[16:55] <EvilResistance> can someone answer a question for me?
[16:56] <EvilResistance> when one reports in one of the #ubuntu-* channels that they've added something to [Arbitrary Site or Wiki Here] that is obvious vandalism, does that constitute a violation of the U. CoC?
[16:56] <Myrtti> depends
[16:57] <EvilResistance> on what?
[16:58] <EvilResistance> the individual channel operator who witnessed the situation?
[17:04] <EvilResistance> as well, does this include #ubuntu-offtopic?
[17:04] <EvilResistance> (since the issue occurred there)
[17:05] <EvilResistance> (approx. 20 minutes ago, _Marcus stated spam that he subsequently added to a Wikipedia article on Acer Inc., which is blatant vandalism)
[17:05] <EvilResistance> wondering whether that alone constitutes a violation
[17:06] <AlanBell> I would not think of the code of conduct in terms of violations
[17:06] <Pici> We use the CoC as a set of guidelines for our channels, even if the person in question has not signed it.
[17:06] <EvilResistance> i see.
[17:07] <EvilResistance> then in this case, does it count as a violation of any channel policies?
[17:07] <AlanBell> it is a.set of principles of guidelines
[17:07] <zykotick9> seems there is an issue with !text factoid, it doesn't actually contain instructions for "text" anymore...
[17:07] <AlanBell> !text
[17:12] <bazhang> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BootOptions#Changing_boot_options_Temporarily_for_an_Existing_Installation
[17:12] <bazhang> that?^