| === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk | ||
| pitti | micahg: still need copying, or did someone else get to tit? | 05:03 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | pitti: infinity got to it, thanks | 05:04 |
| jamespage | morning all | 09:02 |
| jamespage | please could the libv8 binary packages in NEW be accepted into precise - FFe bug 892034 | 09:02 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 892034 in libv8 "[FFe] Please merge nodejs (0.6.12~dfsg1-1) from Debian unstable" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/892034 | 09:02 |
| doko_ | jamespage, accepted | 10:47 |
| jamespage | thanks doko_ | 10:49 |
| * Riddell wonders what hamster-indicator is in new | 11:24 | |
| === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| jbicha | hi, so I guess I decided to try the "ask forgiveness instead of permissions" strategy with my accidental tracker upload | 13:23 |
| jbicha | I was thinking dput ppa:gnome3-team/gnome3 but my fingers typed dput ubuntu, I was going to ask for a FFe today for it anyway | 13:23 |
| jbicha | here's the rdepends http://paste.ubuntu.com/913005/ | 13:27 |
| Laney | jbicha: it needs a transition? | 13:28 |
| jbicha | Laney: yes, but it's smallish, I can handle gnome-documents (we were stuck at a development snapshot any way because newer versions required new tracker), and we should just be able to sync bognor-regis & grilo-plugins from wheezy | 13:31 |
| Laney | OK, and is tracker itself a sync? | 13:31 |
| Laney | I suggest now that it's done that we get someone to deNEW it and you handle the transition ASAP (looks small anyway) | 13:32 |
| jbicha | Laney: our evolution packaging is a bit broken, evolution-dev should depend on libevolution, I explicitly added that to tracker's build-depends | 13:33 |
| Laney | evolution just got an upload ... | 13:33 |
| Laney | anyway, I believe that if there's a diff that the version needs an ubuntu substring to make the autosyncer not clobber it. | 13:34 |
| jbicha | yeah, there's the fix :) | 13:34 |
| jbicha | it's fine if the autosyncer clobbers it, the diff won't be needed any more | 13:35 |
| Laney | ok, well it's in NEW for all arches now. | 13:35 |
| === x4 is now known as init | ||
| === init is now known as x4 | ||
| cjwatson | I posted an analysis to -devel of all the remaining build failures in main. | 14:02 |
| === x4 is now known as init | ||
| skaet | thanks cjswatson. :0 | 14:12 |
| skaet | :) even | 14:12 |
| gema | skaet, cjwatson: is there a website where we can see build failures in any understandable fashion? | 14:24 |
| gema | like a summary of builds or so | 14:24 |
| cjwatson | gema: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20120328-precise.html | 14:25 |
| cjwatson | that's of the "rebuild everything based on current archive" run going on at the moment | 14:26 |
| gema | cjwatson: thanks | 14:26 |
| cjwatson | doko_: is it OK to sync gdc-4.4 and gdc-4.6 from unstable to fix their test rebuild failures? | 14:26 |
| stgraber | would probably be a good idea to update the link to the ftbfs in #ubuntu-devel's topic, can someone with access do that? | 14:27 |
| doko_ | cjwatson, ohh yes. forgot that | 14:27 |
| cjwatson | shall I do that? | 14:27 |
| doko_ | sure | 14:27 |
| cjwatson | done | 14:28 |
| cjwatson | doko_: Is the python2.7/amd64 failure one you've seen before? | 14:37 |
| doko_ | cjwatson, yes, not able to reproduce here. and failing on some other debian archs too. will disable the test with the final 2.7.3 release | 14:39 |
| cjwatson | ok | 14:40 |
| doko_ | I have to recheck mpfr4, but that one wasn't reproducible either :-/ | 14:42 |
| === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk | ||
| doko_ | cjwatson, do you have a reference for the genshi upstream report? | 14:51 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| cjwatson | doko: they're linked from bug 935516 | 14:57 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 935516 in genshi "genshi version 0.6-2 FTBFS on i386 in precise" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/935516 | 14:57 |
| cjwatson | comment 1 | 14:57 |
| Laney | stgraber: anyone can | 15:05 |
| stgraber | Laney: oh, right, I thought the channel was +t | 15:06 |
| Laney | thankfully not :-) | 15:06 |
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| === init is now known as x4 | ||
| nessita | hello all! just wanted for confirm archive is open for uploads | 15:58 |
| nessita | sorry, typo: if* the archive is open... | 15:58 |
| cjwatson | yes | 16:00 |
| cjwatson | subject to feature/ui freezes | 16:00 |
| nessita | cjwatson: right, thanks1 | 16:01 |
| skaet | nessita, should be bug fixes or approved feature freeze exceptions only at this point. | 16:01 |
| nessita | skaet: yes, thanks | 16:02 |
| === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ | ||
| micahg | could someone please copy thunderbird/oneiric from ubuntu-mozilla-security to oneiric-security | 16:51 |
| micahg | any archive admins aroundopy for a copy? | 17:14 |
| micahg | slangasek: could you please copy thunderbird/oneiric from ubuntu-mozilla-security to oneiric-security | 17:18 |
| slangasek | micahg: looking | 17:28 |
| === fabo__ is now known as fabo | ||
| slangasek | micahg: done, sorry for the delay | 17:56 |
| micahg | slangasek: thanks | 17:56 |
| broder | could i get someone to accept the mosh packages in binNEW? they've been sitting there for a while now | 18:12 |
| phillw | Hi, just as a heads up to bug that is getting hotter as a regression, has bug 972285 hit your radar yet? | 18:18 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 972285 in linux "segmentation fault when start on linux 3.0.0-18-generic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/972285 | 18:18 |
| knome | can somebody from the release team look at bug 972402? also, are we still in a mode where just uploading is okay after ACK, or do i need to do something else? | 18:35 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 972402 in xubuntu-meta "FFe: include xfce4-datetime-plugin in Xubuntu's default install" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/972402 | 18:35 |
| knome | btw, note that this FFe is actually three bugs... (links in the bug) | 18:39 |
| cyphermox | hi, could someone please give back evolution-exchange and evolution-indicator in test-rebuild-20120328 ? | 18:43 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: done | 18:50 |
| cyphermox | stgraber: thanks | 18:50 |
| micahg | who has rights on the copy archive? | 18:59 |
| slangasek | for build retries, it looks like it might be buildd admins only | 19:00 |
| micahg | ah, ok | 19:00 |
| stgraber | jibel: ouch, for a moment I thought my upgrade testing environment was broken (after 2 days of edubuntu upgrade failing) but checking jenkins I see that Ubuntu is broken too for the same reason (compiz/unity/... failing to upgrade) ;) | 19:08 |
| infinity | knome: I'm a bit biased, since I already use xfce4-datetime-plugin. | 19:56 |
| infinity | knome: Is there a migration strategy at all for upgrades, or will panels just be different between new and upgraded installs? | 19:57 |
| knome | infinity, just different | 19:57 |
| knome | infinity, the looks is the same afaik though | 19:57 |
| infinity | knome: (Either way, I think moving to the new datetime is the right thing to do, and it's mostly your call, not ours, as long as you don't break the world) | 19:57 |
| knome | hehe, we won't | 19:58 |
| knome | so if you can add ACK for the bug (and the others too), i'll tell our uploaded to do his thing | 19:58 |
| infinity | Sure. | 19:59 |
| knome | thanks | 19:59 |
| infinity | I'll just ACK the meta bug. | 19:59 |
| knome | btw, release team is not subscribed to the other bugs, if that matters | 19:59 |
| infinity | S'all good. | 20:01 |
| infinity | Like I said, I just acked the FFe one, just do your thing and close them all as you upload. | 20:01 |
| knome | k, will do. thanks! :) | 20:01 |
| infinity | knome: This is largely based on the fact that I run the new datetime every day, and I know it's not broken. So, please don't break it now. ;) | 20:03 |
| knome | hehe | 20:03 |
| knome | won't, we promise | 20:03 |
| infinity | broder: No plans to fix the arm* FTBFS first? | 20:07 |
| infinity | broder: (And I assume you mean binNEW for the backports?) | 20:08 |
| * infinity accepts, given that it's backports anyway... | 20:09 | |
| broder | infinity: arm fix is coming in a few days, but yes, was referring to backports. thanks | 20:14 |
| infinity | broder: arm fix(es), perhaps. The failure in lucid didn't look the same as the one in precise, though I didn't look closely, could be the same root cause. | 20:15 |
| broder | it's probably not. the precise failure was due to thumb-2-by-default | 20:16 |
| broder | i'll look into lucid | 20:16 |
| infinity | Yeah, the precise one was definitely thumb. | 20:17 |
| infinity | The lucid one was whining about a no-op comparison, which at first geuss, I would has assumed a signedness error, but then powerpc would have failed (which it didn't). | 20:17 |
| infinity | s/would had/would have/ | 20:17 |
| micahg | would it be a problem if a -backports package is only built against -security? (no reverse dependencies) | 20:18 |
| infinity | micahg: What do you mean? | 20:19 |
| micahg | infinity: after the thunderbird 11 migration I want to backport lightning-extension (been meaning to do this for 2 years now), the first one will be a real backport, but I'd want to keep it updated when I push out security updates | 20:19 |
| micahg | so, I'd like to build the backport in the security PPA with everything else | 20:20 |
| infinity | And then have it copied to backports manually? | 20:20 |
| micahg | yep | 20:20 |
| micahg | I'd do it as an actual backport of whatever release I end up backporting from (probably precise) | 20:20 |
| infinity | Does it help to realise that -backports already builds against security? | 20:20 |
| micahg | infinity: it's about timing, nothing else | 20:21 |
| infinity | backports is a superset of updates (and security). | 20:21 |
| micahg | yes | 20:21 |
| infinity | But I guess if it's just a timing issue, sure, it can be done, there's nothing magical about the backports pocket. | 20:21 |
| infinity | But make sure the people who do backport approvals are aware that you'll be end-running around the process. | 20:21 |
| micahg | infinity: that's me :) | 20:22 |
| infinity | Well, talk to yourself, then. | 20:22 |
| micahg | and I"ll open a backport tasks when I do this so people are aware | 20:22 |
| infinity | Just make sure the AA who get to do this for you is very clear on what you're doing, so no one copies it to security by accident. :P | 20:23 |
| micahg | infinity: right | 20:23 |
| infinity | But yeah, like I said, nothing magical about the pocket, so no technical reason we can't do it. | 20:23 |
| micahg | ScottK: ^^ FYI | 20:24 |
| ScottK | OK | 20:26 |
| ScottK | micahg: That's fine. | 20:27 |
| === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!