[15:10] <SpamapS> hazmat: was that subordinates I saw land?
[15:10] <hazmat> SpamapS, there's one last branch for it
[15:11] <hazmat> SpamapS, hmm.. maybe two the agent branch that actually deploys it (which is approved in the queue), and then a followup control branch to restrict remove-relation/destroy-service on subordinates
[15:15] <SpamapS> hazmat: ok. The packaging branch is broken right now due to a patch I have in there for tests.. thinking about just ditching the patch and setting AWS_* when running the tests.
[15:17] <hazmat> SpamapS, is it just those 3 tests in environment.. afaik.. having a look
[15:22] <hazmat> hmm.. looks like a few in the provider as well
[15:28] <hazmat> SpamapS, here's the diff, http://paste.ubuntu.com/917565/
[15:29] <hazmat> i'm going to apply to trunk if that looks sane 2 u
[15:31] <SpamapS> hazmat: sure, I think the tests should always run without those env vars set.
[15:47] <hazmat> bcsaller, juju.control.tests.test_status.StatusTest.test_render_svg on trunk
[15:52] <robbiew> bcsaller: yo...did you submit your self-review yet?  If not, can you get that in today...I'm trying to knock these out! ;)
[15:59] <hazmat> bcsaller, fixed on trunk
[16:00] <hazmat> robbiew, i think he's probably asleep atm, he was up till 3ish
[16:00] <hazmat> SpamapS, trunk runs tests without env vars
[16:00] <robbiew> hazmat: ah, thnx...I'll shoot him an email
[16:02] <SpamapS> hazmat: woot
[16:34] <hazmat> the magic expiration works pretty well, i can suspend and restore local envs with it
[17:56] <hazmat> shiny.. http://www.madeiracloud.com/
[18:11] <hazmat> hmm. its shiny, but its not very useful afaics
[18:44] <robbiew> lol
[20:52] <jimbaker> lbox still wants to use the honolulu milestone
[23:32] <jimbaker> hazmat, i'm still going through the review of https://codereview.appspot.com/5970080/, but i noticed it's not current with what has been pushed
[23:35] <hazmat> jimbaker, this one http://codereview.appspot.com/5976074/
[23:37] <jimbaker> hazmat, hmmm, i wonder why i was going against  https://codereview.appspot.com/5970080/ ? was it recently linked against the merge proposal?
[23:37] <hazmat> jimbaker, they look the same to me
[23:37] <jimbaker> anyway, the MP now links against ..74
[23:38] <jimbaker> hazmat, they differ with respect to managed.py