=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [15:48] * phillipsjk delegates reading the TOS to his cat. [16:01] aloha [16:10] Are we here yet? [16:31] Hi, wasn't the CC meeting today/1600UTC? [16:33] 17 UTC [16:33] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda [16:35] AH, sorry... I'm another one affected by the Google Agenda DTS bug :\ [16:38] yeah, you're not alone [17:00] o/ [17:02] pleia2: ping [17:02] o/ [17:03] shall we start? [17:03] yep [17:03] #startmeeting [17:03] Meeting started Thu Apr 5 17:03:23 2012 UTC. The chair is czajkowski. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [17:03] Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired [17:03] aloha and welcome to the CC meeting [17:03] #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda [17:03] todays agenda [17:04] dpic: ping [17:04] o/ [17:04] hi [17:04] #topic Bug 1 === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Bug 1 [17:04] #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bug1 [17:05] dpic: care to talk to us regarding your agenda item? [17:05] So, bug #1 is a bit vague because it is specific to microsoft. that means apple could solve it for us [17:05] Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [17:05] i don't think that was the intention [17:05] so i drafted this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bug1 [17:05] dpic, or that ubuntu could solve the problem via equally non-free software [17:06] it cites the ubuntu philosophy and commitment to making floss available [17:07] that's interesting [17:07] i don't think ubuntu would be completely proprietary ever, but it does make sense to shift the conversation to proprietary software and away from windows [17:08] because if Apple suddenly took over the world, we would have less free software but bug #1 would technically be solved [17:08] Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [17:08] ok, i'll refer to it as "the bug" or "#1" from now on to avoid the bot haha [17:09] dpic, given how ubuntu already integrates non free software into the core distro i don't think its outlandish to say it would become more proprietary [17:09] hello hello [17:09] sabdfl: hello there [17:09] it's a shame LP is timing out right now, because I'd love to read the bug description and everything again [17:09] sabdfl: do you have logs or shall i pastebin? [17:09] thanks dpic, yes please [17:09] I pastebined them [17:09] dholbach: i can pastebin it if you like [17:10] http://paste.ubuntu.com/916280/ [17:10] pleia2: great, thanks [17:10] dpic, ah no, now it opened [17:11] this is the buf now dholbach http://paste.ubuntu.com/916281/ [17:11] ah, okay [= [17:11] i think it would be a mistake to turn bug 1 from tease to dogma [17:11] Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [17:11] and i think it would be moving the goal posts to edit it now [17:12] sabdfl: interesting point. [17:12] sabdfl, so ubuntu doesnt stand for expanding free software but was just teasing? [17:12] if we get too focused on it, we end up in impossible conversations [17:12] mog: i think that wasn't the point [17:12] like what the meaning of proprietary is [17:12] sabdfl: true [17:12] and mog's point [17:12] I've always seen bug #1 to be a bit tongue in cheek [17:12] Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [17:12] exactly, it was a tease, and frankly one i regret for being a smallminded way to start [17:13] we don't win by being smallminded [17:13] yes [17:13] nor do we win by being pedantic [17:13] and arguing about the wording of a smallminded tease sounds like the third or fourth century of a successful religion, not what we need to be now ;) [17:13] i think the goalposts deserve shifting, but is there a way this bug could be used for that without running into those concerns? [17:14] let sleeping dogs lie, is my view [17:14] if we close that bug, I think we can celebrate. If someone else is now dominating, well, we can always file a new bug ;) [17:14] if the cc feels it needs changing, fine, but i'd be happy to say 'let's focus on more meaningful discussions' [17:14] beuno: there will only be one (bug) #1! [17:14] indeed. bug 1000000 is coming up though ;) [17:14] Error: Launchpad bug 1000000 could not be found [17:15] thank you, ubottu [17:15] haha [17:15] sabdfl, then we'd better be quick :) [17:15] can we thank those who raised it, and move on? [17:15] yeah, I'm happy to leave it and look forward to closing it [17:15] sounds like a great idea [17:15] yes, same here [17:15] moving on [17:15] am happy we're even considering it needs broadening, makes it look smaller! [17:15] agreed [17:16] #topic Asia/Oceania Regional Membership Board Catch up === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Asia/Oceania Regional Membership Board Catch up [17:16] anyone here from the A/O Board? [17:16] I haven't gotten replies from any A/O folks about attending today, but it's the middle of the night for them [17:16] (3AM in Sydney, and it goes from there) [17:16] good, so lifeless should be awake :p [17:17] hah :) [17:17] beuno: *grin* true! [17:17] damn, I should've considered that when I set up the schedule :/ [17:17] do we have any other items to discuss ? [17:17] dholbach: unless you can move timezones it's not your fault :) [17:19] I have a quick one - when will we move over the Teams page? :) [17:20] #topic move over teams page === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: move over teams page [17:20] sooner rather than later [17:20] it's already better than what went before, isn't it? [17:20] nods it is [17:20] and we've merged two columns into one to create more room [17:20] great [17:20] I think we go live with it now, it'll always need tending and updates, it's fine for now [17:20] if people want to add their team information to it when it's up they can [17:20] pleia2: exactly [17:21] who wants to do the honours? [17:21] I can copy over the /temp version to live version this evening [17:21] thanks czajkowski :) [17:21] great [17:21] #action czajkowski to update the /teams page with working draft [17:21] ACTION: czajkowski to update the /teams page with working draft [17:22] anything else ? anyone ? [17:23] merged code of conduct 2.0 [17:23] #topic merged code of conduct 2.0 === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: merged code of conduct 2.0 [17:24] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sabdfl/ubuntu-codeofconduct/v2-draft/changes [17:24] by way of background [17:25] we were looking at how to build awareness of the leadership coc [17:25] and how to make it possible for people to sign / support that [17:25] as part of our general review of governance and leadership in ubuntu [17:25] and thought it might be better to merge the leadership value statement into the normal coc [17:25] on the grounds that all of us have opportunities for leadership [17:26] and we should be clear throughout the community what we think makes for good leadership [17:26] so, (amber?) set about merging them, i crunched it down a few tens of lines, and others have made suggestions [17:26] along the way, it made sense to integrate the diversity statement [17:26] and the link is where we stand with a current draft Code of Conduct 2.0 [17:27] there is some email from the CC on it which i confess to having failed to parse and integrate [17:27] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sabdfl/ubuntu-codeofconduct/v2-draft/view/head:/MergedCodeOfConduct.txt is the actual changed document [17:27] should we take comments and feedback here? [17:27] sure [17:28] I think it's good we've addressed peoples issues that they couldnt sign a LCoC but with it being addressed now in the CoC this helps [17:29] when I googled an expression used in the CoC I was pleasantly surprised to see many other communities who adopted it :) [17:30] There is talk of Mozilla adopting portions of the Ubuntu CoC [17:30] they might want to get a heads-up on this 2.0, and we could take suggestions from them [17:30] i tried to generalise it but.... it was difficult [17:31] I'm very happy with the new CoC - the only bit I think we could improve is the BDFL bit - it might need some clarification, particularly for new contributors [17:31] dholbach, i've tried to demystify the BDFL reference [17:31] sabdfl, they're aware - czajkowski and I are in conversations [17:31] ok [17:33] any further comments on the CoC V 2.0 ? [17:34] should we blog this [17:34] post to mailing lists? [17:34] to let people know of this change and when should we do it ? [17:35] i'm going to work through the CC comments now and make tweaks [17:35] dholbach said the latter portion felt a bit too heavy on the delegation mechanics [17:36] I think that was in reference to the Leadership part no? 'Their teams' ? [17:36] ah yes - sabdfl, you're right - I missed that when reviewing the thread again [17:38] while it is important to explain leaders what good leadership is and how delegation works, a casual Ubuntu contributor might feel a bit less free to jump in and pioneer in a given area [17:38] ... after reading a few paragraphs about delegated powers and delegated responsibilities [17:38] I'm not sure if this is also a concern of yours [17:41] * beuno re-reads [17:41] there are a couple of things i really wanted to convey [17:42] this is as much about being a leader as it is about being lead [17:42] i think it's important we avoid some of the post-decision carping that is toxic in other communities [17:42] you know the story: [17:42] * there is a hard decision to be taken ("Upstart vs Systemd") [17:43] * someone steps up to do the analysis and the work [17:43] * they take a decision and do a ton of work tomake it real [17:43] * then others who weren't around jump in and say it's all wrong [17:43] * so it all goes on hold for three years [17:43] * people resign in frustration [17:44] * then someone just does it that way anyway [17:44] let's not go there [17:44] totally agreed [17:44] so i was being forceful about the importance of getting the delegation right (top down delegation, bottom up confirmation) [17:44] +1 [17:44] and the importance of letting the folk do the work they have taken on [17:45] recognising the occasional need to escalate [17:45] all of that becomes a little longwinded [17:45] i'll give it another spin [17:45] i think that covers all the feedback [17:46] will push a few more commits up, then am happy for blogging and feedback [17:46] could we identify someone to act as a central taker of feedback? [17:46] so we can consider, say, one wiki page of feedback rather than a long thread? [17:46] nods makes sense to keep the feedback in one place [17:46] maybe we can blog about it on the fridge and collect replies there? [17:46] rather than here on a ml then another chunk elsewhere [17:47] +1 [17:47] ...as we don't really have a general purpose mailing list [17:47] sabdfl: I could collect any feedback mailed to my @ubuntu.com address [17:47] and put it on a wiki page for us to review [17:47] +1 [17:47] perfect [17:47] grand job [17:47] yes, I'm quite happy with it as well :) [17:49] ok are we done folks ? [17:49] * dholbach is [17:49] * beuno too [17:50] right [17:50] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [17:50] Meeting ended Thu Apr 5 17:50:39 2012 UTC. [17:50] Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-04-05-17.03.moin.txt [17:50] Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-04-05-17.03.html [17:50] thanks for coming folks [17:50] got a lot done today [17:50] o/ [17:50] thanks everyone :) === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox === plars is now known as plars-away === bladernr_ is now known as bladernr_afk === bladernr_afk is now known as bladernr_ === Effenberg0x0 is now known as EffenbergAway