[00:00] <poettone> it's nice to have launchpad available right on the desktop now..
[00:02] <nathwill> poettone, what?
[00:02] <nathwill> do share!
[00:07] <BarkingFish> ditto. I didn't know launchpad was accessible directly from the desktop either.
[00:33] <Logan_> Hello BarkingFish.
[00:33] <BarkingFish> hi Logan_ :)
[00:33] <BarkingFish> I've sent my request for the IU keyboard up to kde development
[00:34] <Logan_> Cool.
[00:34] <BarkingFish> I've been through my system with a fine toothed comb, and we don't have an Inuktitut keyboard layout, that's pretty much certain
[04:17] <philipballew_> How can I find out if a checkinstall bug I reported's fix will land in ubuntu 12.04?
[04:17] <philipballew_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkinstall/+bug/976380
[04:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 976380 in checkinstall "checkinstall creates directories and files in //usr/*" [Medium,Fix released]
[04:18] <micahg> philipballew_: therés a note in comment #2 to say which version it landed in
[04:20] <philipballew_> micahg, Yeah, I know that. it says its in checkinstall-1.6.2-3ubuntu1 but how can I see if that version is going to land in 12.04
[04:20] <micahg> philipballew_: that's the version in 12.04
[04:21] <philipballew_> hum. odd as i am runing 12.04.
[04:21] <philipballew_> maybe I will update again or something
[04:22] <philipballew_> philip@PrincessLeia:~$ checkinstall -v
[04:22] <philipballew_> checkinstall 1.6.2
[04:23] <micahg> philipballew_: you want apt-cache policy checkinstall
[04:25] <philipballew_> micahg, thats right...
[04:26] <philipballew_> philip@PrincessLeia:~$ apt-cache policy checkinstall
[04:26] <philipballew_> checkinstall:
[04:26] <philipballew_>   Installed: 1.6.2-3ubuntu1
[04:26] <philipballew_>   Candidate: 1.6.2-3ubuntu1
[04:26] <philipballew_>   Version table:
[04:26] <philipballew_>  *** 1.6.2-3ubuntu1 0
[04:26] <philipballew_>         500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages
[04:26] <philipballew_>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[04:26] <philipballew_> shoot...
[10:05] <astraljava> Hi gang, I'm working on Ubuntu Studio and Xubuntu, acting as a QA person for both projects, and working on bugs that affect these projects (primarily, but others as well of course). How should I go about when I'd want to have privileges for setting f.e. bug Importance and other properties?
[10:07] <astraljava> Is it the BugSquad that I should apply for?
[10:16] <dlentz> astraljava, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl
[10:18] <astraljava> dlentz: Ok, thanks!
[12:24] <crass> can anyone confirm what the latest oneiric zlib version is?
[12:25] <crass> I think a security release has broken previous zlib compressed streams
[12:26] <seb128> crass, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib
[12:26] <seb128> 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu3 	release (main) 	50 weeks ago
[12:26] <seb128> crass, didn't change for a year,no security update
[12:27] <crass> when running pngcheck a warning message is output "zlib warning:  different version (expected 1.2.3.3, using 1.2.3.4)"
[12:28] <Pici> 1.2.3.3 is in lucid and hardy
[12:28] <crass> I'm wondering if that's causing some of my png files to appear corrupt
[12:30] <crass> Pici: is it possible that pngcheck for oneiric could have been compiled against this older lib?
[12:31] <seb128> crass, no, can you run ldd $(which pngcheck) and copy that to pastebin?
[12:31] <seb128> oh, it's the other way around, hum
[12:32] <seb128> crass, yeah, pngcheck didn't get rebuild or uploaded since lucid
[12:33] <crass> ok, so maybe that's just a red-herring then
[12:33] <Pici> crass: no, you were right.
[12:34] <crass> Pici: I mean a red-herring wrt the file corruption
[12:34] <Pici> crass: oh, yes.
[12:38] <crass> ok, the file is truncated, so that's why, suckage
[21:31] <poettone> Hi everyone!
[21:31] <poettone> question  for someone
[21:39] <dlentz> !ask | poettone
[21:39] <ubot2> poettone: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience
[21:40] <poettone> Thanks and yes, I've read that somewhere before..
[21:43] <poettone> I have recently setup two ubuntu 11.10 machines, one using wubi on top of windows Vista, the other on bare metal. I noticed on my wubi machine under the network applet it shows "wired connection 1" last used 1 minute. The bare metal machine has nothing listed under the applet but I'm on that machine and connected.  I think I need to report this as a possible issue with the applet itself. Does anyone know where to post this as a possible
[21:43] <poettone> thanks
[23:13] <candtalan> I have a dell inspiron 1300 and tried ubuntu 12.04 daily build and also beta2, but cannot get to a desktop at all, how to file a bug?
[23:16] <astraljava> candtalan: You're gonna have to be more specific than that. In which phase does it stop? What are the things you see before it doesn't go to a desktop? And what exactly means you can't get to it? Any error messages? What do you see when you hit Ctrl + Alt + F1?
[23:18] <candtalan> ctrl alt f2 (not f1) tried and it does not offer a terminal. live cd seems to hang after end of red progress dots
[23:20] <candtalan> install from boot menu does not get to even an early stage. Install from the alternate cd beta 2 seems to complete but boots then does not run
[23:21] <candtalan> Would be good to    do a (test) and then file a bug - but what is th ebest test? just th elive cd beta 2 not running??
[23:22] <candtalan> Or the beta 2 alternate  installed  not running after boot?
[23:26] <astraljava> candtalan: After the successful install from alternate, what happens when you try to boot?
[23:31] <candtalan> astraljava: I see a good grub menu (lots of other partitions on this demo laptop) then get b43-phy0 errors firmware file(s) not found b43/ucode5.fw and b43-open/ucode5.fw not found. These are wireless?? I an using ethernet wired
[23:32] <astraljava> candtalan: I've seen that error before, but not sure whether it's the reason for the halting. Hold on for a moment, please.
[23:38] <astraljava> candtalan: Can you try adding a kernel parameter 'b43.blacklist=yes' for the next boot?
[23:39] <candtalan> will try that
[23:43] <candtalan> astraljava: it booted! I may hav eadded the param incorrectly I saw a fleeting 'unknown parametter 'blacklist''
[23:43] <astraljava> candtalan: I saw from the bug report that there's such a warning, but that it boots for others, too.
[23:43] <candtalan> I added the string into  text lines  after using 'e' at the grub menu
[23:44] <candtalan> shall i  now try to do updates from this situation or what?
[23:46] <astraljava> candtalan: You can, I'm still reading the one huge bug report on the matter to find out what's the situation atm.
[23:48] <candtalan> ok thanks. I will  try  updates - it is installed as beta 2 currently so there are many updates I guess
[23:49] <candtalan> there are 498 updates :-)   here we go
[23:51] <astraljava> Yep, good luck. Looks like that missing firmware is an upstream bug, not a ubuntu-specific. Been open for about a month now.
[23:57] <candtalan> astraljava: Thanks for your help! Bye
[23:57] <astraljava> See ya, and while it's not fixed still, keep using that kernel parameter.