[12:22] <seblabel> is there a language convenience here ?
[12:33] <sva> seblabel: usually everyone speaks english, as far as i know
[12:33] <seblabel> ok
[12:33] <seblabel> no french so
[12:33] <seblabel> :)
[12:34] <sva> seblabel: you can try :)
[12:34]  * sva cannot speak french on a technical level, but may be someone else. there are alot people in here
[12:34] <seblabel> i'm having some problem with my system and i was thinking of changing it with lubuntu
[12:35] <sva> you could use the live cd to try out if you'll get rid of the problems :)
[12:35] <seblabel> my wife is using lubuntu for some time
[12:35] <seblabel> and i have here lucid lynx 10.04 x86
[12:36] <seblabel> i wanted to know if i can get more with x86-64 (i have a amd64 cpu)
[12:38] <seblabel> can i have incompatibilities if uses lubuntu x86-64
[12:38] <seblabel> instead of x86
[12:40] <mr-squidley> seblabel: do you mean as in sharing files? or will x86 packages install on amd64
[12:40] <seblabel> hey
[12:41] <seblabel> yes, is a x86 package compatible ?
[12:41] <seblabel> i mean, every
[12:43] <seblabel> my aim is to know if it is usefull to use a x86-64 version instead of a x86
[12:44] <mr-squidley> yes and no its more a personally choice your hardware may run faster with amd64 ... but you may find more packages are compatible for x86
[12:44] <seblabel> humm
[12:44] <seblabel> thinks
[12:57] <AngelForget> Good afternoon to all
[12:58] <AngelForget> with new updates Lubuntu 12.04 beta 2 is very good
[13:03] <phillw> AngelForget: glad to hear they didn't break anything with the push to get the 'final' release candidate out for beta 2. Now all we need to do is test them all!
[13:04] <AngelForget> phillw, certainly we must try to infinite
[13:06] <AngelForget> phillw, However, I did a test of speed and memory between Lubuntu 12.04 Beta 2 and linux mint 12 lxde and there is no comparison Lubuntu is lighter is faster than linux mint 12 lxde
[13:07] <phillw> AngelForget: you can see which need a test by viewing http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/210/builds
[13:07] <phillw> OMG. They've done nearly all of them!!!!!
[13:20] <AngelForget> phillw, well I finished downloading the iso of ubuntu kde now I try on my laptop suffered from war
[13:22] <phillw> AngelForget: great. it is (hopefully) the last respin before beta 2 goes live. If it is not, I'm going to have a tantrum & scream & scream & scream 'till I'm sick ;)
[13:30] <AngelForget> restart and come back
[13:54] <achero> salve a tutti posso fare una domanda ? vorrei istallare lubuntu
[13:54] <MrChrisDruif> !it | achero
[13:57] <achero> ubuntu-it ok scusatemi..
[14:21] <pmatulis> what is the default terminal again in Lubuntu?
[14:23] <Derpadong> LXterminal
[14:39] <ix_> hello, why can't I connect to any encrypted wireless network on lubuntu 12.04?
[14:40] <ix_> I can't even click on any of them
[15:04] <bioterror> !daily
[15:04] <phillw> bioterror: please use http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/210/builds
[15:05] <phillw> we're on feature freeze :)
[15:08] <MrChrisDruif> Ah, we can't use the dailies anymore? =(
[15:08] <MrChrisDruif> ;-)
[15:10] <phillw> MrChrisDruif: you *can* using the iso tracker lets you know of any gremlins :)
[15:11] <phillw> after Ffreeze, the dailies are also on iso tracker. That's why I changed the wiki for testing to just point to one place :)
[15:12] <phillw> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/
[15:24] <kanliot> pcmanfm
[15:52] <bioterror> w0w
[15:52] <bioterror> at the last 12.04 works without problems ;)
[15:52] <bioterror> and I got wild: /dev/sda5: UUID="49e21c38-6c8f-4672-8c99-6767159fb3a6" UUID_SUB="18b51e34-f9a9-46f4-bc9b-a58716dcf818" TYPE="btrfs"
[15:52] <bioterror> ;)
[16:05] <ltrojan> Hello all! I have a small question about printing images... the default viewer is GPicView which doesn't seem to have a printing option... is it possible to perhaps change the preferences to make it visible or printing images is simply not available in that image viewer?
[16:06] <ltrojan> cheers!
[16:11] <bioterror> I would probably change image viewer then
[16:15] <ltrojan> yeah... just browsed the net a bit and found out that sadly the printing has not been implemented in gpicview... what a shame :(
[16:15] <ltrojan> anyway, thanks for the reply bioterror...
[16:16] <bioterror> np
[17:21] <seblabel> yo!
[17:21] <seblabel> it's done
[17:21] <seblabel> i'm under lubuntu now
[17:21] <seblabel> but my eyes hurt
[17:22] <seblabel> cause everything is very small now!
[17:22] <seblabel> the time for a process to start is small, very small
[17:22] <seblabel> but everything is also written very small
[17:22] <seblabel> :)
[17:24] <MrChrisDruif> seblabel; afaik you can change the font etc
[17:24] <bioterror> are you using television?
[17:24] <seblabel> :)
[17:24] <bioterror> with television you have to lift the size of the fonts
[17:24] <seblabel> i'm new with openbox
[17:24] <seblabel> i'm not using a tv
[17:24] <bioterror> okay, then fonts should not be small
[17:24] <bioterror> as I had to make them smaller on titlebar ;)
[17:26] <seblabel> humm
[17:26] <seblabel> i just tried to change lxterminal font size
[17:27] <seblabel> increasing it from 10 to 11
[17:27] <bioterror> ahahaha, Spinal Tap!
[17:27] <seblabel> i guess that the best font depends on my screen resolution
[17:28] <seblabel> font size i mean
[17:28] <bioterror> yes
[17:28] <bioterror> if you have like 1920x1600 or what ever it was, you might want a little bigger font
[17:28] <seblabel> yes 1920*1600 is what i'm using
[17:29] <seblabel> but now 11 even if bigger than 10, looks a bit strange
[17:29] <seblabel> like cloudy
[17:30] <MrChrisDruif> Some fonts sizes might look imperfect...cloudy?
[17:30] <seblabel> i mean, less clean
[17:30] <seblabel> my english is poor
[17:30] <seblabel> i meant that it looks not very accurate
[17:31] <MrChrisDruif> Alright, some sizes aren't perfect. You could try 12 for instance (a more common font size)
[17:31] <seblabel> oh, yes, you got it!
[17:31] <MrChrisDruif> ^_^
[17:31] <seblabel> thanks
[17:32] <seblabel> i was frightened that this could be a graphic card driver problem
[17:32] <seblabel> but, hopefully, it's not !
[17:32] <seblabel> :)
[17:32] <seblabel> i have read some documentation about openbox
[17:33] <seblabel> and i would like to (re)create some keybindings that i was using often with gnome
[17:34] <seblabel> do some of you use openbox (almost) without mouse ?
[17:34]  * MrChrisDruif uses gnome-shell tbh
[17:35] <bioterror> rxvt-unicode ;)
[17:35] <MrChrisDruif> But keybindings can be assigned to all sorts of keys
[17:35] <MrChrisDruif> bioterror; rxvt-unicode?
[17:35] <bioterror> seblabel, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ/Guides#I_want_to_bind_a_key_to_lock_my_screen.2C_how_do_I_do_it.3F
[17:36] <bioterror> seblabel, a small guide how to do it
[17:36] <bioterror> MrChrisDruif, yeah
[17:36] <bioterror> MrChrisDruif, bestest
[17:36] <MrChrisDruif> bioterror; it misses the step to find out which code is meant for "special" keys
[17:37] <bioterror> W-C-A :D
[17:41] <seblabel> thanks
[17:42] <bioterror> !bug 967348 | gilir
[17:43] <gilir> bioterror, thanks :)
[18:19] <bioterror> sva, I have to take VGA cable from work
[18:21] <sva> bioterror: hehe, i did the same for at home. at work we are anyway just using DVI so all the VGA cables got thrown away some day anyway
[18:22] <bioterror> where I work for the next two days they just changed desktop computers which uses "HP multilink" :D
[18:23] <bioterror> or what that is called, a propietary dvi kind of adapter which divides into two VGA connectors
[18:25] <bioterror> DMS-59 to dual vga
[18:32] <ALTAS> what is a good browser for lubuntu
[18:34] <bioterror> chromium?-)
[18:34] <KM0201> yup
[18:34] <KM0201> its installed w/ Lubuntu
[18:35] <KM0201> Chromium is the best browser for any OS actually... (Linux, Mac, or Windows)
[18:35] <bioterror> some people tends to like firefox, but they are wrong ;)
[18:35] <KM0201> FF used to be awesome, but i started noticing a serious downturn in the project, starting around 5.0
[18:35] <ALTAS> any other, that's the default
[18:35] <KM0201> if you don't like the default, just install another one, there's lots of choices
[18:36] <bioterror> xxxterm?
[18:36] <KM0201> firefox, opera, etc..
[18:36] <ALTAS> need a really simple one
[18:36] <bioterror> ALTAS, ^^
[18:37] <KM0201> um, whats that other one for Linux, starts w/ an E?
[18:37] <KM0201> it's a GUI though, not like xxxterm
[18:37] <bioterror> xxxterm is graphical?
[18:37] <KM0201> is it?
[18:37] <KM0201> i was thinking it was command line
[18:38] <ALTAS> there's a browser name xxxterm???
[18:38] <bioterror>  apt-cache search xxxterm          .:20:21:56 on 12-03-28:.
[18:38] <bioterror> xxxterm - Minimalist's web browser
[18:39] <KM0201> Epiphany, thats it
[18:39] <KM0201> never heard of xxx
[18:39] <ALTAS> btw why when i use chromium to go on sites it saids download flash player but there isn't any flash player for linux =(
[18:40] <bioterror> you have not installed lubuntu-restricted-extras
[18:40] <ALTAS> install what>?
[18:40] <bioterror> the difference between chrome and chromium is that the chrome comes bundled ith flash
[18:41] <bioterror> ALTAS, open terminal and say: sudo apt-get install lubuntu-restricted-extras
[18:41] <ALTAS> oh o.k. one sec
[18:41] <KM0201> ALTAS: there's flash for Linux, you can install it like bioterror said, or download it from adobe.com   where did you get the idea there was no flash for linux/
[18:42] <bioterror> I recommend using package manager
[18:42] <bioterror> it ill be kept up-to-date
[18:42] <KM0201> bioterror: i absolutely agree
[18:42] <KM0201> just saying, if you need any proof there's a linux version, just go to adobe.com
[18:42] <ALTAS> km0201: i search every where and didn't find any
[18:43] <KM0201> ALTAS: it's there, your search failed
[18:43] <bioterror> ALTAS, did you search package repository?-)
[18:43] <KM0201> ALTAS: regardless, do what bioterror said... you'll have flash in 2min
[18:43] <ALTAS> wait on a sec
[18:46] <bioterror> KM0201, some people tends to like Midori too
[18:46] <KM0201> bioterror: never heard of trhat one
[18:46] <bioterror> w00t
[18:46] <bioterror> :D
[18:47] <bioterror> it's part of the Elementary
[18:48] <MrChrisDruif> Yup
[19:11] <benQ> what is a good lightweight browser?
[19:11] <bioterror> midori
[19:14] <benQ> is that a browser
[19:15] <phillw> benQ: yes
[19:16] <benQ> phillw: how can i get it using terminal
[19:16] <bioterror> sudo apt-get install midori
[19:17] <benQ> bioterror: oh gracias
[19:17] <phillw> bioterror: it's in the repos? excellent, I must give it a try
[19:17] <bioterror> ofcourse it is, it's part of the xfce goodies
[19:18] <bioterror> and it supports html5 on youtube :-)
[19:18] <benQ> bioterror: is it a simple browser
[19:19] <bioterror> it is
[19:19] <phillw> I
[19:19] <MrChrisDruif> You?
[19:19] <benQ> tan adios mi amigos
[19:20] <phillw> bioterror: I know it has been mooted as a replacement for Chromium. Yes, that fun when we all argue what packages to use for 12.10 is soon to start :)
[19:20] <bioterror> yeah
[19:20] <bioterror> I hate that
[19:20] <sva> mh never heard of midori before as well. sounds nice *install*
[19:21] <phillw> bioterror: it is a bit of a scrap, but at least *we* get a choice :)
[19:21] <bioterror> we'll get this "firefox is no better than chromium" and someone says that midori is still too far away from stable enough or something like that
[19:22] <phillw> bioterror: we can pick anything in the repos.
[19:22] <phillw> but, this is -ot
[19:29] <benQ> where does files go when you have install them in terminal?
[19:29] <bioterror> explain more
[19:30] <benQ> like you have use that sudo apt- install thing, where do i find the files that had been install?
[19:31] <bioterror> benQ, dpkg -L midori |less
[19:31] <bioterror> -L lists files inside package
[19:32] <bioterror> and where they are pushed on your system
[19:35] <benQ> oh
[20:33] <seblabel> thanks for the help people
[20:33] <seblabel> good night
[20:34] <seblabel> ;)
[21:04] <benQ> how does transmission work?/
[21:27] <list> how do you use transmission
[21:27] <Flazer> i'm confused by your question
[21:27] <Flazer> what do you mean how do you use it? as in, what is it used for?
[21:27] <list> torrent
[21:28] <Flazer> right. you open a torrent file with it, which connects to the servers and downloads said file
[21:28] <list> so can you search for a file using it and download it from there
[21:29] <Flazer> the way I use it is, I'll search for a torrent i want, using google or a torrent site
[21:29] <Flazer> download the "torrent" file and open that with transmission
[21:29] <Flazer> which downloads the file you want...say and iso or mp3 etc.
[21:30] <list> oh, i also want a good browser know any
[21:30] <Flazer> an*
[21:30] <Flazer> in lubuntu, i use chromium
[21:30] <Flazer> because it's lightweight and efficient
[21:30] <Flazer> i also like opera
[21:30] <list> how do you get opera
[21:30] <Flazer> but firefox works well also, so it comes down to preference
[21:31] <Flazer> you can download the file from www.opera.com
[21:32] <Flazer> make sure you get the debian package, and it should open up using symantic
[21:32] <list> using terminal
[21:32] <Flazer> or you can go into symantic, search for the opera browser, and install the package that way
[21:32] <Flazer> i don't think you even need terminal
[21:33] <list> oh chromium doean't cut it for me
[21:33] <Flazer> what about chrome?
[21:33] <Flazer> which has built in flash support
[21:33] <list> chrome, ah i havent tryed it yey
[21:33] <list> yet
[21:34] <Flazer> it's the google version of chromium (open source version of chrome you could say)
[21:34] <Flazer> i just downloaded the opera debian package and launched it
[21:34] <Flazer> it will just install for you that way
[21:35] <list> oh that os are you running
[21:35] <Flazer> lubuntu
[21:35] <Flazer> but you can download the ubuntu one
[21:36] <Flazer> since they're essentially the same except for the top layer
[21:36] <Flazer> ie: the interface
[21:36] <list> oh, does lubuntu need security things
[21:37] <Flazer> security things?
[21:38] <list> software
[21:38] <Flazer> like antivirus?
[21:38] <list> no the internet sec
[21:39] <Flazer> firewalls? i don't think it comes standard, but it's something you can install
[21:39] <bioterror> ubuntus comes with apparmor
[21:39] <bioterror> !apparmor
[21:39] <Flazer> it's like any other linux distrobution, just slated for lower spec machines
[21:40] <Flazer> !lubuntu
[21:46] <list> cool
[21:46] <list> i see someting about appArmor on my pc
[21:52] <phillw> list: AppArmour is a system you can install for if you are opening your computer up for outside access https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppArmor has all the gory details