[02:03] <Pikkachu> How LP translation gets into the build proccess?
[02:04] <Pikkachu> I have built a package which is translated in LP and after building
[02:04] <Pikkachu> but the original po files are the same with lots of untranslated stuff
[02:05] <Pikkachu> hmm it's built in the PPA, I guess something there sets stuff up
[02:35] <jalcine> I was going to say that maybe dh_translations kicked in somewhere..'
[02:43] <JontheEchidna> The buildd's have some config switches flipped that run pkgbinarymangler on binaries built for main/restricted
[06:08] <vibhavp>  /window 8
[14:20] <kklimonda> highvoltage: hey, I've just been skimming through the developer week logs and found your session on edubuntu. You said that you've "abandoned the server part" - does it mean you don't think it's a good idea to be working on it considering alternative server solutions, or did you just ran out of hands to work?
[14:28] <highvoltage> kklimonda: we think that it's a really good idea, we just don't currently have the resources to maintain it
[18:11] <jfi> Hello, is there particular ubuntu (or debian) rules to follow when packaging a binary executable with sticky bit?
[18:13] <bregma> people still use the sticky bit?  do you mean the setuid bit?
[18:18] <jfi> yes, sorry for the confusion
[18:23] <jtaylor> anyone got any issues with me merging matplotlib 1.1.1rc from debian? its bugfix only and there should be a final before release
[18:24] <jtaylor> unfortunatly it can't be synced do to a dep rename
[19:51] <ScottK> jtaylor: Can we fix the dep rename (if it's just sync the dep/push through new and there's no other changes, I'll do the new?
[19:54] <jtaylor> let me check
[19:55] <jtaylor> though maybe its not such a good idea there are a million testsuite failures
[19:55] <ScottK> Let's wait and see then.
[19:55] <jtaylor> weird for a rc that is supposed to get "rock solid"
[19:55] <ScottK> Yeah.
[19:56] <highvoltage> wom 15
[19:57]  * Laney woms at highvoltage
[20:00] <ajmitch> Laney: how could you do that to him?
[20:01] <jtaylor> this hud is really getting in the way of work!
[20:01] <jtaylor> can one disable it for the terminal?
[20:02] <ScottK> woms is not specifically forbidden in the CoC.
[20:02] <ScottK> jtaylor: sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop.
[20:02] <ScottK> ;-)
[20:02] <jtaylor> ^^
[20:02]  * highvoltage is wommed over by Laney 
[20:10] <jtaylor> ScottK: concerning the rename, 4 rdepends getting the rename from debian is a new upstream
[20:10] <jtaylor> but I have no idea of fonts and no idea how to formulate a ffe for it
[20:11] <ScottK> It's probably OK, but you might ask the maintainers.
[20:17] <jtaylor> in the lyx news: Additionally, byte-compiled python files changed their installation target. Distribution
[20:17] <jtaylor> maintainers are encouraged to verify their patch sets
[20:17] <jtaylor> that sounds invasive, probably we don't want that yet
[20:17] <jtaylor> (and all because arch py3 crazyness ...)
[21:23] <ockham> is it to late already to re-add ocropus to precise which has just been upgraded to 0.4 in debian at last?
[21:23] <ockham> see bug 500527
[21:28] <ScottK> ockham: If it's in Debian and it's a sync, it's not to late.
[21:31] <ockham> well it has been removed from precise some weeks ago, and I guess there isn't anything Debian specific to it, so I guess that makes it a sync, right?
[21:32] <ScottK> You'd need to check and make sure it builds, installs, and runs without changes.