[02:44] <micahg> bkerensa: if you're interested in helping with Seamonkey, let's chat over the weekend
[08:58] <dpm> micahg, a while ago we talked about chromium translations, and you told me I should give you a reminder to look at them (e.g. to include translations from LP into the package, and if possible send them upstream). Would you have some time for it?
[09:04] <micahg> dpm: not really, I glanced at this earlier tonight while trying to fix something else
[09:05] <dpm> micahg, so you think we should disable the Chromium translations in Launchpad, or do you think someone else might be able to maintain them?
[09:06] <micahg> dpm: answered in private
[09:06] <dpm> ok, looking, thanks
[09:07] <micahg> dpm: I'd prefer to keep them, but I"m noticing when creating the tarball's we're drifting from upstream a bit
[09:08] <dpm> micahg, I'd also be very much for keeping them, but we need to include them on the package and keep the template up to date, as otherwise it's driving contributors out
[09:09] <micahg> dpm: makes sense
[09:09] <micahg> I thought I knew what to do, but then I looked at it and wasn't clear on it
[09:11] <dpm> micahg, there is a good description of the infrastructure in fta's blog post from a while ago, but I suspect the infrastructure he used to do merges and automate translations is all gone
[09:12] <micahg> dpm: FWIW, I think I just figured it out, but I don't have the time to do it right now
[09:49] <TheOpenSourcerer> As TB 3.1 will go EOL end of April, will the newer TB 11+ series be backported to earlier versions of Ubuntu?
[09:54] <micahg> TheOpenSourcerer: yes, they will be in -proposed starting on Monday
[09:54] <micahg> for Lucid and Natty
[09:54] <TheOpenSourcerer> OK - Thanks. Not Maverick then?
[09:54] <micahg> 12 will be a security update
[09:54] <micahg> no, Maverick is EOL before 12 is released
[09:54] <TheOpenSourcerer> OK.
[09:54] <TheOpenSourcerer> Will be moving from 10.10 to 12 when it's released anyway.
[09:55] <micahg> that's only supported as an upgrade through natty and oneiric
[09:55] <TheOpenSourcerer> Will you be sticking with the Mozilla long term releases or updating every 6 weeks with their mainline dev?
[09:55] <micahg> every 6 weeks
[09:55] <micahg> same as Firefox, see http://www.chriscoulson.me.uk/blog/?p=111 for reasoning
[09:56] <TheOpenSourcerer> TY. BTW moving from 10.10 to 12.04 doesn't necessarily mean "upgrade" ;-)
[09:56] <micahg> sure
[16:48] <cousin_luigi> Hello.
[16:49] <cousin_luigi> mdeslaur: Are you around?
[16:50] <mdeslaur> cousin_luigi: yes
[16:53] <cousin_luigi> mdeslaur: Regarding the flashplugin bug, I have it working as I think it's best on Linuxmint 12 (oneiric based), but I can't replicate it on a parallel 11.10 installation. Namely the presence of libvdpau1 and having the video acceleration disabled without any /etc/adobe/mms.cfg file whatsoever.
[16:53] <cousin_luigi> I can't locate where the "enable hardware acceleration" checkbox stores its value.
[16:53] <mdeslaur> cousin_luigi: I have no idea
[16:55] <cousin_luigi> I see.
[16:57] <mdeslaur> cousin_luigi: I suspect somewhere in ~/.adobe or ~/.macromedia...but no source, so I can't take a look
[16:59] <mdeslaur> the fact that closed-source flash is incompatible with closed-source nvidia means either adobe or nvidia have to fix the issue...there's nothing we can do about it
[18:17] <cousin_luigi> mdeslaur: Are you sure it's not libvdpau related?
[18:28] <mdeslaur> cousin_luigi: I don't know
[18:32] <mdeslaur> well, it somehow related...flash tries to use it when it's installed
[18:33] <mdeslaur> and when it uses vdpau for hardware acceleration, the colors get inverted
[18:34] <chrisccoulson> hi!
[18:34] <mdeslaur> hi chrisccoulson
[18:45] <cousin_luigi> hello cc
[18:45] <Unit193> Howdy cousin_luigi.
[19:47] <FernandoMiguel> hi
[19:55] <Unit193> Howdy.
[20:37] <FernandoMiguel> WebGL: Unavailable. Hardware acceleration disabled.
[20:37] <FernandoMiguel> what can I do to get Chrome to support CPU HW ?