[07:19] <dholbach> good morning
[07:21] <ajmitch> morning dholbach
[07:21] <ajmitch> & geser :)
[07:21] <dholbach> hi ajmitch
[07:24] <geser> Good morning dholbach, good evening ajmitch
[07:25] <dholbach> hi geser
[07:25] <dholbach> blueyed, bdrung, did you get home alright last night?
[08:26] <gotwig> Hey, I would be pleased if someone can help me in packaging  my unity lens and scopes properly in one package, so its ready for USC. launchpad.net/lens-cooking . Its alredy packaged but with some sort of hacks, so it uses e.g absolute paths.
[08:30] <gotwig> al-maisan: hey
[08:31] <al-maisan> hello gotwig
[08:51] <gotwig> mhall119: hey
[09:02] <gotwig> please help :/
[09:34] <tumbleweed> ARB members: ^ I thought there was supposed to be an example package for lenses and scopes?
[10:13] <bdrung> good morning, dholbach. yes, and you?
[10:14] <dholbach> bdrung, yes - I guess it didn't take me as long :)
[10:14] <bdrung> dholbach: how long?
[10:17] <dholbach> bdrung, maybe 15m by bus - that's nothing compared to your bike ride :)
[10:18] <bdrung> k, 15m wouldn't even be possible with car
[10:18] <bdrung> i could have saved up to 15m if i would have taken the S-Bahn.
[12:40] <Kiall> Can anyone point me at a decent guide for how to make use of UCF in a package?
[12:41] <Kiall> Or - better yet - a simple example package that uses it?
[14:24] <tumbleweed> ScottK: re u-d-t bugs. do you do a lot of work on remote machines?
[14:29] <ScottK> tumbleweed: No, but I don't blindly give applications access to my LP account either.
[14:30] <ScottK> Since I'm an archive admin, giving an application maintained by non-archive admins blind access to my LP account is a priviledge escalation path.
[14:30] <ScottK> (yesterday's unicode bug happened in a chroot)
[14:30] <tumbleweed> fair enough. The new desktop-authorisation apporach to LP really doesn't help there
[14:32] <ScottK> I don't mind doing the authorization dance each time it's needed, but for --no-lp there's no need for it.
[14:32] <tumbleweed> I guess we need more than 4 levels of authorisation to solve that properly
[14:33] <tumbleweed> totally agreed re --no-lp
[14:33] <tumbleweed> I was just wondering why you seem to run into these issues more than anyone else
[14:33] <ScottK> Most people probably just click the 'have your way with me' button the first time it comes up.
[14:33] <tumbleweed> yeah
[14:34] <ScottK> Also https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue is the only page that still needs dgetlp, so I doubt it gets a lot of use.
[14:34] <tumbleweed> yes, you are probably one of the sole users of it
[14:34] <tumbleweed> err the sole
[14:35] <tumbleweed> have you raised these concerns with LP people? IIRC canonical people have two-factor authentication for SSO
[14:36] <tumbleweed> but the launchpad API is getting pretty powerful, and there's much less protection around it then there is around my gpg key
[14:36] <ScottK> No.  I haven't.
[14:37]  * tumbleweed adds it to the mental list of things to chat about over beer at UDSa
[14:48] <dupondje> Getting something merged/synced is WAY to late I guess ?
[14:48] <scott-work> i've been told there are some concerns about the ubuntustudio-default-settings package?  specifically about the inclusion of an *.svg
[14:49] <scott-work> i am very anxious and motivated to resolve this issue as soon as possible
[14:49] <scott-work> does anyone know about this situation?
[14:50] <tumbleweed> dupondje: no. Especially if it isn't on a CD
[14:50] <tumbleweed> dupondje: and if it's just bug-fixes, go ahead
[14:50] <dupondje> hmz :) cause in the current state its quite useless for me :)
[14:51] <dupondje> aka opensc :)
[14:51] <tumbleweed> !ffe|dupondje
[14:52] <dupondje> i'll spam doko first, he did some changed to it less then a day ago :) so
[15:39] <dupondje> tumbleweed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/979986
[15:39] <dupondje> looks fine to you ? :)
[15:40] <tumbleweed> dupondje: summary of the new features, please
[15:47] <dupondje> added
[15:54] <tumbleweed> dupondje: approved
[15:55] <dupondje> thanks!
[16:31] <tumbleweed> ScottK: sorted
[16:31] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Cool.
[16:32] <tumbleweed> BTW, LP people have strongly encouraged everyone to login whenever possible, I seem to recall the anonymous API being described as "for web use, primarily"
[16:33] <ScottK> I can understand why they want it, but from a user perspective it's backwards.
[16:33] <ScottK> I should give out no more permissions that needed.
[16:33] <tumbleweed> yeah
[17:42] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Are you going to upload u-d-t again?
[18:10] <ukbeast> Does gnome-media-player work for anybody else on ubuntu 12.04 beta 2? I still receive a "segmentation fault"
[18:11] <ukbeast> Does it work for anybody else?
[19:38] <blair> svn 1.6.18 was released today with some repository corruption issues, how do i request an update from 1.6.17 to 1.6.18?
[19:38] <blair> for 12.04?
[19:41] <micahg> blair: today's final freeze, so you need to find someone to do the update, I'd suggest asking in #ubuntu-server since they have the most use from it
[19:41] <blair> micahg, thanks!
[19:42] <micahg> blair: that's only if it's bug fix only, if it's got features, it'll probably not fly at this point
[19:42] <blair> 1.6.x is the older active branch and 1.7.x is the active one, but they both neither get new features, just fixes
[19:58] <c_korn> hello, I have a package which build depends on xulrunner-dev in lucid. I now want to rebuild it in precise but there is no such package any longer. what is the correct dependency now?
[19:59] <micahg> c_korn: depends what you need it for, there's no gecko runtime for third party apps in precise, for NPAPI, use firefox-dev, for spidermonkey, use libmosjs185-dev
[19:59] <micahg> *libmozjs185-dev
[20:00] <c_korn> hum
[20:03] <c_korn> I'll try with firefox-dev,thanks micahg
[20:43] <tumbleweed> ScottK: there's time, we can.
[20:44] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Since you've been fixing my bugs, I'd like to see it.
[20:45] <tumbleweed> ScottK: if you have any dget patches...
[20:46] <ScottK> I don't.  I think I'll remember not to try dgetlp inside a chroot again.
[20:46] <tumbleweed> heh