47 |
| Rhonda | Laney: what, NEW queue, rmadison -uubuntu wesnoth-1.10 says it's already in? | 11:47 |
| dholbach | I recorded the session, but it's >1G and not quite up to my usual mixtape standards - but it was a great party nonetheless | 11:47 |
| Laney | Rhonda: the source yes, but not the binaries | 11:47 |
| Laney | e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+queue | 11:47 |
| Rhonda | hmmm | 11:48 |
| Laney | never mind, someone will get to it soon | 11:48 |
| Rhonda | uhm, then my dent about it was too soonish. %-( | 11:48 |
| Laney | still technically correct ^o) | 11:49 |
| Rhonda | Have to push an update soonish anyway, the help file translations are missing. %-/ | 11:49 |
| Rhonda | see http://bugs.debian.org/664164 | 11:50 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 664164 in wesnoth-1.10 "[wesnoth-1.10] Help translations missing" [Normal,Open] | 11:50 |
| ryanakca | What would be the appropriate version for a no changes rebuild? Current: 2.0.0-1, Rebuild: 2.0.0-1build1 ? | 12:04 |
| StevenK | ryanakca: That would be fine, yes. | 12:09 |
| ryanakca | StevenK: Alright, and I'm guessing I need to also Maintainer -> XSBC-Orig-Maintainer ? | 12:10 |
| StevenK | I'm not sure. I would probably ignore it, just since it's a no-change rebuild. | 12:11 |
| ryanakca | StevenK: Alright, thanks, debcommitting and pushing :) | 12:15 |
| Laney | yeah, no need to change that unless you make actual changes | 12:23 |
| * ryanakca nods, lp-proposed, thanks :) | 12:26 | |
| === imbrando1 is now known as imbrandon | ||
| vibhavp | While preparing a patch (ubuntu delta) , what do I put in the "Uploaders" Section? | 13:07 |
| vibhavp | /window/window 2 | 13:11 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: I have attached the debdiff to bug report 913018 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913018) | 13:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 913018 in sflphone (Ubuntu) "sflphoned crashed with SIGSEGV in std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook() from DBus::DefaultWatch::DefaultWatch" [Medium,Fix released] | 13:15 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: sflphone built find for amd64/i386 in my testing PPA and for armel in the qemu chroot. | 13:16 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: should I attach the armel build log to the ticket? | 13:20 |
| cjwatson | don't care | 13:21 |
| cjwatson | Whoopie: I think it would be a good idea to keep config.guess and config.sub in sync | 13:23 |
| cjwatson | it is not usually recommended to update them independently | 13:23 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: ok. | 13:24 |
| cjwatson | (I don't think that needs another test build TBH, I'd be happy to apply a diff that just did that) | 13:24 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: how to name the patch file then? | 13:30 |
| cjwatson | "config-guess-sub" or just "config" | 13:30 |
| cjwatson | not that important :) | 13:30 |
| vibhavp | */window 2 | 13:46 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: updated debdiff attached. | 13:48 |
| cjwatson | Whoopie: thanks, uploaded | 13:51 |
| cjwatson | (modulo beta freeze) | 13:51 |
| Whoopie | cjwatson: thank you! | 13:52 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| kirkland | is there a PPA I can depend upon to get a package that needs "dh clean --with python2" to build on lucid? | 16:28 |
| kirkland | a backports ppa or something? | 16:28 |
| tumbleweed | kirkland: not that I'm aware of | 16:29 |
| kirkland | tumbleweed: okay, thanks | 16:29 |
| kirkland | tumbleweed: any known workaround? | 16:29 |
| tumbleweed | besides pysupport? | 16:30 |
| tumbleweed | barry: ^ | 16:30 |
| PaoloRotolo | Hi all! | 16:59 |
| vibhavp | Is it a coincidence the dholbach's nick starts with "dh" ? | 17:10 |
| hakermania | Hello, World! If you have your application 'sitting in the archive admin / release team review queue', how do you know whether your package has been accepted or not (what changes in order to realize it)? See bug #964451 last answer :P | 17:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 964451 in wallch (Ubuntu) "FFE: Wallch 3.01" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/964451 | 17:26 |
| hakermania | I can see that the application has been uploaded (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wallch) but I don't know where to search for 'accepted' or similar... | 17:29 |
| cjwatson | hakermania: you'll get mail when it's accepted | 17:36 |
| cjwatson | uh, but that *has* been accepted | 17:37 |
| cjwatson | your error was in not putting "LP: #964451" somewhere in the changelog so that it would auto-close the bug | 17:37 |
| cjwatson | I've closed the bug now | 17:38 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| hakermania | cjwatson, thanks:) But, seriously, was it my bad? Here: http://tinyurl.com/caafqv2 it doesn't say somewhere that the changelog should close the bug the I open... :/ | 17:44 |
| cjwatson | it's not mandatory to auto-close bugs, but if you want them to be auto-closed then that's the only way to do it. | 17:44 |
| cjwatson | otherwise you should close them following the mail you got when the package was accepted. | 17:45 |
| hakermania | cjwatson, OK! Thanks again. One last question, do you know whether this accepted application will land in Beta 2? | 17:45 |
| hakermania | (will be in usc in beta 2) | 17:45 |
| cjwatson | it's in the archive now and beta 2 hasn't been released yet | 17:45 |
| cjwatson | so yes | 17:45 |
| hakermania | cool :) | 17:45 |
| barry | kirkland: sadly, no | 18:00 |
| kirkland | barry: okay, thanks, no worries | 18:01 |
| kirkland | barry: no one should run 10.04 any more anyway :-P | 18:01 |
| kirkland | bring on the 12.04s! | 18:01 |
| barry | kirkland: exactly :) | 18:01 |
| jtaylor | barry: I think I finally have a working scipy patch | 18:06 |
| jtaylor | see the branch | 18:06 |
| jtaylor | the changelog still needs work | 18:08 |
| barry | jtaylor: awesome, let me try building it locally | 18:09 |
| barry | jtaylor: could you link the branch to bug 960595? | 18:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 960595 in python-scipy (Ubuntu) "FFe for python3 scipy packages" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/960595 | 18:10 |
| jtaylor | it is interesting that the -dbg test brings down the interpreter | 18:13 |
| jtaylor | but thats the case for the old packages too | 18:13 |
| jtaylor | so no regression | 18:13 |
| jtaylor | one non-dbg test fails also no regression | 18:13 |
| barry | ScottK: i suppose i should file ffe's for all the other flufl.* packages? | 18:39 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 18:40 |
| ScottK | Feel free to do it all in one bug. | 18:40 |
| barry | cool. i'll file them after you've reviewed and uploaded .password and .bounce (coming soon | 18:40 |
| barry | jtaylor: in your branch, why did you remove all the -1buildN entries in changelog? | 18:43 |
| jtaylor | they are just rebuilds not realyl necessary to keep them | 18:44 |
| jtaylor | at least I have been told that in the past | 18:44 |
| barry | jtaylor: hmm, it seems to lose information though, which i don't like. maybe ScottK has an opinion on that? | 18:44 |
| ScottK | jtaylor: IME, generally you just drop changelog entries when syncing from Debian. I'd keep them. | 18:45 |
| barry | jtaylor: also, X-Python-Version: >= 3.1... is that for consistency w/debian? (ubuntu only cares about >= 3.2) | 18:45 |
| ScottK | Actually that only matters on Ubuntu. | 18:45 |
| jtaylor | scipy works with 3.1 | 18:45 |
| ScottK | No, I take that back. | 18:46 |
| jtaylor | I had the impression that should denote the oldest version supported by the source | 18:46 |
| ScottK | barry: Explicit is better tahn implicit. | 18:46 |
| jtaylor | which makes backport situation clear | 18:46 |
| barry | ScottK: cool, no problem with that then | 18:46 |
| ScottK | Yeah. | 18:46 |
| barry | jtaylor: okay, i'm going to comment in the ffe bug, but i approve of the patch with the restoration of the d/changelog entires | 18:47 |
| barry | *entries | 18:47 |
| * ScottK just watched the BDFL's Pycon keynote on Youtube, so is feeling particularly Pythonic today. | 18:47 | |
| barry | ScottK: you know how much he hates doing those? :) | 18:48 |
| ScottK | He mentioned it. | 18:48 |
| jtaylor | ScottK: keep or remove the +build changelogs? | 18:48 |
| ScottK | It was a good talk though. I learned some things. | 18:48 |
| ScottK | jtaylor: Keep | 18:48 |
| jtaylor | k | 18:48 |
| barry | me too! | 18:48 |
| ScottK | Don't mess with history unless you can sync with Debian. | 18:49 |
| pabelanger | Any suggestions on bug 965484? Should redmine be rolled back or a new sync request for ruby-rack? | 18:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 965484 in redmine (Ubuntu) " redmine : Depends: ruby-rack (>= 1.4.0) but 1.3.5-1 is to be installed " [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/965484 | 18:49 |
| barry | jtaylor, ScottK https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scipy/+bug/960595/comments/2 | 18:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 960595 in python-scipy (Ubuntu) "FFe for python3 scipy packages" [Undecided,New] | 18:50 |
| ScottK | pabelanger: I'd be inclined to more forward. | 18:50 |
| pabelanger | ScottK, Ya, if people agree with bumping ruby-rack, I can setup the FFe | 18:51 |
| ScottK | pabelanger: There are a few other rdepends. They'll need to be checked for compatibility. See apt-cache rdepends ruby-rack. | 18:53 |
| jtaylor | changelog restored | 19:00 |
| jtaylor | I'll forward the patch to debian then upload | 19:00 |
| ScottK | barry: Next time you can use the -b option and close the FFe bug when you do the sync. | 19:02 |
| barry | ScottK: ah crap, i meant to do that. sorry | 19:09 |
| jtaylor | uploaded, thanks for the review | 19:12 |
| pabelanger | ScottK, understood | 19:36 |
| barry | ScottK: i'll now file a blanket ffe for flufl.*[!enum] | 19:37 |
| barry | ScottK: bug 966521 | 19:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 966521 in flufl.bounce (Ubuntu) "[FFe] sync flufl.{bounce,password,i18n,lock} from Debian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/966521 | 19:43 |
| ScottK | barry: Approved, but you got some of the tasks on the upstream projects and not the Ubuntu packages. | 19:52 |
| barry | ScottK: fixed, thx | 19:54 |
| barry | ScottK: i'll sync as they hit lp | 20:01 |
| ScottK | Sure. Hopefully they won't be in New very long. | 20:01 |
| jtaylor | youtube-download is broken precise again it seems... such an app really should not be packaged | 20:55 |
| jtaylor | good seems non-ffe syncable | 20:57 |
| micahg | jtaylor: the nature of the beast | 20:59 |
| micahg | this is where volatile would be nice :) | 21:00 |
| micahg | eh, I guess an SRU would serve the same purpose | 21:00 |
| jtaylor | I don't really care that much about it, opera does the same much much more reliable for every site | 21:02 |
| jtaylor | unfortunatly the flash plugin in opera does not work in my new precise installation and I want to watch the pycon keynot in higher speed :/ | 21:02 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| jtaylor | hm just got a mail, scipy powerpc build failed, but it hasn't even started yet according to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-scipy/0.9.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1/+build/3323364 | 21:53 |
| micahg | if I've got a conf file I forgot to migrate, do I add snippets to move and remove or just remove? | 21:54 |
| RAOF | micahg: How long has the package been not reading the old conf file? | 22:07 |
| micahg | RAOF: about 18 hours :) | 22:07 |
| RAOF | If it's only in Precise, then I'd move-and-remove. | 22:07 |
| micahg | should I attempt to be smart and remove the new file so the old one can migrate? | 22:08 |
| RAOF | Oh! Totally move-and-remove; there's a good chance that even those on precise won't have edited the new conf file! | 22:08 |
| RAOF | micahg: I think the correct thing to do would be to remove the new conf file and replace it with the migrated old conf iff the new conf hasn't been changed. | 22:09 |
| micahg | RAOF: so does that mean I can't use the pretty dpkg-maintscript-helper stuff for the first part? | 22:10 |
| micahg | oh, I can lie :0 | 22:11 |
| RAOF | :) | 22:11 |
| RAOF | I think you can still use the maintscript helper ;) | 22:11 |
| micahg | yeah, I just lie about the last-version | 22:11 |
| RAOF | Hm. Will that successfully trigger on upgrades? | 22:12 |
| micahg | I'm going to test it :0 | 22:12 |
| RAOF | (If it gets too hairy it's probably not *terrible* to just unconditionally migrate the old conf file; 18 hours isn't very long.) | 22:13 |
| micahg | well, I added an rm_conffile statement first, then the mv_conffile statement | 22:13 |
| micahg | RAOF: nope, my idea just wiped all of it :) | 22:18 |
| * micahg tries just a move | 22:18 | |
| micahg | yeah, I'll just clobber the new file | 22:23 |
| broder | jtaylor: you know we have precedent for just SRU'ing new upstream releases of youtube-dl, right? | 23:28 |
| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!