[02:49] Hello [02:50] Is there a way to search for source packages with ubottu [02:52] Daskreech: If you do `!info package` then the line that comes back will include the source package name [02:52] I don't know of a way to search for source packages directly, though. !find only takes binary package names [02:53] !info irssi [02:53] irssi (source: irssi): terminal based IRC client. In component main, is optional. Version 0.8.15-4ubuntu1 (oneiric), package size 911 kB, installed size 3104 kB [02:53] Right I was looking for packages and they seem to be source only [02:54] Erm... source packages (in Ubuntu's repositories, at least) build at least one binary package from a source package. that's kinda the point [02:54] what is it you're looking for? [02:55] wayland [02:55] If you're looking to search for a source package name based off of terms instead of finding it's binary package, etc. You can do so with packages.ubuntu.com, it has a source package search option. [02:55] I know it's not IRC based, but it's there! [02:56] :-) I know I was just wondering how smart the bots are [02:56] not very [02:57] I don't see any non-library wayland stuff in precise. which is odd, because I thought I heard there was some [02:57] I don't think there's really any use-case for it, so I doubt the bots would include that. If you need a source package of a binary one, that's already there, and I imagine that's the only thing that would be useful. [02:59] Flannel: Yeah just didn't want to tell someone that Ubuntu didn't provide something they they do becuase of a gap in knowledge [02:59] aha [02:59] !info weston precise [02:59] weston (source: weston): reference implementation of a wayland compositor. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.85.0-1build1 (precise), package size 178 kB, installed size 437 kB (Only available for linux-any) [03:00] (renamed from wayland-demos, which is what I was remembering. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland-demos/+bug/954722 ) [03:00] Launchpad bug 954722 in wayland-demos (Ubuntu) "Please remove wayland-demos from the archive for precise" [Undecided,Fix released] [03:00] Ah. [03:00] KDE is a wayland compositor client as well [03:02] Well I'll just answer to what I know then do backup checks in future [05:31] kilrae called the ops in #kubuntu-offtopic () [05:40] Just a ##fix_your_connection call. [07:00] * [humanoism] (~dude@2001:470:26:83:308b:be72:3f5c:cfc7): fnordistus [07:01] very familiar [09:00] Hi, I can't send to #ubuntu [09:00] I get the following "== Cannot send to channel: #ubuntu" [09:05] could you leave the channel for a while? [09:05] I'll try to poke the bot [09:05] Myrtti: ok [09:05] #ubuntu, that is [09:06] Left [09:07] 08:53:15 -!- GirlyGirl_ is now known as GirlyGirl => I forget, do nick changes confuse FloodBot's exempting? [09:07] yes [09:07] indeed [09:08] GirlyGirl should be able to join now, and an exempt will be set for that nick [09:09] Myrtti: oCean: ok thanks [09:09] exempt set [09:09] well, before leaving you could try... [09:09] nvm [09:09] I can't see when the exempts are set [09:09] I wonder why [09:09] I don't seem to have any ignores [09:10] because you're not opped [09:10] ^ [09:10] ah [11:02] CFHowlett called the ops in #ubuntu (chiklazy) [11:03] DJones called the ops in #ubuntu-offtopic (chiklazy) [11:04] assume other channels will be hit soon [13:08] FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [13:08] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [13:08] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [13:10] * [sk0tie] (sk0tie@CPE-60-224-33-160.tnyt1.lon.bigpond.net.au): ... [13:10] same IP as agent_x [13:38] We are having solar windstorms today [13:38] why dns settings are lost [13:47] @mark #ubuntu Quantum_Ion giving more nonsense "advice" [13:47] The operation succeeded. [15:03] heh [15:04] and i thought MY brain was lagging this morning [15:04] * genii-around tries to imagine 2300-something runlevels [15:04] * mneptok jots down notes for forwarding to Keybuk next April 1 [16:35] need to step away for a bit [17:23] 2300-something runlevels... genii-around if you had thought of that sooner you could have saved the upstart devs so much time! [17:25] jrib: Earlier there was a user going "2345 sounds like some arbitrary runlevel thats not from 0 to 6!" or so [17:26] heh === Myrtti_ is now known as Myrtti [23:55] You might want to watch User_ in #ubuntu+1 - I either smell troll, or he's not entirely on the level.