dakira | mgrandi: argh.. I think I see what happened | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
mgrandi | oh? | 00:00 |
mgrandi | did addpatch add a bunch of files? | 00:01 |
dakira | bzr lp-propose automaticalle selected lp:ubuntu/compiz as the branch to merge with. That is the branch where the development takes place. lp:compiz is where the merge should happen (it only contains the debian directory) | 00:02 |
mgrandi | ah yeah | 00:03 |
mgrandi | it did seem like there were a bunch of files that were present and got added | 00:03 |
mgrandi | because the branches diverged | 00:04 |
mgrandi | so what is lp:compiz then if dev happens at ubuntu/compiz | 00:04 |
poolie | upstream development ought to be in lp:compiz | 00:04 |
poolie | well | 00:04 |
poolie | that ought to be a mirror, i suppose | 00:04 |
mgrandi | ah makes sense | 00:05 |
dakira | https://code.launchpad.net/~compiz/compiz/ubuntu | 00:05 |
mgrandi | so yeah, just change the merge proposal dest and you should be good | 00:05 |
dakira | this branch is listed in debian/control under the Vcs-Bzr tag | 00:05 |
mgrandi | hmm | 00:06 |
mgrandi | im not too familiar with how lp-propose works | 00:07 |
mgrandi | but poolie can help hehe! | 00:07 |
mgrandi | i have to go, gl | 00:07 |
dakira | poolie: so what do I have to enter as the target branch if I want the above to be the target branch? | 00:13 |
dakira | When I try to propose my branch to be merged back into lp:compiz I get "This branch is not mergeable into lp:compiz." | 00:15 |
dakira | okay.. this looks better https://code.launchpad.net/~mniess/ubuntu/precise/compiz/fix-screenshot/+merge/100539 | 00:29 |
vila | hi all | 07:03 |
mgz | morning | 08:23 |
lifeless | ok look, its wgz renamed :P | 08:24 |
fullermd | He's not renamed, he's just on the other side of the world from you, so he looks upside-down. | 08:27 |
=== quicksil1er is now known as quicksilver | ||
mgz | we are certainly each other's evil twin | 08:37 |
fullermd | That's just the sort of thing an evil twin would WANT us to believe. | 08:49 |
lifeless | spiv: https://code.launchpad.net/~spiv/ubuntu/lucid/paramiko/address-families-579530-lucid/+merge/25297 | 09:37 |
lifeless | spiv: perhaps that needs a 'delete' button clicked on it or something. I imagine its still in your activereviews list | 09:37 |
jelmer | mgz, vila: are we hanging out now? | 10:34 |
vila | jelmer: waiting for poolie ? | 10:34 |
mgz | jelmer: that's the general plan | 10:35 |
poolie | hi all | 10:37 |
jelmer | hi.. | 10:37 |
vila | h... | 10:37 |
vila | hi poolie | 10:37 |
poolie_ | hi | 10:40 |
poolie_ | am i here? | 10:40 |
jelmer | poolie_: hi | 10:40 |
jml | how can I eliminate this warning? 2012-04-03 10:57:12,217 - udd.scripts.mass_import - WARNING - Error accessing max threads file /srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/max_threads: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/max_threads' | 10:57 |
poolie_ | jml, hi, does the file exist? | 11:46 |
jml | poolie_: no. when I create it empty the error goes away. useful error huh? | 11:47 |
poolie_ | :/ | 12:11 |
poolie_ | it's a bit hardcoded | 12:11 |
poolie_ | whack james | 12:11 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
ErwinM | Hi, I am looking for the automv plugin, but it seems gone | 14:59 |
ErwinM | http://bzr.oxygene.sk/bzr-plugins/automv/ <-- empty | 15:00 |
jelmer | ErwinM: it's now in bzr core I think | 15:00 |
jelmer | ErwinM: "bzr mv --auto" | 15:00 |
ErwinM | Aha, thanks | 15:00 |
ErwinM | Yes, that worked just fine. :-) | 15:01 |
jam | jml: echo 5 > /..../max_threads ? | 15:02 |
jam | I believe it does a live check to allow you to turn up and down the number of running threads | 15:03 |
jam | (udd uses it to lower throughput when LP is under high load) | 15:03 |
jam | I think warning is probably useful for UDD, since it indicates a configuration error. | 15:03 |
jam | Not as useful for your project, though. | 15:04 |
jam | anyway, EOD here, have a good evening to all. | 15:04 |
jml | jam: it runs when the file is empty | 15:04 |
jml | jam: so it's a bogus warning. | 15:04 |
jam | jml: well, I'm sure there is a default num threads. | 15:04 |
jam | But not having the file would be a misconfiguration for UDD | 15:04 |
jml | pha | 15:04 |
jam | jml: I can see your point, it is just a "how generic is this code" issue. It isn't super-duper useful for UDD | 15:05 |
jam | other than if we set a value and it doesn't take | 15:05 |
jam | a warning helps understand if we accidentally have the file owned as "root" for example | 15:05 |
=== lool- is now known as lool | ||
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
Merwin_ | Hey, I've got would like to make patch using diff of a revision range A..B but excluding the rev XXX, how can I do this ? | 16:51 |
Merwin_ | I would like* | 16:51 |
mgz | I would... make a new branch -r B, merge -rXXX...(XXX-1), and diff -rA.. | 16:52 |
Merwin_ | Hum good idea, I'll try, thank you | 16:53 |
Merwin_ | Erf, I tried to remove a colo-branch with bzr rmbranch and know my depo is unusable... | 16:59 |
Merwin_ | I had no pushed commits... | 17:00 |
Merwin_ | bzr: ERROR: No repository present: "file:///home/thibaut/OpenERP%206/OpenAssur/addons-opas/" | 17:00 |
Merwin_ | Seriously, I lost everything ? | 17:00 |
mgz | hm, and I'm not sure the fix for bug 922953 has been landed on 2.5 | 17:01 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 922953 in Bazaar "rmbranch should refuse removing active branch" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/922953 | 17:01 |
Merwin_ | I used bzr rmbranch mycolobranch | 17:02 |
Merwin_ | How can I fix that mgz ? I had work I didn't pushed, is it lost ? | 17:02 |
mgz | welcome to the git way of working, I guess... | 17:02 |
mgz | am checking to see if pre-fix there was a way of recovering or not | 17:02 |
Merwin_ | I don't understand why it removed my trunk branch wheras I told him to remove a colo branch Oo | 17:03 |
mgz | see also bug 920653 | 17:04 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 920653 in Bazaar ""bzr rmbranch" doesn't handle colocated branches" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/920653 | 17:04 |
Merwin_ | ... | 17:05 |
Merwin_ | Here, I don't even have a branch, brz branches prints nothing... | 17:06 |
mgz | I did recover from doing various daft things with colo, but don't recall which issue was which | 17:06 |
mgz | jelmer: any suggestions? | 17:06 |
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
Merwin_ | or vila maybe ? | 17:08 |
Merwin_ | Please tell me I'll be able to push my last 2 hours work I just commited before doing this :D | 17:09 |
mgz | there's always the filesystem recovery tool route | 17:11 |
Merwin_ | At least it didn't removed the files... | 17:12 |
mgz | just the repo and branch metadata, not the tree, right? | 17:13 |
mgz | comma after repo. | 17:13 |
Merwin_ | Yep I guess, I've got a .bzr dir and my files are still there | 17:13 |
Merwin_ | So, I've got to call my boss est tell him why I can't push the things we were supposed to put in production tonight (I was making a patch for this) | 17:14 |
mgz | but no repository/ or branch/ inside, right? | 17:14 |
Merwin_ | branch branches branch-format branch-lock checkout README | 17:14 |
Merwin_ | In .bzr | 17:14 |
mgz | Merwin_: so, you have your actual changes, so this isn't a complete disaster | 17:16 |
mgz | can either branch from previous location, copy tree across and commit for now | 17:16 |
mgz | or.. it was a fresh project? recreate and copy tree, add and commit | 17:17 |
Merwin_ | I can't commit | 17:17 |
mgz | in that branch. | 17:17 |
mgz | you can make a new one. | 17:17 |
Merwin_ | Hum | 17:17 |
mgz | which unblocks you for tonight. | 17:17 |
Merwin_ | I try | 17:17 |
Merwin_ | Don't seems to work: bzr branch actual_dir new_dir | 17:18 |
Merwin_ | Same error: bzr: ERROR: No repository present: "file:///home/thibaut/OpenERP%206/OpenAssur/addons-opas/" | 17:18 |
mgz | Merwin_: so, did you create this from scratch 2 hours ago, or branch from an origin? | 17:18 |
Merwin_ | Nope, it's a long time branch I used for weeks | 17:19 |
mgz | but you have no other version of the same base project anywhere? | 17:19 |
Merwin_ | Yes, on our dev server | 17:19 |
Merwin_ | Where I regulary push | 17:20 |
mgz | okay, so branch from that. | 17:20 |
Merwin_ | But I won't have the last commit I made in my branch (the one I did't pushed yet) | 17:20 |
mgz | then copy in your changes from today, and do one big commit. | 17:20 |
Merwin_ | Ok | 17:21 |
mgz | you lose any little commits you did along the way, but the changes are still there. | 17:21 |
mgz | and +affectsmetoo that bug I linked :) | 17:21 |
Merwin_ | That's enought for tonight | 17:21 |
Merwin_ | I did it thank you. It's a hudge repo, it's downloading I keep you informed :) | 17:22 |
mgz | :) | 17:23 |
Merwin_ | mgz, while it's downloading, could you tell me how I'm supposed to remove a colo-branch ? | 17:30 |
mgz | that would be the way, it's just buggy in 2.5.0 | 17:30 |
mgz | it should be roughly equivalent to removing the dir .bzr/branches/NAME though | 17:31 |
Merwin_ | ok... | 17:31 |
mgz | not your fault, basically | 17:37 |
Merwin_ | mgz, merge -r 552.1.1...X => What should I put at X? | 17:39 |
Merwin_ | I want to undo the commit 552.1.1 | 17:39 |
mgz | 552 | 17:40 |
Merwin_ | Looking at qlog, it seems that its 'ancestor' is 552. | 17:40 |
Merwin_ | Ok | 17:40 |
mgz | it's easy in that case, .1 follows from the without-dot form always | 17:40 |
Merwin_ | Hum, my patch contains binary files that I want to have | 17:42 |
Merwin_ | It doesn't seems to handle binary files (OpenOffice .sxw, models for generating PDF) | 17:42 |
Merwin_ | I'll have to add them manually ? | 17:43 |
mgz | you mean the textual patch only says "binary file added" but you want to be able to apply it and have the files added? | 17:44 |
Merwin_ | Yes, exactly :) | 17:44 |
Merwin_ | I don't have a lot I can push them via SFTP, it's not a problem, I'm just curious if there is a way to handle this | 17:45 |
mgz | you can just use a different diff format I think. | 17:46 |
=== CardinalFang is now known as qengho | ||
mgrandi | hey jelmer if you are there, i remember you saying yesterday that you took out the fast export from x stuff from bzr-fastimport, does that include the bzr fast import (from svn dumpfile)? | 19:11 |
jelmer | mgrandi: bzr fast improt never supported importing from a svn dump file | 19:12 |
jelmer | mgrandi: bzr-svn supports importing from a dumpfile | 19:12 |
mgrandi | hmm, does that get called by bzr fast-import? | 19:12 |
jelmer | mgrandi: no, they're unrelated | 19:12 |
mgrandi | just trying to understand the structure a bit | 19:12 |
mgrandi | how did i import that svn dumpfile then | 19:13 |
jelmer | mgrandi: bzr-fastimport only deals with the fastimport/fastexport format used by git-fastexport | 19:13 |
jelmer | mgrandi: with bzr-svn I think? "bzr svn-import <dumpfile> <target>" ? | 19:13 |
mgrandi | yeah | 19:14 |
mgrandi | that seems like it, ok. I was going to say since import from dumpfile seemed important | 19:14 |
jelmer | mgrandi: it doesn't read the dumpfile directly | 19:15 |
jelmer | mgrandi: it creates a svn repo first from the dumpfile, and then uses that | 19:15 |
mgrandi | yeah | 19:15 |
mgrandi | i meant the general concept of importing from a dumpfile since svn doesn't seem to have fast-export | 19:16 |
mgrandi | at least i think | 19:16 |
jelmer | mgrandi: subvertpy has a 'subvertpy-fast-export' command that can generate a fast-export stream | 19:17 |
mgrandi | ah ok. | 19:18 |
mgrandi | also, before you dissapear again, i was wondering if there was anything to kinda 'verify' the integrity of a branch, or is it just bzr check | 19:19 |
jelmer | mgrandi: just 'bzr check' | 19:20 |
jelmer | mgrandi: generally, it's better to just talk to the svn repo directly rather than using a dumpfile | 19:21 |
mgrandi | yeah that makes sense. let svn worry about the dump file. | 19:21 |
mgrandi | but i was wondering cause im going to see if this bzr plugin for a IDE works, but it hasn't been updated in like a year so i have no idea if it still works | 19:21 |
jelmer | mgrandi: the svn dumpfile is a distraction, it just adds two extra steps to the process | 19:32 |
=== r0bby is now known as robbyoconnor | ||
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
poolie_ | hi all | 22:34 |
jelmer | 'morning poolie_ | 22:37 |
LeoNerd | Can I somehow "bzr ignore" files in a directory that don't have an extension (i.e. a "." in their name). These will be compiled binaries, but I don't want to ignore e.g. the .c source for them | 22:37 |
mgrandi | should be able to with regular expressions | 22:38 |
mgrandi | which i believe bzr uses for bzrignore | 22:39 |
LeoNerd | Mhmm? | 22:39 |
mgrandi | bzr ignore "RE:^#" | 22:40 |
mgrandi | so to do a reg exp you put RE: | 22:40 |
mgrandi | you can also look at 'bzr help ignore' for some more examples, you can also tell it to nOT ignore .c files | 22:40 |
mgrandi | so, tell it to ignore everything in that directory, but not c files maybe? | 22:40 |
LeoNerd | Oooh that might work too | 22:41 |
bob2 | or just ignore them all and add -f the source | 22:41 |
LeoNerd | Nah, 'cause I'd still like to be reminded about new files in case I forget :) | 22:41 |
wgz | LeoNerd: `bzr help ignore` | 22:42 |
mgrandi | so add "somedirectory/*", and then "!somedirectory/*.c" | 22:43 |
wgz | ...and I was scrolled up a little | 22:43 |
mgrandi | time to go, laterz | 22:44 |
wgz | can also do exactly "that don't have a dot in the name" with /[^.]*/ | 22:46 |
LeoNerd | That got it :) | 22:46 |
LeoNerd | RE:examples/demo-[^.]+ | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!