| ScottK | infinity: I see you are a step ahead of me and already fixed libomxil-bellagio. | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| ScottK | Rejected the superseded xbmc binaries in any case. | 00:11 |
| ScottK | Checking qapt. | 00:19 |
| ScottK | Don't accept that one. | 00:25 |
| ScottK | We'll have a new upload in a bit. | 01:50 |
| infinity | ScottK: Yeah, a bit ahead. I'm trying to sort out locally how to make xbmc armhf-friendly. | 01:57 |
| infinity | ScottK: Which is leading me to an ICE, so maybe it's a lost cause for now. :P | 01:58 |
| rsalveti | infinity: that's the weird thing, we got it to build at our PPA, probably a different config option | 02:13 |
| rsalveti | infinity: https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+recipe/xbmc-eden-daily-precise | 02:13 |
| rsalveti | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/xbmc/xbmc-linaro-pkg-precise/view/head:/debian/rules | 02:14 |
| rsalveti | if you want to compare the build options with yours | 02:14 |
| infinity | Well, --enable-neon is wrong there, for Ubuntu. | 02:15 |
| rsalveti | sure, but don't think that this is what causing you the issue | 02:15 |
| rsalveti | I didn't yet check in details, just saw it | 02:15 |
| infinity | Upstream configure is also universally setting -mfloat-abi=softfp. | 02:15 |
| infinity | So, I patched that out. | 02:15 |
| infinity | And now I get an ICE later on. | 02:15 |
| infinity | Could just be entirely different versions between your PPA and the Debian packages? | 02:16 |
| rsalveti | infinity: well, we're using the released eden, probably a bit similar with the debian one | 02:16 |
| infinity | Although. Only by about a day, if the date-as-version is to be believed. | 02:16 |
| rsalveti | and we got it to build for a few months already | 02:16 |
| infinity | Okay, you carry an armhf patch here. | 02:17 |
| infinity | And other bits. | 02:17 |
| infinity | I might just merge your packaging with the Debian one, and see how that works for me. | 02:17 |
| infinity | rsalveti: Thanks for the pointer. | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | yeah, true, avik is maintaining this package, and I remember he had to create an armhf specific patch for a ftbfs | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | quite a while ago | 02:18 |
| rsalveti | so that could be the fix you're looking for | 02:18 |
| infinity | Right, your armhf patch basically covers the configure fix I did locally, though. | 02:19 |
| infinity | So. | 02:19 |
| infinity | Hrm. | 02:19 |
| infinity | That probably still won't fix my ICE. | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | I think there's another one | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | let me look | 02:19 |
| infinity | You have other bits here that aren't in Debian's, though, I'll look. | 02:19 |
| rsalveti | infinity: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/xbmc/xbmc-linaro-pkg-precise/view/head:/debian/patches/0011-Fixing-MathUtils.h-for-armel.patch | 02:20 |
| infinity | Yeah, this source is a complete mess. | 02:20 |
| infinity | It's been a long time since I've seen a gcc-warnings-per-file ratio this dense. :P | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | you might also need http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/xbmc/xbmc-linaro-pkg-precise/view/head:/debian/patches/0013-WinSystemX11GLES-Avoid-closing-X11-window-otherwise-.patch later on | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | but not critical, and we can fix once you get it to build | 02:21 |
| infinity | They desperately need someone anal-retentive upstream to go through this, warning-by-warning. | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | yup | 02:21 |
| infinity | I'm actually amazed it works on Windows. | 02:21 |
| rsalveti | hahah, yeah | 02:22 |
| infinity | Unless they're using mingw32 there. | 02:22 |
| infinity | Cause MSVC++ would probably just barf on this source and flip them the virtual bird. | 02:22 |
| infinity | rsalveti: If you've got a good handle on what needs to be done here, I won't mind terribly if you give me new xbmc packages for precise. :P | 02:36 |
| infinity | (And I can go back to planning my fpc transition) | 02:37 |
| rsalveti | infinity: sure, I can handle that | 02:37 |
| rsalveti | infinity: I'm planning to do a few things tonight already :-) | 02:37 |
| infinity | rsalveti: s/armel/armel armhf/ should be enough for debian/control and debian/rules. And then all the Linaro patches. | 02:37 |
| rsalveti | infinity: ok | 02:38 |
| infinity | (At least, I hope that's enough to make it happy) | 02:38 |
| rsalveti | let me start my icecc enviroment :-) | 02:38 |
| infinity | Do you guys normally forward this stuff to upstreams and/or Debian? | 02:38 |
| rsalveti | infinity: yes, we didn't yet do to xbmc because we just enabled the build for precise, and for oneiric with have tons of other patches | 02:39 |
| rsalveti | but that's always the goal | 02:39 |
| * infinity nods. | 02:39 | |
| infinity | Kay, just checking. | 02:39 |
| infinity | rsalveti: internal compiler error: in fp_immediate_constant, at config/arm/arm.c:13419 | 02:51 |
| infinity | ^-- Same ICE I got locally. | 02:51 |
| rsalveti | infinity: hm, ok, will check | 02:51 |
| infinity | rsalveti: That MathUtils patch might fix it. I haven't looked at what config/arm/arm.c does... | 02:51 |
| infinity | This is all obviously kinda fragile in a lot of places, given that the same source succeeded on Ubuntu/powerpc and failed on Debian/powerpc... | 02:53 |
| infinity | Can you spell b-r-i-t-t-l-e? | 02:53 |
| infinity | Okay, even more special. It succeeded on Ubuntu's PPC buildds, but not my local Ubuntu/PPC build... | 02:54 |
| infinity | Best source EVER. | 02:54 |
| infinity | Oh, hah: Illegal instruction | 02:55 |
| infinity | I'm guessing it's building with altivec or something. | 02:55 |
| infinity | (Which the G5 buildds could handle, my local machine can't) | 02:55 |
| infinity | I'll look at that later, after you make armhf work. | 02:56 |
| rsalveti | hm, weird, are you using a clean local build? | 02:56 |
| rsalveti | ok | 02:56 |
| infinity | rsalveti: Oh, a hint on upstream's configure, you might want to call it with the "we're using tegra" flag (I forget what the flag was, but grepping for tegra should do). | 02:57 |
| rsalveti | infinity: yeah, I remember that | 02:57 |
| rsalveti | probably because of neon | 02:57 |
| infinity | rsalveti: Since that's pretty much exactly Ubuntu's target. arch=armv7-a, tune=cortex-a9, neon off. | 02:57 |
| infinity | (we might actually tune for a8 by default, but we should be tuning for a9, IMO, so it wouldn't hurt for something CPU intensive like xbmc) | 02:58 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 02:59 |
| infinity | rsalveti: On a vaguely related note, if you and your minions are currently carrying any other arm-specific patches in PPAs that aren't in Precise, could you spend the next week or so finding those and getting them sponsored before we go into final freeze? | 03:02 |
| infinity | rsalveti: Things that aren't too scary to review, anyway, and obviously can't break other arches. ;) | 03:02 |
| rsalveti | infinity: sure, that's something I requested already last week, but I'll keep my eye on it | 03:03 |
| infinity | (I realise xbmc is kinda special here, since it wasn't *in* Ubuntu until yesterday) | 03:03 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 03:03 |
| infinity | rsalveti: Also stop slacking and become a core-dev. | 03:04 |
| infinity | kthx. ;) | 03:04 |
| rsalveti | infinity: I'll be applying for next cycle, I didn't want to become a core-dev because then I'd be forced to review and apply all patches from others | 03:05 |
| rsalveti | and I could become a blocker easily | 03:05 |
| rsalveti | what kind of worked, wookey pushed a bunch of fixes, marcin is now motu | 03:05 |
| infinity | rsalveti: There's a whole sponsorship team (and queue, and process) for that sort of thing. Get your people to talk to our people and smooth that out if it's not working for them/us. | 03:05 |
| infinity | rsalveti: (wookey seems to have learned this cycle). | 03:06 |
| rsalveti | yeah | 03:06 |
| rsalveti | that was my goal | 03:06 |
| rsalveti | we're improving | 03:06 |
| rsalveti | :-) | 03:06 |
| infinity | Still, I think *you* should be core-dev. You have the skills, and we'd like you. :P | 03:06 |
| infinity | I'm happy with wookey continuing to be sponsored, while he learns our quirks. | 03:07 |
| rsalveti | yeah, maybe will apply for the meeting we usually have at uds | 03:07 |
| rsalveti | will be at uds this time as well | 03:07 |
| infinity | \o/ | 03:07 |
| infinity | I should be at Connect too, I think. | 03:07 |
| infinity | So, I can bug you twice in a row about it. | 03:07 |
| infinity | With violence. | 03:07 |
| rsalveti | cool :-) | 03:07 |
| rsalveti | lol | 03:07 |
| * infinity decides to do something non-work-related for a bit on his long weekend. | 03:12 | |
| infinity | rsalveti: Ping me if you get xbmc happy (or if you give up and decide to have a weekend). | 03:12 |
| rsalveti | infinity: sure, will fix it ;-) | 03:13 |
| rsalveti | enjoy | 03:13 |
| * ScottK looks at qapt again. | 03:18 | |
| Laney | infinity: omxil-bellagio> You don't mind the circular depends? | 08:25 |
| infinity | Laney: It's mildly unfortunate, but it does the trick. | 09:41 |
| infinity | Laney: It pretty much guarantees they go in the same dpkg run so, in practice, it does what I want it to do. | 09:41 |
| infinity | Laney: And undoing the lib/bin split, while a viable solution right now, is a no-go if anyone plans to multi-arch the library. | 09:45 |
| infinity | Laney: (Then again, it may be that the plugin registry it maintains would need rethinking in the face of multiarching too, I dunno) | 09:45 |
| infinity | (accepting obviously-correct base-installer fix) | 09:46 |
| * infinity flip-flops between sleep, or a run to Subway for a 4am snack... | 09:49 | |
| rsalveti | infinity: got xbmc to build, will create the proper debdiff and make it available at a ppa to be sure it's building for all archs | 17:29 |
| tumbleweed | could an archive-admin please unblacklist xnee. bug 973872 | 19:35 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 973872 in ubuntu "Sync xnee 3.11-1 (universe) from Debian testing (main)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/973872 | 19:35 |
| * ScottK looks at ubuntu-defaults-zh-cn and purges unseeded. | 19:40 | |
| CareBear\ | porn? | 20:53 |
| CareBear\ | hm, wrong channel, but ok | 20:53 |
| superm1 | rsalveti: once you verify, would you mind sharing it with amejia (the debian maintainer)? could easily put it in debian then and resync | 21:50 |
| superm1 | oh and thanks for helping out on alternate architectures btw :) | 21:50 |
| rsalveti | superm1: sure | 21:59 |
| cjwatson | tumbleweed: done | 22:02 |
| tumbleweed | thanks | 22:03 |
| ScottK | superm1: does that mean you're good with accepting what we have now (xbmx)? | 22:41 |
| superm1 | ScottK: yeah -4 can be accepted | 23:04 |
| ScottK | superm1: Thanks. | 23:04 |
| superm1 | ScottK: if rsalveti's patch lands upstream we'll resync with that, but it's just for fixing FTBFS for arm* arch' | 23:04 |
| ScottK | Right. There was a note not to accept it and check with you,so I'm just closing the loop. Thanks. | 23:05 |
| ScottK | DOne. | 23:06 |
| superm1 | thanks | 23:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!