[01:53] <swick> hi, can someone tell me why there is no xvidcap for ubuntu 12.04 anymore?
[01:56] <JontheEchidna> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/xvidcap/1.1.7-0.2ubuntu12
=== Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie
[10:42] <geser> Laney, l3on: see also bug #921523
[10:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 921523 in libomxil-bellagio (Ubuntu) "package libomxil-bellagio0 0.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/921523
[11:29] <ajmitch> whoops, bitten by bug 969957 on upgrade, looks like a sync may fix it
[11:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 969957 in libsamplerate (Ubuntu) "package libsamplerate0 0.1.8-1 failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/share/man/man1/sndfile-resample.1.gz« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket samplerate-programs 0.1.7-3ubuntu1 ist" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/969957
[12:08] <Laney> geser: indeed
[12:09] <ajmitch> I guess we'd better get these upgrade failures fixed :)
[14:25] <Laney> geser: syncing it
[14:26] <Laney> i wonder why that's not on rcbugs
[14:26] <Laney> ajmitch: any clue?
[14:27] <ajmitch> Laney: about which package?
[14:27] <Laney> libsamplerate
[14:27] <Laney> ref debian bug #657414
[14:27] <ajmitch> probably because it's in main
[14:27] <ubottu> Debian bug 657414 in libsamplerate0 "libsamplerate0: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ..." [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/657414
[14:27] <Laney> also: up late?
[14:27] <Laney> oh, it doesn't consider that?
[14:27]  * ajmitch was going to ask about an FFe for that before syncing it, due to the hardening stuff
[14:27] <Laney> also I didn't notice --- fancy syncing? :-)
[14:27] <ajmitch> up late, *still* dist-upgrading to precise :)
[14:28] <ajmitch> I'd be happy to sync it, but I'd need to test it first :)
[14:29] <Laney> I don't see hardening stuff in the diff
[14:29] <Laney> oh yes I do
[14:29] <Laney> $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure) :-)
[14:29] <ajmitch> ok
[14:29] <ajmitch> I was only going by the changelog, I didn't look at the diff yet
[14:30] <ajmitch> do you think that'd need an FFe?
[14:30]  * ajmitch is being extra paranoid about it because it's close to release 
[14:31] <Laney> I suppose so, yeah. I tested it and it seems OK though. But I thought I could upload so you'll have to do it again :P
[14:31]  * Laney hands it over
[14:32] <ajmitch> hah
[14:32] <ajmitch> it is 2:30AM, so I'd better not do anything dangerous :)
[14:33] <Laney> do you know why rcbugs doesn't cover main?
[14:33] <ajmitch> probably because when it was written back in the dark ages it was only really intended for my use & then for MOTU?
[14:34] <Laney> hrm
[14:34] <ajmitch> shouldn't be hard to fix up
[14:34] <Laney> lunchies, ttyl
[14:35]  * ajmitch hacks it & sees if it breaks
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
[14:43] <ajmitch> Laney: I think I'll need to improve the code somewhat for it to not be quite as horrible
[15:59] <Rhonda> hmmm, bugfix update for wesnoth …
=== sharms_ is now known as sharms
[20:09] <ScottK> It would be nice if someone looked into gajim.  There's a new upload in Debian that fixes security issues, but it's need a merge and a check to see if an FFe is needed.
[20:52] <geser> is the "do not touch" message on merges.u.c still valid?