| gary_poster | bac benji frankban gmb call in 2 | 12:08 |
|---|---|---|
| bac | rt | 12:09 |
| gmb | benji, Thank you kindly: https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/launchpad/ebt-logging-bug-974586/+merge/101720 | 12:19 |
| bac | sorry i got booted. trying to rejoin. | 12:21 |
| bac | gary_poster: starting hangout | 12:46 |
| * bac tries again | 12:46 | |
| bac | gary_poster: g+ is having fits and won't let me join goldenhorde. i've sent you an invite | 12:50 |
| gary_poster | k bac | 12:51 |
| gary_poster | bac, "this hangout no longer exists" | 12:53 |
| bac | that's a lie, a damned lie. | 12:53 |
| bac | i'm in it. existing. | 12:54 |
| bac | argh | 12:54 |
| gary_poster | :-) | 12:54 |
| bac | gary_poster: ok, the normal hangout now let me in | 12:54 |
| gary_poster | bac, don't see you in https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde | 12:55 |
| bac | google needs to spend more resources making hangouts work instead of making new whitespace | 12:55 |
| gary_poster | heh | 13:34 |
| gary_poster | frankban, https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhordeoneonone whenever you are ready | 13:35 |
| bac | gary_poster: the newest version of juju solve the bootstrap --constraint problem | 14:09 |
| gary_poster | great bac | 14:09 |
| gary_poster | gmb, ready in 10 or less; still on with fb | 14:31 |
| gmb | k | 14:32 |
| gary_poster | gmb, https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhordeoneonone whenever ready | 14:36 |
| bac | gary_poster: this works: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/926506/ it includes at line 13 a work-around for a new issue with deploy & --constraints | 14:45 |
| gary_poster | cool bac will look soon | 14:45 |
| gary_poster | bac, so you already have everything up, or are you waiting on slave | 15:08 |
| gary_poster | & is the workaround "68.4"? | 15:08 |
| bac | gary_poster: the workaround was to do it separately as shown at line 13 | 15:09 |
| gary_poster | oic | 15:10 |
| bac | gary_poster: waiting on slave | 15:10 |
| gary_poster | cool bac. are you looking at 974617? if so will move card | 15:10 |
| bac | gary_poster: not yet | 15:11 |
| gary_poster | btw frankban, when you are ready to work on a parallel testing card, please check with gmb to see if you can pair with him on it | 15:11 |
| frankban | sure gary_poster | 15:11 |
| gary_poster | thank you | 15:12 |
| gary_poster | bac, cool | 15:12 |
| bac | gary_poster: working the ppa card first | 15:15 |
| gmb | gary_poster, I think bug 974608 comes under "AAAAAAAAH! Sampledata!" | 15:15 |
| _mup_ | Bug #974608: bugtask-find-similar.txt fails intemittently on paralleltest runs <paralleltest> <Launchpad itself:In Progress> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/974608 > | 15:15 |
| benji | gary_poster: I created a card for my incremental branch (lp:~benji/testtools/modernize-tsfr) and marked the 974622 card as blocked on my branch being reviewed (jml will do so today, UK time) | 15:17 |
| gary_poster | great benji thanks | 15:18 |
| benji | gary_poster: and now the multi-branch work lane is over limit | 15:18 |
| gary_poster | benji, s'ok. it's a reasonable view on reality | 15:18 |
| benji | gary_poster: should I speculatively continue on the 974622 work assuming the branch survives review or do something else? | 15:18 |
| gary_poster | benji, +1 on speculation IMO | 15:19 |
| benji | k | 15:19 |
| gary_poster | agree? | 15:19 |
| benji | I guess it shouldn't be "blocked" then | 15:19 |
| gary_poster | yeah. It will be blocked when you can't do anything on it | 15:19 |
| frankban | gmb: I am ready to pair on your nice bug, when you are | 15:20 |
| gmb | frankban, Ah, I think that the one I'm on now isn't suitable - it's a relatively quick fix, AFAICT. We might be better off picking one of the other cards and pairing tomorrow morning instead. | 15:21 |
| frankban | gmb: coll | 15:21 |
| frankban | hem cool | 15:21 |
| gary_poster | frankban, look, slack time! :-P | 15:21 |
| gary_poster | bac, I need to take lunch now (cat to vet). I'll ping when back | 15:25 |
| bac | gary_poster: coincidence. i was about to go eat chinese food | 15:25 |
| bac | (speaking of cats) | 15:26 |
| gmb | lol | 15:26 |
| gary_poster | heh | 15:26 |
| bac | this past trip to VN was the first time i saw a restaurant specializing in "Thịt meo". | 15:26 |
| frankban | I have a suggestion for everyone here who want to create a programming language: please call it in a way you can easily find info using google: a neologism with len >= 4 is strongly appreciated | 15:27 |
| bac | frankban: +1 | 15:27 |
| bac | G+ needs a 'translate' button for comments | 15:29 |
| gary_poster | heh | 15:33 |
| gary_poster | frankban, I find "golang" works ok | 15:33 |
| frankban | gary_poster: coll didn't know, I was using "go language" | 15:34 |
| * gmb -> very late lunch; back later | 16:04 | |
| gary_poster | benji, I saw discussion in -dev with jml. What he said about the purpose of the forwarding result makes sense (where each test needs to be isolated, not just each call), but I thought that the semaphore was handled explicitly so that would work fine. As I thought about it more, though, I realized I can't imagine a truly sane story for global tags within a merged set of test streams | 16:57 |
| gary_poster | the expectations for the meaning of global tags would have to be drastically reduced | 16:58 |
| gary_poster | though, I'm not really sure what the use cases are for global tags anyway | 16:58 |
| gary_poster | stepping away; back again soon | 16:58 |
| benji | gary_poster: (I was eating lunch.) right, I don't think there is a general story that will work with tags without a great deal of development effort, however if we are specific about what TSFR needs to do and what it doesn't do, I think we can get something that continues to work. The funny part is that it is less and less important to us for our worker ID tagging result wrapper. | 17:25 |
| gary_poster | benji, less and less important: it was only importat initially as it helped us understand what was going on, and you were using it as a template of sorts, right? | 17:27 |
| gary_poster | bac, lemme know when you are around and we can pair | 17:27 |
| bac | gary_poster: i'm here. | 17:27 |
| benji | right; at this point we could just abandon any work on it and go ahead with what we want | 17:27 |
| benji | well, not quite: I'm pretty sure as-is TSFW is broken with respect to tags, so we'll have to do *something* about it, but we can more clearly see what that something is once it bites us | 17:28 |
| gary_poster | benji, if we are sure of a fix, I'd be in favor of applying it. Otherwise (for instance, the undoing of the global tags) I'm fine with putting it aside. | 17:30 |
| gary_poster | https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhorde | 17:31 |
| gary_poster | bac ^ | 17:31 |
| benji | gary_poster: I'm not sure of the fix, but I'm relativly sure there is a problem. I'm afraid this is one of those things that cross package boundries and will be hard to get just right. | 17:32 |
| benji | gary_poster: I'm trying to figure out how to move the cards around to represent the current state of the world: I intend on 1) writing an add-worker-id-tag result wrapper, 2) integrating it into ConcurrentTestSuite, 3) fixing the tag bugs I believe we will uncover in TSFR. | 17:37 |
| benji | 1 and 2 seem to be covered under the card for 974622 and 3 is the other card I created earlier; should they both be in Active/Coding? | 17:38 |
| gary_poster | benji, have you started work on 3? | 17:41 |
| benji | gary_poster: I thought I had, but now I see that I haven't really. Take that for what it is. :) | 17:41 |
| gary_poster | benji, heh | 17:42 |
| benji | s/it is/you will. | 17:42 |
| benji | so I guess it's reasonable to move the card for 3 into the started-but-threw-it-away bucket and make a new card if we need it | 17:42 |
| gary_poster | ok, benji, I moved that card (#3) back to "Tasks" and changed the title to be less confident ("ThreadSafeForwardingResult doesn't handle tags as well as it could. We suspect.") | 17:43 |
| benji | sounds good | 17:43 |
| gary_poster | benji is it also appropriate to mark 974622 s unblocked | 17:44 |
| gary_poster | as | 17:44 |
| benji | gary_poster: oh, on a different note, a nurse is going to be coming by around 2 (they are habitually late) to teach me how to change Katie's catheter dressing for when we're in TN, so that may spoil our one-on-one time | 17:44 |
| benji | yep, it is unblocked | 17:44 |
| gary_poster | benji, ok, let me know when/if you are available | 17:45 |
| gary_poster | and benji, cool thanks, i marked card as unblocked | 17:45 |
| bac | gary_poster: i now have master and slave coming up. slave is verified to be m2.4xlarge | 18:02 |
| gary_poster | bac, excellent | 18:03 |
| benji | gary_poster: the nurse is already 25 minutes late, what say we start our call? | 18:25 |
| gary_poster | benji, oh ok! I was just going to reboot. I am in https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhordeoneonone | 18:26 |
| bac | gary_poster: master and slave up and ready after 65 minutes. i've manually done work-around for bug 974584 and have forced a build | 19:10 |
| _mup_ | Bug #974584: Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container <paralleltest> <Launchpad itself:Invalid> <lxc (Ubuntu):Fix Released by serge-hallyn> <sysvinit (Ubuntu):Confirmed> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/974584 > | 19:10 |
| gary_poster | yay, bac! | 19:10 |
| bac | gary_poster: chat? | 19:30 |
| gary_poster | bac, still talking :-P ready in 5 or so ok? | 19:31 |
| bac | ok | 19:31 |
| gary_poster | thx | 19:31 |
| gary_poster | bac, 4 | 19:37 |
| gary_poster | bah | 19:37 |
| gary_poster | bac, https://talkgadget.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/canonical.com/goldenhordeoneonone | 19:37 |
| gary_poster | benji, do you agree that the following buildbot waterfall indicates that the "teach buildbot to understand subunit in test results to properly report failure numbers in waterfall" card has a bug or problem of some sort? http://ec2-50-19-152-175.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8010/waterfall | 20:17 |
| * benji looks | 20:18 | |
| gary_poster | benji, would it be worth asking bac to verify that [something or other that you describe] is in the buildbot.cfg of the master? | 20:18 |
| benji | gary_poster: on the first point, the "no test results" looks discouraging, as I understand it there should be a summary line there | 20:20 |
| gary_poster | right, so we're on the same page there | 20:20 |
| benji | gary_poster: on the second part, if I recall correctly, no .cfg change should be required, I just changed the bzrbuildbot Test class to report in the new way. Checking that the bzrbuildbot/subunittest.py module exists would be a good smoke test | 20:21 |
| gary_poster | benji, ok cool. bac, could you look for that on the master when you get a chance? | 20:22 |
| bac | benji: -rw-r--r-- 1 buildbot nogroup 3255 Apr 12 18:05 /var/lib/buildbot/masters/master/bzrbuildbot/subunittest.py | 20:24 |
| bac | that what you want to see? | 20:24 |
| benji | bac: yep, looks good | 20:24 |
| benji | why we're not seeing a meaningful summary is a mystery to me | 20:25 |
| gary_poster | benji, dragged that card back to active coding but also pulled your head off it. We need to get it resolved but it doesn't have to be you | 20:30 |
| benji | k | 20:30 |
| gary_poster | I'll send an email to yellow inviting gmb and frankban to look at it tomorrow if they want | 20:30 |
| benji | my inclination, for whoever looks at it... well, I'll reply to your email with my inclination | 20:31 |
| gary_poster | :-) k | 20:31 |
| gary_poster | bac, is it appropriate for me to drag card for bug 974617 to done done? | 20:32 |
| _mup_ | Bug #974617: test_operational_view_integration fails intermittently in parallel tests <paralleltest> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by bac> <Python PGBouncer:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/974617 > | 20:32 |
| bac | yes | 20:32 |
| gary_poster | cool thx | 20:32 |
| gary_poster | bac, could you write an email to the yellow list with a description of how you successfully started up your instances today, please? | 20:37 |
| gary_poster | benji, I just sent the email, but who knows when it will actually make it through the mailing list. | 20:37 |
| bac | ok | 20:37 |
| gary_poster | thank you | 20:38 |
| bac | gary_poster: inside the container: | 20:38 |
| bac | buildbot@lptests:~$ bzr whoami | 20:38 |
| bac | Launchpad PQM <launchpad-pqm@canonical.com> | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | cool | 20:38 |
| bac | this is *before* i did anything...so not so cool | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | ...oh... | 20:38 |
| bac | even so, the celery test fails | 20:38 |
| bac | so that's pretty confusing | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | with the same error? | 20:38 |
| bac | yes | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | huh | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | ok | 20:38 |
| gary_poster | bac, I'll try now to dupe in a local lucid lxc container... | 20:39 |
| gary_poster | when you ran the test locally you were not in an lxc, right? | 20:39 |
| bac | correct | 20:43 |
| bac | this is odd, gary_poster | 20:46 |
| bac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/927024/ | 20:46 |
| bac | this is inside an lxc container on the slave on ec2 | 20:46 |
| bac | so the cmdline 'bzr whoami' gives results but bzrlib.config doesn't | 20:47 |
| bac | and if i manually set 'bzr whoami', then bzrlib.config *still* returns None, None | 20:48 |
| gary_poster | bac, what about the thing that calls _auto_user_id, though | 20:48 |
| gary_poster | bac config.username() | 20:49 |
| bac | gary_poster: harder to test as you have to instantiate a Config subclass object | 20:51 |
| gary_poster | bac, ah ok. but bac, this fails for me on lxc | 20:51 |
| gary_poster | so some kind of interaction | 20:51 |
| bac | running the test again | 20:51 |
| bac | same same | 20:52 |
| gary_poster | bac, doing a pdb... | 20:53 |
| bac | well at least it is easy to reproduce... | 20:54 |
| gary_poster | y | 20:54 |
| gary_poster | bac, could you set a pdb in your local environment and see what self.file_name is in the username method when you run that test? | 21:00 |
| gary_poster | can do it tomorrow | 21:01 |
| gary_poster | EoD | 21:01 |
| bac | ok | 21:01 |
| gary_poster | I get /tmp/tmpOmHAkg/.bazaar/bazaar.conf | 21:01 |
| gary_poster | which looks like it is a nice test isolation thing | 21:02 |
| gary_poster | and then... | 21:02 |
| gary_poster | _get_default_mail_domain() returns None in _auto_user_id | 21:03 |
| gary_poster | which causes everything to fall over | 21:03 |
| bac | gary_poster: so it smells like an lxc isolation problem | 21:04 |
| gary_poster | /etc/mailname is not installed | 21:04 |
| gary_poster | mm | 21:04 |
| gary_poster | smells like an "unspoken dependency" problem to me with that | 21:04 |
| gary_poster | I don't know who is supposed to define /etc/mailname | 21:04 |
| gary_poster | but I bet it is from a package that we don't install | 21:05 |
| gary_poster | because we shouldn't have to | 21:05 |
| gary_poster | could be wrong | 21:05 |
| gary_poster | ok running | 21:05 |
| gary_poster | bye all | 21:05 |
| bac | setting /etc/mailname to 'example.com' allows the tests to fail differently with a TimeoutError | 21:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!