[00:02] cnd, hey, is gesture support working? [00:40] I can't seem to get xorg-server to build properly [00:40] I'm using parallel=16 [00:40] I think that may have something to do with it [00:40] but that has always worked in the past [00:40] I'm trying without any parallel [00:41] cnd: What's failing? [00:41] that's the thing, I don't know [00:41] it's very non-obvious [00:41] Aah, the joys of no multiplexing. [00:41] Got it pushed to git? I can build locally. [00:42] RAOF, this is what I get at the end: http://paste.ubuntu.com/906483/ [00:42] I'll push to git [00:42] We can also turn on the integration tests while where at it. [00:42] pushed [00:45] Yeah, the actual error will be waaaaay back. [00:45] Oh! That's why this system's so slow. I seem to be using 4G of swap. [00:45] Ah, Chromium and Evolution, you are marvellous, but perhaps not 6G worth of marvellous. [00:46] Chromium I can understand, but Evolution? marvelous? [00:47] RAOF, ahh [00:47] it's your gtest patch [00:47] Well, perhaps not marvellous. [00:47] But “less sucky than the alternatives” [00:48] cnd: Oh, that breaks something? [00:48] cnd: Or the tests are failing? [00:48] yeah, all over :0 [00:48] they won't compile [00:48] probably due to the libxorg-gtest changes [00:48] That'd be right. [00:48] RAOF, http://paste.ubuntu.com/906488/ [00:49] Allow me to fix that for you [00:49] RAOF, unfortunately, we need the server pushed with one of the other fixes asap [00:49] do you think you can get this fixed and uploaded today? [00:49] Well, it won't fail on the buildds. [00:49] Because it won't build those tests. [00:50] ahhh [00:50] RAOF, would you rather upload now, and you can fix it in due course? [00:50] or fix it now and upload in a few hours [00:50] If you've got urgent fixes, upload now. [00:50] ok [00:50] I'll fix it in due course. [00:51] It's not like the build time checks are urgent. [00:51] Also, they'll cause the X server to hit dep-wait until the relevent packages get promoted. [00:51] yeah [00:51] * cnd fires of a nocheck build [00:51] off* [01:30] ooo, ITPs for utouch in debian, awesome! [01:41] yep :) [01:41] Sarvatt, now that utouch doesn't require a multi-thousand line patch in xserver, we figure it might actually make it into other distros :) [01:41] it's a crazy thought [01:42] cnd: yeah its freaking awesome that the X side doesnt need crazy stuff now, except now xfixes!! [01:42] heh [01:42] * cnd points at RAOF [01:42] it's not me this time! [01:42] * Sarvatt points at RAOF too [01:43] I got my crap out before the LTS release at least :) [01:43] its still much less of a change than is needed in all the gnome crap though :) [01:43] maverick is almost dead [01:43] cnd: Yeah, it's high priority to get that done. [01:43] and the whole compiz supported by pkg-xorg in debian and desktop team in ubuntu thing [01:52] it would be awesome to see unity in debian optionally at least, but yeah its not the gnome 2 everyone wants to keep going, not like theres gonna be anyone caring outside of ubuntu, and its complicated enough that its more than one person could do most likely [01:53] utouch-evemu will be freaking useful at least regardless :) [02:01] unity in debian is strange, gnome 3 is forced on everyone so its "accepted" but theres a lot more work needed for unity that noone wants to deal with [02:03] but i see complaints that its not even in debian [02:04] it took me over a year to accept and embrace the changes in unity [02:05] aka its less shit than what i would put up with in gnome 3 [02:07] guess thats too real to say in a channel bound by the CoC, I'm sorry :) [02:12] :) [02:12] I think it's getting less difficult to package Unity over time. [02:13] yeah i feel the same way, compiz is the big problem still imo [02:13] "someone" needs to maintain it in debian before it just gets removed, pkg-xorg is maintaining it now but none of us are in that path [02:16] the people maintaining it in ubuntu which is the only place its released for atm are in pkg-gnome [02:16] debian is still on 0.8.x compiz [02:17] aka lucid compiz [02:17] Oooh, urgh. [02:23] RAOF: btw, s precise still boned for ivb for you? [02:23] i need to check that out if so [02:23] Yes, it is. [02:23] * Sarvatt is still on 11.10 [02:24] RAOF: displayport monitors by any chance? [02:24] I'm not restarting for a while because it's doing a backup, but the current status is that I know 3.3-rc7 works, and our 3.2 kernel doesn't. [02:24] Yes, I am indeed using a DP monitor. [02:24] Because screw that VGA nonsense. [02:24] ok so crap I cant check, go figure [02:24] i've heard many woes about 3.2 and dp though [02:25] all the OEM crap is using 11.10 so i've had to care about that more, i'm glad someone can care about 12.04 :P [02:26] the intel guys say 3.2 is fail for dp though, i'll see if i can come up with anything for that [02:28] tuesday is the latest kernel changes can go in for the 12.04 livecd kernel, go figure its tight timing [02:33] You reckon that DP is the issue? That should significantly reduce my bisection requirements. [02:34] 100% positive [02:34] i'm monitor shopping now [02:35] your monitor have hdmi/dvi ports to be sure? [02:35] It does, yes. [02:35] do you have cords to check? :P [02:36] I presume that a (passive) DP→DVI connector would work? [07:57] Sarvatt: hmm, having these in git would make things easier ;) [07:58] for me anyway, but a debdiff isn't too bad.. [10:01] meh, forgot to add DM-Upload-Allowed to libwacom.. [10:14] oh well, replied to my AM, so hopefully that won't be an issue for too long === yofel_ is now known as yofel [19:47] hi