[02:49] <Daskreech> Hello
[02:50] <Daskreech> Is there a way to search for source packages with ubottu
[02:52] <Flannel> Daskreech: If you do `!info package` then the line that comes back will include the source package name
[02:52] <dax> I don't know of a way to search for source packages directly, though. !find only takes binary package names
[02:53] <Flannel> !info irssi
[02:53] <Daskreech> Right I was looking for packages and they seem to be source only
[02:54] <dax> Erm... source packages (in Ubuntu's repositories, at least) build at least one binary package from a source package. that's kinda the point
[02:54] <dax> what is it you're looking for?
[02:55] <Daskreech> wayland
[02:55] <Flannel> If you're looking to search for a source package name based off of terms instead of finding it's binary package, etc.  You can do so with packages.ubuntu.com, it has a source package search option.
[02:55] <Flannel> I know it's not IRC based, but it's there!
[02:56] <Daskreech> :-) I know I was just wondering how smart the bots are
[02:56] <dax> not very
[02:57] <dax> I don't see any non-library wayland stuff in precise. which is odd, because I thought I heard there was some
[02:57] <Flannel> I don't think there's really any use-case for it, so I doubt the bots would include that.  If you need a source package of a binary one, that's already there, and I imagine that's the only thing that would be useful.
[02:59] <Daskreech> Flannel: Yeah just didn't want to tell someone that Ubuntu didn't provide something they they do becuase of a gap in knowledge
[02:59] <dax> aha
[02:59] <dax> !info weston precise
[03:00] <dax> (renamed from wayland-demos, which is what I was remembering. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland-demos/+bug/954722 )
[03:00] <Daskreech> Ah.
[03:00] <Daskreech> KDE is a wayland compositor client as well
[03:02] <Daskreech> Well I'll just answer to what I know then do backup checks in future
[05:40] <Unit193> Just a ##fix_your_connection call.
[07:00] <bazhang> * [humanoism] (~dude@2001:470:26:83:308b:be72:3f5c:cfc7): fnordistus
[07:01] <bazhang> very familiar
[09:00] <GirlyGirl> Hi, I can't send to #ubuntu
[09:00] <GirlyGirl> I get the following "== Cannot send to channel: #ubuntu"
[09:05] <Myrtti> could you leave the channel for a while?
[09:05] <Myrtti> I'll try to poke the bot
[09:05] <GirlyGirl> Myrtti: ok
[09:05] <Myrtti> #ubuntu, that is
[09:06] <GirlyGirl> Left
[09:07] <dax> 08:53:15 -!- GirlyGirl_ is now known as GirlyGirl => I forget, do nick changes confuse FloodBot's exempting?
[09:07] <Myrtti> yes
[09:07] <oCean> indeed
[09:08] <oCean> GirlyGirl should be able to join now, and an exempt will be set for that nick
[09:09] <GirlyGirl> Myrtti: oCean: ok thanks
[09:09] <oCean> exempt set
[09:09] <oCean> well, before leaving you could try...
[09:09] <oCean> nvm
[09:09] <Myrtti> I can't see when the exempts are set
[09:09] <Myrtti> I wonder why
[09:09] <Myrtti> I don't seem to have any ignores
[09:10] <dax> because you're not opped
[09:10] <oCean> ^
[09:10] <Myrtti> ah
[11:04] <Myrtti> assume other channels will be hit soon
[13:10] <bazhang> * [sk0tie] (sk0tie@CPE-60-224-33-160.tnyt1.lon.bigpond.net.au): ...
[13:10] <bazhang> same IP as agent_x
 We are having solar windstorms today
[13:38] <bazhang> why dns settings are lost
[13:47] <bazhang> @mark #ubuntu Quantum_Ion giving more nonsense "advice"
[15:03] <Pici> heh
[15:04] <mneptok> and i thought MY brain was lagging this morning
[15:04]  * genii-around tries to imagine 2300-something runlevels
[15:04]  * mneptok jots down notes for forwarding to Keybuk next April 1
[16:35] <Pici> need to step away for a bit
[17:23] <jrib> 2300-something runlevels... genii-around if you had thought of that sooner you could have saved the upstart devs so much time!
[17:25] <genii-around> jrib: Earlier there was a user going "2345 sounds like some arbitrary runlevel thats not from 0 to 6!" or so
[17:26] <jrib> heh
[23:55] <BarkingFish> You might want to watch User_ in #ubuntu+1 - I either smell troll, or he's not entirely on the level.