=== jalcine_ is now known as Guest64946
=== webjadmin_ is now known as Guest26207
JontheEchidnaYokoZar: mind if I upload this patch for wine1.4? http://paste.ubuntu.com/906525/01:22
YokoZarJontheEchidna: go for it01:41
JontheEchidnak, didn't know if you wanted to wait for some more changes to go with it or anything :)01:42
YokoZarJontheEchidna: well I'm about to put wine1.5 in ppa but I'll just merge that change in01:45
JontheEchidnathe transitional package is still around so it's not too much of a hurry. It'd be nice to be able to get rid of it though01:46
vibhavpShould I request a sync for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oss4/+bug/858181 or prepare a debdiff?02:30
ubottuLaunchpad bug 858181 in oss4 (Ubuntu) "oss4-dkms 4.2-build2004-1ubuntu1: oss4 kernel module failed to build (error: conflicting types for ‘fd_set’)" [Undecided,Confirmed]02:30
vibhavpOh wait its fixed in precise02:31
vibhavpHow do I then request a backport of it to oneiric?02:31
micahgvibhavp: that needs an SRU, not a backport02:38
vibhavpMay sound noobish, but whats an SRU?02:41
micahg!sru | vibhavp02:42
ubottuvibhavp: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates02:42
vibhavpthanks micahg02:42
vibhavpfrom where I do I get a bug supervisor to Nominate?02:50
micahgI can do that02:51
micahgvibhavp: done02:53
vibhavpmicahg: NOw I need to prepare a debdiff and attach it to the report, right?02:58
micahgvibhavp: yep, then subscribe ubuntu-sponsors02:58
vibhavpmicahg: You there?04:36
micahgvibhavp: yeah04:36
vibhavpmicahg: Could you check my debdiif at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oss4/+bug/858181 ?04:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 858181 in oss4 (Ubuntu Oneiric) "oss4-dkms 4.2-build2004-1ubuntu1: oss4 kernel module failed to build (error: conflicting types for ‘fd_set’)" [Undecided,Confirmed]04:37
micahgvibhavp: target should be oneiric-proposed, version should be 4.2-build2004-1ubuntu2.104:39
kyoushuuhow do I know which packages can still be merged from Debian Testing?04:47
micahgkyoushuu: bug fixes are welcome, features are subject to feature freeze and require an exception04:49
kyoushuuAh, so only bug fixes are allowed to be merged at this time? Like updated packages from Debian that have the same upstream source version?04:50
micahgkyoushuu: well, major build system changes require an exception as well04:51
micahgkyoushuu: new upstream releases with no new features that won't break the world are ok too04:51
micahgspeaking on new upstream releases breaking the world, jtaylor, any news on hdf5?04:52
kyoushuumicahg: Ah, so major upstream releases, like zlib to 1.2.6 are not allowed?04:53
micahgkyoushuu: zlib breaks certain things IIRC so we'll need to wait until Q04:53
kyoushuumicah: Ah ok04:55
kyoushuuDoes the background colors in packages in https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html mean anything?04:55
micahgkyoushuu: yes, priority and essentiality, you might be better served with the universe merges (more likely to be appropriate at this juncture)04:57
micahgerr..maybe just priority04:57
ScottKmicahg: I'd appreciate it if you would take a quick look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qd/2.3.11.dfsg-2.1/+build/3369763/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.qd_2.3.11.dfsg-2.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz and explain to me how that can work in a local build on i386 and on other archs on the buildd's, but not i386 on the buildd?05:12
ScottKBuilt just fine on a buildd in Debian too.05:13
vibhavpmicahg: S\Could you check the debdiff again? Ive corrected it05:16
micahgScottK: does it matter which buildd>05:39
ScottKI retried it and it failed twice. I didn't check if it was on the same buildd or not.05:39
ScottKIt's a quick build.  I can try and see.05:40
micahgvibhavp: you need to target oneiric-proposed, not oneiric, if the fix actually works, then otherwise it looks fine at first glance05:41
ScottKGot roseapple again.05:42
micahghmm, roseapple is one of the less flaky buildds in my experience05:42
micahglooks good this time :)05:42
micahgScottK: uploaded :)05:43
ScottKThird time's the charm I guess.05:44
micahgthere were some buildd issues earlier05:44
ScottKOK.  I didn't know about that.05:45
vibhavpmicahg: Done06:07
dholbachgood morning06:59
vibhavphi dholbach07:00
dholbachhi vibhavp07:00
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
vibhavpdholbach: /window 207:19
vibhavpoops :)07:19
vibhavpsorry dholbach07:19
=== Guest86541 is now known as jalcine
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
vibhavpIs it sensible to work on Unity Bugs?09:16
Laneyyou can do, but you should join #ubuntu-unity and discuss with the developers there09:26
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
vibhavpWhich is higher: libchewing 0.3.3-1 or libchewing3-dev  0.3.3 ?10:36
vibhavpIgnore that question10:36
vibhavpWhat is the difference betwwen libchewing3 and libchewing?10:37
geserlibchewing is the source package name while libchewing3 is the binary package name11:12
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
al-maisanIs there any way to get or access the package version in the debian/rules file (bar grep'ing the debian/changelog) ?14:13
gesernot that I know of, I've only seen the use of dpkg-parsechangelog (and some filtering of the output) in debian/rules14:16
al-maisangeser: thanks for the pointer, will take a look at dpkg-parsechangelog14:22
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
ockhamhi, i'd like to sync http://packages.debian.org/experimental/ocropus (whose 0.3.x version has been removed from Precise recently due to incompatibility with tesseract 3)14:46
ockhamhowever, i'm currently running oneiric, and i'm behind a somewhat sluggish internet connection, so my download of 12.04 Beta2 is going to take a while. anyone else volunteering to test that ocropus 0.4.4-1 from debian?14:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!