/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/04/04/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

penguin42how do we mark kernel bugs that trigger during installation so that the reporter doesn't get hastled to try latest mainline kernels etc?00:05
Logan_Can somebody change the status of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/804662 to "Confirmed" (and remove the assigned person)?00:13
ubot2Launchpad bug 804662 in jockey "jockey-gtk crashed with TypeError in _execute_child(): execv() arg 2 must contain only strings" [Undecided,Fix released]00:13
Logan_It was incorrectly marked as Fix Released by a newbie, and someone assigned it to himself randomly, and I can't change the values back.00:13
* penguin42 looks00:14
penguin42I can't figure out wth is going on with that bug - it seems like loads of people who are newish have changed the assignment on it or changed the state00:18
Logan_Yeah...00:19
Logan_It's really frustrating, as it's a major bug, and having it marked as Fix Released/Committed is essentially hiding it from the developers.00:20
hggdhsome bugs get to be a strange attractor00:20
* Logan_ just applied for the the BugSquad. :-P00:21
penguin42hggdh: I'm just wondering if it's some form of spam type thing - I can't see why there are so many changes of status, all from people who aren't members of any groups, and who have 0 karma and are recent joiners00:21
Logan_Probably a language/knowledge barrier on Launchpad.00:21
Logan_People get sent to the bug via apport, and then they assign it to themselves because they know no better. :-P00:22
Logan_(Can't figure out the status changes, though.)00:22
hggdhyeah00:23
hggdhpenguin42: perhaps we should mark it triaged00:23
penguin42hggdh: Not sure - is it understood?00:24
penguin42hggdh: I'm going to flag it to the bug-control list00:24
hggdhI do not know, and I do not think so (TL;DR)00:24
Logan_Want me to explain the bug? :-P00:25
hggdhnah, let's keep it confirmed. I think the attractor is the video drive00:25
hggdhLogan_: no ;-) I do not deal with video in any form, colour, or type00:25
Logan_Okay.00:26
Logan_How long does it take to be accepted to the BugSquad?00:26
Logan_Just applied; I'd love to help out.00:26
hggdhLogan_: takes about 2 minutes ;-)00:27
Logan_Haha.00:27
hggdhLogan_: welcome to the BugSquad, and all that. Please do not hesitate in asking questions here, we strive to help00:28
penguin42welcome on board!00:28
Logan_Thanks!00:28
* Logan_ adds this channel to his favorites.00:28
* hggdh goes monitor the TV for the destruction around00:29
hggdhsee you all tomorrow00:29
penguin42yeh, and it's 1:30am here - so bed time!00:30
penguin42I've flagged that bug to the bugcontrol list00:30
=== Guest12256 is now known as dmogle
=== dmogle is now known as Guest23275
=== Guest23275 is now known as dmogle
=== _thumper_ is now known as thumper
jcduttonQuestion: bug#973161     Does anyone know which package it should be against? It is a problem with the left hand icon bar when in auto hide mode09:57
hjdWould anyone mind if I reopen bug 973206? It consistently crash on Precise when you attempt to run it.10:17
ubot2Launchpad bug 973206 in gmorgan "gmorgan crashed with SIGSEGV in fclose()" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/97320610:17
arandSounds reasonable, are you able to get the debug info with updated debug symols?10:19
jcduttonarand, surely to get that, you would need a non-stripped dbg version of gmorgan?10:28
hjdfwiw, I tried https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash, but I didn't find a dbgsym package for gmorgan..10:29
arandAh, indeed, it doesn't create one :(10:30
arandSO also report a bug on that ;)10:30
arandBut anyhow, if it does crash reproducibly, I'd still say to re-open the bug report.10:31
jcduttonarand, I like that, report a bug because there is not enough information to fix another bug!10:31
hjdand where would I file that one? To gmorgan as well "Please provide a debug package"?10:32
jcduttonarand, I opened a similar bug report, but for 64bit10:32
arandhjd: Yeah.10:32
jcduttonWhich package provides the icon bar on the left had side of unity?10:34
hjdarand: done. Reopened + filed bug 973282 about the debug package.10:50
ubot2Launchpad bug 973282 in gmorgan "Please provide a debug package for gmorgan" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/97328210:50
erkan^hello, is someone there?12:03
erkan^!97153912:03
ubot2Factoid '971539' not found12:03
erkan^huh?12:03
erkan^https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox-extensions/+bug/97153912:04
ubot2Launchpad bug 971539 in firefox-extensions "ProfileManager" [Undecided,New]12:04
=== ZarroBoogs is now known as Pici
=== Guest31547 is now known as tobin
=== ogra is now known as Guest67850
=== ogra_ is now known as ogry
=== ogry is now known as ogra_
bcurtiswxgood morning13:15
=== io is now known as sw
=== emma is now known as em
matthew-parletteI'm looking at bug 972620. I know I recently saw the same error message come through in a bug but I can't seem to find it. Has anyone seen a bug like this?16:47
ubot2Launchpad bug 972620 in ubiquity "Vitual machine crashed while trying to install Ubuntu 11.10 32-bit on my Win 7 professional machine" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/97262016:47
matthew-parletteSpecifically the OSError: [Errno 17]16:47
=== om26er_ is now known as om26er
penguin42is there a bug tag for bugs that are trivially repeatable?17:46
roadmrpenguin42: if it has a good set of steps to reproduce you can tag it "testcase" (I think)17:48
roadmrpenguin42: no difference between trivial (1. launch program X, 2. watch it crash and burn) and more complicated sequences of steps, if this is what you mean17:49
penguin42ah testcase sounds good17:49
roadmrpenguin42: yes, once you have steps to reproduce all bugs are potentially trivially repeatable :)17:49
penguin42roadmr: Well it's just some are very very simple and don't require any setup or anything like that, it's just 'run this command and it goes bang'17:50
roadmrpenguin42: I see, I'd still just use testcase for them17:50
penguin42ko, thanks17:50
penguin42ok even17:50
* roadmr gets knocked out by penguin42 X(17:53
roadmrheheh17:53
penguin42:-)17:53
penguin42bug 968753 is piling up a few dupes - can't remember seeing a crasher like that for ssh for a long time18:05
ubot2Launchpad bug 968753 in openssh "ssh crashed with SIGSEGV" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/96875318:05
hjdHm, I wonder whether I should mark bug 926605 as a duplicate of bug 824708? They are triggered in completely different ways, but looks like they would have the same underlying cause.18:14
ubot2Launchpad bug 926605 in aptitude "aptitude: failed to download the changlog of apt: Download queue destroyed." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92660518:14
ubot2Launchpad bug 824708 in aptitude "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/82470818:14
=== bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk
hjdCould someone please mark bug 688769 as Triaged/Low? Thanks.18:44
ubot2Launchpad bug 688769 in synaptic "Cannot select previous search terms from the dropdown to repeat a search" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68876918:44
s9iper1hjd: s9iper1 looks18:50
s9iper1hjd: done18:52
penguin42anyone have a Debian sid system around to try something on?19:01
greg-gjust a wheezy19:03
penguin42yeh I wanted to try it on altest to see if it suffers from the same as the ubuntu build19:03
hjds9iper1: thank you.19:19
s9iper1hjd: yw19:19
jtaylorpenguin42: which package?19:41
penguin42jtaylor: sipcalc - I've got to the bottom of the bug - see bug 97360219:41
ubot2Launchpad bug 973602 in sipcalc "sipcalc crashed with SIGABRT in __libc_message()" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/97360219:41
jtaylorsid works19:43
penguin42jtaylor: Thanks; I think it's probably only our builds with fortify that are failing19:43
penguin42jtaylor: What package version is in sid?19:44
jtaylor1.1.4-2.119:44
jtaylorthough I only tried a chroot19:44
jtaylornot sure what that package does19:44
penguin42nod19:44
penguin42jtaylor: It does some ip address calculation by the looks of it, I'm sure I've heard of people using it19:45
jtaylorlet me still check in a real sid19:45
penguin42jtaylor: It looks like an easy fix, but the original author released a new version about 3 years ago with it fixed, it seems that would be the right thing to use (1.1.5)19:45
jtayloralso fails in precise chroot so probably sid not affected19:45
penguin42jtaylor: Nod19:46
penguin42jtaylor: I was triaging it on Precise19:46
penguin42jtaylor: I'm not really sure what to do with that bug now, best thing is to say that it just needs the package updating19:57
jtaylorpenguin42: given the small change I think its resonable to just update to the new upstream20:15
=== gear4 is now known as zz_gear4
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== dmogle is now known as Guest62704
=== bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_
=== dmogle is now known as Guest68416
=== Guest68416 is now known as dmogle
=== greg_g is now known as greg-g

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!