[03:56] <ScottK> broder: This just means you should be doing more uploading to Debian.
[05:42] <vibhav> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgssapi-perl/+bug/935236 is fixed in Debian
[05:43] <vibhav> Should I sync or prepare a debdiff?
[05:44] <micahg> vibhav: does it need an FFe for the sync?
[05:44] <vibhav> micahg: i dont know
[05:45] <micahg> well, it's unseeded with 2 reverse-dependencies, so sync would be preferable
[05:45] <micahg> but check if it needs an FFe
[05:45] <vibhav> I did not understand what you just said :(
[05:46] <micahg> it also depends on if the new version needs other things pulled in
[05:46] <micahg> !ffe | vibhav
[05:46] <vibhav> micahg: I know what is a FFe
[05:46] <vibhav> The "unseeded with 2 reverse-dependencies"
[05:46] <vibhav> part
[05:46] <micahg> vibhav: not on any images and only 2 other packages use it
[05:47] <vibhav> micahg: from where did you know that?
[05:47] <micahg> vibhav: seeded-in-ubuntu and reverse-depends (2 tools in ubuntu-dev-tools)
[05:47] <vibhav> ah
[05:49] <vibhav> So I shall request a sync
[05:51] <micahg> well, it's not fixed, it's disabled, but that's fine
[05:55] <micahg> was it decided if hardening enablement needs an FFe or not?
[06:02] <RAOF> Sounds like a feature (but a pretty safe one) to me.
[06:02] <micahg> vibhav: I forgot to ask if it builds :)
[06:02] <vibhav> micahg: Doing it right now
[06:03] <micahg> vibhav: already replied to your bug
[06:03] <vibhav> ah
[06:04] <vibhav> The Ill prepare a debdiif, right?
[06:04] <micahg> vibhav: yeah, that'll work, just make sure it builds first :)
[06:09] <vibhav> micahg: I just need to add the patch to debian/patches/ right? (And not modify the source instead)
[06:10] <micahg> vibhav: and update the debian/patches/series file
[06:10] <vibhav> ok
[06:14] <vibhav> uploaded packages, hopes that it builds :)
[06:14] <micahg> it's a quick package
[06:17] <vibhav> "start is 24 minutes"
[06:17] <vibhav> drat, Ill use pbuilder
[06:17] <micahg> vibhav: right, a local build should be quick
[06:19] <vibhav> Till now, its fine
[06:19] <vibhav> dependencies have been installed
[06:19] <vibhav> done!
[06:19]  * vibhav attaches debdiff
[06:22] <vibhav> micahg: Done :)
[06:23] <vibhav> Could it be backported to oneiric?
[06:23] <vibhav> micahg: And please review the debdiff
[06:24] <micahg> vibhav: does an oneiric build fail the same way?
[06:27] <vibhav> micahg: Not sure, let me ask somebody
[06:28] <micahg> vibhav: why were you asking me about oneiric?
[06:29] <vibhav> micahg: Never MInd
[06:55] <vibhav> I thought/window 7
[06:55] <vibhav> oops :)
[07:03] <dholbach> good morning
[07:04] <ajmitch> morning dholbach
[07:04] <dholbach> hey ajmitch
[07:07] <geser> Hi dholbach and ajmitch
[07:08] <dholbach> hey geser
[07:13] <vibhav> micahg: ping
[07:14] <micahg> vibhav: pong
[07:15] <vibhav> micahg: Did you check my debdiff
[07:15] <micahg> vibhav: no, I'm working on other things
[07:17] <vibhav> ah fine
[07:20] <vibhav> dholbach: Do you have some free time?
[08:11] <vibhav> kdebase is not present in oneiric and precise
[08:11] <vibhav> How can it be brought into the distros
[08:13] <geser> why? what's the problem?
[08:13] <vibhav> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase
[08:13] <vibhav> Its only present in Natty, maverick, lucid and harfy
[08:13] <vibhav> hardy*
[08:15] <geser> "In oneiric kdebase source was renamed kde-baseapps" (lp: #814411)
[08:16] <vibhav> ah
[08:16] <vibhav> thanks
[08:18] <vibhav> LP: #814411
[14:05] <mfisch> tumbleweed: Whet did you mean in your comment for 959347, "It also doesn't close this bug"
[14:05] <tumbleweed> the changelog entry doesn't include LP: #959347
[14:06] <mfisch> tumbleweed: oh, ok
[14:06] <mfisch> tumbleweed: why is the version 0.3.8-0ubuntu1 when we no longer have any patches in there?
[14:06] <mfisch> is it always 0ubuntu1 for us?
[14:07] <tumbleweed> mfisch: firstly, it's not a native package so it neends to be dash something
[14:08] <tumbleweed> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
[14:08] <tumbleweed> the first upload in debian will be -1. We want to get that when its available, so we want something that sorts before it
[14:08] <tumbleweed> we also want it to be clear that its an ubuntu modification
[14:08] <tumbleweed> so we use -0ubuntu1 whenever grabbing new upstream versions and leapfrogging debian
[14:22] <mfisch> tumbleweed: got it, thx
[14:49] <astraljava> Hi gang, I'm building ubuntustudio-meta on my precise pbuilder, and stumbled upon a few warnings:
[14:49] <astraljava> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Recommends field of package ubuntustudio-graphics: unknown substitution variable ${germinate:Recommends}
[14:50] <astraljava> I couldn't find much info regarding that variable on dpkg-gencontrol documentation, but I admit I may not know where to look. Any pointers, anyone?
[15:21] <mfisch> tumbleweed: new debdiff incoming
[15:23] <Laney> astraljava: that usually means that nothing has put any information into that substvar
[15:23] <Laney> if that's intentional then you don't need to worry
[15:25] <astraljava> Laney: Ok, I'll ignore it for now. Thanks!
[16:22] <jtaylor> yey got a reply from upstream wanting the modified files instead of patches :/
[16:22] <jtaylor> thats a good sign
[16:25] <nigelb> jtaylor: Looks like they have a great way to track changes :D